http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:48:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Is it intentional that the change hasn't been committed to 4.6, just 4.5 and
> 4.7?
Yes. In 4.5 it fixes an ICE; in 4.6 and 4.7 it is a minor correctness
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #37 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-20 06:43:37 UTC ---
The same issue exists with the first comparison (decision between FMT_E and
FMT_F).
Consider:
print "(g35.25)", 0.095d0 ! > 0.95..11..E-01
print "(g35.25)", 0.095_10
print "(RC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:30:45 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 06:30:41 2011
New Revision: 172754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172754
Log:
PR c++/46304
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:31:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 06:31:51 2011
New Revision: 172756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172756
Log:
PR c++/46304
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:31:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 06:31:07 2011
New Revision: 172755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172755
Log:
PR c++/46304
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48657
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #10 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-20
06:03:41 UTC ---
Hi, Kojima-san.
Oh, I completely forgot about it.
Thanks,
Nobuhiro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #1 from Linus Torvalds 2011-04-20
04:28:18 UTC ---
Side note, this is talked about in the Intel optimization manual
3.6.4 Store Forwarding
Under "General Optimization Guidelines" -> "Optimizing Memory Accesses" ->
"Store Forwardin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Summary: Horrible bitfield code generation on x86
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #36 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-20
04:18:31 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Apr 20 04:18:25 2011
New Revision: 172753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172753
Log:
2011-04-19 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
00:06:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 00:06:19 2011
New Revision: 172745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172745
Log:
PR c++/45267
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
00:06:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 00:06:19 2011
New Revision: 172745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172745
Log:
PR c++/45267
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #8 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:53:18 UTC ---
Hi, Kojima-san.
Thank you for commiting this.
Could you commit this to other branch?
I prepared a patch for each branch.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #6 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:52:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 24053
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24053
backport patch for 4.4 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #7 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:53:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 24054
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24054
backport patch for 4.3 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #5 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:52:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 24052
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24052
backport patch for 4.5 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #4 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:52:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24051
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24051
backport patch for 4.6 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-19
23:50:12 UTC ---
Dodji, is there any reason not to apply this fix to 4.5 as well?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-19 23:06:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 24050
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24050
reduced testcase
I am not sure if it is reduced correctly. However, -fno-strict-aliasing
prevents the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #4 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
22:28:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That also nicely works - the symbol only pops up suddenly when calling
> gfc_dump_module, which seems to be a bug in gfc_dump_module.
More precisely, it occ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-19 22:15:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 24049
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24049
partially reduced testcase
$ g++ testcase.C -O2
$ valgrind -q ./a.out
==20686== Invalid write of siz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-04-19
21:58:44 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue Apr 19 21:58:41 2011
New Revision: 172738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172738
Log:
PR testsuite/48676
* gcc.dg/torture/pr3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
--- Comment #2 from John Regehr 2011-04-19 21:52:22
UTC ---
Same testcase dies after consuming about 14 GB virtual memory on a machine with
8 GB of RAM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Summary: Runtime with an array of std::vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
--- Comment #1 from John Regehr 2011-04-19 21:16:39
UTC ---
Sorry forgot to add this.
[regehr@gamow tmp011]$ current-gcc -O1 -fwhole-program small.c -w
current-gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1)
Please submit a full bug report,
w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
Summary: possible memory hog bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48693
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48693
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/module_write_1.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE with
gfortran.dg/module_write_1.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #35 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-19
20:02:38 UTC ---
That does the trick. I will regression test and commit tonight
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #6 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-19 19:38:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 24046
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24046
4.3.5 build log
ya know: yadda-yadda make blah blah|tee
It has been lzma'ed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #5 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-19 19:24:08 UTC ---
kevdig@Satellite2775XDVD:~/projects/GCC/OBJ/gcc-4.3.5-m68k/m68k-netbsdelf1.6.1/libgcc$
gdb --args ../..//gcc/cc1 ../../../../fixunsxfdi.c -m68020 -auxbase-strip
_fixunsxf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #4 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-19 18:59:20 UTC ---
If I understand correctly (disclosure - I might as well be trying to read
Klingon), both of these failures involve 64-bit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #3 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-19 18:57:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 24045
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24045
partial -dr RTL dump
This is what -dr produce before it died.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #2 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-19 18:54:30 UTC ---
The result of -dr for fixunsxfdi() for 4.2.4 is 648 lines. Only 80 are produced
by 4.3.5. It appears to die on the left shift.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48467
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[LTO/driver] Anomalous |[LTO] Anomalous behavior of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48691
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48691
Summary: Assembler file clobbered with -save-temps (LTO)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #1 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-19 18:49:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 24044
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24044
standalone version of popcountdi2() from libgcc2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
Summary: gcc-4.3.5 fails for target m68k
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48688
--- Comment #1 from Piotr Wyderski 2011-04-19
18:00:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> If k is small (on x86/x64 k = 1, 2, 4, 8)
Of course it should be k = 0, 1, 2, 3, the values above are 1 << k.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48689
Summary: ICE in fold-const.c:13798
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48688
Summary: [x64]: shift/or instead of lea
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7] |[4.3/4.4/4.5] Rejects valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48678
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48678
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-19
16:49:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 19 16:49:19 2011
New Revision: 172723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172723
Log:
PR target/48678
* config/i386/i386.md (movs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48678
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-19
16:47:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 19 16:47:06 2011
New Revision: 172721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172721
Log:
PR target/48678
* config/i386/i386.md (movs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46752
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-19
16:44:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 19 16:43:51 2011
New Revision: 172720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172720
Log:
PR fortran/46752
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
16:32:41 UTC ---
Note: The commit from comment 9 fixes only the issue for non-TARGET LHS.
If the LHS has the TARGET attribute (and only* then) a version with an
additional temporary has to be used to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
16:26:21 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Apr 19 16:26:13 2011
New Revision: 172718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172718
Log:
2011-04-19 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
--- Comment #16 from Sebastian Pop 2011-04-19
16:24:44 UTC ---
The patch produces these fails on the 4.5 branch:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ltrans-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ltrans "converted loop
nest to perfect loop nest" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ltra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #34 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
16:22:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> We could put that behind some compiler directives looking for -m32 or similar.
Try:
temp = calculate_exp(mid - 1)* (1 - r * rexp_d);
asm volat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #33 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-19
15:28:56 UTC ---
In response to Comment #30:
One solution seems to be to take away "static inline" for the function:
double calculate_exp(int d)
{
int i;
double r = 1.0;
for (i = 0; i< (d >= 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48687
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44774
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48687
Summary: for errors from -pedantic, -Werror reports
"[-Werror=edantic]"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||3.4.6
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-19 15:08:36
UTC ---
Indeed 3.4 works even with checking enabled:
$ /mnt/sda1/gcc-3_4/binary-172709/bin/g++ pr40975.C -c
$ g++ -v
Reading specs from
/mnt/sda1/gcc-3_4/binary-172709/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-19 14:59:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Isn't this related to PR 48682 ?
Just a coincidence. BTW PR 48682 can be closed as invalid.
BTW: Above should read: The conversion in this case is F(w-n).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48682
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thenlich at users dot
) ? ((void)(0)) : ((pixel) = 0)));
return 0;
}
$ gcc-snapshot-20110419/build/gcc/xgcc -Bgcc-snapshot-20110419/build/gcc/ foo.c
foo.c: In function 'main':
foo.c:3:10: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7034
Please submit a full bug report,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-19
14:46:39 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 19 14:46:37 2011
New Revision: 172712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172712
Log:
PR lto/48148
* gimple.c (gimple_types_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48366
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin 2011-04-19
14:21:24 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Tue Apr 19 14:21:18 2011
New Revision: 172710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172710
Log:
* config/pa/pa.h (REGISTER_MOVE_COST): I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
Summary: Incorrect field alignment with Gw.dEe descriptor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47923
--- Comment #8 from Mirko 2011-04-19
14:02:18 UTC ---
Hello,
I have tried to compile the new version GCC 4.6.0
But the compilation stops anyway:
checking whether sbrk is declared... (cached) yes
checking whether strverscmp is declared... (cached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48419
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-19
13:26:15 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Apr 19 13:26:08 2011
New Revision: 172709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172709
Log:
2011-04-19 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48683
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48207
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48683
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48207
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-19
13:05:01 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 19 13:04:57 2011
New Revision: 172708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172708
Log:
2011-04-19 Richard Guenther
PR lto/482
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48683
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 252.eon in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48678
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
11:46:58 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-04/msg00206.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression] Recent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-19
10:54:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 19 10:54:47 2011
New Revision: 172706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172706
Log:
2011-04-19 Bernd Schmidt
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin 2011-04-19
10:27:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The following seems to mostly work. I think some double resolving could happen
> - thus, one might need to tweak resolve_all_program_units.
Either this or we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48678
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2011-04-19 09:59:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Might be a good idea, though IMHO just for 4.7, not for 4.6.
> Would you be ok with this patch (plus testcase obviously) for 4.6? If yes, is
> it ok temporari
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
