[Bug tree-optimization/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50611] Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-11 02:24:56 UTC --- Hummm. This patchlet avoids the ICE and apparently passes the testsuite (already past g++.dg), but the amount of diagnostics in mainline seems in any case much more than in 4.6, in par

[Bug c/50695] New: double comparison broken after computation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50695 Bug #: 50695 Summary: double comparison broken after computation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/50611] Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50611 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #10 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-11 01:47:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > 3) only zero_extract special cases looks to be dominant. > I'm sorry, I forgot to mention that it was just a proof of concept hack > of mine, just to se

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Loop optimization restricted by GOTOs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-11 01:35:20 UTC --- Sorry, I was looking at the loop1 and loop2 functions, not the code inlined into the benchmark for main. LLVM generates: movq%r12, %rdi movl$99, %esi

[Bug c++/50660] warning about pass NULL to non pointer argument happens twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug c++/50660] warning about pass NULL to non pointer argument happens twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-11 01:28:37 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 11 01:28:34 2011 New Revision: 179779 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179779 Log: 2011-10-10 Paolo Carlini PR c++/

[Bug c++/27692] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Loop optimization restricted by GOTOs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-11 01:24:00 UTC --- The vectorization is not being done for the second version of the loop with the goto. I have not looked into the cause of it though. Note -fno-tree-vectorize shows that the loop is s

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Loop optimization restricted by GOTOs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/27692] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-11 01:10:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I honestly don't understand how such a warning would look like: like warning > for any snippet of code where destructors could run in an unpredictable order?

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Slightly different loop body leads not vectoring loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-11 00:22:28 UTC --- Oh but LLVM has a memset loop detector which causes the speed up to happen.

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Slightly different loop body leads not vectoring loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-11 00:21:48 UTC --- Created attachment 25464 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25464 GCC 4.6.1 assembler output

[Bug target/50694] New: SH Target: SH2A little endian does not actually work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50694 Bug #: 50694 Summary: SH Target: SH2A little endian does not actually work Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Slightly different loop body leads not vectoring loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25462|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Slightly different loop body leads not vectoring loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-10 23:56:55 UTC --- Created attachment 25462 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25462 GCC 4.6.1 assembler output

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-10 23:48:17 UTC --- Created attachment 25461 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25461 CSiBE comparisons (In reply to comment #8) > > Another combine pass to reduce size less than 0.3% on on

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Slightly different loop body leads not vectoring loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10 22:55:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > It may be interesting to note that clang (version 2.9) does not exhibit this > performance difference, but versions execute quickly. Yes that really true be

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Slightly different loop body leads not vectoring loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Component|c

[Bug c/50693] Slightly different loop body leads to 5.5x slower performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #1 from Alex Gaynor 2011-10-10 22:52:07 UTC --- It may be interesting to note that clang (version 2.9) does not exhibit this performance difference, but versions execute quickly.

[Bug c/50693] New: Slightly different loop body leads to 5.5x slower performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 Bug #: 50693 Summary: Slightly different loop body leads to 5.5x slower performance Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 --- Comment #4 from Jon Grant 2011-10-10 22:41:22 UTC --- Ok. That makes sense. I confirmed by modifying the test, and having "static int unused_int;" which gives a warning that it is unused at global scope.

[Bug c++/27692] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug c++/46980] ICE (Segmentation fault) building opencv on hppa

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46980 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10 21:40:53 UTC --- This is just a guess, but I suspect the problem is opencv is using precompiled headers. Note that pch is disabled for libstdcxx. I tried to fix the libstdcxx pch bug, but it was a

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 21:37:40 UTC --- Time to make serious progress on the rest ;)

[Bug c++/27692] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-10-10 21:18:32 UTC --- On 9-Oct-11, at 12:00 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > Not sure to understand which is the current status of this. Should > it be simply > *skipped* instead

[Bug fortran/50688] OpenMP: Strange interaction with BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50688 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic, openmp CC|

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10 20:51:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Do you mind if I take over the patch? No I don't mind at all.

[Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-10 20:48:40 UTC --- On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 > > --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10 > 19:58:32 UT

[Bug rtl-optimization/50663] conditional propagation missed in cprop.c pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50663 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #7 from Paul Koning 2011-10-10 20:41:35 UTC --- Re comment 5, does "works by luck" mean that I should not look in trunk for a fix to backport because nothing was actually fixed? Should I just avoid all versions of GCC newer than 4.4?

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 --- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 20:34:26 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Mon Oct 10 20:34:20 2011 New Revision: 179772 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179772 Log: PR c++/48665 * cp-demangle.c (d_cv_q

[Bug debug/50279] [4.7 Regression] ICE while building the go front-end with LTO enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279 --- Comment #9 from Peter Foley 2011-10-10 20:34:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > I've attached a reduced testcase that reproduces the ICE with the > > commandline > > g++ -nostdlib -flto -g test.i > > This tes

[Bug fortran/50692] option -finstrument-functions causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50692 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49675] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with -finstrument-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49675 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||longb at cray dot com --- Comment #7 from

[Bug fortran/50692] New: option -finstrument-functions causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50692 Bug #: 50692 Summary: option -finstrument-functions causes ICE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug middle-end/50691] Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10 20:16:23 UTC --- Created attachment 25459 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25459 Simplified testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 20:14:53 UTC --- Created attachment 25458 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25458 tentative patch Currently testing attached patch on x86_64. 2011-10-10 Tom de Vries

[Bug target/50683] GCC compiles MPFR 3.1.0 wrongly on sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10 20:15:24 UTC --- Most likely related to bug 50691.

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-10 20:11:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > > On powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0, c52103x, c52104x, and c52104y fail with a > > different error: > > > > raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow detecte

[Bug middle-end/50691] Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10 20:08:01 UTC --- Compile command: gcc -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_LOCALE_H=1 -DHAVE_WCHAR_H=1 -DHAVE_STDARG=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1 -DHAVE_S

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-10 20:04:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) No acats regressions on i686-darwin9 (at 179745). > On powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0, c52103x, c52104x, and c52104y fail with a > different error: > > raised STOR

[Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10 19:58:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ping? It would be nice to have this patch in 4.7 ... I cannot officially submit it until Cavium's assignment has been fully submitted.

[Bug middle-end/50691] Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10 19:34:31 UTC --- Created attachment 25457 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25457 Preprocessed source

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-10 19:34:06 UTC --- On powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0, c52103x, c52104x, and c52104y fail with a different error: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow detected

[Bug middle-end/50691] New: Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691 Bug #: 50691 Summary: Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50690] [4.7 Regression] ICE with front end optimization and OMP workshare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50689] AIX bootstrap failure from cgraphunit.c aliases change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50690] New: ICE with front end optimization and OMP workshare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690 Bug #: 50690 Summary: ICE with front end optimization and OMP workshare Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2011-10-10 19:07:38 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Oct 10 19:07:35 2011 New Revision: 179770 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179770 Log: 2011-10-10 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/5056

[Bug bootstrap/50689] AIX bootstrap failure from cgraphunit.c aliases change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-10 19:07:43 UTC --- Created attachment 25455 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25455 Assembler output of correctly compiled files

[Bug bootstrap/50689] AIX bootstrap failure from cgraphunit.c aliases change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-10 19:08:13 UTC --- Created attachment 25456 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25456 Assembler output of miscompiled file

[Bug libstdc++/49818] libsupc++ does not export __cxa_get_globals or related functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49818 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50689] New: AIX bootstrap failure from cgraphunit.c aliases change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689 Bug #: 50689 Summary: AIX bootstrap failure from cgraphunit.c aliases change Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/49818] libsupc++ does not export __cxa_get_globals or related functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49818 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-10-10 19:03:43 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Mon Oct 10 19:03:39 2011 New Revision: 179769 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179769 Log: 2011-10-10 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc++/49

[Bug c++/50685] Compiler segmentation fault on AIX when constructors and destructors are implemented in the implementation file (non-inline).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-10 19:00:22 UTC --- AIX 5.3 TL10 (as well as AIX 6.1 TL05 and AIX 7.1 TL00) instroduced AIX assembler changes with some bugs. An AIX iFix for AIX 5.3 is available (APAR IZ98385 for AIX 5.3 TL10, APAR IZ

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #9 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2011-10-10 18:57:09 UTC --- > implicit none > integer :: i > real :: A(5), B(5) > B(1) = 3.344 > A = [real :: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ] > !$omp parallel default(shared) > !$omp workshare > A(:) = A(:)*cos(B(

[Bug fortran/50688] New: OpenMP: Strange interaction with BLOCK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50688 Bug #: 50688 Summary: OpenMP: Strange interaction with BLOCK Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Seve

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug bootstrap/50674] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46980] ICE (Segmentation fault) building opencv on hppa

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46980 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-10-10 18:09:11 UTC --- Ugh, this uses pch. I can't compile the preprocessed source without this file: "/tmp/opencv-2.1.0/obj-hppa-linux-gnu/src/cvaux/_cvaux.h.gch/ cvaux_Release.gch" I'll tr

[Bug debug/50279] [4.7 Regression] ICE while building the go front-end with LTO enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2011-10-10 18:03:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I've attached a reduced testcase that reproduces the ICE with the commandline > g++ -nostdlib -flto -g test.i This test case doesn't trigger the ICE on x86_6

[Bug c++/33109] ICE: segfault while compiling c++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33109 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 17:04:46 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Oct 10 17:04:41 2011 New Revision: 179763 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179763 Log: PR bootstrap/50665 * optabs.h (DOI_v

[Bug bootstrap/50674] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-10-10 16:51:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Git bisect points to Rev179701: ... > Rename vshuffle/vec_shuffle to vec_perm. > > * doc/extend.texi (__builtin_shuffle): Improve the de

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/47256] "--sysroot" option is not passed to COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47256 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 16:31:45 UTC --- Patches go to gcc-patches...

[Bug middle-end/50195] [4.7 Regression] Linking time error with -fast-math -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-10 16:25:15 UTC --- > The folding is guarded with optimize_function_for_speed_p (), but that always > returns true for -O0 ... > > Honza, should the _for_speed_p () functions in predict.c be optimize && ..

[Bug lto/50687] New: Missing symbols with -flto -fvisibility=hidden on 4.6.x but not on 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50687 Bug #: 50687 Summary: Missing symbols with -flto -fvisibility=hidden on 4.6.x but not on 4.7.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONF

[Bug tree-optimization/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/50195] [4.7 Regression] Linking time error with -fast-math -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50389] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1730 with -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer and __builtin___memcpy_chk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50389 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50389] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1730 with -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer and __builtin___memcpy_chk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50389 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10 15:45:58 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 10 15:45:53 2011 New Revision: 179757 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179757 Log: 2011-10-10 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/50674] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/50682] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50667] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vshuf-* on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/50658] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in tree-flow-inline.h:562

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50658 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/50628] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/50622] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed for std::complex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/50618] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Virtual inheritance segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/50615] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in distribute_notes, at combine.c:13282 with -O --param max-cse-insns=1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50615 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50607] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/bconstp-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50614] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in component_ref_field_offset, at expr.c:6697 with -fcompare-debug and a non-static initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50614 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10 15:20:07 UTC --- Probably.

[Bug c++/50608] [4.6/4.7 Regression] cannot apply 'offsetof' to a non constant address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Priority|P3

[Bug lto/50601] [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/50579] [4.7 regression] gcc.target/mips/20020620-1.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50579 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50685] Compiler segmentation fault on AIX when constructors and destructors are implemented in the implementation file (non-inline).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   3   >