http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-06
08:38:56 UTC ---
If it happens that the MEM_REF case (supposedly with the adjusted base pointer)
does not work while the non-MEM_REF case works then this looks like a
latent problem in the tailcall code to me. I see nothing wrong with the
GIMPLE itself. Eventually we can adjust code-gen for the MEM_REF case to
match that of the pure component-ref one, but that would again just paper
over the issue.
