http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
--- Comment #4 from e01reynier at gmail dot com 2010-11-09 07:54:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> An internal unit fflush is:
Is there really an internal unit involved when reading an integer from a string
?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
--- Comment #3 from e01reynier at gmail dot com 2010-11-09 07:50:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> See the documentation that comes with gfortran.
>
> You can use
>
> * GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_ALL:: Don't buffer I/O for all units.
> * GFORTRAN_U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #18 from davidxl 2010-11-09 07:22:43
UTC ---
PR tree-optimization/46316? I will make the change.
Thanks,
David
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:01 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-09
07:01:26 UTC ---
The PR reference in the ChangeLog is wrong so no cross-link to this audit trail
has been generated. Please look at the numerous examples in the ChangeLog.
The testcase should have b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46382
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-09
03:54:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Nov 9 03:54:24 2010
New Revision: 166471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166471
Log:
PR c++/46382
* semantics.c (check_constexpr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-09
03:54:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Nov 9 03:54:12 2010
New Revision: 166470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166470
Log:
PR c++/46335
* tree.c (bot_manip): Check TR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46385
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46385
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46030
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46384
Summary: ia64-linux: internal compiler error: in
get_attr_first_insn, at config/ia64/itanium2.md:1909
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #17 from Peter Bergner 2010-11-09
01:50:48 UTC ---
The patch looks good on powerpc64-linux.
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes16234
# of expected failures 170
# of unsupported tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2010-11-08 08:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot|unassigned at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-09
00:08:24 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Nov 9 00:08:20 2010
New Revision: 166461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166461
Log:
2010-11-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/43
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|ICE: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dseketel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383
Summary: ICE: in get_binfo_at_offset, at tree.c:10947
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 22:46:09 UTC ---
r166458 fixes comment #11 (by building the vtab early).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 22:42:41 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Nov 8 22:42:34 2010
New Revision: 166458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166458
Log:
2010-11-08 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-08
22:39:09 UTC ---
At some point modified_type_die is called for volatile_const_my_int with
is_volatile and is_const_type set to 0, meaning we want to emit the DIE
of the cv-unqualified version of volat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-08 22:20:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Patch. Testing on x86_64-linux, testing elsewhere is appreciated.
Works OK on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu:
Running target unix
FAIL: 22_locale/collate/ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46382
Summary: constexpr vs. static_assert in constexpr ctors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44981
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-08 21:56:58 UTC
---
I'm now using the attached patch as a workaround, simply disabling the
lto-plugin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-08 21:56:25 UTC
---
Created attachment 22337
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22337
workaround patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46381
Summary: G++ doesn't catch duplicate members produced by
template instantation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-08 20:12:43
UTC ---
>
> But the cgraph code is messy^2 as well. Bah.
Thanks for working on this. Have at least rewrite of this unreachable function
removal pass
in queue for next stage1;)
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08
19:57:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 22336
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22336
gcc46-pr46360.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44757
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44757
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-08 19:44:47 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Nov 8 19:44:42 2010
New Revision: 166451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166451
Log:
2010-11-08 Joern Rennecke
Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46380
Summary: vec-scal-opt*.c tests fail on hppa*-*-* (32-bit)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08
19:18:37 UTC ---
Reduced testcase (fails without any options, -Wwrite-strings is not needed):
__attribute__((gnu_inline, always_inline)) extern inline char *
strncpy (char *dest, const char *src, __SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44758
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46379
Summary: frv.md:*movdf_nodouble+6 is nonsense
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner 2010-11-08
19:02:39 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Nov 8 19:02:35 2010
New Revision: 166448
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166448
Log:
Fix PR 46378 and PR 45585
Modified:
trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2010-11-08
19:02:40 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Nov 8 19:02:35 2010
New Revision: 166448
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166448
Log:
Fix PR 46378 and PR 45585
Modified:
trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2010-11-08 14:53:32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46378
Summary: Powerpc -mcpu=power5 selects FP found instructions
(should use -mcpu=power5+)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44758
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-08 18:53:00 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Nov 8 18:52:51 2010
New Revision: 166447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166447
Log:
2010-11-08 Joern Rennecke
Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-08
18:31:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> As you can see, I somehow believe that "\n" and "\r" are not interpreted
> correctly and replace these (should it be necessary, at least at one time it
> w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #19 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-08 17:58:36
UTC ---
Created attachment 22334
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22334
testcase failing in r166433
Thanks for fixing this! It seems there is one further failing testcase:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08
17:58:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22333
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22333
opt11.ads
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-08 17:57:42 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Nov 8 17:57:35 2010
New Revision: 166445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166445
Log:
PR bootstrap/46358
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08
17:57:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 22332
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22332
opt11.adb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377
Summary: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization (3)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08
17:53:34 UTC ---
Reducing right now...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|http://gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08
17:46:31 UTC ---
> I was just looking into the same problem with MIPS too. I almost think
> TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES in all targets be removed but that is up to each
> target maintainer.
Yes, this sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-08 17:44:46 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Nov 8 17:44:40 2010
New Revision: 166444
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166444
Log:
gcc:
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_arg_bou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #5 from Kay Hayen 2010-11-08 17:43:23 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The motivating examples in the original raw strings proposal are for
> simplifying regular expressions and HTML markup, there's no mention of binary
> blobs.
> h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08
17:40:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 22331
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22331
gcc46-pr45894.patch
Ok, I'll bootstrapp/regtest this then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #97 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:30:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #96)
> (In reply to comment #88)
> > I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in
> > function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #96 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-11-08
17:24:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #88)
> I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in
> function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must be a separate issue.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:13:24
UTC ---
The testcase looks invalid to me:
static bitstream_init (picture_t * picture, void *start)
{
picture->bitstream_ptr = start;
}
...
xine_xvmc_t * xvmc = bitstream_init (picture, buffer);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357
--- Comment #2 from Justin Lebar 2010-11-08
17:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> We always use zero/sign-extending moves to avoid partial register stalls.
Sure, but the whole instruction on line 10 is unnecessary.
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-multilib=no
--with-system-zlib=yes --enable-threads --disable-nls --with-arch-32=i686
--disable-sjlj-exceptions
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) (GCC)
*** File: test.h
#ifndef TEST_H_INCLUDED
#define TEST_H_INCLUDED
struct VBase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-08
17:05:38 UTC ---
Sorry, I have checked that the test doesn't ICE but missed the additional
warnings. How about the below patch, do you think it makes sense? I have
verified that the test still I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #95 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-08 17:00:41 UTC ---
> CC fs/ioctl.o
> fs/ioctl.c: In function 'do_vfs_ioctl':
> fs/ioctl.c:601:1: internal compiler error: in update_df, at fwprop.c:877
> Please submit a full bug r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376
Summary: LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work
together
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08
16:39:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 22329
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22329
gcc46-pr43808-2.patch
Another possible fix (also untested).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
--disable-threads --disable-target-libiberty
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --build=hppa-linux-gnu
--host=hppa-linux-gnu --target=hppa64-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) [trunk revision 166433] (GCC)
I get the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-08
16:04:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> * config/sparc/sparc.c (TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES): Delete.
I was just looking into the same problem with MIPS too. I almost think
TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with
-O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374
--- Comment #2 from Luís Fernando Schultz Xavier da Silveira 2010-11-08 15:48:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> That code is really:
> bool
> f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y)
> {
> return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17;
> }
I am very sorry. I forg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-08
15:41:30 UTC ---
That code is really:
bool
f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y)
{
return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17;
}
--- CUT ---
There should be no zero extends in that code because the ABI requires the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35649
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08
15:38:21 UTC ---
Ah,
if (optimize)
update_alias_info_with_stack_vars ();
explains that. Guess it should be if (optimize || ...).
if (optimize || flag_strict_aliasing) would work for this testcas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374
Summary: Add nooverflow attribute
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
Summary: fflush called when reading from a string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08
15:32:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Indeed, for
> x:
> (mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8
> A64])
> mem:
> (mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08
15:21:41 UTC ---
Indeed, for
x:
(mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8 A64])
mem:
(mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
(const_int -384 [0xfe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372
Summary: format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has
type 'float'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46371
Summary: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: scalar coarray variable is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08
15:02:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 22326
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22326
preprocessed source
Hm, it seems initial attachment doesn't work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46370
Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE: Error allocating CLASS coarrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression
'((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo