http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51844
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13
20:19:09 UTC ---
Can't reproduce, works exactly the same as in 4.6.
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/src/gcc-4.6/obj2i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.3/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/c++/4.7"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/c++/4.7/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/c++/4.7/backward"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/usr/src/gcc-4.6/obj2i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.3/include"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/usr/src/gcc-4.6/obj2i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.3/include-fixed"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/src/gcc-4.6/obj2i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.3/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include"
with 4.6 and
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/src/gcc/obj10i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/c++/4.7"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/c++/4.7/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/c++/4.7/backward"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/usr/src/gcc/obj10i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/include"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/usr/src/gcc/obj10i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/include-fixed"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/src/gcc/obj10i/usr/local/bin/../lib/gcc/../../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include"
with 4.7. Are you sure you don't have local patches applied that might affect
this? And why are you marking this as regression?
