http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56384
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-02-19
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|ICE in fold_binary_loc, at |[4.8 Regression] ICE in
|fold-const.c:10422 |fold_binary_loc, at
| |fold-const.c:10422
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-19
07:13:09 UTC ---
Started with my http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194250
but I think it has been latent before. Because before pre the IL dumps look
exactly the same, and the first time the associate: code in fold-const.c is hit
is already when gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1 calls fold_binary_loc with
(IMHO)
invalid arguments - BIT_XOR_EXPR, int type, and op0 being unsigned char
SSA_NAME, while op1 is int constant (integer_one_node).
