http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39275
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-21
07:20:42 UTC ---
Here is a reduced testcase:
struct vector
{
char *_M_start;
char *_M_finish;
};
struct LoopBase
{
static LoopBase *f();
LoopBase *ParentLoop;
vector SubLoops;
~LoopBase()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51400
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|mips-sgi-irix6.5|mips*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719
lucier at math dot purdue.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32537
--- Comment #3 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2012-01-21 05:22:40 UTC ---
It seems bootstrap fails at a earlier place.
With this compiler:
godel-257% /homes/lucier/pkgs/gcc-4.6.2-64/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/homes/lucier/p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26380|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51927
Bug #: 51927
Summary: [C++0x] Cannot access non-static members in
initializer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51926
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51926
Bug #: 51926
Summary: libstdc++ iterator store bigendian bitfield related
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51925
Bug #: 51925
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in tsubst
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.marlier at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-01-20 22:37:02 UTC ---
It looks like a GCC bug, not INVALID.
myVar[i] is replaced by constant zero in main().
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-20
22:32:24 UTC ---
gcc just uses -static-libstdc++, so presumably the easiest would be if in some
subdirectory we linked this libstdc++convenience.la into a noinst libstdc++.a.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-20
22:25:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 26398
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26398
try 5, src/c++11/.libs, src/c++98/.libs, libstdc++convenience.la
Changes:
1) nest source SUBDIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51914
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51914
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-20
22:06:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 20 22:06:42 2012
New Revision: 183356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183356
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51914
* tree-vect-stmt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51919
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51919
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-20
21:53:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 20 21:53:29 2012
New Revision: 183355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183355
Log:
PR c++/51919
* g++.dg/pch/mangle1.{C,Hs}: R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-01-20
21:51:12 UTC ---
It's triggered by Joseph Myers' "Table-based default_options_optimization"
change in r165823:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-10/msg01009.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-01-20 21:00:21
UTC ---
> With -free (top), the value is extended r10d -> rax (where only r10b is valid
> -
it is missing the r10b->r10d step)
The value is just moved from r10, not extended from r10d, but th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924
Bug #: 51924
Summary: [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -O -free
-fno-rename-registers -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carrot at google dot com
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51659
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-20
20:03:09 UTC ---
> I have never done that!-(I guess I have to pass something like CFLAGS and
> CXXFLAGS in configure or make). What is the official way to do it?
From the Debugging GCC wiki (http://
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51922
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-20
20:04:39 UTC ---
Patch posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01025.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51922
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-20
20:03:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 20 20:03:11 2012
New Revision: 183351
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183351
Log:
PR c++/51922
* g++.dg/ext/attrib42.C: Requi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51915
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-20
19:39:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 20 19:39:48 2012
New Revision: 183349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183349
Log:
PR target/51915
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_cou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51885
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-20
19:31:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> i am quite sure there is something strange : reinterpret_cast is used to cast
> a
> float pointer to a uint32_t pointer
>
> these two types have the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51885
--- Comment #4 from Laurent MAURIN
2012-01-20 19:18:13 UTC ---
i am quite sure there is something strange : reinterpret_cast is used to cast a
float pointer to a uint32_t pointer
these two types have the same size (4 bytes)
therefore, the swap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45273
--- Comment #8 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
2012-01-20 19:17:53 UTC ---
Is there already a meta bug for patches queued for 4.8?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-20
19:15:08 UTC ---
> Try building the compiler without optimization (-O0).
I have never done that!-(I guess I have to pass something like CFLAGS and
CXXFLAGS in configure or make). What is the of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920
davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davem at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682
--- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant 2012-01-20
18:57:49 UTC ---
Author: ccoutant
Date: Fri Jan 20 18:57:44 2012
New Revision: 183348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183348
Log:
2012-01-19 Cary Coutant
Dodji Sekete
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51649
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tromey at redhat dot com
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51923
Bug #: 51923
Summary: cxa_atexit test changed outcome with gld 2.22
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51922
Bug #: 51922
Summary: g++.dg/ext/attrib42.C FAILs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Bug #: 51921
Summary: [4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken on
Solaris 11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920
Bug #: 51920
Summary: 64-bit gcc.target/sparc/vec-init-1-vis1.c FAILs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51919
Bug #: 51919
Summary: g++.dg/pch/mangle1.* test FAILs without LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-20
17:44:50 UTC ---
The patch breaks g++.dg/guality/redeclaration1.C on i?86 -m32 -Os -g.
The supercontext range has 3 elements, the same range child range has 2
elements, same as the first and last of th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918
Bug #: 51918
Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc-sun-solaris*, |sparc-sun-solaris*,
|mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51917
Bug #: 51917
Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vmihint.C FAILs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51402
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51402
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-20 17:21:27 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jan 20 17:21:19 2012
New Revision: 183345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183345
Log:
/cp
2012-01-20 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51895
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-20
16:49:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 26396
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26396
l.ii
Note that the BLKmode MEM_REF with non-BLKmode base expansion can be triggered
also without SR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-01-20
16:29:11 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Jan 20 16:29:01 2012
New Revision: 183341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183341
Log:
2012-01-20 Andreas Krebbel
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32537
--- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2012-01-20 16:26:26 UTC ---
I found a PPC64 machine, so I'll test it.
Brad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-20
16:25:19 UTC ---
> No luck!-(I get 'No symbol "fcode" in current context.' and if not ' optimized out>').
> The only things I have been to print stepping through
> streamer_get_builtin_tree (ib=, data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
--- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-20 16:24:34 UTC ---
I have done a clean bootstrap of r183305 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with the
patch in comment #25.
Regtesting in progress (allow for ~20 more hours), but gcc at -m32 has only 28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-20
16:09:11 UTC ---
> I don't have a Darwin machine on which to test the link sequence. Do you mind
> finding out which is the fcode in question? It is a matter of setting a gdb
> breakpoint on t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-20 15:54:14 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, the patch in comments #22 breaks most of the tests I
have for extends_type_of (3 out of 5) and in the test suite (only
gfortran.dg/extends_type_of_2.f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-20
15:46:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Created attachment 26395 [details]
> other candidate patch
>
> I'm testing the following patch instead, which avoids changing access types
> for all-sc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #24 from Mikael Morin 2012-01-20
15:31:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Created attachment 26392 [details]
> Small test case for polymorphic optional dummies
>
> (In reply to comment #22)
> > Updated patch.
> > This passes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey 2012-01-20 14:59:51
UTC ---
gdb doesn't read .debug_pubtypes.
So the problem must be something else.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51913
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-20
14:40:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 26390 [details]
> buggy program
Work around: Swap the USE statements in the main program.
(In reply to comment #1)
> /* F2003, 12.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51895
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-20
14:40:09 UTC ---
Testing
@@ -3891,6 +3853,8 @@ decide_one_param_reduction (struct acces
{
by_ref = false;
agg_size = cur_parm_size;
+ if (DECL_MODE (parm) != BLKmode)
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37798
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2012-01-20
14:35:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> On x86_64-darwin10 (Xcode 3.2.6) r183290 is OK.
> On powerpc-apple-darwin9 (Xcode 3.1.4) 183218 is OK.
This issue doesn't occur on x86_64-darwin10 with Xcode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51913
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51895
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux |powerpc64-linux, i?86-*-*
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51895
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-20
13:37:50 UTC ---
We could go just to the immediate supercontext if BLOCK_SAME_RANGE (both when
the fragment count is the same and when it is smaller in the child), but we'd
lose all the verification (w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard 2012-01-20 13:31:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Mark, can you please look at this if it does the right thing you want from it?
Yes, this seems to do what I was thinking of. And it works on my testcases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-01-20
13:24:53 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jan 20 13:24:47 2012
New Revision: 183338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183338
Log:
Fix PR target/51819
Modified:
trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51915
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-20
13:16:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 26394
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26394
gcc47-pr51915.patch
Untested fix.
output_move_double (sometimes intentionally) modifies the operand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
Bug #: 51916
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-3
c_lto_trans-mem-3_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-3_1.o link,
-flto (internal compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51915
Bug #: 51915
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in output_move_double
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45273
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.8.0
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|documentation |
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|documentation |
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-20
12:31:59 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jan 20 12:31:46 2012
New Revision: 183336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183336
Log:
PR target/49868
PR target/50887
* doc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-20
12:31:59 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jan 20 12:31:46 2012
New Revision: 183336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183336
Log:
PR target/49868
PR target/50887
* doc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51402
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51899
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51899
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-20
11:32:55 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jan 20 11:32:52 2012
New Revision: 183335
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183335
Log:
2012-01-20 Tobias Burnus
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51914
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-20
11:28:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 26392
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26392
Small test case for polymorphic optional dummies
(In reply to comment #22)
> Updated patch.
> This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-20
11:28:26 UTC ---
> The testcase that fails is gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-3.c. Both with and
> without (4.6.1 release) the patch.
> The patch I posted fixes the problem, but I don't know if it is gen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
