http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227

--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 16:26:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (r171654?).

Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's
test case has none):

http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=171654

Reply via email to