http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
--- Comment #3 from Andriy Gapon 2010-09-28 05:26:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Patches should be posted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
And, in fact, I did that a (short?) while ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/217482/fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45814
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2127
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45813
Summary: alias analysis problem ?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5 Regression]: |[4.6 Regression]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #32 from Cesar Strauss 2010-09-28
00:16:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> This is somewhat off topic but unfortunately (MinGW) c++filt doesn't work for
> me, e.g.:
>
> % echo '.text$_ZNK17wxMBConvUTF16Base11GetMBNulLenEv'|/mingw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45677
--- Comment #11 from Dan Witte 2010-09-27 23:40:05
UTC ---
Jakub -- did you commit this fix to gcc's libffi? If not, I'll push upstream to
Anthony.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #31 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-09-27
22:42:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> Sorry, but I do not completely agree with this assessment. If you run
>
> objdump -h | c++filt
>
> you will see that 4.4 still generates one section per
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
--- Comment #16 from Dima 2010-09-27
22:13:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Created attachment 21898 [details] [details]
> > backport
> >
> > This is the backport I use against gcc-4.4
>
> dear dima, thanks f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
--- Comment #15 from Fraxinas 2010-09-27
21:57:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Created attachment 21898 [details]
> backport
>
> This is the backport I use against gcc-4.4
dear dima, thanks for that patch but it's not sufficient. it even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45804
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2010-09-27
21:52:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
>
> What do you mean by "returned"? This is an inline function, so it depends
> entirely on what the referencing code is doing whether or not this value is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #30 from Cesar Strauss 2010-09-27
02:00:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Dear Vadim
> The difference in number of sections seems to correspond to the fact that 4.5
> now generates one section per method of any exported class use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
Fraxinas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreas.fri...@multimedia-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-09-27
20:19:48 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Sep 27 20:19:41 2010
New Revision: 164668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164668
Log:
Fix unportable shell quoting.
/:
PR bootstra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-09-27
19:55:31 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:55:29 2010
New Revision: 164663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164663
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45792
* cfgcleanup.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43358
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43764
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-09-27 19:48:39 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:48:35 2010
New Revision: 164662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164662
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43358
--- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-09-27 19:48:18 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:48:13 2010
New Revision: 164660
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164660
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/4335
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25464
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25450
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45763
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35551
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe 2010-09-27 19:24:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > As I recall, the patch was to circumvent a race condition - which manifest
> > most
> > frequently in the decision as to whether libgomp used TLS or not.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25450
--- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2010-09-27 19:22:17
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:22:13 2010
New Revision: 164659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164659
Log:
In gcc/:
2010-09-27 Nicola Pero
* doc/ob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45763
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-09-27 19:22:17
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:22:13 2010
New Revision: 164659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164659
Log:
In gcc/:
2010-09-27 Nicola Pero
* doc/ob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25464
--- Comment #6 from Nicola Pero 2010-09-27 19:22:17
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:22:13 2010
New Revision: 164659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164659
Log:
In gcc/:
2010-09-27 Nicola Pero
* doc/ob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45811
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.mozilla.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45804
--- Comment #2 from Felipe Contreras
2010-09-27 19:02:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This particular case is invalid.
>
> The ARM ABI requires that short and char result types are extended to 32 bits
> (using signed or unsigned extensio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-09-27 18:40:36 UTC ---
> As I recall, the patch was to circumvent a race condition - which manifest
> most
> frequently in the decision as to whether libgomp used TLS or not.
I see no i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe 2010-09-27 18:34:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > But that support was present before, and still GCC_CHECK_TLS didn't
> > detect it before Iain's patch. Something is certainly fis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805
--- Comment #2 from Khem Raj 2010-09-27 18:33:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 21897 [details]
> Fix register specifier in instruction template for vmovl.
I tried similar patch locally before submitting the bug (changed o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2010-09-27
18:26:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> But that support was present before, and still GCC_CHECK_TLS didn't
> detect it before Iain's patch. Something is certainly fishy here...
His patch was exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-09-27 18:21:04 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2010-09-27
> 18:14:21 UTC ---
>>After it, libstdc++-v3/configure incorrectly concludes that alpha-dec-osf5.1
>>has TLS suppor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2010-09-27
18:14:21 UTC ---
>After it, libstdc++-v3/configure incorrectly concludes that alpha-dec-osf5.1
>has TLS support.
No it should be detected that way as it has emulated TLS support.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27377
--- Comment #13 from Nicola Pero 2010-09-27
18:04:14 UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Mon Sep 27 18:04:09 2010
New Revision: 164655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164655
Log:
In gcc/:
2010-09-27 Nicola Pero
Merge f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45811
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45802
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-09-27 17:48:14 UTC ---
Jan,
again, no progress at all for 2 1/2 weeks on a bootstrap failure on a
primary platform. Please fix or revert.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45658
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-09-27 17:46:29 UTC ---
Jan, this bug is now open for two weeks with no indication of any
progress. It breaks Ada bootstrap on a primary platform, so please fix
or revert your patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
--- Comment #2 from Chris Faylor 2010-09-27 17:23:18
UTC ---
once again. sorry for the noise.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
Chris Faylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cgf at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45322
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45782
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45322
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45804
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45088
--- Comment #4 from Ulrich Weigand 2010-09-27
16:25:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> is this another dup of PR 43628? should be fixed if it is
No, unfortunately it's not. In mainline and 4.5 (which have the 43628) fix,
all other GDB C++ t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45088
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-09-27
16:22:18 UTC ---
is this another dup of PR 43628? should be fixed if it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45779
--- Comment #1 from Alexander 2010-09-27
16:20:48 UTC ---
While fiddling around a bit more I found that gcc normally doesn't let me
create objects whose size exceeds PTRDIFF_MAX. For objects of size at most
PTRDIFF_MAX, the bug cannot be triggere
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45088
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
ct st *st)
> {
> int v = *(volatile int *)&st->ptr;
> return v & 0xff;
> }
>
> gcc 4.4.4 works fine (same result with the first test case)
>
> gcc 4.6.0 20100927 (or 4.5.2 20100927) generates:
> lbu$2,0($4)
> lbu$3,1($4)
> andi
int ptr;
} __attribute__ ((packed));
int foo(struct st *st)
{
int v = *(volatile int *)&st->ptr;
return v & 0xff;
}
gcc 4.4.4 works fine (same result with the first test case)
gcc 4.6.0 20100927 (or 4.5.2 20100927) generates:
lbu$2,0($4)
lbu$3,1($4)
andi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44803
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |other
--- Comment #3 from Felipe Contre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45806
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45806
terry at chem dot gu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445
--- Comment #22 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-09-27
12:45:36 UTC ---
Thanks, that's very well done. I've investigated a bit, and it seems the
sequence
mark_pseudo_regno_live (REGNO (reg));
mark_pseudo_regno_live (REGNO (dreg));
mark_pseudo_regn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45806
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-09-27
12:31:53 UTC ---
That looks like the top-level log, the problem is while configuring libgcc, so
you need to look in i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45811
Summary: bugzilla: editing search loses host/target/build
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45806
--- Comment #3 from terry at chem dot gu.se 2010-09-27 12:23:45 UTC ---
I could see nothing in config.log that looked to my untrained eye like the
problem, so I didn't attach it before. Here it is. What am I missing here?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40414
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.0
Target Milestone|4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35551
--- Comment #3 from Lucas 2010-09-27 11:52:44 UTC ---
I am also having a problem to uncompact this file.
Unfortunately, I no longer have the original
source file that caused that error with gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44561
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-27
11:10:21 UTC ---
*** Bug 45789 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45789
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45799
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-27
11:08:35 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45580 it was.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45799
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45804
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-27
10:49:36 UTC ---
Patches should be posted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-27
10:48:33 UTC ---
For single-file programs -fwhole-program and -flto should be basically
equivalent if the Frontend provides correctly merged decls. I suppose
it does not and thus we do less inlinin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at pci
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45790
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-09-27
10:31:13 UTC ---
On powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu, this problem seems to only affect the
gcc.dg/vmx/* tests (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg02397.html ).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45807
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
Summary: 40% slowdown when using LTO for a single-file program
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45790
Jie Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45809
Summary: Canonicalize file names output during dependency
generation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45790
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
Summary: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-09-27
09:32:14 UTC ---
Looking at it now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45792
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45806
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45807
Summary: Lying eh_frame r2 save info causes crashes with static
libgcc_eh and libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
83 matches
Mail list logo
