[Bug c++/46420] [C++0X][4.6 regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11677

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46420 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46420] [C++0X][4.6 regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11677

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46420 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-11 06:17:38 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 11 06:17:32 2010 New Revision: 166592 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166592 Log: PR c++/46420 * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostics, more more

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-11 04:54:49 UTC --- Oh, i thought of another thing, if non-literal type with a constexpr constructor is used to define a namespace-scope static variable, and the "constexpr" creation cannot be honored,

[Bug testsuite/46425] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425 --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-11-11 04:41:09 UTC --- These failures have fixed already. The issue was in the testsuite. On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:13 PM, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: [Bug testsuite/46425] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures

These failures have fixed already. The issue was in the testsuite. On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:13 PM, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" > wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added --- --- --

[Bug testsuite/46425] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46425] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-11 03:24:29 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 11 03:24:26 2010 New Revision: 166589 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166589 Log: 2010-11-10 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug c++/46369] [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-11 03:12:39 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 11 03:12:35 2010 New Revision: 166588 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166588 Log: 2010-11-10 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 --- Comment #2 from Brad 2010-11-11 02:53:43 UTC --- Also, whoops, the remove code is broken. It doesn't increment it at the end of the while loop. This bug has no impact on the problem I was encountering. Sorry for the swarm of posts, it's re

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 Brad changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|major

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 --- Comment #1 from Brad 2010-11-11 02:37:56 UTC --- I forgot to mention one thing. The code that seems to acting suspisciously is this bit: toDo.erase( *out ); //Putting this code here instead of the end breaks this code. std::map >::const_i

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 Brad changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical

[Bug libstdc++/46424] New: Iterators being improperly invalidated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 Summary: Iterators being improperly invalidated Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig.

[Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com, |

[Bug middle-end/46423] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46423] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedT

[Bug c++/46065] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46065 Nathan Froyd changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/46422] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/other/i386-?.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46422 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-11 0

[Bug testsuite/46422] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/other/i386-?.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46422 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/other/i386-?.C Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: u

[Bug c/46421] fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46421 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/26749] too few arguments to function va_start is caught too late

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749 Leo Izen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leo.izen at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-11 01:46:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > I have verified that > > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-11/msg00170.html > > > > fixes the problem. > > Thanks HJ.

[Bug c/46421] New: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46421 Summary: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #16 from Zeev Tarantov 2010-11-11 00:42:57 UTC --- In http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi?r1=166555&r2=166554&pathrev=166555: +will be shared acroess multiple compilation units. The default value is 20. s/acroess/a

[Bug target/46353] [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner 2010-11-11 00:19:44 UTC --- Created attachment 22369 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22369 Patch to fix the FMA instructions.

[Bug fortran/38669] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Array bounds violation for arguments of elemental subroutine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38669 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-11 00:17:38 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Nov 11 00:17:34 2010 New Revision: 166579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166579 Log: PR tree-optimize/38669 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

[Bug c++/46369] [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-11 00:06:38 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 11 00:06:34 2010 New Revision: 166576 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166576 Log: PR c++/46369 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_bit_fi

[Bug rtl-optimization/27357] 20 % increase code size in 4.1 vs 3.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27357 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug gcov-profile/45892] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/inliner-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45892 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 23:49:42 UTC --- We actually handle the testcase sanely now too. We don't inline since mainline is called once that is true. I am testing patch to update the testcase.

[Bug debug/46409] [4.6 Regression] ICE in propagate_rtx, at fwprop.c:688

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46409 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-10 23:34:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 10 23:33:56 2010 New Revision: 166574 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166574 Log: PR debug/46409 * gcc.dg/debug/pr46409.c: Ne

[Bug c++/46368] [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1033

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-10 23:34:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 10 23:33:56 2010 New Revision: 166574 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166574 Log: PR debug/46409 * gcc.dg/debug/pr46409.c: Ne

[Bug target/46419] [4.4, 4.5, 4.6 Regression] _mm_cvtpu16_ps (and hence _mm_cvtpu8_ps) returns false result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/46419] [4.4, 4.5, 4.6 Regression] _mm_cvtpu16_ps (and hence _mm_cvtpu8_ps) returns false result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 23:28:10 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 10 23:28:03 2010 New Revision: 166572 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166572 Log: PR middle-end/46419 * config/i386/xm

[Bug target/46419] [4.4, 4.5, 4.6 Regression] _mm_cvtpu16_ps (and hence _mm_cvtpu8_ps) returns false result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 23:26:54 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 10 23:26:49 2010 New Revision: 166571 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166571 Log: PR middle-end/46419 * config/i386/xm

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 23:05:25 UTC --- > Note that the IO block escapes and thus cannot be coalesced with others in > the same function. I had a frontend patch to re-use the same IO struct > across multiple calls but that w

[Bug c++/46188] [4.5 regression] -fipa-cp removes destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mi

[Bug target/46419] [4.4, 4.5, 4.6 Regression] _mm_cvtpu16_ps (and hence _mm_cvtpu8_ps) returns false result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 23:00:08 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 10 23:00:01 2010 New Revision: 166569 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166569 Log: PR middle-end/46419 * config/i386/xm

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 --- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10 22:54:51 UTC --- Btw, the old "kill stmt" idea would be a useful thing to insert for the frontend to mark the end of life of IO struct contents.

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10 22:53:46 UTC --- Note that the IO block escapes and thus cannot be coalesced with others in the same function. I had a frontend patch to re-use the same IO struct across multiple calls but that wa

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 --- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2010-11-10 22:52:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > I have verified that > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-11/msg00170.html > > fixes the problem. Thanks HJ. I can't self-approve patches to that cod

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 22:50:08 UTC --- Ok, it might be interesting to run some fortran benchmarks with the large-stack-frame parameter bumped up. If it helps, I think we can just do so for 4.6.x

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #26 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-10 22:43:31 UTC --- Because one IO command is split into several function calls and a state has to be preserved in between those.

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #24 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:39:13 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been recei

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #24 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:39:13 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been recei

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #23 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:36:14 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been recei

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 22:35:46 UTC --- The inline heuristics should take that into account. But at the moment io block simply always prevent inlining function with IO into function without IO. We consider function with more t

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #22 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:33:17 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been recei

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #21 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:30:23 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been recei

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #20 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:27:14 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been recei

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #19 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2010-11-10 22:24:15 UTC --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been recei

[Bug tree-optimization/41012] Missing inlining after indirect call promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41012 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46419] [4.4, 4.5, 4.6 Regression] _mm_cvtpu16_ps (and hence _mm_cvtpu8_ps) returns false result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #18 f

[Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 21:36:07 UTC --- Hmm, I should read testcases curefully. It is memcmp. GCC is not really smart on inlining this; I guess we should just disable the inline unless we optimize for size since we don't reall

[Bug c++/46156] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11370 with -frounding-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Assigned

[Bug debug/46150] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fPIC -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/46065] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46065 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Froyd 2010-11-10 21:05:55 UTC --- Author: froydnj Date: Wed Nov 10 21:05:50 2010 New Revision: 166558 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166558 Log: gcc/cp/ PR c++/46065 * decl.c (poplevel_na

[Bug middle-end/40230] it takes too much time to compile using -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40230 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46156] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11370 with -frounding-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse 2010-11-10 20:59:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > The #c6 testcase doesn't appear related to the original one, thus please file > it separately. Done as PR 46420.

[Bug c++/46420] New: [C++0X][4.6 regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11677

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46420 Summary: [C++0X][4.6 regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11677 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug target/38629] target-specific parameters for inline heuristics not defined for AVR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38629 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 20:52:18 UTC --- OK, at -Os the issue is that function is called once so inlining is a win. Making multiple copies of it leads to GCC making clone: delay_wait_us_ms.constprop.0: .LFB3: movl

[Bug c/46419] New: xmmintrin.h: _mm_cvtpu16_ps (and hence _mm_cvtpu8_ps) returns false result in gcc >= 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46419 Summary: xmmintrin.h: _mm_cvtpu16_ps (and hence _mm_cvtpu8_ps) returns false result in gcc >= 4.4 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug tree-optimization/43411] Missed inline optimization opportunity with indirect calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43411 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 20:38:25 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Nov 10 20:38:15 2010 New Revision: 166557 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166557 Log: PR tree-optimize/33172 PR tree-optimize/43

[Bug rtl-optimization/33172] Optimizer fails to elid away unreferenced static function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33172 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 20:38:26 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Nov 10 20:38:15 2010 New Revision: 166557 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166557 Log: PR tree-optimize/33172 PR tree-optimize/43

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 20:26:39 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Nov 10 20:26:36 2010 New Revision: 166556 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166556 Log: PR tree-optimize/46228 * doc/invoke.texi

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 20:23:12 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Nov 10 20:23:09 2010 New Revision: 166555 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166555 Log: PR tree-optimize/46228 * doc/invoke.texi (

[Bug target/38629] target-specific parameters for inline heuristics not defined for AVR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38629 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 20:19:24 UTC --- Hi, I have reservations for making inline heuristics too target specific as it would increase the testing matrix of inliner even more. It is difficult to satisfy everyone. We no long

[Bug target/46417] spu-elf --enable-werror-always build fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46417 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46417] spu-elf --enable-werror-always build fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46417 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-10 20:15:28 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Wed Nov 10 20:15:24 2010 New Revision: 166554 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166554 Log: PR target/46417 * config/spu/spu

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10 20:10:51 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Nov 10 20:10:46 2010 New Revision: 166553 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166553 Log: PR tree-optimize/46228 * cgraph.c (cgraph_

[Bug tree-optimization/46414] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/recip-vec-sqrtf-avx.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46414 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 20:08:30 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 10 20:08:27 2010 New Revision: 166552 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166552 Log: Check preferred vector mode for vector type

[Bug c/46418] Segmentation fault compiling C source without specified optimization on x86/32-bit under 4.4.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46418 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Lange 2010-11-10 19:58:34 UTC --- Correction: I provided gcc with no -O option, but a #pragma specifies level 2 optimization.

[Bug c/46418] New: Segmentation fault compiling C source with no optimization on x86/32-bit under 4.4.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46418 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling C source with no optimization on x86/32-bit under 4.4.3 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug c++/46188] [4.5 regression] -fipa-cp removes destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/46148] [C++0x] std::map lacks a template insert overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46148 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 19:08:54 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 10 19:08:49 2010 New Revision: 166551 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166551 Log: 2010-11-10 Paolo Carlini PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/44436] [C++0x] Implement insert(&&) and emplace* in associative and unordered containers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436 --- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-10 19:08:54 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 10 19:08:49 2010 New Revision: 166551 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166551 Log: 2010-11-10 Paolo Carlini PR lib

[Bug target/21122] ICE in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:2549

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21122 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/37949] static initialisation through pointer deferred until run time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37949 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug tree-optimization/36352] missed "inlining" of static untouched variable in linked once function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36352 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/35728] Inlined function via function pointer emitted unnecessarily

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35728 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/34940] contained subroutines called only once are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bur...@net-b.de, hubicka at

[Bug fortran/46411] MOVE_ALLOC wrongly rejected as impure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46411 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-10 18:04:10 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Nov 10 18:04:04 2010 New Revision: 166550 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166550 Log: 2010-11-10 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/46

[Bug tree-optimization/46403] inefficient PRE bloat code size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46403 --- Comment #4 from davidxl 2010-11-10 18:01:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I think what you are seeing is tail duplication happening. Right, disabling bb-reordering, the duplication does not happen -- looks like something to tune. David

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46411] MOVE_ALLOC wrongly rejected as impure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46411 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-10 17:55:14 UTC --- Fixed on the trunk. I was asked in #gfortran to backport it to 4.5. I thus leave it open. The backport probably requires that non-IMPURE variables are marked as attr.pure (cf. comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/33172] Optimizer fails to elid away unreferenced static function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33172 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46403] inefficient PRE bloat code size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46403 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-10 17:53:41 UTC --- I think what you are seeing is tail duplication happening.

[Bug tree-optimization/46403] inefficient PRE bloat code size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46403 --- Comment #2 from davidxl 2010-11-10 17:50:37 UTC --- Yes, there is redundancy removed for a[x] -- but for *y, it should not be duplicated. See the following example: int a[100]; int foo(int x, int* y, int *yy, int *yyy, int z) { int m;

[Bug fortran/46244] gfc_compare_derived_types is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-10 17:49:24 UTC --- The commit fixes the issue mentioned in comment 7 to comment 9. TODO: comment 0 to comment 6, i.e. the test cases of comment 0, comment 1 and comment 5. Comment 4 contains a patch (p

[Bug fortran/46244] gfc_compare_derived_types is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-10 17:45:10 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Nov 10 17:44:58 2010 New Revision: 166547 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166547 Log: 2010-11-10 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/46

[Bug tree-optimization/43411] Missed inline optimization opportunity with indirect calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43411 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-10 17:42:54 UTC --- Fixed - hopefully. The PR can be closed if a "4.6.0 (experimental)" build for s390 does no longer has a failing bessel_7.f90. Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/current

[Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-10 17:41:31 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Nov 10 17:41:22 2010 New Revision: 166546 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166546 Log: 2010-11-10 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/46

  1   2   3   >