http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-25 06:52:15
UTC ---
LRA generates
(gdb) call debug_rtx (insn)
(insn 6 20 7 2 (set (reg/f:SI 0 ax [orig:65 gomp_tls_data.ts.work_share ] [65])
(mem/f/j/c:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 2 cx [68])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-25 06:51:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> LRA generates
This comment belongs to PR55049 (copied there).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55070
--- Comment #2 from Chandan Apsangi 2012-10-25
06:32:00 UTC ---
Anyway, Not reproducible on latest version of glibc.
-20121024/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs
-c -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -gtoggle -DIN_GCC -fno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-25
04:20:00 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Oct 25 04:19:43 2012
New Revision: 192797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192797
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-25
04:20:00 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Oct 25 04:19:43 2012
New Revision: 192797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192797
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-25 03:34:22
UTC ---
That's strange, because GCC 4.0 doesn't have _Unwind_GetIPInfo, so the
configure test that checks for it should have failed, and it should not have
been called. Does the Xco
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55062
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-25
03:12:11 UTC ---
This issue appears to have been fixed with the commit of...
Author: singhai
Date: Wed Oct 24 23:09:30 2012
New Revision: 192788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&vie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55070
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55067
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-25
02:31:36 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Oct 25 02:31:31 2012
New Revision: 192794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192794
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55070
Bug #: 55070
Summary: pthread_getname_np returns the name with a terminating
newline on Linux.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Stat
|FIXED |
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-25
01:12:53 UTC ---
The failure has shifted now under gcc 4.0.1 to...
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace -I
../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-25 00:49:09
UTC ---
LRA generates
(gdb) call debug_rtx (insn)
(insn 6 20 7 2 (set (reg/f:SI 0 ax [orig:65 gomp_tls_data.ts.work_share ] [65])
(mem/f/j/c:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 2 cx [68])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55069
Bug #: 55069
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] TRIM incorrectly optimized out
for assignment to allocatable string
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49848
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
Bug #: 55068
Summary: [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap in push_reload() after
LRA merge
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at gnu dot org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48643
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||will...@witt-family.net
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46684
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55067
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55067
Bug #: 55067
Summary: [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to lra.c
loc_t
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50874
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-24 22:34:34
UTC ---
Another testcase:
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.c
enum gomp_schedule_type
{
GFS_GUIDED,
GFS_AUTO
};
struct gomp_work_share
{
enum gomp_schedule_type sched;
};
struct gomp_team_st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55066
Bug #: 55066
Summary: lto integer-cst change causes ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #57 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-10-24
22:16:09 UTC ---
BTW, Clang has decided to implement this in the FE for simple cases.
Quoting: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
-Wuninitialized has been taught to recognise uninit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yellow at rg3 dot name
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48414
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-10-24
22:01:54 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed Oct 24 22:01:50 2012
New Revision: 192786
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192786
Log:
2012-10-24 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48414
Andy Valencia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ajv-198-093-0407 at vsta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55065
Bug #: 55065
Summary: different compiling results ...
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24
21:49:40 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Oct 24 21:49:36 2012
New Revision: 192784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192784
Log:
Add a testcase for PR bootstrap/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54887
--- Comment #7 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 21:25:24 UTC ---
I looked at this. Looks like even before r191494, this lexical block was there
already. So I'd think this is as expected.
Dehao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24
21:09:59 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Oct 24 21:09:55 2012
New Revision: 192782
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192782
Log:
PR target/55061
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55064
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52843
Sean Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantheory at gmail dot com
--- C
unk dated 20121024 on an AMD x86_64 box.
The compiler said
src/torrent_info.cpp: In function 'void bind_torrent_info()':
src/torrent_info.cpp:216:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
}
^
0xa7a86f crash_signal
../../src/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:335
0x997452 df
||2012-10-24
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2012-10-24 20:32:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> ../gcc-4.8-20121024/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8
> --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-24
20:28:59 UTC ---
Totally agreed it would be better (in Italian in such cases we say something
like "you are trying to open a door which is already open" ;) We'll come to
that. Thanks Jon for al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55063
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
20:12:03 UTC ---
Also seen as...
0x45d5: TAG_class_type [74] *
AT_name( "ios_base" )
AT_declaration( 0x01 )
AT_declaration( 0x01 )
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55063
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
20:06:12 UTC ---
A 'dwarfdump -a' of the malformed static.o shows the error is at...
[ 74] TAG_class_typeDW_CHILDREN_yes
AT_name FORM_string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
20:03:52 UTC ---
It's conforming for unordered_map to have a possibly-throwing move ctor, but it
must be possible to insert it into a vector, because vector::emplace_back
doesn't require copy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-24
20:02:12 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 20:02:08 2012
New Revision: 192779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192779
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55063
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
19:52:07 UTC ---
Also seen on x86_64-apple-darwin12 with Xcode 4.5.1. Note that is actually is
an error from the dsymutil run on the executable.
dsymutil ./static.exe
warning: invalid DWARF ge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55027
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-24 19:35:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 28525
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28525
patch
Surprisingly enough, the attached patch doesn't cause any regression in the
testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #30 from François Dumont 2012-10-24
19:27:58 UTC ---
I am going to take a look to 4.4 implementation to see if I can explain the
difference. But waiting for that can you confirm that without the reserve the
number of rehash is simila
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55062
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
19:24:13 UTC ---
../gcc-4.8-20121024/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55062
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
19:21:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 28524
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28524
bzip2 compressed archive of assembly file for gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c on
powerpc-apple-darw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
--- Comment #4 from Manuel L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55062
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
19:20:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28523
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28523
bzip2 compressed archive of preprocessed source file for
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c on powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55063
Bug #: 55063
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Thousands of failures in the
libstdc++-v3 tests after revision 192739
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc -I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/.
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
-I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55048
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-24
18:51:24 UTC ---
Essentially memory allocation is needed because that is the "simplest" state
for such containers, what the default constructor also does in other terms.
Given that the moved fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028
--- Comment #3 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-10-24 18:36:44 UTC ---
Can this be debugged by hacking installed libstdc++ headers? If so, could you
point to what needs exporting/testing please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
18:30:21 UTC ---
The testcase fails with the system compiler on powerpc-apple-darwin9, which
is...
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5493)
with the same error when compiled with '-funwind-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-24 18:12:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Looking at the concrete problem here I think the only thing that is needed
> is a conditional noexcept for all containers move constructors (which is
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54887
--- Comment #6 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 17:56:32 UTC ---
I'll take a look at this case today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
--- Comment #2 from Han Shen 2012-10-24 17:55:40
UTC ---
Yeah, I think value of "i" is never used.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
17:55:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 28522
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28522
assembly file for libbacktrace/dwarf.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
17:54:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 28521
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28521
preprocessed source for libbacktrace/dwarf.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
17:52:30 UTC ---
Xcode 3.1.4
Component versions: DevToolsCore-1204.0; DevToolsSupport-1186.0
BuildVersion: 9M2809
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54887
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Arnez 2012-10-24
17:51:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> <2><32e>: Abbrev Number: 27 (DW_TAG_lexical_block)
> <32f> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x400758
> <337> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x38 0x0
> <3><3
--tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace -I
../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace/../include -I
../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace/../libgcc -I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I
../../gcc/include -funwind-tables -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #17 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-24 17:48:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > 1) It will prevent the incomplete type support
>
> Ouch... but not required by the standard.
I agree, but I consider that as a high price.
> > 2) Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
Bug #: 55060
Summary: False un-initialized variable warnings
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54030
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
17:36:52 UTC ---
I have a better idea: specialize is_copy_constructible for each std::container
to depend on whether its value type is CopyInsertable into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-24
17:35:50 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 17:35:37 2012
New Revision: 192771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192771
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34892
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54030
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-10-24
16:55:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 28520
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28520
pr54030.diff tentative patch
The patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
--- Comment #8 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2012-10-24
16:39:58 UTC ---
Romain, good analysis.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber
2012-10-24 16:12:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> can you reduce it to get rid of all the code that doesn't affect the failure?
I already reduced it quite a lot, but I try harder tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55059
Bug #: 55059
Summary: DWARF missing concrete class definition
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
15:40:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I think it is implementable (I have done something similar to ensure that my
> optional realizes the same effect), but the costs are not small:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
Bug #: 55058
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unexpected invalid type
conversion error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFI
alt the storages of x, y and z overlap.
Notice that the problem is present only when calling alt through an
additional subroutine sub, as indicated by the comments.
gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.8.0 20121024 (experimental)
./test
All the following values should be 2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55048
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-24
15:35:17 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:35:12 2012
New Revision: 192770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192770
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 15:23:29 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:23:25 2012
New Revision: 192768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192768
Log:
2012-10-24 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-24 15:23:19 UTC ---
-Og -g0 is a total failure of everything, such as:
-Breakpoint 2, func2 () at ./gdb.base/return.c:12
-12 return -5;
-(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/return.exp: continue to retur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52981
--- Comment #1 from Aaron S. Kurland 2012-10-24
15:22:28 UTC ---
I just realized that my original message was referring to the wrong option. I
meant: -Wpadded
I am therefore requesting two new options:
-Wpadded-element and -Wpadded-st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-linux-gnueabi
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55054
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2012-10-24
14:52:04 UTC ---
Ok, sorry. Then we should probably close this one as INVALID...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54473
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55053
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo