http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54598
--- Comment #4 from xuepeng guo ---
Author: xguo
Date: Fri Sep 13 05:26:32 2013
New Revision: 202551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Terry Guo
Backport from mainline
2012-09-17 Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I know what's happening here. It's obscure and quite nasty.
We have a jump threading opportunity which requires threading through a joiner
block. The jump thread leaving one edge of the joiner eventually
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36566
Hei changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||structurechart at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Looks like make_range_step is getting miscompiled. Still trying to figure out
how/why.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #5 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 30813
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30813&action=edit
the .i file for fs/namei.c (bzip2 compressed)
I put .i file for fs/namei.c which need "bzip2 -d" to decompress.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #4 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 30812
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30812&action=edit
the .i file for fs/ext4/mballoc.c (bzip2 compressed)
I put .i file in attachment which need "bzip2 -d" to decompress.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401
--- Comment #5 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 30811
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30811&action=edit
the .i file for fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c (bzip2 compressed)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58401
--- Comment #4 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 30810
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30810&action=edit
the .i file for fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c (bzip2 compressed)
I put the related .i files in attachments, which need "bz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42955
Brooks Moses changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42955
--- Comment #10 from Brooks Moses ---
Author: brooks
Date: Thu Sep 12 23:07:32 2013
New Revision: 202544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202544&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/42955
* Makefile.in: Do not install driver binaries in $(target)/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58273
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #7 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
Grrr, I cannot reproduce the original bug, something must have changed during
my attempts at "fixing" the problem...
Sorry for the noise.
I'll come back here if I ever met that problem again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #6 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
OK with the gcc-4.8 from debian unstable the preprocessed output does compile
whereas with the one from testing it does not.
I'll try to reproduce the bug within the vegastrike build chain ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
I see. Have to double check our policy in this area, I'm not at all sure that
in general anything in Section D gets a warning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58340
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu ---
r202345 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from H.J.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58408
Bug ID: 58408
Summary: [C++11] __thread + trivially_constructible -> error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think anything in appendix D apart from auto_ptr does.
The warning would be useful to help find places where defaulted definitions
could be added, but I'm not sure I'd want it enabled by -Wall. YMMV
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58387
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++1] Should warn about|[C++11] Should warn about
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55926
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58335
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Sep 12 18:23:09 2013
New Revision: 202536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/58335
* lra-elim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #1 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
This was with modifications I made to the codebase, I'll investigate what the
culprit is...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407
Bug ID: 58407
Summary: [C++1] Should warn about deprecated implicit
generation of copy constructor/assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #3 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
No, sorry for the uninformative comment
The source code modifications I spoke about are to vegastrike source code and
cmake build chain, but I have a hard time finding the root cause...
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
I can't reproduce the ICE with stock FSF GCC 4.8.0, 4.8.1, mainline. Tried
various optimization levels too.
Or are you saying that you are using a modified *GCC*?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
--- Comment #5 from vincent.legoll at gmail dot com ---
I'll see if I can get a debian package for a more up to date gcc-4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|vincent.legoll at gmail dot com|
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407
--- Comment #2 from Andrzej Krzemienski ---
No. Other compilers (Clang and VS 2010) do not emit such warning either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58340
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Andreas,
ia64 is bootstrapping fine for me. I did one immediately before installing the
patch to fix this PR and just did another one (r202530 of the trunk on
ia64-unknown-linux-gnu)
I'm going to need mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58398
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58340
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Obviously in a bootstrap comparison failure we have a situation where the
compiler has mis-compiled itself or something similar. Ultimately I need to be
able to reproduce the failure. So far I've been unab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58340
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab ---
Just tell me what you need.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392
tprince at computer dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58406
Bug ID: 58406
Summary: ICE when compiling Vegastrike svn trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I agree it's QoI.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #9 from Zhihao Yuan ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> [...] It is unspecified whether
> "it += A::a" is an odr-use or not.
Well, it's true, but I guess the primary purpose of making
containers' iterator implementatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Sep 12 15:20:05 2013
New Revision: 202532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202532&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/58389
* ipa-prop.c (remove_des
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58388
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
> It took me some time to reproduce this in a way that would give me
> enough debug info to look at stuff. Nevertheless, indeed that is the
I usually debug these crashes by simply running stage1 compiler when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 12 15:15:34 2013
New Revision: 202531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/58403
* includ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58389
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Somewhat reduced...
void
bar (int *dst, int *src)
{
asm ("cld ; repne scasb %%es:(%%edi),%%al": "+c" (dst), "+DaX" (*src));
}
struct
{
int a;
int p[];
} s;
void
foo (void)
{
while (1)
bar (0, s.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58394
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58392
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fix posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00935.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini ---
Hi,
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
>
> You odr-use a static member variable, so it must have a definition.
I may b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58388
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
You odr-use a static member variable, so it must have a definition. The linker
error is your fault for not defining the static mem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58367
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58388
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58377
Bug 58377 depends on bug 58402, which changed state.
Bug 58402 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-1.c
scan-tree-dump-times optimized "if" 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58402
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58402
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58404
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58404
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 12 13:20:17 2013
New Revision: 202525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58404
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58402
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 12 13:19:21 2013
New Revision: 202524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58402
* passes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #5 from Zhihao Yuan ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Although I see no harm in changing the library to take those arguments by
> value, the testcase is of course invalid.
Can you elaborate?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58314
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from chrb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58371
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58371
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Sep 12 12:15:15 2013
New Revision: 202522
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202522&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/58371
* g++.dg/ipa/pr58371.C:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Although I see no harm in changing the library to take those arguments by
value, the testcase is of course invalid.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #4 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
this are the compiler flags for the project
CXX_FLAGS = -save-temps -msse -msse -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -std=c++11
-mstackrealign -O2 -g -DNDEBUG
@CMakeFiles/DelayUGens_supernova.dir/includes_CXX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #3 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
Created attachment 30808
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30808&action=edit
ii file compressed with rar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58396
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 12 11:18:46 2013
New Revision: 202521
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58396
* tree-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58405
Bug ID: 58405
Summary: Unoptimal code generated for computed goto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58391
--- Comment #2 from semicontinuity at yandex dot ru ---
Currently, the logic is that if the function contains computed goto, it cannot
be inlined.
My suggestion is to inline the function if
- it is static and used only once in the compilation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #2 from Zhihao Yuan ---
Created attachment 30807
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30807&action=edit
test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Changing this would be of course trivial. I'd like to see one of those
linker-errors though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58404
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58404
Bug ID: 58404
Summary: &noninvariant_address not forwproped into
->handled_component
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58403
Bug ID: 58403
Summary: __normal_iterator triggers odr-use
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58390
--- Comment #2 from semicontinuity at yandex dot ru ---
Agreed, this is probably not a bug but an RFE, can it be re-opened?
movw + ijmp in this case would be faster and shorter, and would not use stack
memory.
Regarding reservation of z - I'm aw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58402
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so the testcase requires that
1) critical edges are split (before PRE which isn't run at -O1)
2) the next CFG cleanup (after copyprop) will end up removing the
forwarders in a way building up a tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58396
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Hopefully a better trace. gcc build with -Og. Testcase needs -O3 to trigger.
==3882== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x600600321644
at pc 0x17d7480 bp 0x7fff6d493880 sp 0x7fff6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58402
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58402
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58402
Bug ID: 58402
Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-1.c
scan-tree-dump-times optimized "if" 0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Jacek Caban from comment #18)
> Created attachment 30806 [details]
> mingw-w64-headers intrins fix
Thanks Jacek for providing this work-a-round here, but I would like to ask
Dongsheng not to hi-jac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #19 from Dongsheng Song ---
When I use this 64 bit gcc 4.9 cross compiler to generate the native compiler,
I got the error:
In file included from
/home/cauchy/cross/x86_64-windows-gcc49/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/4.9.0/include/x86intr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #18 from Jacek Caban ---
Created attachment 30806
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30806&action=edit
mingw-w64-headers intrins fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #17 from Jacek Caban ---
(In reply to Dongsheng Song from comment #14)
> Created attachment 30804 [details]
> 32 bit gcc 4.9 build errors
This has to be fixed in mingw-w64-headers. I will attach a draft of the patch
for testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #16 from Dongsheng Song ---
Created attachment 30805
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30805&action=edit
64 bit gcc 4.9 - cross to native build errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #15 from Dongsheng Song ---
Yes,it helps, 64 bit gcc 4.9 build fine. but 32 bit failed with lots of
'conflicting types' errors, this maybe another story.
$ svn info mingw-w64/trunk/
Path: mingw-w64/trunk
URL: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #14 from Dongsheng Song ---
Created attachment 30804
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30804&action=edit
32 bit gcc 4.9 build errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58399
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58399
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is a dup of PR 54835 which is fixed on trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|LTO profiledboo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58342
Bug 58342 depends on bug 58340, which changed state.
Bug 58340 Summary: [4.9 regression] gcc/cp/pt.c:7064:1: internal compiler
error: in propagate_threaded_block_debug_into, at tree-ssa-threadedge.c:623
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58340
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
100 matches
Mail list logo
