http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: |[4.7 Regression] ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2013-02-19 06:46:20 UTC
---
> Honza, any progress on this?
Oops, forgot to check the Firefox results. I am currently on a way, will do it
once arriving.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
06:43:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 06:43:34 2013
New Revision: 196133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196133
Log:
PR tree-optimization/56381
* tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56388
Bug #: 56388
Summary: catch(...) in lambda rejected
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-19
00:04:59 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Feb 19 00:04:49 2013
New Revision: 196129
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196129
Log:
PR target/52555
* genopinit.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-18
23:42:18 UTC ---
Some debugging. If one adds the following debugging patch:
--- a/libquadmath/strtod/strtod_l.c
+++ b/libquadmath/strtod/strtod_l.c
@@ -441,3 +441,5 @@ mpn_lshift_1 (mp_limb_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56387
Bug #: 56387
Summary: Alias of class template wrongly seen as different
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
Bug #: 56386
Summary: ICE with ASSOCIATE construct and an derived type array
component
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56259
Loren Rittle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ljrittle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56385
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] ICE with allocatable |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2013-02-18
22:21:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The original patch was the patch you reverted in comment #1 and the fix for
> the
> original issue. As far as I can see, you didn't put it ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56385
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56385
Bug #: 56385
Summary: ICE with allocatable function result in a type-bound
procedure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #49 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-18
21:46:58 UTC ---
Here's a proof of concept patch which lets the
test cases "work" due to buffering.
Index: unix.c
===
--- uni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
Bruce Dubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdubbs at linuxfromscratch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #48 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2013-02-18 21:29:22 UTC ---
Am 18.02.2013 20:15, schrieb dominiq at lps dot ens.fr:
> Are you suggesting to "fix" the non working named pipes on Darwin by removing
> them everywhere?
Actu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #47 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2013-02-18 21:24:31 UTC ---
Am 18.02.2013 21:16, schrieb jb at gcc dot gnu.org:
>> Look at this piece of code:
>> >
>> > /* Seek to the head and overwrite the bogus length with the real
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #3 from Jay 2013-02-18 20:50:44 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> call? Anyway, it would be better to see a testcase.
I'm not sure I can construct one in C.
It might be too painful for you to take what I have -- a genera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #46 from Janne Blomqvist 2013-02-18
20:16:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> If unformatted sequential ever worked, it was by chance.
>
> Look at this piece of code:
>
> /* Seek to the head and overwrite the bogus le
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-18
20:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
...
> function int_fvec2vec (f_vec, n) result (c_vec)
> integer f_vec(:)
...
> subroutine lat_to_c (Fp, C) bind(c)
...
> call lat_to_c2 (c_loc(fvec2vec(ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56365
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2013-02-18 20:04:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I see, at -O2, on x86_64 in 070t.phiopt:
>
> test_04 (int a, int b)
> {
> int D.1744;
> int D.1741;
> int _3;
> int _4;
>
> :
> _3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-18
19:43:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 18 19:42:56 2013
New Revision: 196124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196124
Log:
PR pch/54117
* c-opts.c (c_com
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
With GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130218 :
$ cat fold.c
int a, c;
void f(void)
{
unsigned char b;
if(a)
{
for(; b < 1; b++);
lbl1:
c =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
Summary|ICE: cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-18
19:24:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29486
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29486
pr56381.ii
Somewhat reduced, just -std=c++11 -O2 is enough to reproduce.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #45 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-18 19:15:43 UTC ---
> ...
> I would therefore suggest to resolve this PR by issuing a well-defined
> error if we encounter a pipe on opening.
Are you suggesting to "fix" the non working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56383
Bug #: 56383
Summary: error with multiple enable_shared_from_this base
classes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
2013-02-18 18:48:28 UTC ---
simplified testcase:
module t
use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding
interface fvec2vec
module procedure int_fvec2vec
end interface
contains
function int_fvec2vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #44 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-18
18:44:02 UTC ---
If unformatted sequential ever worked, it was by chance.
Look at this piece of code:
/* Seek to the head and overwrite the bogus length with the real
length. */
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger
2013-02-18 18:41:55 UTC ---
hhmm...
could some one give an example where packedp would be false but the value
is packed or unaligned?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56382
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2013-02-18
18:34:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 29485
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29485
Patch
I tried the above changes to expmed.c but this
approach eventually reaches a gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56382
Bug #: 56382
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55921.c (internal
compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2013-02-18
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2013-02-18
18:04:23 UTC ---
Patch to remove old work around is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00854.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56370
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at redhat dot com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
--- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente
2013-02-18 17:10:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 29484
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29484
preprocessed file of user code (sorry for not reducing)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
Bug #: 56381
Summary: ICE: cc1plus: internal compiler error: in
gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7842
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380
Bug #: 56380
Summary: Const/reference mutable members are not always
rejected in class templates
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379
Bug #: 56379
Summary: libquadmath: Wrong result for strtoflt128.c if
compiled with -O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #3 from David Sagan 2013-02-18
16:36:14 UTC ---
Somehow the attachment did not get sent with the initial writeup Now it is
downloaded.
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > 1) Unpack and cd to the attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #2 from David Sagan 2013-02-18
16:34:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 29483
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29483
3 *.f90 files and script to run them
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2013-02-18
16:29:56 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Feb 18 16:29:49 2013
New Revision: 196123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196123
Log:
PR target/56347
* config/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Bug #: 56378
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-18
16:17:35 UTC ---
If you mean Joseph's http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6527
comment, then that is about _Decimal128, thus something not part of ISO C89 nor
ISO C99.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-18 16:16:18 UTC ---
I've run another reghunt, which revealed that the 4.8 regression was
caused by this patch:
2012-05-23 Jan Hubicka
* tree.h (alias_diag_flags)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
--- Comment #1 from Paul Smith 2013-02-18
16:12:00 UTC ---
Looks like this was introduced in rev. 190664, with the merging of
'deduction_tsubst_fntype' into 'fn_type_unification'.
The instantiation context is constructed with 'targs' as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
Bug #: 56377
Summary: [4.8 Regression] template args in
substitution-failure diagnostics
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-18
16:04:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> User error, malloc doesn't guarantee sufficient alignment of the pointer,
> which
> you are relying on. You need to use posix_memalign or memalign o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341
Sandra Loosemore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at codesourcery dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2013-02-18
15:21:41 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Feb 18 15:21:32 2013
New Revision: 196122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196122
Log:
PR target/56214
* config/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37237
--- Comment #11 from Tom Tromey 2013-02-18 15:20:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I don't think such an attribute belongs in the DWARF standard, since this is
> very much an internal detail of the ABI; another ABI might have just a s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56359
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-18
14:27:29 UTC ---
Honza, any progress on this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56357
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-18
14:24:50 UTC ---
Works just fine on x86_64-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56376
Bug #: 56376
Summary: gdb needs a way to associate a vtable symbol with a
class type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-18
14:19:04 UTC ---
The previous commit was for PR56349.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-02-18
13:58:47 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56366
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-18
13:58:30 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 18 13:58:21 2013
New Revision: 196121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196121
Log:
2013-02-18 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.3 |
Target Milestone|4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener 2013-02-18
13:46:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 18 13:46:37 2013
New Revision: 196120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196120
Log:
2013-02-18 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-18
13:42:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Do you think I should revert the patch on the branch nevertheless?
> (it was a fix for a missed-optimization regression only ...)
Yeah, missed-opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56375
Bug #: 56375
Summary: SIGSEGV when assign SIMD variable to member of
allocated structure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de
2013-02-18 13:34:31 UTC ---
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373
--- Comment #4 from Akim Demaille 2013-02-18
13:23:08 UTC ---
> If you're smart enough to know the object isn't used then don't create it :)
:) :) :)
> ~shared_ptr() has non-trivial side-effects, the compiler isn't smart enough to
> d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-18
13:20:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > It's necessary, because otherwise you get bogus warnings from
> > ScopeGuard-style
> > RAII types.
>
> In which case the constructor and destr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-02-18
13:09:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 18 13:09:17 2013
New Revision: 196119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196119
Log:
2013-02-18 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Summary|I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-18
13:03:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 18 13:03:15 2013
New Revision: 196118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196118
Log:
2013-02-18 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56373
--- Comment #2 from Akim Demaille 2013-02-18
12:52:46 UTC ---
Thanks a lot for the detailed answer.
> The warning isn't issued when 0 converts to std::nullptr_t, only when it
> converts to a pointer type.
And shouldn't it?
>> It's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-02-18
12:48:13 UTC ---
I don't see how this is a bug.
job_64 = job_new (class_39, "");
# DEBUG job => job_64
if (job_64 == 0B)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
# DEBUG __fmt => "BAD:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-18
12:47:32 UTC ---
*** Bug 56374 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Matthi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56374
Bug #: 56374
Summary: N3276 Incomplete return types Implent in gcc 4.8
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2013-02-18
12:31:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 29482
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29482
test case
no reduced test case yet, but there is a diff in the tree dump with
-fdump-tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
