http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-20
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
Summary|[4.7 regression] EH |[4.6/4.7 regression] EH
|unwinding support is broken |unwinding support is broken
|on Solaris 11 |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-20
19:15:14 UTC ---
With this line of reasoning, there was no real justification for rewriting it
from scratch either... This code is used in Ada (I don't count Java here, as
nobody uses GCJ on SPARC/Solaris) and the emphasis in Ada is robustness; we
cannot afford introducing gratuitous regressions (and I certainly don't want to
maintain a separate code for AdaCore's compiler) so we need to find a modus
vivendi.
