http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855
Bug #: 55855
Summary: incorrect warning with type-bound procedure pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844
--- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-03
06:17:38 UTC ---
>> Could you please do an extra merge soon, even before switching the default?
I'll start somewhere after Jan 10.
(I am on holidays before that. There are substantial chang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Nicholas Wourms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nwourms at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854
Bug #: 55854
Summary: ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited
polymorphic component
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-03
01:42:37 UTC ---
Confirmed reduced testcase:
enum { A=1 } something = A;
void test(void)
{
char found_bit_mask[1][something];
found_bit_mask[0][0] = 1;
}
--- CUT
Fails with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-03
01:33:19 UTC ---
This works for me on x86_64-linux-gnu with revision 194774.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-03
01:28:28 UTC ---
What options are you using and what is the target?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853
--- Comment #2 from Kyle Konrad 2013-01-03
01:15:56 UTC ---
Version information:
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853
--- Comment #1 from Kyle Konrad 2013-01-03
01:13:26 UTC ---
I forgot to mention that adding "this->" to the Insert() call causes
compilation to succeed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853
Bug #: 55853
Summary: [C++11] ICE calling member function of templated class
in lambda
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
Bug #: 55852
Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call,
at fortran/expr.c:4647
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Bug #: 55851
Summary: ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961
--- Comment #8 from Joseph S. Myers 2013-01-03
00:00:08 UTC ---
Mikael, ping on this patch from June 2010 ... what happened in testing? And
shouldn't this bug be marked as a regression, given the identification of the
responsible revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55850
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55850
Bug #: 55850
Summary: [OOP] SELECT TYPE issues
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, ice-on-invalid-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55849
Bug #: 55849
Summary: [OOP] Implement temporary support for SELECT TYPE(name
=> array ( [vector-subscript] ))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2013-01-02
21:14:22 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Jan 2 21:14:13 2013
New Revision: 194822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194822
Log:
PR middle-end/55198
* exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-02
21:07:21 UTC ---
Could you please do an extra merge soon, even before switching the default?
You've raised some cases where on ubuntu _Unwind_* based backtrace wasn't
accurrate, it would be nice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
20:56:37 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 20:56:29 2013
New Revision: 194821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194821
Log:
PR c++/54325
* call.c (build_n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
20:54:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 20:54:42 2013
New Revision: 194820
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194820
Log:
PR c++/54325
* call.c (build_n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-01-02
20:46:02 UTC ---
Based on the interp, current gfortran is acceptable and we can close this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-01-02
20:29:35 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 2 20:29:28 2013
New Revision: 194819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194819
Log:
2013-01-02 Jerry DeLisle
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:04:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:46 2013
New Revision: 194813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194813
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:04:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:46 2013
New Revision: 194813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194813
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:03:57 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:37 2013
New Revision: 194812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194812
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:03:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:37 2013
New Revision: 194812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194812
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:04:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:46 2013
New Revision: 194813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194813
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:03:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:37 2013
New Revision: 194812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194812
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:03:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:04 2013
New Revision: 194811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194811
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:03:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:04 2013
New Revision: 194811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194811
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-02
19:03:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:04 2013
New Revision: 194811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194811
Log:
PR c++/55804
PR c++/55032
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48914
--- Comment #7 from Roger Jarrett 2013-01-02
18:51:12 UTC ---
Additional workaround (big hammer)
#pragma GCC system_header
Best used when the code generating the warning is in an isolated header file
--Roger
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844
--- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-02
17:31:05 UTC ---
>> we should just move over to using the dwarf unwinder and forget about the
>> manually unwinding the stack
Upstream asan-rt has two flags now:
--
fast_unwind_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jvdelisle at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-01-02
17:09:17 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 2 17:09:09 2013
New Revision: 194809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194809
Log:
2013-01-02 Jerry DeLisle
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-01-02
15:18:47 UTC ---
Reduced C testcase:
extern int omp_get_thread_num (void);
void __attribute ((noinline)) f()
{
omp_get_thread_num();
}
int main()
{
int i;
#pragma omp parallel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848
Bug #: 55848
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
(with `-flto' and `-fopenmp')
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-02
14:18:24 UTC ---
Maybe for consistency with bad_weak_ptr it should return "bad_function_call"
without the std:: qualification (see Bug 55847)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #13 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-01-02
13:47:43 UTC ---
fix original problem for me too
Thank You
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55172
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55847
Bug #: 55847
Summary: mistake bad_weak_ptr::what() message
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener 2013-01-02
11:57:36 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 2 11:57:31 2013
New Revision: 194804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194804
Log:
2013-01-02 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-01-02
11:30:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Cannot reproduce with xgcc (GCC) 4.6.4 20130102 (prerelease).
Make sure to have checking enabled.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-01-02
11:22:00 UTC ---
Cannot reproduce with xgcc (GCC) 4.6.4 20130102 (prerelease).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-01-02
11:13:52 UTC ---
> Note that SCCVN already value-numbers both loads the same (but for some
> reason _not_ the dependent calculation ...).
>
> This we track here.
Ah, of course - they are n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55846
Bug #: 55846
Summary: Cannot sink conditional code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-01-02
11:00:54 UTC ---
The sink issue is that we cannot sink PHI nodes:
:
...
if (_11 < _20)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
_26 = _19->block_info;
_27 = (long unsigned int) _11;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55840
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #31 from Dmitry Vyukov 2013-01-02
10:28:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> The formatting in the patch is wrong (multiple issues).
>
> I don't see a point in the __atomic_load_n (addr, MEMMODEL_RELAXED), for
> aligned in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-02 10:15:16
UTC ---
It looks to me that scheduler is doing something with unspec_volatile
instructions, since vzeroupper insertion will be cancelled if there are live
call-saved SSE registers at the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vbyakovl23 at gmail dot com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-02
09:43:29 UTC ---
The formatting in the patch is wrong (multiple issues).
I don't see a point in the __atomic_load_n (addr, MEMMODEL_RELAXED), for
aligned ints or pointers the loads are atomic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845
Bug #: 55845
Summary: 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3
-ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data
run
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #29 from Dmitry Vyukov 2013-01-02
09:09:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > For config/linux/ptrlock the changes are:
> > [...]
>
> Following your suggestions, I applied the following patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-02 08:30:26
UTC ---
Alexandre, do you plan to proceed with the patch in Comment #4?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
80 matches
Mail list logo
