http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38629
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-10 20:19:24 UTC --- Hi, I have reservations for making inline heuristics too target specific as it would increase the testing matrix of inliner even more. It is difficult to satisfy everyone. We no longer inline delay_wait_us on i386, ARM should behave the same. For whatever reason we still inline delay_wait_us_ms. I am checking why. Size is estimated to grow by one instruction (that is bit underestimated) but with --param early-inlining-insns=0 we should not inline. Honza
