[Bug target/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 --- Comment #22 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon Apr 7 06:40:18 2014 New Revision: 209175 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209175&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-03 Dominique d'Humieres Backport from main

[Bug libstdc++/60758] Infinite backtrace in __cxa_end_cleanup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758 --- Comment #3 from Alexey Merzlyakov --- Thank you very much! Reg. test - no changes. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00195.html

[Bug lto/50679] [meta-bug] Linux kernel LTO tracking bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50679 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60774] New: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774 Bug ID: 60774 Summary: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug fortran/60751] Extra comma in WRITE statement not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/60718] Test case gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 fails on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 32554 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32554&action=edit possible fix Hi, this is probably what Tobias proposed in Comment#8. What do you think of this patch?

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.7 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > No, it does not work on 4.7. Paul, Do you remember what was not working. I have applied the patches of r195492 and r195815 to 4.7.4 r209162 without regression (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testres

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32553 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32553&action=edit Patch for 60772 testcase OK, I could reproduce it with Andreas's instructions after configuring wi

[Bug target/60773] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/60773] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773 Bug ID: 60773 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/60768] Excessive C++ compile time with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60768 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- >I'll try --enable-checking=release and see if the times are reasonable. For trunk 20140406 I got real0m47.473s user0m46.415s sys0m0.526s which seems pretty reasonable to me. Out

[Bug fortran/60751] Extra comma in WRITE statement not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 03:45:08PM +, w6ws at earthlink dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751 > > --- Comment #9 from Walter Spector --- > Harald and Steve: I am quite aware o

[Bug testsuite/60671] FAIL: g++.dg/pr49718.C -std=gnu++98 scan-assembler-times __cyg_profile_func_enter 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60671 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/60671] FAIL: g++.dg/pr49718.C -std=gnu++98 scan-assembler-times __cyg_profile_func_enter 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60671 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Apr 6 16:44:21 2014 New Revision: 209166 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209166&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/60671 g++.dg/pr49718.C: Adjust scan-assembler-tim

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug target/60772] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/direct-move-float1.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60772 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 Summary|ICE in extract_i

[Bug target/60772] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/direct-move-float1.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60772 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/60772] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/direct-move-float1.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60772 Bug ID: 60772 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/direct-move-float1.c (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNC

[Bug testsuite/60672] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/auto-fn25.C -std=gnu++1y (test for errors, line 7)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60672 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/60672] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/auto-fn25.C -std=gnu++1y (test for errors, line 7)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60672 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Apr 6 16:31:38 2014 New Revision: 209165 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209165&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/60672 * g++.dg/cpp1y/auto-fn25.C: Require lto.

[Bug fortran/60751] Extra comma in WRITE statement not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751 --- Comment #9 from Walter Spector --- Harald and Steve: I am quite aware of the std= options, thanks. My main point is that the default situation violates the Principle of Least Astonishment. I don't have a problem with gfortran offering such a

[Bug debug/55794] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98 and -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/55794] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98 and -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Apr 6 15:17:41 2014 New Revision: 209163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209163&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/55794 * config/pa/pa.c (pa_output_function_epilogue):

[Bug tree-optimization/60766] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 --- Comment #25 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Apr 6 11:43:38 2014 New Revision: 209162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209162&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-06 Dominique d'Humieres Iain Sandoe

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 --- Comment #24 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Apr 6 10:38:16 2014 New Revision: 209161 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209161&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-06 Dominique d'Humieres Iain Sandoe

[Bug c++/60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517 --- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #12) > Why do you want to remove the clobber? I am in the DSE pass, so removing the clobber as a dead store is the easiest thing to do ;-) Ok, it might not be su

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 --- Comment #12 from lailavrazda1979 at gmail dot com --- Bug still a problem with latest trunk.

[Bug fortran/56674] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Slightly reduced test MODULE realspace_grid_types PUBLIC :: realspace_grid_input_type CONTAINS SUBROUTINE rs_grid_create_descriptor ( ) TYPE(realspace_grid_input_type), END SUBROUTINE END MOD

[Bug c++/60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517 --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11) > Created attachment 32551 [details] > first try > > With clobber removal now. Why do you want to remove the clobber? I understood your idea to avoid dupli

[Bug tree-optimization/60770] disappearing clobbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32549|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/60766] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766 netheril96 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||netheril96 at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/60770] disappearing clobbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- int f(int n){ int*p; { int q=n; p=&q; } return *p; } Here CCP turns: q = n_2(D); p_4 = &q; q ={v} {CLOBBER}; _6 = *p_4; into: q_5 = n_2(D); _6 = q_5; I guess relying on clobbers

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57676] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (30)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57676 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/44281] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Global Register variable pessimisation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44281 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/39838] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] unoptimal code for two simple loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39838 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/43052] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's, no longer expanded inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED