[Bug fortran/50163] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE: initialization expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50163 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-30 06:50:28 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Aug 30 06:50:22 2011 New Revision: 178280 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178280 Log: 2011-08-30 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/50

[Bug c++/50233] Internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:336

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50233 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug c/50236] New: compiler throws internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50236 Bug #: 50236 Summary: compiler throws internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50235] New: Wrong code with volatile bitfields and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50235 Bug #: 50235 Summary: Wrong code with volatile bitfields and -Os Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/50224] [C++0x] bogus unused parameter warning (it is referenced in lambda)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50224 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50224] [C++0x] bogus unused parameter warning (it is referenced in lambda)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50224 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-30 04:40:29 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 30 04:40:22 2011 New Revision: 178278 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178278 Log: PR c++/50224 * semantics.c (finish_id_expre

[Bug c++/50209] [C++0x] Braced-init-lists are rejected as function default arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50209 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50234] New: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_component_reference, at cp/semantics.c:6527

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50234 Bug #: 50234 Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_component_reference, at cp/semantics.c:6527 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status

[Bug c++/50224] [C++0x] bogus unused parameter warning (it is referenced in lambda)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50224 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-30 04:31:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 30 04:30:58 2011 New Revision: 178277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178277 Log: PR c++/50224 * semantics.c (finish_id_expre

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-30 04:30:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 30 04:30:42 2011 New Revision: 178276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178276 Log: PR c++/50207 * class.c (finish_struct_1): C

[Bug c++/50209] [C++0x] Braced-init-lists are rejected as function default arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50209 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-30 04:30:38 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 30 04:30:27 2011 New Revision: 178275 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178275 Log: PR c++/50209 Core DR 994 * parser.c (cp

[Bug c++/50233] New: Internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:336

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50233 Bug #: 50233 Summary: Internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:336 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/50232] New: [4.7 Regression] reorg.c:3971: undefined reference to `make_return_insns'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50232 Bug #: 50232 Summary: [4.7 Regression] reorg.c:3971: undefined reference to `make_return_insns' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug target/50194] wrong tail call optimization for mixed arm/thumb mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50194 --- Comment #3 from Carrot 2011-08-30 01:16:34 UTC --- Yes, it's a problem of the linker in my testing environment. I've tried to manually link it with a different linker, it can run successfully. And the correct stub is generated 2472 a9c8

[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/2316] g++ fails to overload on language linkage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 --- Comment #20 from Marc Glisse 2011-08-30 00:20:07 UTC --- Created attachment 25134 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25134 remember linkage of a function type This is an extremely basic patch, that probably misses many things

[Bug fortran/50225] [OOP] The allocation status for polymorphic allocatable function results is not set properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50225 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50225] [OOP] The allocation status for polymorphic allocatable function results is not set properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50225 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 21:55:16 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Mon Aug 29 21:55:10 2011 New Revision: 178262 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178262 Log: 2011-08-29 Janus Weil PR fortran/5

[Bug fortran/50231] Fatal Error: Wrong module version '5' (expected '4') for file 'sizes.mod'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50231 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50231] Fatal Error: Wrong module version '5' (expected '4') for file 'sizes.mod'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50231 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/50231] Fatal Error: Wrong module version '5' (expected '4') for file 'sizes.mod'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50231 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/50231] Fatal Error: Wrong module version '5' (expected '4') for file 'sizes.mod'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50231 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/50231] New: Fatal Error: Wrong module version '5' (expected '4') for file 'sizes.mod'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50231 Bug #: 50231 Summary: Fatal Error: Wrong module version '5' (expected '4') for file 'sizes.mod' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 19:28:42 UTC --- Well, the obvious patch (based on Tobias' debugging) would be: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-types.c === --- gcc/

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 --- Comment #4 from Ruben Van Boxem 2011-08-29 18:30:29 UTC --- For those wondering how on Earth I am cross-compiling for Mac, see http://build1.openftd.org/fedora-cross-darwinx/ This is a cross toolchain for Fedora, which works quite well. The

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 18:29:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > > > (r171654?). > > > > Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's > > test case has none): > > Sorry to be such

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Van Boxem 2011-08-29 18:26:10 UTC --- Created attachment 25133 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25133 Compressed build log detailing failure Attached build log. ("make all-gcc" output)

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem 2011-08-29 18:23:12 UTC --- Created attachment 25132 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25132 gcc/config.log Attached gcc/config.log

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 Ruben Van Boxem changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25130|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/50229] New: [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 Bug #: 50229 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 S

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-29 18:17:50 UTC --- > > (r171654?). > > Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's > test case has none): Sorry to be such a nuisance, but it is: r171653 works, r1

[Bug rtl-optimization/50191] Strange debug insn produced for TOC compiling 416.gamess with profile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2011-08-29 18:05:17 UTC --- Hm, mysterious. That's the correct auto-host.h and the correct options. I will get on one of the farm machines and see if I can reproduce with a cross-compiler.

GCC 2.95.3 for PS2 Multiplication Issue

Hi,   I am seeing this issue when using the 2.95.3 compiler for EE processor.    When compiling the following code:    unsigned int a,b;     a = ((unsigned int)4294967295 * b);    the 2.95.3 compiler generates the following assembly:      8fc30014  lw $v1,20($s8)    0060102d  move $v

[Bug gcov-profile/50228] New: Incorrect line execution count.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50228 Bug #: 50228 Summary: Incorrect line execution count. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-29 17:39:01 UTC --- > Oops. Did I do this? Sorry, it was not intentional ... Apparently this happens while changing the summary(?).

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-29 17:34:02 UTC --- Why setting this pr as unconfirmed?

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE-on-valid with allocatable class variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code S

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with allocatable class component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/45170] [F2003] allocatable character lengths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170 --- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-29 16:34:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > > R421 length-selector is ( [ LEN = ] type-param-value ) [or ...] > > From F2003: > > C402 (R402) The type-param-value for a kind type parameter shall

[Bug fortran/50225] [OOP] The allocation status for polymorphic allocatable variables is not set properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50225 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with allocatable class component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 16:26:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (r171654?). Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's test case has none): http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revis

[Bug fortran/45170] [F2003] allocatable character lengths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170 --- Comment #27 from Steve Kargl 2011-08-29 16:22:16 UTC --- On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:47:41AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170 > > --- Comment #26 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-29 > 06:

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with allocatable class component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/50124] gfortran.dg/graphite/interchange-1.f XPASSes everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50124 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49972] Invalid .gcc_except_table with -freorder-blocks-and-partition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth 2011-08-29 16:15:02 UTC --- *** Bug 50127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/50227] [4.7 Regression] ICE on valid with allocatable class component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50227] ICE on valid with allocatable class component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Benson 2011-08-29 16:11:25 UTC --- Original report on gfortran mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-08/msg00233.html

[Bug fortran/50227] ICE on valid with allocatable class component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Benson 2011-08-29 16:08:59 UTC --- Created attachment 25129 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25129 Further reduced test case from Janus Weil This is a further reduced test case created by Janus Weil.

[Bug fortran/50227] New: ICE on valid with allocatable class component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227 Bug #: 50227 Summary: ICE on valid with allocatable class component Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/50226] New: Wrong code with -O -fno-implicit-templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50226 Bug #: 50226 Summary: Wrong code with -O -fno-implicit-templates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/50224] [c++0x]g++ complains unused parameter but it is referenced in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50224 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/50137] [4.7 Regression] ppc64/libstdc++-v3 is miscompiled on powerpc-apple-darwin9 since revision 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50137 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug target/49606] mips64: o64 Unrecognizable insn when one noreturn function calling another noreturn function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49606 --- Comment #4 from Martin Decky 2011-08-29 14:33:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > As well as making longs 64 bits wide, -mlong64 makes > pointers 64 bits wide. But you're still using a > 32-bit file format. If you want an LP64 ABI, > then

[Bug rtl-optimization/50191] Strange debug insn produced for TOC compiling 416.gamess with profile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29 14:26:57 UTC --- I still can't reproduce it (with the x86_64-linux -> powerpc64-linux cross compiler, even when using the auto-host.h provided here): ./gfortran --version -B ./; ./f951 -g -O3 -fprofile

[Bug libfortran/50192] Wrong character comparision with wide strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-29 14:12:01 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Aug 29 14:11:54 2011 New Revision: 178238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178238 Log: 2011-08-29 Thomas Koenig Backport from tr

[Bug fortran/50225] [OOP] The allocation status for polymorphic allocatable variables is not set properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50225 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug target/50176] [4.7 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char->int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #6 fro

[Bug fortran/50225] The allocation status for polymorphic allocatable variables is not set properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50225 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-29 13:49:48 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10 I don't need the option -fcheck=all to get the run-timr error. However the error goes away with any optimization above -O1 (at least all those I have tr

[Bug rtl-optimization/50191] Strange debug insn produced for TOC compiling 416.gamess with profile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2011-08-29 13:45:36 UTC --- Jakub, I don't see -fprofile-generate in your list of options. What Peter gave you was the link command that exposed the problem, but the error occurred when compiling chgpen.fpp

[Bug rtl-optimization/50212] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in ei_container, at basic-block.h:610 with -fnon-call-exceptions -freorder-blocks-and-partition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50212 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50225] New: The allocation status for polymorphic allocatable variables is not set properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50225 Bug #: 50225 Summary: The allocation status for polymorphic allocatable variables is not set properly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.3.2 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/50118] node-based containers cannot use allocators with explicit constructor template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50118 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50176] [4.7 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char->int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/50118] node-based containers cannot use allocators with explicit constructor template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50118 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 13:40:39 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Aug 29 13:40:33 2011 New Revision: 178230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178230 Log: 2011-08-29 Paolo Carlini PR libs

[Bug c++/50224] [c++0x]g++ complains unused parameter but it is referenced in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50224 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50224] [c++0x]g++ complains unused parameter but it is referenced in lambda

e 4.6 branch: gcc version 4.6.2 20110829 (prerelease) [gcc-4_6-branch revision 178215] (GCC) and there's no warning or error, so I don't know what the ArchLinux package is based on. It looks like the 20110819 snapshot with a misleading BASE-VER, but that shouldn't warn.

[Bug c++/50220] [C++0x] ICE when capturing a by-reference template function argument in a lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50220 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29 12:48:10 UTC --- Created attachment 25125 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25125 gcc47-pr50207.patch Untested patch which adds that limitation. still seems to work.

[Bug c++/49251] [C++0x][parameter pack expanding] unused parameter warning with unpacking empty tuples

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49251 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-29 12:39:36 UTC --- *** Bug 50224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/50224] [c++0x]g++ complains unused parameter but it is referenced in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50224 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48722] [4.7 Regression] ICE in df_refs_verify() with -mno-push-args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50224] New: [c++0x]g++ complains unused parameter but it is referenced in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50224 Bug #: 50224 Summary: [c++0x]g++ complains unused parameter but it is referenced in lambda Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/48722] [4.7 Regression] ICE in df_refs_verify() with -mno-push-args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29 11:52:26 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Aug 29 11:52:22 2011 New Revision: 178208 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178208 Log: PR middle-end/48722 * emit-rtl.c (unshare_a

[Bug target/50176] [4.7 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char->int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 --- Comment #5 from Igor Zamyatin 2011-08-29 11:48:12 UTC --- Yes, looks like this revision is the reason

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug debug/50203] ICE: in output_loc_list, at dwarf2out.c:8188 with --param max-vartrack-expr-depth=140

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29 11:05:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > But what would be a good limit for the parameter? On some targets some people > have managed to trigger it even with the parameter 20 which has been the

[Bug debug/50203] ICE: in output_loc_list, at dwarf2out.c:8188 with --param max-vartrack-expr-depth=140

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29 10:48:39 UTC --- But what would be a good limit for the parameter? On some targets some people have managed to trigger it even with the parameter 20 which has been the default for a while, but on othe

[Bug tree-optimization/50208] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:598 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29 10:44:42 UTC --- The problem is that def_stmt is a gimple stmt from before the loop and new_loop_vec_info only initializes gimple_uid of stmts in the loop being processed. So perhaps before testing for

[Bug debug/50203] ICE: in output_loc_list, at dwarf2out.c:8188 with --param max-vartrack-expr-depth=140

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29 10:12:00 UTC --- Shouldn't we limit the max of the param then?

[Bug tree-optimization/50208] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:598 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29 10:05:34 UTC --- Oops, sorry, that was for PR50208.

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/50203] ICE: in output_loc_list, at dwarf2out.c:8188 with --param max-vartrack-expr-depth=140

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libfortran/50192] Wrong character comparision with wide strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-29 09:05:18 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Aug 29 09:05:11 2011 New Revision: 178173 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178173 Log: 2011-08-29 Thomas Koenig PR libfortran/50

[Bug debug/50215] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr45882.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at redhat dot com,

[Bug debug/50215] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr45882.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50215 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29 08:55:07 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Aug 29 08:55:02 2011 New Revision: 178167 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178167 Log: PR debug/50215 * var-tracking.c (create_ent

[Bug tree-optimization/50222] ICE with -O{1,2} -funswitch-loops -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50222 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29 08:39:42 UTC --- Reduced testcase (only ICEs 4.6.1 and trunk): typedef struct AVProgram { void *priv_data; unsigned int nb_streams; } AVFormatContext; typedef struct { unsigned short fl

[Bug tree-optimization/50222] ICE with -O{1,2} -funswitch-loops -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50222 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|U

[Bug target/50116] [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2632

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50116 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50116] [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:2632

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50116 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29 08:03:45 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Aug 29 08:03:34 2011 New Revision: 178155 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178155 Log: 2011-08-29 Richard Guenther PR mid

[Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29 07:57:29 UTC --- On a 2nd thought the work should be still linear, even for N PHI args the way the merging is constructed (one arg has to dominate the other - the only exception is the diamond case

[Bug target/50164] [IRA, 4.7 Regression] Performance degradation due to increased memory instructions count

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50164 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/50221] Allocatable string length fails with array assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29 07:29:57 UTC --- The loop over PHI args is a little hard to follow, but yeah, that's how it should work. Eventually we can put this in with a new --param telling the maximum number of PHI args to c

[Bug c/50219] Combine pass generated wrong code for unsigned char comparison on MIPS target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50219 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >