http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-02
17:24:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> 10.7.2.3.2 says
> "the field occupies w positions, the fractional part of which
> consists of d digits"
> and this does not make sense if w<d. Therefore, according to the
> first sentence of 1.5 Conformance, the program is not standard
> conforming.
>
> There are therefore no requirements on the processor for this
> program, and it may produce either output, or even a runtime error.
> Disclaimer: WG5 might still revise the J3 answer; there will be also an J3
> email voting on the IR.
Latest result version ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1901-N1950/N1932.txt (search
for F08/0063)
Result was: YES WITH COMMENTS, with 7 YES votes, 1 YES WITH COMMENT and 1 NO
vote (or two? At the top it lists one, below it has two comments claiming a
"NO".) ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1901-N1950/N1944.txt
Additionally, it is listed in the Corrigendum 2 draft as being contained in the
document, though no edits have been done:
ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1901-N1950/N1948.pdf
