[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58963] Does C++ need flag_complex_method = 2?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58963 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- As of revision 204772, there are still problems on hppa-linux. libtool: compile: /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/home/dave

[Bug bootstrap/59094] [4.9 Regression] Cilk runtime library headers are installed into the general include directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094 --- Comment #2 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Dmitry, Can you please confirm if the following patch works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. === --- libcilkrts/Makefile.in (revi

[Bug tree-optimization/59109] [4.9 regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59109 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/59102] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59102] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Nov 14 03:18:17 2013 New Revision: 204773 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204773&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59102 * gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c (insert_t

[Bug c++/59056] ambiguous call to function template overloads not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056 --- Comment #8 from Richard Smith --- (In reply to Walter Mascarenhas from comment #7) > In itself, Richard's paragraph "Morally, the function should ambiguous... " > implies that the code below is ambiguous. However, it > compiles just fine with

[Bug c++/59056] ambiguous call to function template overloads not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056 --- Comment #7 from Walter Mascarenhas --- In itself, Richard's paragraph "Morally, the function should ambiguous... " implies that the code below is ambiguous. However, it compiles just fine with gcc 4.8.1, because gcc also takes into account the

[Bug c/59126] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59126 Bug ID: 59126 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/59125] New: [4.8 regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125 Bug ID: 59125 Summary: [4.8 regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/57887] nested non-type template parameters not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57887 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] New: [4.8 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 Bug ID: 59124 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds" Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/59123] New: [c++11] can't forward-declare an object later defined constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59123 Bug ID: 59123 Summary: [c++11] can't forward-declare an object later defined constexpr Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/59087] Issues including complex.h in C++11/1y mode because of C's complex.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087 Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||3dw4rd at ve

[Bug c++/59056] ambiguous call to function templates overloads not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCO

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On x86_64-apple-darwin13 the fix from llvm svn applied to gcc trunk at r204759 produces... Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0 === gcc tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL:

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Nov 13 23:10:34 2013 New Revision: 204760 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204760&root=gcc&view=rev Log: * PR middle-end/59119 * gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c (find_implicit_err

[Bug sanitizer/59122] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 causes duplicate symbol errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59122 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 31213 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31213&action=edit untested fix This seems to work for me in the cross, but it is a hack in any case (before and now with the patch)

[Bug sanitizer/59122] New: libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 causes duplicate symbol errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59122 Bug ID: 59122 Summary: libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 causes duplicate symbol errors Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Nov 13 22:34:33 2013 New Revision: 204757 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204757&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/59009 * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_p

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

tests132 === g++ Summary === # of expected passes962 # of unsupported tests264 /sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ version 4.9.0 20131113 (experimental) (GCC) === gcc tests === Running target uni

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth --- Created attachment 31212 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31212&action=edit fix from llvm svn

[Bug tree-optimization/59121] endless loop with -O2 -floop-parallelize-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59121] endless loop with -O2 -floop-parallelize-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 31211 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31211&action=edit sampling of f951 I am attaching a sampling of f951 in case someone can figure out what is going on.

[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 --- Comment #25 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tejohnson Date: Wed Nov 13 21:51:44 2013 New Revision: 204756 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204756&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-13 Teresa Johnson PR ipa/58862 * pred

[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 --- Comment #24 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tejohnson Date: Wed Nov 13 21:48:59 2013 New Revision: 204755 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204755&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-13 Teresa Johnson PR ipa/58862 * ipa-

[Bug tree-optimization/59102] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/59121] New: endless loop with -O2 -floop-parallelize-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121 Bug ID: 59121 Summary: endless loop with -O2 -floop-parallelize-all Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug c++/59120] [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/59120] New: [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120 Bug ID: 59120 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/59056] enable_if turns a non-ambiguous template into an ambiguous one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056 --- Comment #5 from Richard Smith --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > I thought if the partial specializations were ambiguous then these function > overloads should be too. Yes, this inconsistency is very surprising. GCC, EDG, and

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #16) > I've actually removed the Foundation linkage from LLVM today. Unfortunately, that is impossible to test here. A remerge of llvm libsanitizer at 194597 with

[Bug ada/54040] [x32] Incorrect timeval and timespec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug ada/54040] [x32] Incorrect timeval and timespec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Ah nuts. While pondering this a bit more, I realized we have the same problem in this code that we do in DOM. Namely that we can have references to SSA_NAMEs that have been released to the name manager in

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Potapenko --- I've actually removed the Foundation linkage from LLVM today. On Nov 13, 2013 10:45 PM, "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #14) > I think one of the frameworks depends on another one, please make sure to > pick the latter one if that's true. > Also add a comment denoting this is a dirt

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/59036] [4.9 regression] Performance degradation after r204212 on 32-bit x86 targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59036 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Nov 13 18:00:43 2013 New Revision: 204752 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204752&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-13 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/59036 * ir

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #14 from Alexander Potapenko --- I think one of the frameworks depends on another one, please make sure to pick the latter one if that's true. Also add a comment denoting this is a dirty workaround. On Nov 13, 2013 9:38 PM, "howarth at

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #12) > That was Foundation, not sure if CoreFoundation also works. Linking libasan against -Wl,-framework,CoreFoundation for gcc trunk at r204750 suppresses all o

[Bug tree-optimization/59109] [4.9 regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59109 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ia64-*-*| Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #13 from Kostya Serebryany --- No objections, thanks!

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11) > This patch seem to have fixed the last of the powerpc64-linux build failures: > > Index: libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc >

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner --- This patch seem to have fixed the last of the powerpc64-linux build failures: Index: libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc =

[Bug middle-end/59119] New: Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 Bug ID: 59119 Summary: Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner --- On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:03:50AM +, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 > > --- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany --- > Is this fixed by http://gcc.gn

[Bug c++/59083] -fisolate-erroneous-paths produces illegal instruction with enabled -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083 --- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yes, the glibc guys have already found real bugs that they've fixed.

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner --- I'm testing a fix for the left over failures.

[Bug c++/59083] -fisolate-erroneous-paths produces illegal instruction with enabled -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083 --- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #17) > For the kernel case, note the qsort prototype and the non-null attribute. > That explicitly states that the pointer arguments must not be null. Any > co

[Bug c++/59118] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault - with "using" keyword and template parameter(s) (C++11)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59118 Bug ID: 59118 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault - with "using" keyword and template parameter(s) (C++11) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/59083] -fisolate-erroneous-paths produces illegal instruction with enabled -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Markus, For the kernel case, note the qsort prototype and the non-null attribute. That explicitly states that the pointer arguments must not be null. Any code which then passes null for those arguments ha

[Bug c++/59083] -fisolate-erroneous-paths produces illegal instruction with enabled -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083 --- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Richi, No doubt about *0 = 1 and the like. While it's clearly undefined, I think we've got to continue to support catching the SIGSEGV/SIGBUS from a QOI standpoint. That's why I installed the changes to p

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #8 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #7) > Is this fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204726&root=gcc&view=rev ? I just tried r204726 on powerpc64-linux and it's failing as follows now. In file inc

[Bug objc++/59117] New: Is the default constructor generated by the compiler actually called?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59117 Bug ID: 59117 Summary: Is the default constructor generated by the compiler actually called? Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/58951] [4.9 regression] cilk build fails due to use of -ldl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58951 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/58800] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::nth_element segfaults on valid input

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58800 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chandraprakashblr at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/59116] std::nth_element segfaults by invalidating one of the vector elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59116 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/59099] [4.9 Regression] Erroneous register allocation on 32-bit x86 using regparm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/59116] std::nth_element segfaults by invalidating one of the vector elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59116 --- Comment #1 from chandraprakashblr at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 31210 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31210&action=edit preprocessed file of sample program

[Bug libstdc++/59116] New: std::nth_element segfaults by invalidating one of the vector elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59116 Bug ID: 59116 Summary: std::nth_element segfaults by invalidating one of the vector elements Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug c++/59083] -fisolate-erroneous-paths produces illegal instruction with enabled -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Note that technically invalid C programs still may be "reasonable". For example writing *0 = 1; and catching that via sigsetjmp/siglongjmp and a signal handler is possible but of course invokes undefined be

[Bug libstdc++/59087] Issues including complex.h in C++11/1y mode because of C's complex.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Wed Nov 13 15:47:04 2013 New Revision: 204750 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204750&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-13 Marc Glisse PR libstdc++/59087 * include/ext/pod_char_

[Bug c++/59082] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with duplicate (virtual) base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59082 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Target Milestone|---

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #10) > This might help, but we don't actually need that dependency. > Instead libsanitizer should be updated to r194573. Okay, I assume the missing linkage should

[Bug c++/59080] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with array of auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/56902] Fails to SLP with mismatched +/- and negatable constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56902 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 31209 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31209&action=edit hack Btw, I also had a patch^Whack, see attached. Also further patches that didn't get merged to take care of v

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Potapenko --- That was Foundation, not sure if CoreFoundation also works.

[Bug c++/59111] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE on invalid usage of auto in return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59111 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target Milestone|-

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Potapenko --- This might help, but we don't actually need that dependency. Instead libsanitizer should be updated to r194573.

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #8) > Clang's libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib depends on the Foundation > framework. When I remove that dependency, ASanified programs crash on the > same env_pt

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #9) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8) > > The following patch seems to fix the issue: > > Looks good to me. > > I think it needs to get int

[Bug c++/58533] [c++1y] ICE with auto in function pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |error-recovery, |

[Bug rtl-optimization/59099] Erroneous register allocation on 32-bit x86 using regparm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|-

[Bug c++/59115] New: [c++1y] ICE with auto as template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 Bug ID: 59115 Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto as template parameter Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/59114] New: [c++1y] ICE using auto in conversion operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114 Bug ID: 59114 Summary: [c++1y] ICE using auto in conversion operator Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/59113] New: [c++1y] ICE using auto as parameter in local function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59113 Bug ID: 59113 Summary: [c++1y] ICE using auto as parameter in local function Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/59112] New: [c++1y] ICE using auto as parameter in local class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59112 Bug ID: 59112 Summary: [c++1y] ICE using auto as parameter in local class Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/59111] New: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE on invalid usage of auto in return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59111 Bug ID: 59111 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE on invalid usage of auto in return type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/59110] [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE using auto in cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59110 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #9 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8) > The following patch seems to fix the issue: Looks good to me. I think it needs to get into the compiler source code somehow. Would posting the patch to

[Bug c++/59110] New: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE using auto in cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59110 Bug ID: 59110 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE using auto in cast Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug rtl-optimization/58934] [4.9 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in reload_cse_simplify_operands for newlib dtoa.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #12) > > --- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor --- > [...] > > If anyone is willing to test the patch on any platform but especially > > on those which I

[Bug sanitizer/58680] Spurious warnings from libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680 --- Comment #14 from Yury Gribov --- I hate zombie bugs. Can we either fix or wontfix this?

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31207|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Kostya Serebryany changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nlewycky at google dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/59097] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid statement expression as array size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59097 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59100] requesting optimization of safe rotate function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug tree-optimization/59102] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59109] [4.9 regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59109 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Potapenko --- Clang's libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib depends on the Foundation framework. When I remove that dependency, ASanified programs crash on the same env_ptr assertion.

[Bug tree-optimization/59077] ipa-pure-const.c (better_state): comment and code mistmatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59077 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Alexey Samsonov from comment #4) > Yeah, in LLVM/Clang we build C++-specific part of UBSan with -frtti (and > link it to C++ programs only), and the rest sanitizers with -fno-rtti. Can't we just

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany --- Patch looks ok. Please send it in a usual way and someone else (Jakub?) will need to approve it.

[Bug tree-optimization/59077] ipa-pure-const.c (better_state): comment and code mistmatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59077 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Wed Nov 13 11:55:01 2013 New Revision: 204739 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204739&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-13 Marc Glisse PR tree-optimization/59077 * ipa-pure-cons

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31206|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug sanitizer/58994] asan.exp regressions on x86_64 darwin at -m64 but not -m32 at r204372

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Potapenko --- If I compile stack-overflow-1.c with 'clang -fsanitize=address -c', the resulting object file can be linked into an executable with either 'clang -fsanitize=address' or 'gcc -fsanitize=address' (this req

  1   2   >