http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10618
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-21 15:30:26 UTC --- > > > test.cc:12:1: error: need ‘typename’ before ‘A<T>::k’ because ‘A<T>’ is a > > dependent scope > > test.cc:14:6: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion > > before ‘func2’ > > > Clang gives the correct output: > > > > /tmp/webcompile/_10395_0.cc:12:1: error: missing 'typename' prior to > > dependent > > type name 'A<T>::k' > > A<T>::k func1(); > > ^~~~~~~ > > typename > > /tmp/webcompile/_10395_0.cc:14:4: error: no type named 'k' in 'B' > > B::k func2(); > > ~~~^ > > 2 errors generated. > > Huh? This is the same as G++'s output > The second diagnostic from G++ does not make sense. Clang gives the correct diagnostics in that case. > If you instantiate the function template G++ trunk gives a better diagnostic > than clang 3.0 Great! Let's say this is almost fixed then.
