[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Ridge 2012-01-14 07:55:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > >The message "Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3" stands out > That just means the version of gdb you are using does not understand the > dwarf2 > exten

[Bug c++/51832] [4.7 regression] Rev.182970 causes LTO link errors (multiple definitions of allocator_traits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-14 07:48:35 UTC --- Created attachment 26320 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26320 testcase patch I've attached the original reduced testcase. markus@x4 allocator_lto_testcase

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-14 07:20:06 UTC --- >The message "Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3" stands out That just means the version of gdb you are using does not understand the dwarf2 extensions that GCC is emitting. We r

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Ridge 2012-01-14 07:11:43 UTC --- Here is stack trace of cc1plus at the point where it prints garbage: #0 tree_check_failed (node=0x7fffdc568b40, file=0xf8f214 "../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c", line=1687, function=0xf94cd0 "eq

[Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-01-14 04:54:23 UTC --- This is a binutils bug. Single word conversions need to use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd. This doesn't fail for PA1.1 bec

[Bug libmudflap/51858] New: Some malloc'd inside libc is not being tracked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51858 Bug #: 51858 Summary: Some malloc'd inside libc is not being tracked Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libmudflap/20696] all libmudflap tests fail on mips{,el}-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20696 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/51853] MPFR assertion failure with Python: p >= 2 && p <= ((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)>>1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51853 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-14 01:40:56 UTC --- > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions.

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-14 00:54:05 UTC --- Probably for TARGET_MACHO && !TARGET_64BIT && flag_pic you want to define "nonlocal_goto_receiver" pattern that would compute the right PIC pointer value at that point (not sure if th

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-14 00:38:18 UTC --- Sounds like i?86-darwin target bug. The %ebx value is wrong, should be 0x2929 instead (i.e. the point after call __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx in x, but most probably is the point after call

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-14 00:36:19 UTC --- surely this is obvious, don't HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø before you txøtsø ;) you could also try building with --enable-checking=valgrind or run cc1plus under gdb and provide a stack trace and

[Bug bootstrap/32719] ICE when compiling c-format.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/32719] ICE when compiling c-format.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719 --- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2012-01-14 00:26:46 UTC --- I no longer have a machine to test it on. Brad

[Bug middle-end/31192] functions with __attribute__((externally_visible)) becomes static if "-O -fwhole-program"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31192 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression] C++

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 --- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14 00:22:21 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Sat Jan 14 00:22:14 2012 New Revision: 183178 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183178 Log: gcc/: PR c++/50012 * tree.h (TYPE_QU

[Bug bootstrap/32719] ICE when compiling c-format.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/29358] Warning issued two times with snprintf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29358 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/28314] cpp: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28314 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-* Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug driver/51857] New: gcc -flto ignores -B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51857 Bug #: 51857 Summary: gcc -flto ignores -B Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-13 23:46:47 UTC --- > disas x > > would be interesting here to find out what insn is at 0x29c0 and what is > around > that. 0x291b <+0>:push %ebp 0x291c <+1>:mov%esp,%

[Bug libitm/51855] improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 --- Comment #2 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13 23:45:12 UTC --- Author: torvald Date: Fri Jan 13 23:45:06 2012 New Revision: 183172 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183172 Log: libitm: Filter out undo writes that ov

[Bug libitm/51855] improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-13 23:41:44 UTC --- Hmm, do you know if this works with a split stack?

[Bug rtl-optimization/51856] [4.7 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/51856] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856 Bug #: 51856 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-c

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-13 23:35:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > (gdb) stepi > 0x29bd29 y (a); > (gdb) p/x _NSGetEnviron() > $3 = 0x50a8 > (gdb) p/x *_NSGetEnviron() > $4 = 0xbfffd9b4 > (gdb) p/x **_NSGetEnv

[Bug libitm/51855] improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug libitm/51855] New: improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 Bug #: 51855 Summary: improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug target/17280] -mrelax and -O cause .uses directives in assembler to refer to non-existent local labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17280 --- Comment #2 from Michael Beach 2012-01-13 23:21:53 UTC --- It's no longer an issue for me, as I'm not working on a project using sh-elf-gcc any more. I'm unaware of whether this problem occurs in more recent gcc releases or not.

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-13 23:11:40 UTC --- Created attachment 26319 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26319 patch for libgcc/libgcov.c to debug findenv Patch to use the findenv in http://www.opensourc

[Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2012-01-11 00:

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-13 23:02:09 UTC --- Created attachment 26318 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26318 test findenv Test of findenv found in http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-498.1

[Bug preprocessor/37215] ICE on 'gcc -E -dM -fpreprocessed - < /dev/null'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 fro

[Bug other/31352] gcc -v --help doesn't notice when front-ends documentation differs for same option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31352 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-13 22:36:37 UTC --- On the trunk we get warnings while building GCC about the mismatch of the documentation of the options.

[Bug libstdc++/51845] [4.7 regression] 23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.cc segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips64-linux-gnu and|mips64-*-* s390-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/18589] could optimize FP multiplies better

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18589 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassign

[Bug c++/51854] ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51854 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/26894] On a 64 bit system the generated crosscompiler generates invalid assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26894 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51854] New: ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51854 Bug #: 51854 Summary: ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot

[Bug target/26219] longjmp dosn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51634] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-13 22:17:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Fixed on trunk as long as explicit allocations are inserted, as below. > I will raise a separate PR for the lack of automatic allocate on assign for > class

[Bug java/41356] Circular dependencies between jars cause errors: jars order shouldn't matter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41356 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/36545] Type _uleb128_t doesn't defined properly in /gcc/unwind-dw2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36545 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179 --- Comment #62 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-13 22:08:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #61) > 4.7 14s 1704M (r183161, optimized, --enable-checking=release) Making the change to convert_to_integer mentioned in 12245 reduces VM size to 1509M; there

[Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5763|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/51832] [4.7 regression] Rev.182970 causes LTO link errors (multiple definitions of allocator_traits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-13 21:25:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I still can't reproduce this on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I notice that you have a > lot of configure flags in your gcc -v output; mine is just > > /home/

[Bug fortran/48351] [OOP] Realloc on assignment fails if parent component is CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48351 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51733] [OOP] No allocate on assign for class objects with allocatable components.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51733 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48351] [OOP] Realloc on assignment fails if parent component is CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48351 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-13 21:14:42 UTC --- FIXED on the trunk (4.7).

[Bug fortran/51808] Improve handling of ISO_C_BINDING binding names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug c/51853] New: MPFR assertion failure with Python: p >= 2 && p <= ((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)>>1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51853 Bug #: 51853 Summary: MPFR assertion failure with Python: p >= 2 && p <= ((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)>>1)) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4

[Bug c++/51851] Overriding a function with a parameter of dependent type fails to override.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51851 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48351] [OOP] Realloc on assignment fails if parent component is CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48351 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2012-01-13 20:42:07 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Fri Jan 13 20:42:01 2012 New Revision: 183162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183162 Log: 2012-01-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48351 *

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-13 20:36:16 UTC --- PR51471 patch has been committed by now, can you recheck if it didn't fix also this PR? http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183038

[Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/51845] [4.7 regression] 23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.cc segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libmudflap/40778] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Mudflap instrumentation missing in cloned function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40778 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/51852] New: [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 Bug #: 51852 Summary: [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug c/12245] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Uses lots of memory when compiling large initialized arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fa

[Bug driver/51844] [4.7 regression] configuring with --with-gxx-include-dir= adds a relative (non-existing) C++ include dir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51844 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7

[Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681 --- Comment #34 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-13 20:06:25 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 13 20:06:16 2012 New Revision: 183161 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183161 Log: PR c++/20681 * semantics.c (finish_break_s

[Bug fortran/51842] fortran fails if ssize_t is 32-bit on 64-bit host

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51842 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51851] Overriding a function with a parameter of dependent type fails to override.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51851 --- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen 2012-01-13 19:13:13 UTC --- Johannes Schaub says "in both situations the question is whether the parameter type adjustments happen immediately or after instantiation (when T is replaced by the actual type)",

[Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/51851] New: Overriding a function with a parameter of dependent type fails to override.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51851 Bug #: 51851 Summary: Overriding a function with a parameter of dependent type fails to override. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNC

[Bug c++/39055] questionable default parameter of a member function accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code | Target Milestone|4.4.7

[Bug c++/51832] [4.7 regression] Rev.182970 causes LTO link errors (multiple definitions of allocator_traits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-13 18:55:24 UTC --- I still can't reproduce this on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I notice that you have a lot of configure flags in your gcc -v output; mine is just /home/jason/src/trunk/configure -v --with-mpf

[Bug target/51709] armv7 target is not using unaligned access to packed fields sometimes (halfwords, loads?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51709 --- Comment #5 from John A. Van Boxtel 2012-01-13 18:39:43 UTC --- Sorry about not understanding CS vs GNU release numbering and time relationship. I now understand that CS versions may precede introduction into the GNC source. I will also try

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-13 17:51:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 13 17:50:58 2012 New Revision: 183156 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183156 Log: PR c++/51813 * decl2.c (constrain_visibilit

[Bug libstdc++/51850] New: debug mode for std::array and tr1::array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51850 Bug #: 51850 Summary: debug mode for std::array and tr1::array Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Prio

[Bug c/51849] New: -Wc99-compat would be considered useful

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51849 Bug #: 51849 Summary: -Wc99-compat would be considered useful Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Prior

[Bug fortran/51842] fortran fails if ssize_t is 32-bit on 64-bit host

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51842 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13 17:23:37 UTC --- The last fix looks perfect, thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/51845] [4.7 regression] 23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.cc segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug c++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-13 16:52:41 UTC --- The right answer would seem to be wrapping includes of C headers in #pragma GCC visibility push/pop, like many of the libsupc++ headers do. But I'm not sure why the compiler wants to

[Bug libstdc++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-13 16:46:56 UTC --- Thanks for your help Jon. Note the issue isn't just about std::use_facet, is about std::codecvt too, any type we instantiate with mbstate_t.

[Bug libstdc++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-13 16:43:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > What do we want to do about C library visibility? We can't redeclare all the types with default visibility, because we don't know if e.g. mbstate_t is jus

[Bug c++/39055] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-13 16:41:08 UTC --- Pinged again about creating a core issue for this.

[Bug libstdc++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-13 16:24:07 UTC --- Eh, thanks for the analysis. Is there some sort of conservative option here? I don't think we want to take risks at this stage only for the sake of hiding a few more symbols ws 4.6. Co

[Bug libstdc++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Component|c++

[Bug c++/51225] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51225 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/51374] [avr] insn combine reorders volatile memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann

[Bug middle-end/51848] GCC is not able to vectorize when a constant value is also added to the sum of array expression inside a loop.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51848 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/51374] [avr] insn combine reorders volatile memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-13 15:58:10 UTC --- Created attachment 26316 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26316 pr51374.diff (tentative patch against 4.7) * combine.c (record_dead_and_set_regs_1): Update

[Bug c++/51813] [4.7 Regression] -fvisibility=hidden causes std::codecvt members to be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/51620] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with private destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51620 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51620] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with private destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51620 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-13 15:49:35 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 13 15:49:29 2012 New Revision: 183155 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183155 Log: PR c++/51620 * class.c (build_vtbl_initiali

[Bug fortran/51842] fortran fails if ssize_t is 32-bit on 64-bit host

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51842 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-13 15:41:19 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 13 15:41:13 2012 New Revision: 183154 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183154 Log: 2012-01-13 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/51

[Bug target/51709] armv7 target is not using unaligned access to packed fields sometimes (halfwords, loads?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51709 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization St

[Bug middle-end/51848] New: GCC is not able to vectorize when a constant value is also added to the sum of array expression inside a loop.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51848 Bug #: 51848 Summary: GCC is not able to vectorize when a constant value is also added to the sum of array expression inside a loop. Classification: Unclassified Product

[Bug libstdc++/51845] [4.7 regression] 23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.cc segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-01-13 13:07:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Andreas, can you run the test under valgrind? Thanks in advance. I should better have mentioned that Valgrind on S/390 doesn't support 32 bit code yet :(

[Bug c++/51847] New: incorrect primitive array initialization in generic methods

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51847 Bug #: 51847 Summary: incorrect primitive array initialization in generic methods Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/51845] [4.7 regression] 23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.cc segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-13 12:56:03 UTC --- Andreas, can you run the test under valgrind? Thanks in advance.

[Bug fortran/38813] ICE with C_LOC(array)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38813 --- Comment #7 from Salvatore Filippone 2012-01-13 12:48:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) And the example that still fails: -- module foo_mod type foo_type integer, allocatable :: idx(:) end type foo_type end module foo_mod

  1   2   >