iled to build on hppa64.
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20070716/gcc-4.1-20070716.tar.bz2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32785
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 06:36
---
Can you please stop changing the Severity?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from Sushil dot Kothawade at kpitcummins dot com 2007-07-17
06:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=13928)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13928&action=view)
patch to get rid of ICE...
Hi,
Investigation Details :
While debugging gcc, I found that the re
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
Severity|normal
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 05:19 ---
Subject: Re: Cannot build cross compiler for Solaris: configure: error: Link
tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
On 17 Jul 2007 05:15:47 -, cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ---
On 17 Jul 2007 05:15:47 -, cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Comment #18 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 05:15 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Did you copy all of the libraries including the 64bit ones?
hp 11.11(pa8800), supports both 32 and 64b
--- Comment #19 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 05:16 ---
checking for library containing strerror... configure: error: Link tests are
not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/beans/gcc-build/bui
--- Comment #18 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 05:15 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Did you copy all of the libraries including the 64bit ones?
hp 11.11(pa8800), supports both 32 and 64bit.
I can build gcc-3.4.6 32bit/64bit, but can't build gcc-4.1.2 64bit.
$ gcc -v
Readin
--- Comment #10 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 05:09 ---
>>How are you invoking make?
use "make", no any option.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32785
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 04:57 ---
$ /opt/gcc-3.4.6/lp64/bin/as -v
GNU assembler version 2.17 (hppa64-hp-hpux11.11) using BFD version 2.17
$ /opt/gcc-4.1.2/lp64/bin/as -v
GNU assembler version 2.17 (hppa64-hp-hpux11.11) using BFD version 2.17
--
ht
-as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld
--without-gnu-ld --enable-threads=posix --enable-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.3 20070716 (prerelease)
/var/tmp//ccZWFTkL.s: Assembler messages:
/var/tmp//ccZWFTkL.s:3: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.subspa'
/var/tmp//ccZWFTkL.s:4: Error: unknown p
--- Comment #2 from markwright at internode dot on dot net 2007-07-17
04:39 ---
Subject: Re: Sun Studio 12 Undefined symbol addl
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17
> 04:26 --- Try this patch:
...
Thanks for the suggestion. I have a patch which
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 04:38
---
I will investigate further, but if all its trying to do is WRITE to the console
use WRITE(unit=6) and don't give it a filename at all. You don't even need to
OPEN it. It will be OPENed implicitly for you. READ (
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 04:26
---
It does not work with WRITE. If you replace the PRINT statement inside foo
with an equivalent WRITE statement, you get the same error. The public ::
print symbol is getting used by the PRINT statement rather tha
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 04:26 ---
Try this patch:
Index: config/i386/driver-i386.c
===
--- config/i386/driver-i386.c (revision 126667)
+++ config/i386/driver-i386.c (working copy)
@@
Compiling gcc-4.2.1-RC-20070712 with Sun Studio 12 on Solaris Express
Community Edition b66:
goanna% CC -V
CC: Sun C++ 5.9 SunOS_i386 2007/05/03
goanna%
With the environment variables:
CXXCPP=CC -E -Xs
CPP=cc -E -Xs
LD=/opt/jdsbld/bin/ld-wrapper
CXX64=/opt/SunStudio12/SUNWspro/bin/CC
CXX32=/opt/
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 04:11 ---
> checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after
> GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
This should not happen with native builds.
How are you invoking make?
Also what happens when you remove the buil
--- Comment #4 from bachmann dot matt at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 04:04
---
alright then. ::shrugs::
thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32786
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 04:03
---
Did you copy all of the libraries including the 64bit ones?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28125
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:59
---
This is not a bug, you need a C library while building or the use of
--without-headers
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:58 ---
No, it is crashing. Anyways this is just undefined behavior so any behavior
here is ok :).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:56 ---
Subject: Bug 32773
Author: rakdver
Date: Tue Jul 17 03:56:40 2007
New Revision: 126700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126700
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/32773
* cfglayout.c (forc
--- Comment #2 from bachmann dot matt at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 03:39
---
but thats just it! alright it does not infinite loop but for me it does not
crash, it runs perfectly. Here is my output:
$ g++ HW1.cpp
$ ./a.out
23
Mary had a little lamb.
ary had a little lamb.
ry had a littl
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 03:35 ---
reopen.
also hppa64.
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 03:28 ---
Bug 25035
Bug 28125
Bug 28949
similar to these bugs.
I can build gcc-3.4.6, but can't build GCC-4.1.2.
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 03:26 ---
Subject: Re: (hpux11.11)link test not allowed GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
Bug 25035
Bug 28125
Bug 28949
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28949
- Original Message -
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org"
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:19 ---
Can you read config.log and see why it is failing?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #38 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:18
---
(In reply to comment #37)
> We might want to test "-mfixed-range=REGISTER-RANGE" while we are checking
> that
> this bug is completely fixed.
That option does not exist for x86.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:17 ---
They are duplicated because they are different sections of the case statement.
Nothing we can do about this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:17 ---
> the condition in the while loop should cause an infinite loop and should be
> moby*
I think you mean *moby. Anyways it is just undefined that you go past the
array bounds when incrementing a pointer so we know it
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 03:13 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We might want to test "-mfixed-range=REGISTER-RANGE" while we are checking
> this.
x86 does not have that option. Only IA64, HPPA, and SPU have that option.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 03:11 ---
checking for library containing strerror... configure: error: Link tests are
not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/beans/gcc-build/buil
--- Comment #37 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 03:10 ---
We might want to test "-mfixed-range=REGISTER-RANGE" while we are checking that
this bug is completely fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32004
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 03:08 ---
We might want to test "-mfixed-range=REGISTER-RANGE" while we are checking
this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32267
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 03:01 ---
>It shows on pages 9 and 10 a list of IPA and inlining options that exceed our
>"-fipa-pta" and friends. They also use different default values in some cases
>where 'similar' features are offered.
If no "auto-tuning" (whic
--- Comment #4 from steven dot chapel at sbcglobal dot net 2007-07-17
02:52 ---
What name should I change 'con' to so that the write statement writes to the
console? I asked on the gfortran mailing list, and I was told to submit this
bug report. If it's as simple as changing the name, l
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 02:52 ---
In file: gcc-4_3-trunk/libiberty/configure.ac
line 364 and line 369 both have gettimeofday
Another occurance (in configure.ac) is here:
*-*-msdosdjgpp)
for f in atexit basename bcmp bcopy bsearch bzero calloc clo
--- Comment #16 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 02:37 ---
also affects 4.1_branch, libiberty.
HPUX 11.11 hppa64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28125
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 02:37 ---
Except con should be the console aka /dev/pts/?? .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #1 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-17 02:35 ---
checking for g++ that supports -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections... yes
checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Er
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 02:25
---
Under Cygwin we get:
$ ./a.exe
At line 4 of file test.f90 (unit = 29, file = '')
Fortran runtime error: File 'con' already exists
con is a reserved device name from MS DOS:
See http://www.tcs.org/ioport/jul98/
This is my first bug report... I am not quite sure what you mean by
host/target/build triplet so ill give you what I can
complied on an 686 architecture in linux.
#include
#include
using namespace std;
/**
* Matt Bachmann
* CS 331
* HW1 Due: July 9th 2007
* Main method shows different ways
svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch gcc-4_1-branch
Checked out revision 126698.
boot gcc: hppa64,gcc-3.4.6.
../gcc-4_1-branch/configure --build=hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
--host=hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 --target=hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
--prefix=/opt/gcc-4.1.2/lp64 --with-as=/opt/gcc-4.1.2/lp
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 01:26 ---
Thank you Andrew. !
This bug report was about a "blocker" - the build breaking, unable to continue.
I altered the Makefile to use "moc-qt4" (instead of "moc") and the build
continued past that point perfectly well, that w
many threads have a reply that says: "it's broken,
don't do it" - I say enable it, and lets fix it!
I'm compiling "gcc version 4.3.0 20070716" and as far as "_building_" goes, it
works - not at the _testing_ part yet.
Make sure you alter file
"
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-17
01:06 ---
Subject: Re: jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of
805021000 bytes
> Hi guys, can you check whether the 32723 fix that was just checked in
> fixes this?
Still same problem with the 32
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 00:49 ---
Another "DEBUG" just showed up in "gcc version 4.3.0 20070716":
gcc-4_3-trunk/libjava/gnu/classpath/Configuration.h
...
static ::java::lang::String * CLASSPATH_VERSION;
static jboolean DEBUG;
s
--- Comment #17 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2007-07-16 23:26
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/auto_array_1.f90
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #16 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-16 19:27 ---
> revision 125923 works. Kenny, it looks like you
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 22:57 ---
--enable-java-awt=qt is not tested at all and is known not to work, see PR
24403.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32781
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 22:55 ---
I think this is a dup of bug 27928.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-16 22:53 ---
make[6]: Leaving directory
`/opt/gcc-4_3-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/native/jni/gtk-peer'
Making all in qt-peer
make[6]: Entering directory
`/opt/gcc-4_3-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/native/jni/q
--- Comment #20 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 22:29
---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing causes skipped code
Oh, for 4.2 you need to add make_constraint_to_escaped_var
On 16 Jul 2007 15:51:44 -, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-16 22:15 ---
I may be enabling more features than others are using ;)
I re-did ./configure and "make clean" and "make" and got a thousand lines
further, now I am here:
make[7]: Entering directory
`/opt/gcc-4_3-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 22:15 ---
This is a windows only issue as using special files (device files) under
GNU/Linux works just fine.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
When this program is compiled and run:
character*72 fnint
data fnint /'con'/
i=index(fnint,' ');
open(unit=29,file=fnint(1:i-1),status='new')
write(29,100)
100format('1Hello, world!')
end
It generates this error message:
At line 4 of file bug.for (un
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:56 ---
When dealing with X in the initialization expression, the PROC attribute equals
PROC_EXTERNAL, function X was not seen yet. Thus the wrong error message.
Here we should diagnose that X is not a specification functio
--- Comment #2 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2007-07-16 19:51 ---
Seems to work now in r126689.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32572
--- Comment #5 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:39 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01462.html
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:38
---
The patch requires RM approval.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32199
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:30 ---
The type of sizeof is unsigned. So you really have (short)(unsigned)-4 .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32782
--- Comment #16 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-16 19:27 ---
revision 125923 works. Kenny, it looks like your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01557.html
causes this regression. Can you look into it? Thanks.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|
--- Comment #5 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:14
---
Fixed.
--
lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #4 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:14
---
Fixed.
--
lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #4 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:13
---
Subject: Bug 32238
Author: lmillward
Date: Mon Jul 16 19:12:44 2007
New Revision: 126689
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126689
Log:
PR fortran/3
PR fortran/32238
--- Comment #3 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:13
---
Subject: Bug 3
Author: lmillward
Date: Mon Jul 16 19:12:44 2007
New Revision: 126689
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126689
Log:
PR fortran/3
PR fortran/32238
--- Comment #8 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:13
---
Subject: Bug 32242
Author: lmillward
Date: Mon Jul 16 19:12:44 2007
New Revision: 126689
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126689
Log:
PR fortran/3
PR fortran/32238
--- Comment #15 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-16 19:11 ---
revision 125924 is bad. I am testing revision 125923 now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32749
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:11 ---
configure is a generated file from configure.ac so please look into there
first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32783
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 19:10 ---
Oh but what happens is we do some duplication of code (for 4.2 at least) and
then we see the variable is used unitialization. This has changed in the trunk
to a may used uninitialized but the issue is still the same
While linting libibery I found various problems with
"gcc-4_3-build-4/libiberty/configure" - all minor, some you might want to fix
someday:
Around line 5140 in the funtion detection it checks for gettimeofday two times:
for ac_func in asprintf atexit basename bcmp bcopy bsearch bzero calloc cloc
--- Comment #1 from Steve at Zook dot com 2007-07-16 19:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=13926)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13926&action=view)
Test code fragment compiled m68k-elf-g++ -c testpp.cpp
Lines end in \r\n.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-16 19:05 ---
Subject: Bug number pr32627
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01459.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
When calling a procedure with signed char or short arguments using -sizeof() as
an expression, an ":: warning: overflow in implicit constant
conversion" is output. Arguments with int or long do not. This happens even
though there is no real overflow (e.g. if -sizeof() evaluates to -4). See
attached
--- Comment #2 from bernard at brenda-arkle dot demon dot co dot uk
2007-07-16 19:01 ---
I have gone through this removing many repetitions of "see above for my
actual bug report". Please take it as read (and see above for my actual
bug report).
I explicitly said that the mere confess
--- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-16 18:47 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> revision 125920 works.
> Revision 125925 is bad:
17:06 r125925 - in /trunk/gcc: ChangeLog testsuite/gc... spop
16:25 r125924 - in /trunk/gcc: ChangeLog df-problems.czadeck
15:
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
--- Comment #13 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-16 18:14 ---
revision 125920 works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32749
--- Comment #6 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2007-07-16
17:30 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
You need the following patch to fix this bug (but bootstrap on alpha is still
broken for other reasons, see bug 32747):
---
gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c | 13 +++--
1 fil
--- Comment #9 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:22 ---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:21 ---
Subject: Bug 3456
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 16 17:21:10 2007
New Revision: 126685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126685
Log:
gcc:
PR bootstrap/3456
* config.gcc (mips-sgi-ir
--- Comment #10 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:10 ---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-16 17:10 ---
revision 125905 works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32749
--- Comment #18 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:09 ---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:07 ---
Subject: Bug 32465
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 16 17:07:25 2007
New Revision: 126684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126684
Log:
PR target/32462
PR libgcj/32465
* class.c (hide
--- Comment #17 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:07 ---
Subject: Bug 32462
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 16 17:07:25 2007
New Revision: 126684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126684
Log:
PR target/32462
PR libgcj/32465
* class.c (hid
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-07-16 17:01 ---
I bet you are doing again something I noticed before, and is *totally*
unsupported: using the 4_2 library sources together with a 4_3 compiler-proper
sources or viceversa. You cannot do that, because, just as an example,
_
-arch=athlon-xp
--enable-stage1-checking=assert,df,fold,gc,misc,rtl,rtlflag,runtime,tree
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.0 20070716 (experimental)
Screen output:
...
libtool: link: creating libgtkpeer.la
libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgtkpeer.la"
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 16:47 ---
This one is most likely my fault with pointer plus, something is creating an
BIT_AND_EXPR with a pointer type.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 16:41 ---
I've just tried bootstrapping alpha-dec-osf5.1b (C only): all is fine before
the
ptrplus patch (r125754), but after the patch (r125755) building libgcc fails in
stage 1. With Andrew's patch, I get into stage 2, but buil
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-16
16:16 ---
Subject: Re: jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of
805021000 bytes
> Hi guys, can you check whether the 32723 fix that was just checked in
> fixes this?
Doesn't seem to be checked in y
--- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org 2007-07-16 16:13 ---
Simplified test case:
extern void dont_optimize_away(unsigned long);
void crashGcc(char*a)
{
unsigned long b=(unsigned long)a - ((unsigned long)a & 1);
dont_optimize_away(b);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Comment #1 from bero at arklinux dot org 2007-07-16 15:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=13925)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13925&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32780
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../include -I../../../../hw/xfree86
-I../../../../hw/xfree86/include -I../../../../hw/xfree86/common
-I../../../../hw/xfree86/os-support -I../../../../hw/xfree86/os-support/bus
-I../../../../os -I/usr/include/drm -DUSESTDRES -DHAVE_SYSV_IPC
-DHAVE_XORG_CONFIG_H -D
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 15:56 ---
*** Bug 32779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 15:56 ---
Mark as duplicate. At least ac does works after reverting the patch.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32773 ***
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2007-07-16 15:52 ---
The problem is that the reg_stat array in combine.c does not adjust when
splitters create new pseudo-registers. I'm working on a patch to convert
reg_stat to a VEC.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Remo
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 15:51
---
The backported patch causes
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr28778.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr28778.c execution, -Os
DCE removes
-
-:;
- list[3] = 42;
we have one added constraint:
blis
--- Comment #13 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-16 15:49 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 15:36 ---
Probably a dup of PR32773.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32779
On AMD Athlon64 4800+ using gcc-Version 4.3.0 20070716
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) with aermod of the Polyhedron benchmark suite:
http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/pb05/polyhedron_benchmark_suite.html
gfortran -fprofile-generate -march=opteron -ffast-math -funroll-loops
-ftree-loop-linear -ftree
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
