[Bug fortran/46668] FAIL: gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_10.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46668 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26 07:43:34 UTC --- Thanks. That's a known endian problem. I have a patch which works on PowerPC, which I still have to commit.

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #8 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-26 07:31:39 UTC --- when I add -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables it goes back to the "good" behaviour.

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #7 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-26 07:26:56 UTC --- .o hunting converged on dlls/ntdll/thread.o however: $ diff -u bad.lst good.lst --- bad.lst 2010-11-26 08:25:05.0 +0100 +++ good.lst2010-11-26 08:25:12.00

[Bug c++/46587] ICE when instantiating template member function in another template member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46587 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Voinov 2010-11-26 05:50:07 UTC --- Tested it with "gcc version 4.6.0 20101106 (experimental) (GCC)". The bug is still there.

[Bug middle-end/46671] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in default_no_named_section, at varasm .c:5994

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in default_no_named_section, at varasm .c:5994 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/46026] [trans-mem] Unable to build libitm on Solaris/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46020] Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1 character return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26 04:29:45 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 26 04:29:41 2010 New Revision: 167163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167163 Log: PR other/46020 * configure.ac (CXX_FOR_TARGET):

[Bug debug/46258] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23820.c: -fcompare-debug failure with -O3 -ffloat-store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46258 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26 04:27:33 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 26 04:27:24 2010 New Revision: 167162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167162 Log: PR debug/46258 * tree-cfg.c (replace_uses_by): D

[Bug fortran/46020] Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1 character return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26 04:25:37 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 26 04:25:32 2010 New Revision: 167160 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167160 Log: PR other/46020 * configure.ac (CXX_FOR_TARGET):

[Bug tree-optimization/46651] ICE with graphite enabled in cairo-1.8.10

from Brad Jackson 2010-11-26 03:03:04 UTC --- This crash was not in the 20101104 weekly snapshot, but has been in all snapshots since, including 20101125.

[Bug c++/46670] New: ICE with 4.6.0 2010-11-26 with c++0x, in TBB's header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46670 Summary: ICE with 4.6.0 2010-11-26 with c++0x, in TBB's header Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-26 01:41:24 UTC --- Created attachment 22535 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22535 invalid autoreduced testcase Reproduced at x86_86-linux, r167127 and r167147. Attached is autoreduced

[Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46668] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_10.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46668 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_10.f90 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unass

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug regression/46667] Target arm-unknown-eabi build results in "causes a section type conflict" error in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug regression/46667] New: Target arm-unknown-eabi build results in "causes a section type conflict" error in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667 Summary: Target arm-unknown-eabi build results in "causes a section type conflict" error in libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug c++/18635] use of uninitialised reference accepted in C++ front end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635 Ádám Rák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adam.rak at streamnovation |

[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263 --- Comment #36 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-11-26 00:15:05 UTC --- Awesome! I still think that the output would be better if it was more consistent with the current way of printing template instantiations, that is, using "note: while expanding

[Bug target/46666] New: gcc.target/i386/funcspec-3.c ICEs in count_reg_usage (cse.c:6596) with -fno-early-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Summary: gcc.target/i386/funcspec-3.c ICEs in count_reg_usage (cse.c:6596) with -fno-early-inlining Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263 --- Comment #35 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-25 23:43:02 UTC --- OK, my browser screwed up my last comment. Here is another attempt of the same. Sorry. I have worked on decreasing the memory consumption of this patchset and I could decrease it qu

[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263 --- Comment #34 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-25 23:38:09 UTC --- I have worked on decreasing the memory consumption of this patchset and I could decrease it quite a bit, even though there is still room for improvement. On a testcase of mine, I sta

[Bug rtl-optimization/46665] two gfortran tests fail with -O[2s] -fipa-pta -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46665 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46581] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] segfault in SELECT TYPE with associate-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46581 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46581] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] segfault in SELECT TYPE with associate-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46581 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-25 22:05:06 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Thu Nov 25 22:04:59 2010 New Revision: 167154 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167154 Log: 2010-11-25 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug rtl-optimization/46649] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_bb_info, at sel-sched-ir.c:5080 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigne

[Bug rtl-optimization/46665] New: two gfortran tests fail with -O[2s] -fipa-pta -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46665 Summary: two gfortran tests fail with -O[2s] -fipa-pta -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug lto/46664] Failed to build 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-25 20:44:14 UTC --- With testcase at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/gcc/lto/wrf.ltrans2.o.gz I got [...@gnu-4 build_base_lto.]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-spec/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-

[Bug lto/46664] New: Failed to build 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664 Summary: Failed to build 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 with LTO Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: un

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.sagan at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/46339] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #20 from Uros Bizjak 2010-

[Bug tree-optimization/46663] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in vect_recog_pow_pattern (gimple.h:2055) with -O -fexceptions -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46663 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in vect_recog_pow_pattern (gimple.h:2055) with -O -fexceptions -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2010-11-25 18:40:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Let's add Francois in CC, he knows STLPort pretty well. And somebody should > profile this difference, redo the tests for current mainline (which already > h

[Bug rtl-optimization/46649] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_bb_info, at sel-sched-ir.c:5080 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/46662] [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 18:14:23 UTC --- Some data points: gfortran 4.6 and NAG 5.2 reject the program; Crayftn accepts the program - but it also accepts the program with a deferred TBP - and ICEs.

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46662] [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 18:08:45 UTC --- Asked at J3: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-November/004015.html

[Bug fortran/46662] New: [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 Summary: [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp() Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-25 18:01:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 25 18:00:47 2010 New Revision: 167148 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167148 Log: PR middle-end/46637 * combine.c (try_combin

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-25 17:43:35 UTC --- I started profiledbootstrap tracking: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2010-11/msg00378.html

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #13 from Michael Matz 2010-11-25 17:07:10 UTC --- > no, your example here is different, and is not allowed. The original > testcase is fine. > > so y=>a%b%c%d%z > > is allowed as soon as any of a, b, c, or d or z have the pointer

[Bug libffi/46661] New: 32-bit cls_pointer.c, cls_pointer_stack.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46661 Summary: 32-bit cls_pointer.c, cls_pointer_stack.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #12 from Michael Matz 2010-11-25 17:02:19 UTC --- The following needs to be taken into account when determining the validity: If this use is supposed to be valid (we can associate a pointer with and entity that isn't marked TARGET but

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-11-25 17:00:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thus, isn't what the program does equivalent to > > REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), ALLOCATABLE :: z > REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), POINTER::

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org Seve

[Bug libffi/46660] New: cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660 Summary: cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libffi Assigne

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-25 16:50:50 UTC --- Thus, isn't what the program does equivalent to REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), ALLOCATABLE :: z REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), POINTER:: y y=>z which is invalid? Valid w

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-25 16:34:32 UTC --- Does the problem only happen at -O3 with the 4.5.x snapshot, i.e. do compilations with bare -O or -O2 generate working executables?

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-25 16:25:35 UTC --- > --- Comment #15 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-11-25 > 16:05:36 UTC --- > Can you go back to the failing sources and test whether > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche

[Bug fortran/46656] libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46614] [4.5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4.c FAILs with -fno-rename-registers -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46614 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/46538] [4.3/4.4./4.5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_make_fname_decl (decl.c:3690) on invalid code when using __PRETTY_FUNCTION__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/46499] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20051021-1.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-ccp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46499 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/46534] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE optimizing printf ("...>10MBstring\n") into puts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46534 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 --- Comment #15 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-11-25 16:05:36 UTC --- Can you go back to the failing sources and test whether http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02569.html fixes the problem? For future bug reports, please use gcc -v -save-t

[Bug tree-optimization/46494] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed when casting-out attribute noreturn with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46494 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-25 15:59:18 UTC --- Works with GCC version ... ?

[Bug rtl-optimization/46440] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2165 with -fstack-protector-all -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug c++/46401] [4.5 Regression] very slow compile time with -Wsequence-point

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46401 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-25 15:45:58 UTC --- the changes in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2010-11/msg00131.html might help

[Bug fortran/46656] libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/46658] [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment #10 from H.

[Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940 Vincent Gramoli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Version|unknown

[Bug fortran/46656] libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656 --- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-25 15:11:39 UTC --- Nothing shows here on x86-64-linux

[Bug libstdc++/46659] New: std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 Summary: std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one. Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug c++/46658] [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #8 from Zara 2010-11-25 14:44:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > It would be nice if you could reduce the testcase a bit by using Delta or > other > means: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction Manually reduced it

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #7 from Zara 2010-11-25 14:44:12 UTC --- Created attachment 22531 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22531 And this is the intemediate file!! 335 bytes I hope this minimum case will be just what you need to correct t

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Zara changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22527|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Zara changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22528|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/46648] [4.6 Regression] type mismatch in array reference; verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46648 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-25 13:48:06 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Nov 25 13:47:42 2010 New Revision: 167146 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167146 Log: Properly cast integer constant char. gcc/

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-25 13:40:30 UTC --- It would be nice if you could reduce the testcase a bit by using Delta or other means: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-25 12:56:35 UTC --- > we do CFG manipulations based on debug stmts (verified with a later > assert that triggers on -O2 -g -fprofile-use). > > It's of course unfortunate that we do this BB splitting at al

Re: [Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

> we do CFG manipulations based on debug stmts (verified with a later > assert that triggers on -O2 -g -fprofile-use). > > It's of course unfortunate that we do this BB splitting at all when > not doing coverage test. The BB splitting is neccesary so the CFG can be solved (i.e. you have explicit

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #17 from Richard G

[Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 --- Comment #3 from Michael Haubenwallner 2010-11-25 12:30:37 UTC --- Huh - AIX-as also doesn't accept line numbers >=65536 any more since SP6100-04-07-1036 it seems, as I get an error on ".line 118674" from insn-automata.c later in bootstrap of g

[Bug target/46548] Build arm gcc failure after patch 165463

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548 Paul Brook changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-25 12:13:14 UTC --- In your dump files there is a CFG inconsistency that I can't reproduce. At least basic block numbers are not consistent. I also see DEBUG insns in stagefeedback but not stageprof

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 --- Comment #7 from schuh.robert at gmail dot com 2010-11-25 12:10:19 UTC --- I didn't notice that. I'm really sorry about that.

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #2 from Zara 2010-11-25 11:53:29 UTC --- gcc has been downloaded form git mirror.

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #1 from Zara 2010-11-25 11:51:51 UTC --- Created attachment 22528 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22528 preprocessed output from g++ The file has been compressed with tar/gz

[Bug c++/46658] New: internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Summary: internal compiler error on cp/init.c Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-25 11:42:54 UTC --- *** Bug 46657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Jonathan

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 schuh.robert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 schuh.robert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Manue

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-11-25 11:22:59 UTC --- *** Bug 46657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/46539] libquadmath: Add -static-libquadmath

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46539 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 11:22:08 UTC --- cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00348.html

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 schuh.robert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID Severity

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schuh.robert at gmail dot

[Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug tree-optimization/45685] [4.6 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity in loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,

  1   2   >