[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-10 06:58:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Agreed. Separate, though related. I think the error message is a bug indeed. A > way to fix it might be: That won't work for: type(t), intent(in) :: dt c

[Bug fortran/50273] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Walign-commons no longer effective

2011-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50273 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-10 06:54:23 UTC --- The following patch was committed with the wrong PR number: Author: burnus Date: Sun Oct 9 19:37:47 2011 New Revision: 179729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=

[Bug fortran/45044] Different named COMMON block size: No warning

2011-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45044 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-10 06:53:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > New Revision: 179729 > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179729 Wrong PR number. This patch was for PR 50273 ([4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

2011-10-09 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2011-10-10 05:55:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > It's mainly a matter of style, but this is the approach I prefer. Thanks, it looks nicer indeed :-) Would you care to commit (or submit) your patch? Or can I

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

2011-10-09 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-10-10 04:19:03 UTC --- Created attachment 25451 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25451 Possible patch It's mainly a matter of style, but this is the approach I prefer.

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

2011-10-09 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #8 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-10 01:31:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Option 2 seems more robust even if it seems less effective, what do you think? Another combine pass to reduce size less than 0.3% on one target would be n

[Bug bootstrap/50646] configure detects big endian on little endian system.

2011-10-09 Thread fzvqedi at v dot mintemail.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50646 --- Comment #6 from Roger Meyer 2011-10-09 23:34:47 UTC --- the host system is aboriginal linux 1.03 armv6l (little endian) using gcc 4.2.1 on qemu somehow configure seems to think that the used compiler is a crosscompiler, but i have no idea why

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

2011-10-09 Thread oleg.e...@t-online.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-09 23:34:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Yep, maintenance burden but I don't mean ack/nak for anything. > If it's enough fruitful, we should take that route. When it > gives 5% improvement in the usua

[Bug other/50647] gcc/system.h: wrong prototype for sbrk

2011-10-09 Thread fzvqedi at v dot mintemail.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50647 Roger Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 23:26:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > > > How about this? > > > > > > Looks as if should work (for comment 0). > > > > It does. I'll check for regressions. > > Unfortunately it fail

[Bug c/50683] GCC fails to build MPFR 3.1.0 on sparc

2011-10-09 Thread lfousse at debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 --- Comment #1 from Laurent Fousse 2011-10-09 23:26:43 UTC --- gcc fails to build MPFR 3.1.0 on sparc. You can get a full build log from: http://bugs.debian.org/644552 This new release of MPFR introduces TLS support. The build is successful whe

[Bug c++/38980] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missing -Wformat warning on const char format string

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38980 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at o

[Bug c/50683] New: GCC fails to build MPFR 3.1.0 on sparc

2011-10-09 Thread lfousse at debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 Bug #: 50683 Summary: GCC fails to build MPFR 3.1.0 on sparc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug c++/38980] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] missing -Wformat warning on const char format string

2011-10-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38980 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 23:20:43 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Oct 9 23:20:39 2011 New Revision: 179731 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179731 Log: /cp 2011-10-09 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug objc++/23616] obj-c++.dg/try-catch-[29].mm (objc exceptions are broken) fails with the GNU Runtime

2011-10-09 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23616 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added CC||js-gcc at webkeks dot org --- Comment #14 f

[Bug objc++/48394] ObjC exceptions cannot be caught in ObjC++

2011-10-09 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48394 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 23:08:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > How about this? > > > > Looks as if should work (for comment 0). > > It does. I'll check for regressions. Unfortun

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug c++/49896] undefined reference to static const integral member whose address is not used, for some values of the constant

2011-10-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-10-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug middle-end/34792] [avr] c++ worse than c compiler at 8-bit optimisations

2011-10-09 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34792 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-*-* |avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/34789] [avr] sometimes the compiler keeps addresses in registers unnecessarily

2011-10-09 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34789 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-*-* |avr Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/34791] [avr] optimisation of 8-bit logic sometimes fails

2011-10-09 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34791 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-*-* |avr Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 20:39:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > How about this? Looks as if should work (for comment 0). (I think the test case in comment 2 is a completely different issue, which needs a separate fix.)

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

2011-10-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/50677] volatile forces load into register

2011-10-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-09 19:48:39 UTC --- This is a dup of an older bug too though I cannot find it right now. Also it is related to bug 49807.

[Bug fortran/45044] Different named COMMON block size: No warning

2011-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45044 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 19:37:52 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Oct 9 19:37:47 2011 New Revision: 179729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179729 Log: 2011-10-09 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/45

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

2011-10-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-09 19:34:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I could understand this for libraries. However, when linking as an executable > binary, could the global really be still exported? Yes. In fact this is how

[Bug c++/33758] g++: Internal error

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33758 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/31147] increased size of debug information

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31147 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug fortran/50627] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2011-10-09 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug tree-optimization/50682] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer

2011-10-09 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682 Bug #: 50682 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/50681] [C++0x] A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code.

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50681] A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code.

2011-10-09 Thread Fetrovsky at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 Feto changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://ideone.com/kfs6n CC|

[Bug c++/50681] New: A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code.

2011-10-09 Thread Fetrovsky at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 Bug #: 50681 Summary: A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Sta

[Bug fortran/50627] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2011-10-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Sum

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

2011-10-09 Thread tkoenig at netcologne dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #7 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2011-10-09 18:10:37 UTC --- Am 09.10.2011 18:14, schrieb burnus at gcc dot gnu.org: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 > > --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 > 16:14:43

[Bug c++/38172] warn_unused_result does not work with structs not containing a copy constructor

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug rtl-optimization/50677] volatile forces load into register

2011-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50674] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

2011-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug lto/50679] Linux kernel LTO tracking bug

2011-10-09 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50679 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

2011-10-09 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #46 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-09 16:44:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #45) > Are these numbers misleading, or once again compiling for size does not give > the smallest size? Well, to begin with, I don't think the test is close to a

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

2011-10-09 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 --- Comment #2 from Jon Grant 2011-10-09 16:44:18 UTC --- I could understand this for libraries. However, when linking as an executable binary, could the global really be still exported?

[Bug c++/39043] C++ compiler doesn't optimize inlined function call for PIE

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39043 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug c++/39164] [C++0x] defaulted dtor redefinition not caught

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39164 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/50680] New: -ftree-vectorizer-verbose does not report about "basic block SLP" (attempt of) vectorization

2011-10-09 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50680 Bug #: 50680 Summary: -ftree-vectorizer-verbose does not report about "basic block SLP" (attempt of) vectorization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

2011-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 16:14:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > one has a problem as "tmp" is shared. Thus, one needs to make sure that all > inserted temporary variables are thread private (DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P). Actuall

[Bug preprocessor/46444] termination of preprocessing by cpp when no include file is found

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46444 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug c++/43913] error: ‘’ is not a valid template argument for type ‘int’ because it is a non-constant expression

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43913 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

2011-10-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #45 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-09 16:01:27 UTC --- > Thanks. One comment: I think you will increase the binary size by inlining the > reduction. Could you consider keeping the current libgfortran version and > protecting the sc

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

2011-10-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 16:00:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > So, the best method is to disable front-end optimization within > a forall loop. > > I assume the same holds for DO CONCURRENT. I think do concurrent is OK

[Bug c++/27692] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug c++/32614] -fmessage-length documentation and implementation disagree

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32614 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug c++/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de Summa

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

2011-10-09 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-10-09 15:31:43 UTC --- Created attachment 25449 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25449 reduced testcase Copy & paste didn't work. Here is an attachment.

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

2011-10-09 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug c++/48686] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2103 with -ftree-vectorize and -O2

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48686 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/49896] undefined reference to static const integral member whose address is not used, for some values of the constant

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/49976] Cross (Linux->AIX) GCC crashes with Segmentation fault

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org Severity

[Bug objc++/48394] ObjC exceptions cannot be caught in ObjC++

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48394 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug c++/43922] internal compiler error: in copy_body_r, at tree-inline.c:748 when compiling with -fopenmp

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43922 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug tree-optimization/50635] ICE on valid: segfault in vectorize_loops

2011-10-09 Thread irar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50635 --- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 15:09:04 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Oct 9 15:09:00 2011 New Revision: 179724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179724 Log: PR tree-optimization/50635

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-09 15:04:34 UTC --- I already felt free, I asked because without a manageable testcase it gonna take more time, be warned.

[Bug c++/46727] [4.4 Regression] ICE with -O3 and -ffast-math (in get_callee_fndecl, at tree.c:6857)

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46727 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|spamverdacht

[Bug c++/49525] [4.4] wrong code and wrong warning for bitfield related operations

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

2011-10-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #2 from dcb 2011-10-09 14:55:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you try to reduce the testcase somewhat, maybe helping yourself with > 'delta'? http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction I tried for an hour or so to

[Bug c++/49912] [4.7 Regression] ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/44650] internal compiler error: in ei_container, at basic-block.h:687

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44650 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/43566] Debug information removed on last bracket of function

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43566 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/42768] ICE: libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/vec.cc:354

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42768 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/50620] "undefined reference" errors / csmith lto testing

2011-10-09 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50620 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot

[Bug lto/50679] Linux kernel LTO tracking bug

2011-10-09 Thread ak at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50679 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c++/11814] Code with missing "template" keyword wrongly accepted

2011-10-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-09 14:01:26 UTC --- and 4.7.0

[Bug c++/10852] Old for-scoping rules improperly used?

2011-10-09 Thread bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10852 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

2011-10-09 Thread fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-09-03 21:39:27 |2011-10-09 21:39:27 Known

[Bug c++/10291] error referencing a static local from a local struct in template code

2011-10-09 Thread bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10291 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug lto/50679] New: Linux kernel LTO tracking bug

2011-10-09 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50679 Bug #: 50679 Summary: Linux kernel LTO tracking bug Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/11814] Code with missing "template" keyword wrongly accepted

2011-10-09 Thread bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/50675] master and single OpenMP constructs broken

2011-10-09 Thread markflorisson88 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 --- Comment #2 from markflorisson88 2011-10-09 13:46:27 UTC --- Indeed, you are right. My apologies, I should teach myself to use default(none).

[Bug c/50675] master and single OpenMP constructs broken

2011-10-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

2011-10-09 Thread bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/15272] lookup, dependent base

2011-10-09 Thread bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15272 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

2011-10-09 Thread bangerth at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/50674] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

2011-10-09 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/50620] "undefined reference" errors / csmith lto testing

2011-10-09 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50620 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug lto/50676] Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

2011-10-09 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-09 13:17:58 UTC --- > Have a look at PR50620. I can provide 30 different testcases > for this issue ;-). Those are different problems (i.e. not involving labels with address taken). I will look into that no

[Bug lto/50676] Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

2011-10-09 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug ada/50678] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-10-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Bug #: 50678 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug rtl-optimization/50677] New: volatile forces load into register

2011-10-09 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677 Bug #: 50677 Summary: volatile forces load into register Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/50676] New: Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

2011-10-09 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 Bug #: 50676 Summary: Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

[Bug tree-optimization/50622] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed for std::complex

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-09 12:42:38 UTC --- Thanks Vincenzo. Doesn't happen for __complex__ float, doesn't happen for < 4 components, thus seems related to the size of the struct.

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

2011-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/50675] New: master and single OpenMP constructs broken

2011-10-09 Thread markflorisson88 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 Bug #: 50675 Summary: master and single OpenMP constructs broken Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug libfortran/50673] very slow I/O with trailing spaces

2011-10-09 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673 --- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-10-09 12:04:55 UTC --- Actually, since eating the trailing spaces is the issue (seems to be implemented very generally in libfortran), the following is a practical workaround in this case: read(line(1:

[Bug bootstrap/50674] New: [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

2011-10-09 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Bug #: 50674 Summary: [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50667] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vshuf-* on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guen

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

2011-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug lto/50666] bad error reporting for TMPDIR full

2011-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50666 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >