--- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-06-30 06:22 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> It looks like you run out of stack space during GC walk. You can check if so
> by raising the stack limit with 'ulimit -s unlimited'.
current trunk (actually a few days old) doesn't fail anym
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-06-30 06:14 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> These are aliases to real functions, but I guess they should also be listed in
> gcc-4.3.0 section. Please send a patch to gcc-patches@ for discussion.
>
I doubt anyone is using __float12
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-30 06:01 ---
These are aliases to real functions, but I guess they should also be listed in
gcc-4.3.0 section. Please send a patch to gcc-patches@ for discussion.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36669
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-30 05:42 ---
The patch in comment #1 fixes the problem (tested on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and
i686-apple-darwin9).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36664
--- Comment #5 from sandra at codesourcery dot com 2008-06-30 02:05 ---
Maybe I'm just being clueless here, but I don't understand why this bug was
re-categorized. In my original analysis, I traced the bad code directly to the
RA pass un-doing the results of previous optimizations. And
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-30 00:29 ---
Mine, I will post the patch for this bug later this week. Note the patch is
located in PR 36444.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-30 00:29 ---
Mine, I will post the patch for this later this week.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
Keywords||build
Targ
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 23:56 ---
This means GCC is running out of memory.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36665
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 23:30 ---
Hmm, I thought I saw a draft ealier that added also auto template and static
template but I can't find that draft any more :(.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36655
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-29 22:12 ---
Confirmed on i686-apple-darwin9. The following modified code
! { dg-do run }
! PR 25292: Check that the intrinsic associated works with functions returning
! pointers as arguments
program test
real, pointer :: a,
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-29 21:46
---
Fixed again.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 21:45 ---
Subject: Bug 36655
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Jun 29 21:44:57 2008
New Revision: 137261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137261
Log:
/cp
2008-06-29 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c+
Given
--- main.h ---
not_declared_yet();
--- main.c ---
#include "main.h"
--- Makefile ---
all:
gcc --version
gcc -Wall -E -I. main.c > huhu.ii
-gcc -Wall -I. huhu.ii
gcc -Wall -I. main.c
make produces:
---
make
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.
--- Comment #1 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-06-29 21:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=15831)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15831&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36673
> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin9.3.0
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc44-ira
--enable-threads=posix --with-arch=core2 --with-tune=core2 --with-gmp=/sw
--with-mpfr=/sw --disable-nls --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=yes,rtl
CFLAGS=-g LDFLAGS=/usr/
--- Comment #1 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-06-29 21:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=15830)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15830&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36672
> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin9.3.0
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc44-ira
--enable-threads=posix --with-arch=core2 --with-tune=core2 --with-gmp=/sw
--with-mpfr=/sw --disable-nls --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=yes,rtl
CFLAGS=-g LDFLAGS=/usr/
Revision 137252:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01883.html
caused
FAIL: gfortran.dg/associated_1.f90 -O1 execution test
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/associated_1.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Runtime checks are OK, compile-time checks are better.
$ cat sum.f90
program main
real, dimension(3,3) :: a
real, dimension(2) :: b
a = 21.
b = sum(a,dim=1)
end program main
$ gfortran -fbounds-check sum.f90
$ ./a.out
Fortran runtime error: Incorrect extent in return value of SUM intrinsic
45: 8d20 517 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 11 __gttf2@@GCC_3.0
80: 8f30 549 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 11 __lttf2@@GCC_3.0
116: 8ba0 381 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 11 __netf2@@GCC_3.0
They should be @@GCC_4.3.0 instead of @@GCC_3.0.
--
Summary:
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 19:06
---
Subject: Bug 36341
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jun 29 19:06:06 2008
New Revision: 137255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137255
Log:
2008-06-29 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 19:02
---
Docs updated. Committed revision 137254. Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 17:57
---
If you are still having problems, please let me know. I am closing this as
invalid but certainly know that we ill help you if you need further help.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wh
--- Comment #1 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 17:50 ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01890.html
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-29 16:45 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> extended.h in soft-fp assumes the size 80bit XFmode is 16byte.
> It is only correct for x86-64. For ia32, it is 12byte.
I don't think so. From extended.h:
...
#if _FP_W_TYPE_SIZE < 64
union _F
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-06-29 16:42 ---
I guess it is OK.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.4/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.4/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/PR23205.C -nostdinc++
-I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.4/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa-linux
-I/home/dave/
extended.h in soft-fp assumes the size 80bit XFmode is 16byte.
It is only correct for x86-64. For ia32, it is 12byte.
--
Summary: Incorrect XFmode emulation in soft-fp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-06-29 15:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] ICE in
process_constraint, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2573
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 15
--- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 15:23 ---
You can't remove the assert, the assert is there because things will be broken
if it hasn't been handed off to do_structure_copy.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 14:19 ---
The solution is to remove the assert, but there is more latent bugs I just
discovered while looking at this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
Testcase, reduced from ia64 ada bootstrap failure:
struct Foo {
int *p;
struct X {
int a,b,c,d,e,*f;
} x;
} *init, *init2;
struct X __attribute__((const)) foo(struct X);
void bar (void)
{
init->x = foo (init2->x);
}
mine.
--
Summary: [4.4 Regression] ICE in process_con
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-29 13:18
---
Ok, ok...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36655
--- Comment #5 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-06-29
12:54 ---
Crap, pasted the wrong code. Here's the code that now triggers the warning:
template class S {};
extern template class S;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36655
--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis dot net 2008-06-29
12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Fixed for 4.4.0.
Thanks! However, I just noticed that while the problem has been fixed for
function templates, it's still there for class templates. This code:
template vo
--- Comment #5 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2008-06-29 12:25 ---
It's a bug in calculation of number of iterations of prolog loop. I am testing
the following patch:
Index: tree-vect-transform.c
===
--- tree-vect-transfor
--- Comment #1 from jasenk2 at gmail dot com 2008-06-29 11:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=15829)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15829&action=view)
util.ii file produced a internal error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36665
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:7604: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline
inserted
{standard input}:8453: Error: undefined symbol `.LLSDACSE5526' in operation
g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)
--
Summary: g++: Internal error: Killed (p
On i686-apple-darwin9 at revision 137248, bootstrap fails with:
...
/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/./prev-gcc/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.4w/i686-apple-darwin9/bin/ -c -g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wcast
--- Comment #25 from wbrana at gmail dot com 2008-06-29 10:55 ---
I think "4.3" is missing in "Summary" and "4.3.1" in "Known to fail".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 10:45 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 10:42 ---
Subject: Bug 36620
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jun 29 10:41:17 2008
New Revision: 137250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137250
Log:
PR testsuite/36620
* gcc.dg/pr36504.c: Add -w to
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 10:39 ---
Subject: Bug 36620
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jun 29 10:39:05 2008
New Revision: 137249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137249
Log:
PR testsuite/36620
* gcc.dg/pr36504.c: Add -w to
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-29 08:58 ---
The test case in comment #1 does compile for me without any ICE. The test case
in comment #0 is actually invalid, triggering the following error message:
procedure(abstract_fun) fun
1
Error: PROCED
--- Comment #1 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-06-29 07:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=15828)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15828&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36663
> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin9.3.0
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc44-ira
--enable-threads=posix --with-arch=core2 --with-tune=core2 --with-gmp=/sw
--with-mpfr=/sw --disable-nls --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=yes,rtl
CFLAGS=-g LDFLAGS=/usr/
48 matches
Mail list logo
