------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-06-30 06:14 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > These are aliases to real functions, but I guess they should also be listed in > gcc-4.3.0 section. Please send a patch to gcc-patches@ for discussion. >
I doubt anyone is using __float128 seriously before the full __float128 run-time support is finished. Changing to @@GCC_4.3.0 will at most cause run-time failure. Or we can leave it as is. Adding @@GCC_4.3.0 doesn't make much senses if we will never remove the @@GCC_3.0 ones. If we do want to remove the @@GCC_3.0 ones one day, now is a good time. BTW, it turns out that gcc 4.3 has those __float128 functions in libgcc.a. That means all __float128 functions are linked in as hidden functions. Changing to @GCC_4.3.0 won't make any differences since the ones in libgcc_s.so are never used. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36669
