[Bug middle-end/56120] built-in SIMD with statement expression causes ICE: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6990 when optimization is on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56120 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:37:40 UTC --- Sorry, the apparent fix in comment#5 is just noise. The real fix is on its way today. Paul

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/56112] [4.8 Regression] cannot create unordered_map from range of types convertible to value_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-27 07:32:59 UTC --- I guess we could have in __detail the specialization that submitter proposed to add to stl_function.h as primary.

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:18:29 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 27 07:18:22 2013 New Revision: 195493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195493 Log: 2013-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran

[Bug libstdc++/56112] [4.8 Regression] cannot create unordered_map from range of types convertible to value_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-27 07:15:39 UTC --- Bother. Now it's annoying to go back to the various options (some aren't even discussed in Bugzilla entries). Maybe you did a bit of that already as part of filing the PR and ha

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:09:12 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 27 07:09:06 2013 New Revision: 195492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195492 Log: 2013-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:09:12 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 27 07:09:06 2013 New Revision: 195492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195492 Log: 2013-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug c/56120] New: built-in SIMD with statement expression causes ICE: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6990 when optimization is on

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56120 Bug #: 56120 Summary: built-in SIMD with statement expression causes ICE: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6990 when optimization is on Classification: Unclassified

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #24 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-27 01:44:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > I must say I'm surprised by the gimple-fold.c test, I'd really expect > additional && DECL_VISIBILITY (decl) != VISIBILITY_DEFAULT . I'd actually

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/47115] aix52.h,aix53.h,aix61.h declare host functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47115 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #18 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-26 23:08:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Here is a new patch, which does some further cleanup, such as removing the > 'formal' and 'formal_ns' members of gfc_component (which are not used an

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #17 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-26 22:47:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > > Are procedure dummy arguments mutually exclusive with non-NULL procedure > > interface, so that there is no dummy ambiguity in the array spec and c

[Bug fortran/55887] [OOP][F2008] ICE with CLASS and data-target pointer association in (default) initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55887 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-26 21:21:38 UTC --- This patch fixes the ICE in comment 0: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c === --- gcc/fortran/trans-de

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55887] [OOP][F2008] ICE with CLASS and data-target pointer association in (default) initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55887 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug bootstrap/56116] failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56116 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-26 20:51:51 UTC --- >checking whether sbrk is declared... no That is incorrect.

[Bug debug/55056] [4.8 Regression] -O0 -g missing location for register double var

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056 --- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil 2013-01-26 20:28:45 UTC --- Workarounded with XFAIL for the GDB testsuite: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-01/msg00655.html

[Bug bootstrap/56116] failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56116 --- Comment #4 from Denis Onischenko 2013-01-26 18:53:02 UTC --- configuration options for cross-compiler (printed by ./gcc -v): Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=./gcc Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi Configured with: /home/denis/a/s

[Bug bootstrap/56116] failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56116 --- Comment #3 from Denis Onischenko 2013-01-26 18:46:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29282 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29282 output

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-26 18:32:15 UTC --- > I must say I'm surprised by the gimple-fold.c test, I'd really expect > additional && DECL_VISIBILITY (decl) != VISIBILITY_DEFAULT . > Another alternative to make those always

[Bug c++/56119] Allows static member definition of template class in namespace not enclosing this class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56119 --- Comment #1 from Sergey 2013-01-26 18:13:48 UTC --- Created attachment 29281 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29281 Preprocessed source

[Bug tree-optimization/56118] No constant propagation in vector field assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56118 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-26 17:57:13 UTC --- Note that the case I am most interested in is actually when r is not initialized: __m128d r; gimple_assign , 1.0e+0, NULL, NULL> gimple_assign , 2.0e+0, NULL, NULL> b

[Bug c++/56119] New: Allows static member definition of template class in namespace not enclosing this class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56119 Bug #: 56119 Summary: Allows static member definition of template class in namespace not enclosing this class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug tree-optimization/56118] New: No constant propagation in vector field assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56118 Bug #: 56118 Summary: No constant propagation in vector field assignment Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed

[Bug fortran/55905] [OOP] [F008] ICE for polymorphic dummy argument with an allocatable coarray component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55905 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.or

[Bug bootstrap/56116] failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56116 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-26 17:01:34 UTC --- I have just recently built an aarch64 native compiler. Though not the same as an arm-linux-gnu compiler but it works. Can you provide your configure options for both set of c

[Bug target/56114] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction MOVABS for intel syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kobets 2013-01-26 16:54:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Well, following patch won't break then: Yes, thank you.

[Bug target/54663] microblaze-linux genchecksum failure: opening microblaze-c.o: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54663 --- Comment #3 from eager at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-26 16:53:50 UTC --- Author: eager Date: Sat Jan 26 16:53:45 2013 New Revision: 195488 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195488 Log: gcc: PR target/54663 * co

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-26 16:16:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Created attachment 29279 [details] > patch v3 Forgot to mention: Still regtests cleanly.

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-26 16:10:40 UTC --- Created attachment 29279 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29279 patch v3 Here is a new patch, which does some further cleanup, such as removing t

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #3 from Kangkook 2013-01-26 15:40:43 UTC --- Hi, Richard Thanks a lot for your advice. I will definitely try gcc 4.8 and let you know about the result. Btw, I also tested it from the 64-bit env. but it also crashed the compi

[Bug libstdc++/56112] [4.8 Regression] cannot create unordered_map from range of types convertible to value_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog,

[Bug lto/56115] Internal compiler error / unable to generate a relocatable output with object file(which is with lto info).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Target|

[Bug bootstrap/56116] failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56116 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56117] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in cselib_subst_to_values, at cselib.c:1853 with -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56117 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/56114] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction MOVABS for intel syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114 --- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-26 15:08:35 UTC --- Well, following patch won't break then: --cut here-- Index: i386.md === --- i386.md (revision 195486) +++

[Bug target/56114] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction MOVABS for intel syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kobets 2013-01-26 14:30:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Proposed patch: It is correcting this code, but break another. For example (-mcmodel=large): --cut here-- long* p1; long foo2 (void) { p

[Bug rtl-optimization/55270] ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:823

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug rtl-optimization/55270] ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:823

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270 --- Comment #2 from Antoine Balestrat 2013-01-26 14:10:57 UTC --- Still reproducible as of 4.8.0 20130125. Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=185913

[Bug rtl-optimization/56117] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in cselib_subst_to_values, at cselib.c:1853 with -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56117 Bug #: 56117 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in cselib_subst_to_values, at cselib.c:1853 with -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch() Classification: Unclassif

[Bug target/48659] Segmentation fault when using openMP and SSE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48659 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/56116] New: failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56116 Bug #: 56116 Summary: failed to build ARM native compiler by ARM cross compiler Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-26 11:35:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ok, I understand. Looks like, however, we are back to my original observation > in PR54112 that in C++03 mode we have less constraints and with more lee

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-26 11:31:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Here is an updated version of Mikael's patch, which is free of testsuite > > regressions. > > Indeed, it

[Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-26 11:11:24 UTC --- Ok, I understand. Looks like, however, we are back to my original observation in PR54112 that in C++03 mode we have less constraints and with more leeway we could manage to keep

[Bug c++/52819] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'nop_expr' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:3136

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52819 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pipping at exherbo dot org ---

[Bug c++/53893] segfault with invalid c++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53893 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ --- Comment #4 from Mar

[Bug c++/56111] {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-26 10:38:23 UTC --- BTW, I agree with Jason that we shouldn't optimize these vtable reads. When this hit libstdc++, it could hit very well any other C++ shared library which uses version scripts

[Bug c++/56111] {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-26 10:36:19 UTC --- What happens if we simply #undef at the beginning of and nothing else? It seems to me that is the *real* place where such a macro doesn't make sense and the primary change sho

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/56114] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction MOVABS for intel syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|