http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687
Bug ID: 58687
Summary: "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Fix going through bootstrap and regression testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #23 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 30980
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30980&action=edit
Patch to fixup gcc float conversions in GCC
This changes the float conversions in gcc so that gcc bootstraps i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30899|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58686
Bug ID: 58686
Summary: [BUG] vect_get_loop_niters() cound not get the correct
result for some loops.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58673
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 30978
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30978&action=edit
Patch to fix interaction between -mquad-memory and -mno-vsx-timode
The problem is an interaction between -mqua
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58673
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
++,fortran,lto --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131010 (experimental) [trunk revision 203390
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse ---
See the discussion that starts at:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130923/188747.html
(it continues in the following weeks) for optimization 2 of comment #14 in
clang. The key ide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
We're ending up with latches from two different loops going to the same
destination due to the jump thread path passing through multiple loops. This
ultimately causes the unroller to go nuts.
This should be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
May be related to trying to thread through 2 loop headers. ie,we're starting
the jump thread path outside any loops. On the jump thread path we find a loop
header, then the loop header for a nested loop. T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58226
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Oct 10 19:32:22 2013
New Revision: 203394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203394&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-09 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/58226
* options.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58226
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Gribov ---
/* Answering from my personal account */
According to http://marc.info/?t=13645834152 this may not be a problem for
Android. It seems that NDK links shared libs with -Bsymbolic which should
prevent interpos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Oct 10 16:39:52 2013
New Revision: 203384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203384&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58670
* stmt.c (expand_asm_operands): Add FALLTHRU_BB
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684
Bug ID: 58684
Summary: powerpc uses only unordered floating-point compares
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Oct 10 16:29:50 2013
New Revision: 203383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203383&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58670
* stmt.c (expand_asm_operands): Add FALLTHRU_BB
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58677
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #1)
> Started with r202525 (PR58404 missed-optimization fix), stopped with r203315
> (PR58570 wrong-code fix). The cause of PR58570 was not r202525.
>
> Can you chec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58682
--- Comment #3 from Paulo J. Matos ---
I have now a fix for this. I will prepare a patch for gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Bug ID: 58683
Summary: Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling
Cilk Plus code with -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58464
Bug 58464 depends on bug 58656, which changed state.
Bug 58656 Summary: [4.9 Regression] rnflow regressing after r202826
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 10 14:07:19 2013
New Revision: 203377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58656
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> It looks like changing the testcase line
>
> d = foo (a == 0, (0, 35536));
>
> to
>
> d = foo (a == 0, -3);
>
> fixes it. _No_ IL difference in 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58682
--- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos ---
Here's my reading of the problem:
core_bench_list calls core_list_mergesort which indirectly (through a function
pointer) calls cmp_idx. The global max_count variable is updated in the
beginning of inline_sm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58682
Paulo J. Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pa...@matos-sorge.com
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Component|tree-optimization
s
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.2 20131010 (prerelease) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.2, GMP version 4.3.0, MPFR version 2.4.1,
MPC version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.2 20131010 (prerelease) (x86_64-u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
It looks like changing the testcase line
d = foo (a == 0, (0, 35536));
to
d = foo (a == 0, -3);
fixes it. _No_ IL difference in 065t.mergephi2, but then 066t.vrp1 has
main ()
{
char e;
@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58676
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
cptrf2 shows
:
- pretmp_278 = (integer(kind=8)) ival2_72;
- pretmp_279 = pretmp_278 + -1;
- pretmp_280 = *xxtrt_23(D)[pretmp_279];
:
# ival2_130 = PHI
# ival2_134 = PHI
- # prephitmp_281 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko ---
thanks. I have sent it to gcc-paches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00402.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31671
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58570
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 58677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57377
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Oct 10 12:01:23 2013
New Revision: 203353
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203353&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-10 Andreas Krebbel
PR target/57377
* gensupport.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58639
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
Summary|ICE on self-ref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58641
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58649
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58677
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Started with r202525 (PR58404 missed-optimization fix), stopped with r203315
(PR58570 wrong-code fix). The cause of PR58570 was not r202525.
Can you check if the original testcase works on current trunk?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58633
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58636
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58632
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58611
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58612
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58613
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58596
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58603
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |target
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58609
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58610
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Actually ipa-devirt has a code that is supposed to not make devirt happen in
this case - I will check out why it doesn't here.
But I think it is KDE's bug here. You have library with -fvisibility=hidden
and th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> Hmm, what prevents us from devirtualizing here? It seems to be bug to
> include a class without linking with its implementation..
In this case the implementat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > We used to factor
> >
> > # c_1 = PHI <-3(2), 0(4), 0(3)>
> > # d_2 = PHI <-1(2), 12(4), 12(3)>
> > # e_3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
We used to factor
# c_1 = PHI <-3(2), 0(4), 0(3)>
# d_2 = PHI <-1(2), 12(4), 12(3)>
# e_3 = PHI <-20(2), 26(4), 26(3)>
# f_4 = PHI <-5(2), 7(4), 7(3)>
lab:
into
# c_11 = PHI <0(4), 0(3)>
# d_2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> We used to factor
>
> # c_1 = PHI <-3(2), 0(4), 0(3)>
> # d_2 = PHI <-1(2), 12(4), 12(3)>
> # e_3 = PHI <-20(2), 26(4), 26(3)>
> # f_4 = PHI <-5(2), 7(4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf |arm-linux-gnueabihf,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot
com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
Bug ID: 58681
Summary: Missed RTL optimization - same insns before
unconditional jump as before the jump target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680
Bug ID: 58680
Summary: Spurious warnings from libasan
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58679
Bug ID: 58679
Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at
mode-switching.c:421 with -mavx after r202915
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hmm, what prevents us from devirtualizing here? It seems to be bug to include a
class without linking with its implementation..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Bug ID: 58678
Summary: [4.9 Regression] pykde4-4.11.2 link error
(devirtualization too trigger happy)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
85 matches
Mail list logo
