http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22678|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
07:02:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Yes, a duplicate. A fortran frontend bug?
Maybe - however, in order that we could investigate, it would help if you could
narrow down the failing commit - w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46845
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45754
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jvdelisle at gcc dot
|g
Szia!
Esetleg szeretnél eladni, venni, elcserélni egy, vagy akár több telefont?
Nem szeretnéd a telefonboltokba jóval áron alul eladni a telefonodat?
Akkor regisztrálj az alábbi honlapon teljesen INGYENESEN!
Minden hónapban tárgynyeremény, a regisztráltak között!
Az oldal linkje: http://elado-mobi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46845
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-08
03:39:46 UTC ---
This same ICE also appears in...
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr21101.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr21101.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-mmx.c (in
: ../gcc-4.6-20101207/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-ppl=/sw --with-cloog=/sw --with-mpc=/sw
--with-system-zlib --x-includes=/usr/X11R6
on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20101207/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43300.c
-Os -w -Wno-psabi -S -m32 -o pr43300.s(timeout = 300)
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-08
02:23:45 UTC ---
This issue doesn't seem to be present at r167573 with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00629.html and
Index: opts.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-08
02:15:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Patch here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00629.html
The proposed patch applied to r167573 as well as...
Index: opts.c
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46840
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46840
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-08
02:09:02 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Dec 8 02:08:59 2010
New Revision: 167582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167582
Log:
PR other/46840
Link libgo against -lm.
lib
--with-host-libstdcxx=/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101207 (experimental) [trunk revision 167551] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46626
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-08
02:07:31 UTC ---
Most of the 30_threads tests will abort without -pthread
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin 2010-12-08
01:26:48 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Dec 8 01:26:44 2010
New Revision: 167581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167581
Log:
PR middle-end/46671
PR target/46685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin 2010-12-08
01:26:47 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Dec 8 01:26:44 2010
New Revision: 167581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167581
Log:
PR middle-end/46671
PR target/46685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506
--- Comment #9 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-08
00:54:08 UTC ---
This is not a optimization bug because it fails with -O0.
I am seeking a working src_alt. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506
Changpeng Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||changpeng.fang at amd dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
Changpeng Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46626
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-08 00:43:03
UTC ---
This seems to cause FAILs in libstdc++ testsuite with -O0, for example:
$ g++ 42819.ii -std=gnu++0x
$ ./a.out
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
what()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46837
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #65 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-08
00:32:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 22679
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22679
gcc46-pr41082.patch
Found that now too. Anyway, I believe (if there is no performance issue) I can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-08
00:21:22 UTC ---
Could it be a duplicate of PR46506?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #64 from Andrew Pinski 2010-12-08
00:15:44 UTC ---
> IMHO we should just get rid of UNSPEC_STVE stuff and store the whole vector,
No you cannot because there are builtins which create the UNSPEC_STVE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #63 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-08
00:12:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 22678
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22678
gcc46-pr41082.patch
Totally untested proof of concept patch.
The disadvantage is that as the MEM mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46829
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-07 23:54:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If you compile with dispatch scheduling enabled (together with -march=bdver1),
> both test cases attached PASS.
>
> gcc -O2 -fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure -mdi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40269
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #62 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #2 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-07
23:12:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It does not seem to affect all SPEC testers as Rev. 167317 is already quite
> some old (= 2010-11-30) and I do not have seen any other report. (Cf. for
> in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46843
Summary: ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2157
-fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure when using doubles
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #20 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07
23:09:22 UTC ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00629.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45370
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46829
--- Comment #7 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-07
22:42:26 UTC ---
If you compile with dispatch scheduling enabled (together with -march=bdver1),
both test cases attached PASS.
gcc -O2 -fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure -mdispatch-scheduler -march=bd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2010-12-07
22:10:39 UTC ---
Excellent. If you can confirm that the improvement holds true also for a
smaller number of elements let's close this as fixed for 4.6.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #61 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
22:07:59 UTC ---
I've managed to massage both -O3 -m64 -mtune={rs64,power4} darwin assembly into
ppc64-linux assembly.
Before DSE2 we have:
(insn 460 483 925 33 (set (reg:CC 75 cr7)
(compare:C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659
--- Comment #6 from Pawel Sikora 2010-12-07 22:05:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> With current mainline 20 elements finishes in 0.1s on my x86_64 system,
> which is only 5 times slower than non-debug mode.
>
> That's compared with 5m36
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
Summary: 465.tonto test run miscompares (even with -O0)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-07
21:40:38 UTC ---
With current mainline 20 elements finishes in 0.1s on my x86_64 system,
which is only 5 times slower than non-debug mode.
That's compared with 5m36s with 4.5's debug mode.
I th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
21:04:36 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Dec 7 21:04:33 2010
New Revision: 167572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167572
Log:
PR bootstrap/46810
* configure.ac: D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46595
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46809
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-07
20:29:25 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Dec 7 20:29:22 2010
New Revision: 167569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167569
Log:
2010-12-07 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #19 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07
19:45:19 UTC ---
With this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/sese.c b/gcc/sese.c
index 65f8556..140b16f 100644
--- a/gcc/sese.c
+++ b/gcc/sese.c
@@ -547,8 +547,8 @@ rename_uses (gimple copy, htab_t rename_map,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46841
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46833
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
19:28:49 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Dec 7 19:28:44 2010
New Revision: 167563
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167563
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46805
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46833
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
19:28:48 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Dec 7 19:28:44 2010
New Revision: 167563
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167563
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46805
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46837
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-07
19:08:09 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00604.html for a possible
explanation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46753
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
19:01:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 19:01:36 2010
New Revision: 167561
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167561
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-02 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46819
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
18:59:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 18:59:03 2010
New Revision: 167560
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167560
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-02 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
18:58:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 18:58:18 2010
New Revision: 167559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167559
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-20 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46534
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
18:57:00 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 18:56:56 2010
New Revision: 167558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167558
Log:
PR middle-end/46534
* builtins.c (expand_bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46841
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-07
18:46:31 UTC ---
Confirmed on trunk and 4.5.0. If I replace
procedure (dum_vfunc), pointer, nopass :: p => null()
with
procedure (dum_vfunc), pointer, nopass :: p
the ICE goes away.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46841
--- Comment #1 from Martien Hulsen 2010-12-07
18:28:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 22676
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22676
source file of module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46841
Summary: ICE on allocate array of procedure pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42694
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner 2010-12-07
17:42:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 22675
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22675
Add check for sqrt optab being present before doing some optimizations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46829
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-07 17:34:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 22674
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22674
different testcase
A bit different testcase
$ gcc -O -fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure pr46829-2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46840
Summary: libgo should link against libm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20308
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foehst at informatik dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46839
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2010-12-07
17:19:42 UTC ---
Note that Intel compiler, based on the EDG C++ front-end, also rejects this
code in strict mode. Likewise of course Comeau. This is enough to show the
issue:
template
void forward(T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #29 from Anh Vo 2010-12-07 17:13:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #27)
> > No, the build still failed the same way. In fact, when issuing command 'file
> > gcc/tm.texi' on the build directory, gcc/tm.texi: A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46839
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Föhst
2010-12-07 17:12:45 UTC ---
I forgot: Line 15 is only there to prove that this->forward with another
successor than '<' can be resolved as the member derived from A.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-07
17:04:04 UTC ---
The default initializer is obtained via expr.c's gfc_default_initializer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46839
Summary: Parser confuses derived member with std::forward
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-07
16:48:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:31:22PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > It's not entirely trivial, because e.g. std::tuple_size is declared in more
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46837
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-07
16:48:11 UTC ---
The runtime performance reduction from...
gfortran -mtune=core2 -fschedule-insns -ffast-math -O3 induct.f90 -o induct
compared to...
gfortran -mtune=core2 -ffast-math -O3 induct.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-07 16:45:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hmm, is it possible to do the change without breaking ABI (i.e. preserving the
> proper relative order for binary built with init_arra/fini_array linked with
> cto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #42 from Mike Stump 2010-12-07
16:42:04 UTC ---
Oh, one can use -Wl,-dsym in the time being with this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
Summary: [OOP] Wrong allocation status for polymorphic
component INTENT(OUT) dummy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #41 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
16:34:34 UTC ---
Yeah, I was thinking of letting them bake just a little bit. -dsym would be
the only driver option, if we make it one. Testing of the C languages and
fortran seems to have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-07 16:32:57 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, mrs at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
>
> --- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
> 2010-12-07 16:17:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07
16:33:03 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 16:32:59 2010
New Revision: 167555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167555
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR44676.
2010-12-07 Seba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 16:27:33
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 16:27:28 2010
New Revision: 167554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167554
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR44676.
2010-12-07 Sebas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46837
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-07
16:22:55 UTC ---
The -fschedule-insns option alone is sufficient to regress the induct
benchmark...
gfortran -mtune=core2 -fschedule-insns -ffast-math -O3 induct.f90 -o induct
15.57s
gfortran -mtune=co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
16:17:09 UTC ---
Ok, I can confirm that ptype i is better, now, the next problem:
(gdb) ptype a1
type = volatile __unknown__
:-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #2 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-07 15:49:15 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:31:22PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> It's not entirely trivial, because e.g. std::tuple_size is declared in more
> than one place
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.6.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
