http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50227
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-29 16:26:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (r171654?). Rather not. This one only concerns type-bound procedures (of which Andrew's test case has none): http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=171654