[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

2010-11-08 Thread e01reynier at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 --- Comment #4 from e01reynier at gmail dot com 2010-11-09 07:54:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > An internal unit fflush is: Is there really an internal unit involved when reading an integer from a string ?

[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

2010-11-08 Thread e01reynier at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 --- Comment #3 from e01reynier at gmail dot com 2010-11-09 07:50:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > See the documentation that comes with gfortran. > > You can use > > * GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_ALL:: Don't buffer I/O for all units. > * GFORTRAN_U

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

2010-11-08 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 --- Comment #18 from davidxl 2010-11-09 07:22:43 UTC --- PR tree-optimization/46316? I will make the change. Thanks, David On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:01 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

2010-11-08 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-09 07:01:26 UTC --- The PR reference in the ChangeLog is wrong so no cross-link to this audit trail has been generated. Please look at the numerous examples in the ChangeLog. The testcase should have b

[Bug tree-optimization/46315] [4.5 Regression] gcc-4.5.1 -O2 -fno-strict-overflow causes bad code generation

2010-11-08 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315 Ryan Hill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c++/46382] constexpr vs. static_assert in constexpr ctors

2010-11-08 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46382 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-09 03:54:29 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 9 03:54:24 2010 New Revision: 166471 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166471 Log: PR c++/46382 * semantics.c (check_constexpr

[Bug c++/46335] [C++0X] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:701

2010-11-08 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-09 03:54:16 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 9 03:54:12 2010 New Revision: 166470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166470 Log: PR c++/46335 * tree.c (bot_manip): Check TR

[Bug libstdc++/46385] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46385 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug libstdc++/46385] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46385 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug target/46030] registers trashed with -Os

2010-11-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46030 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46384] New: ia64-linux: internal compiler error: in get_attr_first_insn, at config/ia64/itanium2.md:1909

2010-11-08 Thread dannf at dannf dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46384 Summary: ia64-linux: internal compiler error: in get_attr_first_insn, at config/ia64/itanium2.md:1909 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

2010-11-08 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #17 from Peter Bergner 2010-11-09 01:50:48 UTC --- The patch looks good on powerpc64-linux. === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes16234 # of expected failures 170 # of unsupported tests

[Bug target/46353] [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures

2010-11-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2010-11-08 08:0

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot|unassigned at gcc dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/46383] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in get_binfo_at_offset, at tree.c:10947

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

2010-11-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-09 00:08:24 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Nov 9 00:08:20 2010 New Revision: 166461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166461 Log: 2010-11-08 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/43

[Bug tree-optimization/46383] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in get_binfo_at_offset, at tree.c:10947

2010-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 Summary|ICE: in

[Bug c++/45383] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Implicit conversion to pointer does no longer automatically generate operator== and operator!=.

2010-11-08 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|dseketel at

[Bug tree-optimization/46383] New: ICE: in get_binfo_at_offset, at tree.c:10947

2010-11-08 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383 Summary: ICE: in get_binfo_at_offset, at tree.c:10947 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assig

[Bug fortran/46344] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable CLASS components

2010-11-08 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 22:46:09 UTC --- r166458 fixes comment #11 (by building the vtab early).

[Bug fortran/46344] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable CLASS components

2010-11-08 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 22:42:41 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Mon Nov 8 22:42:34 2010 New Revision: 166458 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166458 Log: 2010-11-08 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug debug/45997] [4.6 Regression] __unknown__ type name for typedef'd int

2010-11-08 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-08 22:39:09 UTC --- At some point modified_type_die is called for volatile_const_my_int with is_volatile and is_const_type set to 0, meaning we want to emit the DIE of the cv-unqualified version of volat

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

2010-11-08 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-08 22:20:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Patch. Testing on x86_64-linux, testing elsewhere is appreciated. Works OK on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu: Running target unix FAIL: 22_locale/collate/ha

[Bug c++/46382] New: constexpr vs. static_assert in constexpr ctors

2010-11-08 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46382 Summary: constexpr vs. static_assert in constexpr ctors Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: una

[Bug target/44981] cfstring_format_type support needed darwin10

2010-11-08 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44981 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug bootstrap/46362] [4.6 regression] lto-plugin.c doesn't compile on IRIX 6.5

2010-11-08 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-08 21:56:58 UTC --- I'm now using the attached patch as a workaround, simply disabling the lto-plugin.

[Bug bootstrap/46362] [4.6 regression] lto-plugin.c doesn't compile on IRIX 6.5

2010-11-08 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-08 21:56:25 UTC --- Created attachment 22337 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22337 workaround patch

[Bug debug/46375] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46381] New: G++ doesn't catch duplicate members produced by template instantation

2010-11-08 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46381 Summary: G++ doesn't catch duplicate members produced by template instantation Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity:

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

2010-11-08 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-08 20:12:43 UTC --- > > But the cgraph code is messy^2 as well. Bah. Thanks for working on this. Have at least rewrite of this unreachable function removal pass in queue for next stage1;) Honza

[Bug middle-end/46360] [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 19:57:07 UTC --- Created attachment 22336 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22336 gcc46-pr46360.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/44757] lm32.md: In function ‘gen_ashlsi3’:unused variable ‘one’

2010-11-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44757 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/44757] lm32.md: In function ‘gen_ashlsi3’:unused variable ‘one’

2010-11-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44757 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-08 19:44:47 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Mon Nov 8 19:44:42 2010 New Revision: 166451 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166451 Log: 2010-11-08 Joern Rennecke Ric

[Bug tree-optimization/46351] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization (2)

2010-11-08 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46380] New: vec-scal-opt*.c tests fail on hppa*-*-* (32-bit)

2010-11-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46380 Summary: vec-scal-opt*.c tests fail on hppa*-*-* (32-bit) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization A

[Bug middle-end/46360] [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 19:18:37 UTC --- Reduced testcase (fails without any options, -Wwrite-strings is not needed): __attribute__((gnu_inline, always_inline)) extern inline char * strncpy (char *dest, const char *src, __SI

[Bug c++/46369] [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/44758] frv.md: incompatible enum comparisons / return

2010-11-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44758 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46379] New: frv.md:*movdf_nodouble+6 is nonsense

2010-11-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46379 Summary: frv.md:*movdf_nodouble+6 is nonsense Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug target/45585] [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9 for gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90 with -O2 -m64

2010-11-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46378] Powerpc -mcpu=power5 selects FP found instructions (should use -mcpu=power5+)

2010-11-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/45585] [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9 for gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90 with -O2 -m64

2010-11-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585 --- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner 2010-11-08 19:02:39 UTC --- Author: meissner Date: Mon Nov 8 19:02:35 2010 New Revision: 166448 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166448 Log: Fix PR 46378 and PR 45585 Modified: trun

[Bug target/46378] Powerpc -mcpu=power5 selects FP found instructions (should use -mcpu=power5+)

2010-11-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2010-11-08 19:02:40 UTC --- Author: meissner Date: Mon Nov 8 19:02:35 2010 New Revision: 166448 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166448 Log: Fix PR 46378 and PR 45585 Modified: trun

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2010-11-08 14:53:32

[Bug target/46378] Powerpc -mcpu=power5 selects FP found instructions (should use -mcpu=power5+)

2010-11-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46378] New: Powerpc -mcpu=power5 selects FP found instructions (should use -mcpu=power5+)

2010-11-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378 Summary: Powerpc -mcpu=power5 selects FP found instructions (should use -mcpu=power5+) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug target/44758] frv.md: incompatible enum comparisons / return

2010-11-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44758 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-08 18:53:00 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Mon Nov 8 18:52:51 2010 New Revision: 166447 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166447 Log: 2010-11-08 Joern Rennecke Ric

[Bug c++/45399] [C++0x] Warning for \0 in raw strings

2010-11-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-08 18:31:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > As you can see, I somehow believe that "\n" and "\r" are not interpreted > correctly and replace these (should it be necessary, at least at one time it > w

[Bug middle-end/46360] [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/46358] [4.6 Regression] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

2010-11-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

2010-11-08 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #19 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-08 17:58:36 UTC --- Created attachment 22334 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22334 testcase failing in r166433 Thanks for fixing this! It seems there is one further failing testcase:

[Bug tree-optimization/46377] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization (3)

2010-11-08 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08 17:58:19 UTC --- Created attachment 22333 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22333 opt11.ads

[Bug bootstrap/46358] [4.6 Regression] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

2010-11-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 --- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-08 17:57:42 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Mon Nov 8 17:57:35 2010 New Revision: 166445 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166445 Log: PR bootstrap/46358 * con

[Bug tree-optimization/46377] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization (3)

2010-11-08 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08 17:57:40 UTC --- Created attachment 22332 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22332 opt11.adb

[Bug tree-optimization/46377] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization (3)

2010-11-08 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377 Summary: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization (3) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assig

[Bug middle-end/46368] [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1033

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 17:53:34 UTC --- Reducing right now...

[Bug target/46280] [4.6 regression] Several testcases FAIL with 16byte alignment ABI warning on Solaris 8/9 x86

2010-11-08 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

2010-11-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

[Bug target/46208] redundant extensions of argument registers

2010-11-08 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08 17:46:31 UTC --- > I was just looking into the same problem with MIPS too. I almost think > TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES in all targets be removed but that is up to each > target maintainer. Yes, this sh

[Bug target/46280] [4.6 regression] Several testcases FAIL with 16byte alignment ABI warning on Solaris 8/9 x86

2010-11-08 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-08 17:44:46 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Nov 8 17:44:40 2010 New Revision: 166444 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166444 Log: gcc: * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_arg_bou

[Bug c++/45399] [C++0x] Warning for \0 in raw strings

2010-11-08 Thread kayhayen at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399 --- Comment #5 from Kay Hayen 2010-11-08 17:43:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > The motivating examples in the original raw strings proposal are for > simplifying regular expressions and HTML markup, there's no mention of binary > blobs. > h

[Bug c++/45894] [4.5/4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: segmentation fault with -Wall

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 17:40:15 UTC --- Created attachment 22331 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22331 gcc46-pr45894.patch Ok, I'll bootstrapp/regtest this then.

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #97 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:30:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #96) > (In reply to comment #88) > > I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in > > function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must b

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

2010-11-08 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #96 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-11-08 17:24:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #88) > I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in > function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must be a separate issue. I

[Bug c++/46364] basic_string.h:541:32: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46366] gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:13:24 UTC --- The testcase looks invalid to me: static bitstream_init (picture_t * picture, void *start) { picture->bitstream_ptr = start; } ... xine_xvmc_t * xvmc = bitstream_init (picture, buffer);

[Bug target/46357] Unnecessary movzx instruction

2010-11-08 Thread justin.lebar+bug at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357 --- Comment #2 from Justin Lebar 2010-11-08 17:08:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > We always use zero/sign-extending moves to avoid partial register stalls. Sure, but the whole instruction on line 10 is unnecessary.

[Bug lto/46376] LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work together

2010-11-08 Thread rodrigorivascosta at gmail dot com
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-multilib=no --with-system-zlib=yes --enable-threads --disable-nls --with-arch-32=i686 --disable-sjlj-exceptions Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) (GCC) *** File: test.h #ifndef TEST_H_INCLUDED #define TEST_H_INCLUDED struct VBase

[Bug rtl-optimization/46366] gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed

2010-11-08 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366 --- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-08 17:05:38 UTC --- Sorry, I have checked that the test doesn't ICE but missed the additional warnings. How about the below patch, do you think it makes sense? I have verified that the test still I

[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

2010-11-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

2010-11-08 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #95 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-08 17:00:41 UTC --- > CC fs/ioctl.o > fs/ioctl.c: In function 'do_vfs_ioctl': > fs/ioctl.c:601:1: internal compiler error: in update_df, at fwprop.c:877 > Please submit a full bug r

[Bug lto/46376] New: LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work together

2010-11-08 Thread rodrigorivascosta at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376 Summary: LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work together Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 16:39:39 UTC --- Created attachment 22329 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22329 gcc46-pr43808-2.patch Another possible fix (also untested).

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

2010-11-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--disable-threads --disable-target-libiberty --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --build=hppa-linux-gnu --host=hppa-linux-gnu --target=hppa64-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap Thread model: single gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) [trunk revision 166433] (GCC) I get the

[Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string

2010-11-08 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46208] redundant extensions of argument registers

2010-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-08 16:04:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > * config/sparc/sparc.c (TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES): Delete. I was just looking into the same problem with MIPS too. I almost think TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOT

[Bug debug/46375] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts

2010-11-08 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375 Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/45948] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use (tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1242) with -O -fstrict-overflow -ftree-loop-distribution

2010-11-08 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c/46374] Add nooverflow attribute

2010-11-08 Thread lfsxs0 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374 --- Comment #2 from Luís Fernando Schultz Xavier da Silveira 2010-11-08 15:48:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > That code is really: > bool > f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y) > { > return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17; > } I am very sorry. I forg

[Bug c/46374] Add nooverflow attribute

2010-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-08 15:41:30 UTC --- That code is really: bool f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y) { return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17; } --- CUT --- There should be no zero extends in that code because the ABI requires the

[Bug target/46372] format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has type 'float'

2010-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/35649] Incorrect printf warning: expect double has float

2010-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35649 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 15:38:21 UTC --- Ah, if (optimize) update_alias_info_with_stack_vars (); explains that. Guess it should be if (optimize || ...). if (optimize || flag_strict_aliasing) would work for this testcas

[Bug c/46374] New: Add nooverflow attribute

2010-11-08 Thread lfsxs0 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374 Summary: Add nooverflow attribute Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/46373] New: fflush called when reading from a string

2010-11-08 Thread e01reynier at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 Summary: fflush called when reading from a string Product: gcc Version: 4.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unas

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

2010-11-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

2010-11-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 15:32:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Indeed, for > x: > (mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8 > A64]) > mem: > (mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)

[Bug middle-end/46368] [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1033

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

2010-11-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 15:21:41 UTC --- Indeed, for x: (mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8 A64]) mem: (mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame) (const_int -384 [0xfe

[Bug target/46372] New: format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has type 'float'

2010-11-08 Thread corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372 Summary: format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has type 'float' Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/46371] New: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: scalar coarray variable is rejected

2010-11-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46371 Summary: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: scalar coarray variable is rejected Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

2010-11-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

2010-11-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 15:02:02 UTC --- Created attachment 22326 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22326 preprocessed source Hm, it seems initial attachment doesn't work.

[Bug fortran/46370] New: [OOP] ALLOCATE: Error allocating CLASS coarrays

2010-11-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46370 Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE: Error allocating CLASS coarrays Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46369] [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref

2010-11-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug c++/46369] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref

2010-11-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid

[Bug middle-end/46360] [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313

2010-11-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >