[Bug other/49665] 'defined in discarded section' link failures on cpu2006 benchmarks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49665 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/49666] New: passing nested function to inline function causes a trampoline call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49666 Summary: passing nested function to inline function causes a trampoline call Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49353] C++ frontend should not declare function EXTERN when it forces them to stay

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49353 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-07 02:58:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jul 7 02:58:33 2011 New Revision: 175954 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175954 Log: PR c++/49353 * semantics.c (expand_or_defer

[Bug fortran/48351] [OOP] Realloc on assignment fails if parent component is CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48351 Rich Townsend changed: What|Removed |Added CC||townsend at astro dot |

[Bug other/49665] New: 'defined in discarded section' link failures on cpu2006 benchmarks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49665 Summary: 'defined in discarded section' link failures on cpu2006 benchmarks Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/49664] New: liblto_plugin.so exports too many symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49664 Summary: liblto_plugin.so exports too many symbols Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...

[Bug c++/49663] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49663 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49568] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr41257-2.C FAILs to link on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/49568] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr41257-2.C FAILs to link on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-06 21:22:21 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jul 6 21:22:16 2011 New Revision: 175938 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175938 Log: PR c++/49568 * method.c (make_thunk, use_t

[Bug target/38342] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] __attribute__((__progmem__)) not propagated from typedef to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38342 --- Comment #12 from Bill Westfield 2011-07-06 21:18:26 UTC --- Ah. So this is the same compiler behavior that results in C++ overloading not being able to tell the difference between a RAM pointer and a progmem pointer; the attribute ends up on

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-06 20:30:13 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jul 6 20:30:06 2011 New Revision: 175933 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175933 Log: Use pointer_mode for address computation.

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-06 19:37:00 UTC --- why not just add this to make the code valid by emitting an extern definition? extern long trouble(long, long);

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #5 from Gary Funck 2011-07-06 19:21:26 UTC --- Would the following make sense as an enhancement, and still be standards conforming? RFE: If compiling in C99 mode at -O0 (optimization disabled), compile functions declared as "inline"

[Bug testsuite/48727] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/devirt2.C scan-assembler-times xyzzy 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-06 19:15:49 UTC --- > This also fails on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC with Sun as, which has: > > sethi %hi(_ZN1S5xyzzyEv), %g1 > jmp %g1 + %lo(_ZN1S5xyzzyEv) > sethi %hi(_ZN1S5xy

[Bug c++/49663] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49663 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-06 19:11:06 UTC --- Changing the initializer to: tonc() : onc((onc::Cb)&grac::once) {} makes Comeau happy, but still gives an ICE with 4.7 and -std=c++0x

[Bug c++/49663] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49663 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code | --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2

[Bug fortran/49479] [4.6/4.7 Regression] reshape / optionals / zero sized arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49479] [4.6/4.7 Regression] reshape / optionals / zero sized arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2011-07-06 18:50:50 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Jul 6 18:50:46 2011 New Revision: 175929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175929 Log: 2011-07-06 Thomas Koenig Partial backport

[Bug c++/49663] New: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49663 Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in lookup_base Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug other/49658] Typo in gcc/doc/extend.texi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49658 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/49658] Typo in gcc/doc/extend.texi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49658 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-06 18:40:39 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jul 6 18:40:36 2011 New Revision: 175928 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175928 Log: 2011-07-06 Jonathan Wakely PR other/49658

[Bug middle-end/49662] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-XX.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49662 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-XX.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #4 from Gary Funck 2011-07-06 17:29:32 UTC --- Thanks Andrew and Johannes for the follow-up. The difference in between optimized and non-optimized compilations was surprising to me, but I now understand that this is the result of the

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin 2011-07-06 17:28:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > + else if (mp_flag && sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE && > > sym->attr.function) > > +gfc_resolve_array_spec (sym->result

[Bug testsuite/48727] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/devirt2.C scan-assembler-times xyzzy 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, |

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-06 16:53:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > + else if (mp_flag && sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE && sym->attr.function) > +gfc_resolve_array_spec (sym->result->as, false); I think one could add

[Bug other/49661] New: et-forest.h uses extern "C"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49661 Summary: et-forest.h uses extern "C" Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-06 15:24:51 UTC --- > --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06 > 15:16:47 UTC --- > I think the proper handling of this is part of the --with-cpu-(32|64) > framework. No idea,

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06 15:16:47 UTC --- I think the proper handling of this is part of the --with-cpu-(32|64) framework.

[Bug tree-optimization/49645] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49645 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-06 15:01:11 UTC --- > --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06 > 14:52:04 UTC --- > I think you want to implement --with-cpu-(32|64) like x86 and powerpc. This might be a possi

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2011-07-06 15:00:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Here is a "fix". It breaks class_20.f03 and extends_4.f03 at least. There is another attempt below. (In reply to comment #6) > Alternatively, one should some

[Bug target/49660] 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-06 14:52:04 UTC --- I think you want to implement --with-cpu-(32|64) like x86 and powerpc.

[Bug target/49660] New: 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49660 Summary: 64-bit gcc doesn't enable -mv8plus with -m32 on Solaris/SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug target/46622] ARM --target-help headings not translated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46622 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-06 14:06:59 UTC --- > --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-06 > 08:52:17 UTC --- > Rainer, any idea to solve this? One comment up front: It's best to directly Cc: me in PRs, ot

[Bug tree-optimization/49645] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49645 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-06 14:05:57 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jul 6 14:05:54 2011 New Revision: 175916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175916 Log: 2011-07-06 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383 --- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-06 13:19:08 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jul 6 13:19:04 2011 New Revision: 175912 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175912 Log: Use pointer_mode for address computation.

[Bug target/49335] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ARM: Invalid assembler generated while compiling C++ code from 'codeblocks'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49335 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49335] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ARM: Invalid assembler generated while compiling C++ code from 'codeblocks'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49335 --- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-07-06 12:38:29 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Wed Jul 6 12:38:26 2011 New Revision: 175911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175911 Log: 2011-07-06 Ramana Radhakrishnan B

[Bug fortran/49659] If-and-condition not obeyed using the g77-compiler (Windows 7, 64-bit).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49659 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-07-06 12:01:59 UTC --- > Strangely ifort outputs the same result, so it must be correct ... Indeed! The standard says 7.1.3 Precedence of operators 1 There is a precedence among the intrinsic and e

[Bug tree-optimization/49647] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c XPASSes everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49647 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #22 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-07-06 11:57:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, kirill.yukhin at intel dot com wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 > > > > --- Comment #19 from Yukhin Kir

[Bug tree-optimization/49647] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c XPASSes everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49647 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-06 11:56:49 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Wed Jul 6 11:56:46 2011 New Revision: 175910 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175910 Log: PR tree-optimization/49647 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/200

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-07-06 11:53:56 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, kirill.yukhin at intel dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 > > --- Comment #19 from Yukhin Kirill > 2011-07-06 11:49:

[Bug tree-optimization/49647] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c XPASSes everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49647 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #20 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-07-06 11:50:51 UTC --- With patch attached both tescase and 447.dealII passing

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #19 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-07-06 11:49:34 UTC --- Created attachment 24701 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24701 Patch to make tailcall check more conservative Attached patch adds another check for clobbered stac

[Bug bootstrap/39150] Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39150 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug target/46481] long double should default to 64bit even for aix6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46481 --- Comment #2 from Michael Haubenwallner 2011-07-06 11:26:37 UTC --- Seems this is fixed since gcc-4.6.0 by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=169981.

[Bug fortran/49659] If-and-condition not obeyed using the g77-compiler (Windows 7, 64-bit).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49659 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49659] If-and-condition not obeyed using the g77-compiler (Windows 7, 64-bit).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49659 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-06 10:49:24 UTC --- Hm, the argument setup for the tailcall clobbers the incoming stack argument. And without TER we do not overlap argument setup with the loads from the incoming stack argument.

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-06 10:37:57 UTC --- I suspect that the tailcalling code does not expect TER to happen when expanding the call arguments? With -fno-tree-ter the issue also isn't appearant.

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #16 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-07-06 10:35:03 UTC --- Yes. This is because expander prepares arguments like this: ... (insn 6 5 7 2 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 64) (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 53 virtual-incoming-args)

[Bug middle-end/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|i686

[Bug other/49658] Typo in gcc/doc/extend.texi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49658 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONF

[Bug c++/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #14 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-07-06 10:25:01 UTC --- Created attachment 24700 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24700 Reduced testcase

[Bug other/49658] Typo in gcc/doc/extend.texi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49658 --- Comment #1 from Jaak Ristioja 2011-07-06 10:26:24 UTC --- Heh sry. I also made a typo. The text SHOULD contain "are" instead of "are is". PS: The bugzilla might need a "Documentation" component for gcc.

[Bug fortran/49659] New: If-and-condition not obeyed using the g77-compiler (Windows 7, 64-bit).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49659 Summary: If-and-condition not obeyed using the g77-compiler (Windows 7, 64-bit). Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/49658] New: Typo in gcc/doc/extend.texi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49658 Summary: Typo in gcc/doc/extend.texi Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug testsuite/49542] [4.7 regression] 2 failures in the vectorization testsuite in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49542 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #13 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-07-06 08:47:20 UTC --- I agree, that there is no problem with GIMPLE. As I mentioned we may just forbid tailcall opt for non-MEMREFS, but I suspect it will lead to significant perf. degradation. BTW, I am

[Bug testsuite/49542] [4.7 regression] 2 failures in the vectorization testsuite in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49542 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-06 08:46:45 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jul 6 08:46:41 2011 New Revision: 175905 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175905 Log: PR testsuite/49542 * gcc.dg/vect/pr3380

[Bug c++/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot

[Bug testsuite/49542] [4.7 regression] 2 failures in the vectorization testsuite in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49542 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49641] [4.6 Regression] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/49656] internal compiler error on Mac OS 10.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49656 --- Comment #2 from andreas at galauner dot de 2011-07-06 08:30:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Also passes.c from 4.6.1 does only have 2052 lines, so your version > information > cannot be correct. Oh, I'm sorry. You are totally right. I a

[Bug tree-optimization/49645] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49645 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49647] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c XPASSes everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49647 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49649] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49649 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/49652] SIGFPE in vector_alignment_reachable_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49652 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49628] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49655] diagnostic pragma accepts non-warning options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49655 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/49654] Linear search through options in handle_pragma_diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49654 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49656] internal compiler error on Mac OS 10.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49656 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-06 08:08:57 UTC --- Works for me on native x86_64. Also passes.c from 4.6.1 does only have 2052 lines, so your version information cannot be correct.

[Bug tree-optimization/49657] array subscript warnings when building gcc with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49657 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-06 08:05:26 UTC --- The expmed.c code is broken, not sure about the crtstuff one.