http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2010-11-25 16:25:35 UTC --- > --- Comment #15 from Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-25 > 16:05:36 UTC --- > Can you go back to the failing sources and test whether > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02569.html > fixes the problem? Looks good indeed. I didn't try a full bootstrap but just up to the point where g++ failed before. > For future bug reports, please use gcc -v -save-temps, then post the > preprocessed source and the exact options that were passed to cc1. I've > managed > to reproduce the code generation, but only with an explicit "-march=i686" > which > required some guessing. Ok, will do. Thanks for fixing this. Rainer
