[Bug fortran/51632] New: [OOP] Bogus argument checking for generated _def_init parameter and _copy procedure with CAF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632 Bug #: 51632 Summary: [OOP] Bogus argument checking for generated _def_init parameter and _copy procedure with CAF Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/51631] Trunk ICE for case vst1_lanese64.c with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51631 --- Comment #1 from Terry Guo 2011-12-20 07:46:44 UTC --- build@sha-pdsh-build04:~/workspace/GCC-Trunk-Daily-Test/build-linux/gcc-final/gcc/testsuite/gcc$ cat /home/build/workspace/GCC-Trunk-Daily-Test/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/neon/vs

[Bug rtl-optimization/51631] New: Trunk ICE for case vst1_lanese64.c with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51631 Bug #: 51631 Summary: Trunk ICE for case vst1_lanese64.c with -Os Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/51630] failure to detect missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51630 --- Comment #1 from Robert Ramey 2011-12-20 07:35:13 UTC --- note I am compiling with the following command line under cygwin: g++-4 -fsyntax-only -Wall -pedantic -Ic:/boostrelease "c:\Projects\dbms\test.cpp"

[Bug c++/51630] New: failure to detect missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51630 Bug #: 51630 Summary: failure to detect missing Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-20 06:54:00 UTC --- FIND_BASE_TERM is actually supposed just an alternate rtx expression, not its find_base_term value, so something like (perhaps with more conditions, when r28 is never equal to r32 in

[Bug ada/51624] [4.6/4.7 regression] Assert_Failure atree.adb:808 on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51624 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51629] Default Destructor and template extern Instantiation cause the Destructor to be missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51629 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/34263] missed optimization: cleanup loop latch (SMS)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34263 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 --- Comment #3 from Keith Thompson 2011-12-20 00:36:52 UTC --- I see no "-Walign" option, either in the versions of gcc I'm using or in the online documentation. Were you thinking of a different option? What I'm suggesting, primarily, is that t

[Bug c++/51612] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with constexpr constructor and virtual base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51612 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-20 00:22:19 UTC --- Well, you or whomever wants to fix this bug needs to propose some solution. I'm not familiar with avr, so I don't know if avr is doing something like this (starting function with r32

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Khrukin 2011-12-20 00:13:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Did you build binutils already for mispel? Yes i did. cross-mipsel-binutils-2.22.51.0.1-1-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm rpm -ql http://pastie.org/3043495

[Bug c++/51629] Default Destructor and template extern Instantiation cause the Destructor to be missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51629 --- Comment #1 from ted 2011-12-20 00:12:59 UTC --- Link to topic on stack oveflow with discussion/detection, thanks to deft_code: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8560839/linker-error-when-using-an-extern-template

[Bug target/43437] ICE in CSE, during libgcc build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-12-20 00:12:19 UTC --- The new test case stopped ICE:ing on trunk starting with r17: . However that's just a missed-optimization fix so most lik

[Bug c++/51629] New: Default Destructor and template extern Instantiation cause the Destructor to be missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51629 Bug #: 51629 Summary: Default Destructor and template extern Instantiation cause the Destructor to be missing Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-19 23:51:08 UTC --- Did you build binutils already for mispel?

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Khrukin 2011-12-19 23:45:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > > > `/home/user/cross-avr-gcc/B

[Bug fortran/51607] configure: error: GNU fortran compiler is not working ;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51607 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.barrows at me dot com --- Comment #16 f

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-19 23:27:24 UTC --- I think this is just undefined at runtime which means we can only warn about it. Which we do with -Walign

[Bug c++/51611] [c++0x] ICE with non-static data member initializer and virtual base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51611 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-12-19 23:24:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Well, it is certainly desirable not to process the prologue insns during > init_alias_analysis. The fact that stack pointer has the same value as frame

[Bug c++/51037] SIGSEGV -O3 C++ only

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51037 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 --- Comment #1 from Keith Thompson 2011-12-19 23:05:50 UTC --- A commenter on stackoverflow points out that a possible fix would be to permit the address of a member of a packed structure to be assigned only to a pointer object that is itself dec

[Bug driver/48306] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] presence of gcc subdir with . in PATH causes breakdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306 --- Comment #7 from karl at freefriends dot org 2011-12-19 22:59:37 UTC --- I hope you will decide that robustness against the execution environment is more important than a few milliseconds of runtime. I wouldn't have reported it if I hadn't actu

[Bug c/51628] New: __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 Bug #: 51628 Summary: __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 22:40:19 UTC --- suggested patch posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01421.html

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 22:40:16 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Dec 19 22:40:11 2011 New Revision: 182508 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182508 Log: /cp 2011-12-19 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/42839] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc.target/mips/octeon-bbit-2.c failing for -mabi=64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42839 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Reg

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 22:28:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > > `/home/user/cross-avr-gcc/BUILD/cross-mipsel-gcc-4.6.2/gcc-mip

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Khrukin 2011-12-19 22:16:43 UTC --- Also i read http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html /// If you do not have GMP (the GNU Multiple Precision library), the MPFR library and/or the MPC library installed in a stand

[Bug c++/51530] [C++0x] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:16854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51530] [C++0x] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:16854

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19 22:08:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Dec 19 22:08:29 2011 New Revision: 182505 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182505 Log: PR c++/51530 * pt.c (unify): Handle NULLPTR

[Bug c++/51501] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED --- Comment #5 from Jason Merri

[Bug c++/51501] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51228] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE with transparent union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51228 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #8 from Domingo Alvarez 2011-12-19 21:19:40 UTC --- Here is my contribution of bid_decimal.c splitted into several parts to allow better link size and easy edit/view. http://code.google.com/p/luafltk/downloads/detail?name=bid_decimal

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 21:18:51 UTC --- http://www.advogato.org/person/redi/diary/253.html

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Khrukin 2011-12-19 21:15:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > > `/home/user/cross-avr-gcc/BUILD/cross-mipsel-gcc-4.6.2/gcc-m

[Bug c++/51526] [C++11][constexpr] constexpr delegating constructor should be accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51526 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51526] [C++11][constexpr] constexpr delegating constructor should be accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51526 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19 21:06:48 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Dec 19 21:06:44 2011 New Revision: 182499 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182499 Log: PR c++/51526 * semantics.c (build_data_memb

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 21:03:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > `/home/user/cross-avr-gcc/BUILD/cross-mipsel-gcc-4.6.2/gcc-mipsel/mipsel/libgcc': > configure

[Bug bootstrap/51627] cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Khrukin 2011-12-19 20:58:48 UTC --- Build Options mkdir -p gcc-mipsel pushd gcc-mipsel ~/cross-avr-gcc/BUILD/cross-mipsel-gcc-4.6.2/gcc-mipsel ~/cross-avr-gcc/BUILD/cross-mipsel-gcc-4.6.2 CC='gcc -O2 -g -frecord-gc

[Bug bootstrap/38035] GCC 4.3.2 Make fails on ubuntu - configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38035 Alexander Khrukin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexander at mezon dot ru --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/51627] New: cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51627 Bug #: 51627 Summary: cannot compute suffix of object files mipsel Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/51607] configure: error: GNU fortran compiler is not working ;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51607 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-19 20:50:58 UTC --- You could use a binary GCC (cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries for some places for getting an unofficial build). And you could then use that one to compile your own version -

[Bug fortran/47168] Error with use-renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47168 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/51578] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Import of same symbol via different modules and renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51578 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/51364] C++ interoperability with ISO-C extension DFP types requires explicit typedefs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364 --- Comment #11 from Janis Johnson 2011-12-19 20:36:52 UTC --- The large code size isn't from the generated code, it's from the runtime support in static libraries; compile main.c with -c and look at the size of main.o. You might compare it to s

[Bug rtl-optimization/50380] cc1 hangs eating 100% CPU

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 20:29:27 UTC --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Dec 19 20:29:21 2011 New Revision: 182498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182498 Log: 2011-12-19 Sandra Loosemore T

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-19 20:18:30 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Dec 19 20:18:18 2011 New Revision: 182497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182497 Log: 2011-12-19 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/5

[Bug c++/51553] brace initialization and conversion operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51553] brace initialization and conversion operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19 20:11:00 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Dec 19 20:10:49 2011 New Revision: 182496 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182496 Log: PR c++/51553 * cp-tree.h (LOOKUP_LIST_INIT_

[Bug c++/51553] brace initialization and conversion operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19 20:10:45 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Dec 19 20:10:37 2011 New Revision: 182495 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182495 Log: PR c++/51553 * call.c (add_function_candida

[Bug c++/51228] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with transparent union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51228 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19 20:10:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Dec 19 20:10:25 2011 New Revision: 182494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182494 Log: PR c++/51228 * c-common.c (handle_transpare

[Bug driver/48306] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] presence of gcc subdir with . in PATH causes breakdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-19 19:53:43 UTC --- Created attachment 26146 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26146 gcc47-pr48306.patch Not sure if this case is something we need to slow the driver down for, but if y

[Bug middle-end/51411] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:835 with -O -fgnu-tm and overriding virtual transaction_safe function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51411 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/51411] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:835 with -O -fgnu-tm and overriding virtual transaction_safe function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51411 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-12-19 19:33:09 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Mon Dec 19 19:33:05 2011 New Revision: 182493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182493 Log: Commit forgotten testcase that goes along with thi

[Bug middle-end/51411] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:835 with -O -fgnu-tm and overriding virtual transaction_safe function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51411 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-12-19 19:31:23 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Mon Dec 19 19:31:17 2011 New Revision: 182492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182492 Log: PR middle-end/51411 * trans-mem.c (ipa_tm_

[Bug tree-optimization/51580] [4.7 regression] segfault during loop vectorization at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51580 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51580] [4.7 regression] segfault during loop vectorization at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51580 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-19 19:17:15 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Dec 19 19:17:10 2011 New Revision: 182491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182491 Log: PR tree-optimization/51580 * gnat.dg/sp

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 20

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 19:04:53 UTC --- Unfortunately either of those would cause a regression for PR 32618

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 18:57:45 UTC --- I agree with the sentiment, but unfortunately a C++11 allocator isn't required to provide a construct member at all. 17.6.3.5 p5 shows a minimal C++11 allocator, and that won't work

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-12-19 18:56:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > I believe this is just because of very weird target avr stuff, either it is a > target bug that can be fixed up in the backend somehow, or perhaps would

[Bug target/48743] -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon - compiled C fails with "illegal instruction"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743 Quentin Neill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qneill at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-19 18:41:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > subroutine foo > BLOCK_NAME: block > end block BLOCK_NAME > end subroutine foo > subroutine BLOCK_NAME() > end subroutine BLOCK_NAME The pr

[Bug libstdc++/51626] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-19 18:38:56 UTC --- Bah, in my opinion it's late to attempt sophisticated things in 4.6, either we can do something minimal or we should just tell people that in 4.6 a C++0x container wants a C++0x alloca

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug testsuite/50722] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr49994-3.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722 --- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2011-12-19 18:33:07 UTC --- Yes, this was failing on ia64 hpux as well as hppa hpux.

[Bug libstdc++/51626] New: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51626 Bug #: 51626 Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] can't use C++98 allocators with -std=c++0x Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/48743] -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon - compiled C fails with "illegal instruction"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743 --- Comment #6 from Quentin Neill 2011-12-19 17:57:42 UTC --- Author: qneill Date: Mon Dec 19 17:57:32 2011 New Revision: 182489 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182489 Log: 2011-12-19 Quentin Neill 2011-12-19 Quentin Ne

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/51625] New: -Wconversion should be on by default, or at least included in -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51625 Bug #: 51625 Summary: -Wconversion should be on by default, or at least included in -Wall Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/51624] New: [4.6/4.7 regression] Assert_Failure atree.adb:808 on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51624 Bug #: 51624 Summary: [4.6/4.7 regression] Assert_Failure atree.adb:808 on IRIX 6.5 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/51583] One more missing force_gimple_operand in SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51583 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-19 16:47:35 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Dec 19 16:47:28 2011 New Revision: 182488 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182488 Log: 2011-12-19 Martin Jambor PR tree-optimiza

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-12-19 16:40:33 UTC --- > --- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-16 > 20:05:16 UTC --- > Can you try the patch in PR 51471#c11 ? That patch fixes most of the > maybe_record_trace_st

[Bug c++/51553] brace initialization and conversion operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/51600] [4.7 Regression] ice in estimate_local_effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/51328] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19 15:58:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thus I guess rejecting it earlier is fine, but we don't want to misled people > by saying that 'typename T::~T' would be ok. Agreed. I would expect it to b

[Bug lto/51573] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in lto_varpool_encoder_encode_initializer_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51573 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-19 15:57:06 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Dec 19 15:57:02 2011 New Revision: 182487 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182487 Log: 2011-12-19 Richard Guenther PR lto/51

[Bug lto/51573] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in lto_varpool_encoder_encode_initializer_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51573 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51580] [4.7 regression] segfault during loop vectorization at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51580 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #11 from Dan Nagle 2011-12-19 15:51:40 UTC --- Hi, I can confirm that changing the label of the select type to integer_or_logical_or_error removes the ICE. I did so at lines 9325 and 13536 in the original source. The new label is

[Bug c++/51619] [c++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[c++0x] [4.6/4.7|[c++0x] [4.6 Regression]

[Bug rtl-optimization/51623] PowerPC section type conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623 --- Comment #1 from Chung-Lin Tang 2011-12-19 15:44:10 UTC --- Created attachment 26145 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26145 Minimal testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/51623] New: PowerPC section type conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51623 Bug #: 51623 Summary: PowerPC section type conflict Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51619] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-19 15:38:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 19 15:38:06 2011 New Revision: 182485 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182485 Log: PR c++/51619 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_vec_in

[Bug rtl-optimization/51366] [cygwin] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366 --- Comment #5 from Denis Excoffier 2011-12-19 15:31:46 UTC --- Reduced test case is: % cat exclude.c int version; int zz1(char *); static void zz2(int flags) { static int initialized = 0; char xx[4096]; if (initialized) return; initializ

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-19 15:30:29 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Dec 19 15:30:23 2011 New Revision: 182484 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182484 Log: 2011-12-19 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/5

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-19 14:43:05 UTC --- This has been introduced with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01402.html which has been written as a better way of: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01393.html

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #6 from Domingo Alvarez 2011-12-19 14:40:45 UTC --- Rewrite expected executable sizes with a realistic better code generation by gcc. If code generation is solved probably we can have better results with the following: lua 5.1.4 wit

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #5 from Domingo Alvarez 2011-12-19 14:34:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Which architecture are you compiling for? gcc mingw32 4.6.1 32bits

[Bug tree-optimization/51583] One more missing force_gimple_operand in SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51583 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-19 14:33:21 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Dec 19 14:33:18 2011 New Revision: 182483 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182483 Log: 2011-12-19 Martin Jambor PR tree-optimiza

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 --- Comment #4 from Domingo Alvarez 2011-12-19 14:30:26 UTC --- Created attachment 26143 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26143 Another program to demonstrate gcc bad code generation On the previous example program my conclusi

  1   2   >