http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Potapenko <glider at google dot com> --- I've actually removed the Foundation linkage from LLVM today. On Nov 13, 2013 10:45 PM, "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 > > --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> --- > (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #14) > > I think one of the frameworks depends on another one, please make sure to > > pick the latter one if that's true. > > Also add a comment denoting this is a dirty workaround. > > On Nov 13, 2013 9:38 PM, "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" < > > gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994 > > > > > > --- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> > --- > > > (In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #12) > > > > That was Foundation, not sure if CoreFoundation also works. > > > > > > Linking libasan against -Wl,-framework,CoreFoundation for gcc trunk at > > > r204750 > > > suppresses all of the failures in asan.exp on x86_64-apple-darwin12. > > > Retesting > > > with -Wl,-framework,Foundation. > > > > > > -- > > > You are receiving this mail because: > > > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > > > > The Foundation framework is already linked against the CoreFoundation > framework. I've confirmed that linking libasan against > -Wl,-framework,Foundation alone (as is done by llvm) is sufficient to > suppress > the asan.exp failures. This change will duplicate the linkage used by llvm > for > the asan shared library. Posted proposed patch at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01499.html, > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. >
