http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-10-24 18:12:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Looking at the concrete problem here I think the only thing that is needed > is a conditional noexcept for all containers move constructors (which is > presumably a border-case for the allowed extensions but to me an acceptable > one. I tend to suggest to open an LWG issue for this) For allocator-aware containers, it really should be unconditionally noexcept. Could someone explain why allocations are needed within the move-constructor of such containers?
