[Bug target/47855] missed cbnz optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47855 --- Comment #4 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 06:41:49 UTC --- Author: jye2 Date: Thu Sep 22 06:41:44 2011 New Revision: 179077 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179077 Log: 2011-09-22 Joey Ye Backport r178852

[Bug c++/50478] New: Internal compiler error when using initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478 Bug #: 50478 Summary: Internal compiler error when using initializer lists Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug bootstrap/50461] mpfr.h found in mpfr-3.1.0/src instead of mpfr-3.0.1/. as previously

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461 --- Comment #1 from Denis Excoffier 2011-09-22 05:22:47 UTC --- Also with mpfr-3.1.0-rc2.

[Bug c++/50477] New: -Wunused-parameter should not warn about virtual method declarations with bodies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477 Bug #: 50477 Summary: -Wunused-parameter should not warn about virtual method declarations with bodies Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status

[Bug target/48974] VIS intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48974 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-09-22 01:25:13 UTC --- For an example of working around (2), see .

[Bug libstdc++/50348] -fvisibility=hidden doesn't hide stl implementation details.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-22 00:29:43 UTC --- Jason, could you please help me triaging this PR? Should the library do something else here? Thanks!

[Bug c/50476] New: Warn of pointer set to object whose lifetime is limited

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476 Bug #: 50476 Summary: Warn of pointer set to object whose lifetime is limited Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/50475] New: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at passes.c:1730

ble-bootstrap --enable-shared --disable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-gomp --enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.7.0 20110921 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-L/tmp/winsup/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup' '-L/tmp/win

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-09-21 23:56:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Thanks, Manu. Most of the PRs mentioned on that page are FIXED, and I don't PR 35441 is still broken. In any case, most of the fixes just gave up on

[Bug c/50380] cc1 hangs eating 100% CPU

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-21 23:30:32 UTC --- The test case got unbroken on trunk by r176563: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-07/msg00830.html

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 23:30:34 UTC --- Thanks, Manu. Most of the PRs mentioned on that page are FIXED, and I don't see specific mention of outputting the types involved in the operation, just better way of outputting the

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 21:03:37 UTC --- The common thing in my original example and comment 2 is that when printing "no match" for a binary operator, the diagnostic machinery tries to "reconstruct" the left operand, but pr

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 20:16:24 UTC --- Wow, that one is worthy of its own bug report, it's not just an unclear diagnostic, it's completely bogus. x[01] is *(x+1) or *((char*)x + 4) but what G++ prints is just wrong

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Yeleighton 2011-09-21 20:06:42 UTC --- == Code == struct X { int x; }; void trigger (X x []) { x [01] = 0; } == Result (v4.6) == doit.cpp:2:34: error: no match for ‘operator=’ in ‘*(x + 4u) = 0’ But who refere

[Bug c/50380] cc1 hangs eating 100% CPU

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #1

[Bug target/50464] Using -Ofast -march=bdver1 results in internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-21 17:37:06 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Sep 21 17:37:00 2011 New Revision: 179053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179053 Log: PR target/50464 * config/i386/sse.md

[Bug fortran/50410] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-21 16:57:08 UTC --- Seems my reduction patterns just give some extreme's index, but not necessarily the first or last extreme's index. It was just narrowing down the index vector together with the compa

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25331|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/50474] New: GCC (cc1plus) hangs forever compiling with -O2 (-fcse-follow-jumps)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50474 Bug #: 50474 Summary: GCC (cc1plus) hangs forever compiling with -O2 (-fcse-follow-jumps) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/10618] Error message for function declarations with invalid return type could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/10618] Error message for function declarations with invalid return type could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618 --- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-09-21 15:46:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > > The second diagnostic from G++ does not make sense. Clang gives the correct > > diagnostics in that case. > > Ah,

[Bug c++/10618] Error message for function declarations with invalid return type could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 15:38:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > > The second diagnostic from G++ does not make sense. Clang gives the correct > diagnostics in that case. Ah, that's because you're using 4.5.2 -- stop

[Bug middle-end/49705] -Wstrict-overflow should not diagnose unevaluated expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49705 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/10618] Error message for function declarations with invalid return type could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618 --- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-09-21 15:30:26 UTC --- > > > test.cc:12:1: error: need ‘typename’ before ‘A::k’ because ‘A’ is a > > dependent scope > > test.cc:14:6: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion > > b

[Bug c/13050] RFE: Support for implementation-specific format specifiers in format string warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13050 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-21 15:08:38 UTC --- > about the ~2000 unconfirmed bugs. 2622 last time (i.e. today) I looked at the number vs. 3670 new;-(

[Bug c/13050] RFE: Support for implementation-specific format specifiers in format string warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13050 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug driver/50470] gcc does not respect -nostdlib with regard to search paths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50470 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-21 15:03:18 UTC --- On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, bugdal at aerifal dot cx wrote: > The sysroot features may be nice but they're not a substitute for being able > to > eliminate the default libra

[Bug c++/50344] friend declaration confused by const qualifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/10618] Error message for function declarations with invalid return type could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 14:56:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > The second part (the non-template case) of the bug is already fixed in > > 3.5.0: > > pr10618.cc:15: error: `k' in class `B'

[Bug c/10143] -Wsequence-point missing warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10143 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/18610] bad error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18610 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 14:48:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > N.B. that's even better than clang, as it tells you *why* substitution > > failed: > > the specialization Q is incomplete >

[Bug c++/10618] Error message for function declarations with invalid return type could be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug c++/18724] missleading error message with undeclared template name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18724 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/18610] bad error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18610 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/35860] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [avr] code bloat caused by -fsplit-wide-types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35860 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Depends

[Bug target/50449] [avr] Loading some 32 constants not optimal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50449 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50433] [4.7 Regression] ACATS c460010 fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50433 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 Christopher Yeleighton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giecrilj at stegny dot

[Bug c++/18610] bad error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18610 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 13:11:47 UTC --- N.B. that's even better than clang, as it tells you *why* substitution failed: the specialization Q is incomplete

[Bug tree-optimization/50433] [4.7 Regression] ACATS c460010 fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50433 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-21 13:10:37 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Sep 21 13:10:31 2011 New Revision: 179046 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179046 Log: PR tree-optimization/50433 * ipa-inline-an

[Bug c++/18610] bad error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18610 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 13:09:55 UTC --- But I think it can be considered fixed for 4.7 by Nathan's excellent work in giving reasons why candidate functions are not viable: t.cc: In function 'int f()': t.cc:17:9: error: no

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 --- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-21 13:08:43 UTC --- > is altogether more hairy - we create at run-time C++ vtables packed with > trampolines so we can intercept / model native C++ objects and interact with > them via python etc. that wou

[Bug c++/50473] New: [C++0x] ICE in type_has_nontrivial_copy_init, at cp/tree.c:2574

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473 Bug #: 50473 Summary: [C++0x] ICE in type_has_nontrivial_copy_init, at cp/tree.c:2574 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/18610] bad error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18610 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/50350] [4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in canonicalize_float_value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 --- Comment #15 from Ira Rosen 2011-09-21 12:20:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Another thing is that this really ought to work even with -ftree-pre, having a > vectorization that requires users to disable PRE would be weird. I believe >

[Bug bootstrap/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor 2011-09-21 12:18:46 UTC --- The different alias set (4 instead of 10) is then just carried along in the RTL dumps not causing any different behavior until tree-ssa-ccp.c.192r.postreload where we get the following

[Bug tree-optimization/50374] Support vectorization of min/max location pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25320|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/50451] [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at tree-vect-loop.c:3557

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |irar at gcc dot gnu.org |gn

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.meeks at suse dot

[Bug libstdc++/49561] [C++0x] std::list::size complexity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49561 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/50471] Qualified lookup fails to find template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50471 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 10:22:48 UTC --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#448

[Bug c++/50471] Qualified lookup fails to find template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50471 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-21 10:19:21 UTC --- The name lookup is delayed until instantiation, however [temp.dep.candidate] says that the qualified lookup in g1 only finds declarations visible at the point of definition of g1: F

[Bug driver/50470] gcc does not respect -nostdlib with regard to search paths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50470 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50454] Unexpected problems with -pedantic / -pedantic-errors and __int128 and unsigned __int128 specializations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50454 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50454] Unexpected problems with -pedantic / -pedantic-errors and __int128 and unsigned __int128 specializations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50454 --- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-21 09:56:49 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 21 09:56:45 2011 New Revision: 179042 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179042 Log: /cp 2011-09-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/45099] [avr] Warning could be issued for use of register variables that will fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45099 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-21 09:40:17 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 21 09:40:13 2011 New Revision: 179040 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179040 Log: PR target/45099 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_fu

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-21 09:38:57 UTC --- > # silent miscompiles; LO/OOo adds -O2/1/0 where appropriate > filter-flags "-O* > > And because the effect of LTO is to fully optimize the important parts of > a pro

[Bug regression/50472] Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-21 08:29:07 UTC --- Duplicate of PR50078?

[Bug target/50465] [avr] Use insn attribute to depict if and how instruction lengths have to be adjusted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50465 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-21 08:22:10 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 21 08:21:57 2011 New Revision: 179037 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179037 Log: PR target/50449 PR target/50465 * conf

[Bug target/50449] [avr] Loading some 32 constants not optimal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50449 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-21 08:22:08 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 21 08:21:57 2011 New Revision: 179037 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179037 Log: PR target/50449 PR target/50465 * conf

[Bug regression/50472] New: Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472 Bug #: 50472 Summary: Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #31 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-21 07:34:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > (In reply to comment #28) > > Created attachment 24791 [details] > > working patch for gcc-4.7-20110709 > > > > gcc-4.7-20110709 bootstrapped fine wit

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 --- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-09-21 07:13:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > > I haven't found out exactly what libs are affected yet, because I've copied > > them in large chunks. > > Hmm, this is quite weird. I am not aware