--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 07:56 ---
Subject: Bug 25331
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 13 07:56:10 2005
New Revision: 108460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108460
Log:
PR c++/25331
* gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_gene
--- Comment #2 from victor at thedods dot com 2005-12-13 07:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=10465)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10465&action=view)
Source file (with a function that, if uncommented, prevents the crash)
For some reason, when the commented-out funct
--- Comment #1 from victor at thedods dot com 2005-12-13 07:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=10464)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10464&action=view)
preprocessed source file
Here is the preprocessed source file (not much different from the original,
which is attach
This example, as is, will cause:
blah.cpp: In function 'void Load() [with T = Blah, T* (* LoadFunction)() =
Blah::Create]':
blah.cpp:24: instantiated from here
blah.cpp:13: internal compiler error: in build_call, at cp/call.c:323
The command is `g++ -c blah.cpp -save-temps`
`gcc -v` produces
U
--- Comment #6 from charlet at adacore dot com 2005-12-13 07:22 ---
Subject: Re: make[2]: *** [ada/einfo.h] Error 1
> Is GNAT still being maintained in the 4.0 branch?
Yes, although only critical changes go there (as you would expect for
a release branch).
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 06:46 ---
The semantics of this feature are pretty obvious for simple testcases. But
since there's no One Definition Rule for namespaces, it's perfectly valid for
different chunks of the same namespace to have different attrib
Take the following example:
void g(int);
int f(int i)
{
int t = i&0xFF;
g(t);
return (i > 0x100);
}
This can happen for casts like (int)(char)(i) and to truncate the i.
The range for t should be [0, 0xFF].
--
Summary: VRP does not get a range from BIT_AND_EXPR if the sec
Take this little (stupid) C example:
int f1(int a)
{
int b = a*2;
return b+a;
}
---
Currently we produce:
_f1:
mr r0,r3
slwi r3,r3,1
add r3,r3,r0
blr
-
We should be able to produce:
_f1:
slwi r0,r3,1
add r3,r3,r0
blr
---
If we l
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 04:30 ---
Fixed in 4.2.0 by:
2005-12-12 Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tree-ssa-dom.c (simplify_rhs_and_lookup_avail_expr): Remove
reassociation code.
* passes.c (init_optimization_passes): Run reass
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 04:29 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #2 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-12-13 04:28
---
The testcase is invalid, because you are compiling libwrapped.so without -fPIC.
Now, powerpc64 code is always PIC, so you might think that -fPIC (or -fpic) is
unnecessary on powerpc64 shared libraries. However,
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 04:24 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 04:18 ---
Fixed by:
2005-12-12 Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tree-ssa-dom.c (simplify_rhs_and_lookup_avail_expr): Remove
reassociation code.
* passes.c (init_optimization_passes): Run reassociation
--- Comment #1 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 03:43 ---
Roger it's your testcase originally, any thoughts?
Identical code works on 4.0 and later.
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #21 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 03:24 ---
After my checkins today, is there anything left to do in 4.0/4.1/trunk ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20772
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 02:29 ---
Strangely, this didn't occur with using 4.1.0 and the same bootstrap version
of gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20051212 (experimental)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25380
main (argc=0, argv=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/main.c:35
(gdb)
This is with 4.2.0 20051212 bootstrapped using 3.4.4.
(gdb) p debug_tree (fndecl)
>
SI
size
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1
arg-types
chain
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 01:59
---
Mark, this appeared with your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-10/msg00056.html
Looks like a latent bug, though.
BTW, the code compiles with a function reference instead of a function pointer
as template
ppc64 segmentation fault on function return that returns the value of another
function.
Segmentation fault occurs when application is compiled with "-O2", but not when
compiled with "-O1". *.i files identical, so included is a small test program,
rather than the .i file. Apply following as a pat
--- Comment #2 from glommer at gmail dot com 2005-12-13 01:18 ---
Ok, the patch worked perfectly here.
(In reply to comment #1)
> Patch posted:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00659.html
>
(In reply to comment #1)
> Patch posted:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23838
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 00:23 ---
I am going to say this is 4.1 regression as it worked in 4.0.0 when removing
the -fno-tree-copy-prop option but fails on the mainline and 4.1 branche with
it. Somehow or another someone could come up with a testcase
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 00:01 ---
I'm guessing but I think this patch might fix this problem as I'm not
seeing this failure: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00325.html.
The timing of the appearance of this bug appears to coincide with th
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 23:59 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 23:58 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 23:58 ---
Subject: Bug 25348
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Dec 12 23:58:16 2005
New Revision: 108432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108432
Log:
2005-12-12 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ob
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 23:47 ---
Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00883.html.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 23:46
---
This is a regression from 4.0.2.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 23:17 ---
(insn 3 9 4 0 (set (mem/f/c/i:DI (reg/f:DI 335 virtual-stack-vars) [0 a+0 S8
A64])
(reg:DI 112 in0 [ a ])) -1 (nil)
(nil))
(insn 6 5 7 0 (set (mem/c/i:DI (reg/f:DI 340) [0 b+0 S8 A128])
(reg:DI
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-12
22:50 ---
Subject: Re: make[2]: *** [ada/einfo.h] Error 1
> > > If the issue is with the bootstrap compiler, there's not much we can do.
> >
> > Bootstrap compiler is GCC. This doesn't occur on linux, but it
>
>
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:49
---
I also get an ICE on the 4.0 branch as of today (and 4.0.0 - 4.0.2):
bug.cc: In function 'int main()':
bug.cc:16: internal compiler error: in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:368
Please submit a full bug report, [etc
--- Comment #20 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:44 ---
Subject: Bug 20772
Author: ghazi
Date: Mon Dec 12 22:44:43 2005
New Revision: 108429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108429
Log:
PR testsuite/20772
* g++.old-deja/g++.eh/tmpl2.C
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:39
---
Shorter testcase:
struct A
{
template void foo() {}
template int foo() {}
};
This compiles correctly without the struct.
--
reichelt a
--- Comment #19 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:37 ---
Subject: Bug 20772
Author: ghazi
Date: Mon Dec 12 22:37:46 2005
New Revision: 108428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108428
Log:
PR testsuite/20772
* g++.old-deja/g++.eh/tmpl2.C
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:35
---
Lets close it as fixed then.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:32
---
More compact testcase:
=
template struct A {};
template<> template struct A {};
A a;
=
--
reichelt at gcc dot g
--- Comment #18 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:28 ---
Subject: Bug 20772
Author: ghazi
Date: Mon Dec 12 22:28:02 2005
New Revision: 108427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108427
Log:
PR testsuite/20772
* g++.old-deja/g++.eh/tmpl2.C
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:14
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't see this problem on FreeBSD with either static of dynamic
> linking. Note, in both cases, I am picking up csqrt() from libgfortran.
> What platform are you using?
It's mentionn
--- Comment #20 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=10463)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10463&action=view)
a full set of debugging dumps
Re. comment #16, sorry, I didn't read it until after going through the
scheduler
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:14 ---
How embarrassing, I tried these things by adding new tests to
gcc.test-framework and the awk script that checks the results was ignoring some
of the results because of magic needed for the generated tests. Now I'm abl
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:10 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0, it fails for me in 3.4.0.
Closing as fixed for 4.0.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:08 ---
What version of gcj are you using?
This seems to work fine for both 4.0 and 4.1.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #19 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:03 ---
The dumps before and after scheduling look OK to me.
There are three groups of instructions for libcalls:
1) 19-14-18-20
inputs: regs 95, 99, and 102 (all of them for x)
result: reg 97
clobbers: nothing
2)
public abstract class bug {
protected void kill() {System.out.println("okay");}
protected abstract void init();
public static bug getBug() {return new bug(){protected void init()
{kill();}};}
public static void main(String s[]) { bug.getBug().init(); }
}
$ g
When the mask is all false, F95 leaves it to the processor what
to return for maxloc, minloc etc. F2003 specifies 0. We currently
use 1, but changing this to 0 would make sense.
$ cat m.f90
program main
real, dimension(2) :: a
logical, dimension(2) :: fa
fa = .false.
print *,maxloc(a,fa)
--- Comment #18 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 21:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=10462)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10462&action=view)
Instruction stream (stripped) after scheduling
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- Comment #17 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 21:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=10461)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10461&action=view)
Instruction stream (stripped) before scheduling
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 21:01 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #10 from bero at arklinux dot org 2005-12-12 21:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=10460)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10460&action=view)
Script to trigger the SIGABRT problem
Attaching a script that still triggers the SIGABRT.
It's quite large for a te
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:52 ---
*** Bug 25321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23209
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:52 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23209 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:49 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:47
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:46 ---
It comes after splitting a RTL pattern.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25295
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:46 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > You have to do "aclocal -I ../config", or you can configure with
> > --enable-maintainer-mode.
>
> Ah, thanks. It fails very early though:> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat t.c
> typedef __ext
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:45 ---
I am going to do this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assi
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:41 ---
This is not what the documention says.
It is talking about global variables and not a local ones.
"Instead GCC allows static initialization of flexible array members. "
Your example is not static initilzating of the
--- Comment #16 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:28
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I can reproduce this on hppa2.0-suse-linux-gnu with the "4.2-20051210"
> snapshot.
Could you make a full set of debugging dumps (i.e. from compiling with -da)
available somewhere?
--
--- Comment #57 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:23
---
*** Bug 2673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:23 ---
Mark as a dup of bug 11751.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11751 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:23 ---
Reopening to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #15 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:19 ---
I can reproduce this on hppa2.0-suse-linux-gnu with the "4.2-20051210"
snapshot.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25299
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25167
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24478
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25292
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25311
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25247
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24220
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24945
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25109
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25149
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25193
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25158
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:13 ---
Subject: Bug 25078
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Dec 12 20:13:37 2005
New Revision: 108426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108426
Log:
PR fortran/25078
* match.c (gfc_match_equivalence
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25207
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13384
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24789
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24705
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24223
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23124
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15809
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19231
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23669
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24326
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24794
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24950
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24999
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:06 ---
I don't see this problem on FreeBSD with either static of dynamic
linking. Note, in both cases, I am picking up csqrt() from libgfortran.
What platform are you using? Is this another glibc problem? Does
-fdump-tree-
I tried to use gfortran together with a library that uses pthreads. This caused
a segfault. Note that my own code didn't directly call pthreads nor use openmp
(this is trunk, not gomp branch).
~/src/benchmark/matmul-bench% gfortran -g -O0 matmul-bench.f90 -o mbgfc-goto
-lgoto -lpthread
~/src/benc
--- Comment #9 from bero at arklinux dot org 2005-12-12 20:02 ---
After some more testing, it turns out the test case is fixed, but the bigger
test case from the original report isn't.
Compiling ecj with gcj 4.0.1 and using it on a simple .java file still causes a
SIGABRT after strace i
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 19:36 ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00659.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 19:33 ---
*** Bug 25363 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25362
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 19:33 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25362 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 19:31 ---
Can you attach the preprocessed source?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 19:28 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #8 from bero at arklinux dot org 2005-12-12 19:18 ---
Adjusting summary to reflect the current situation
--
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from bero at arklinux dot org 2005-12-12 19:16 ---
Just tried current 4.1 branch SVN (108424 with the patch for bug 24441 applied)
- it works a lot better (no more ICEs or segfaults).
One problem remains though (but this isn't major):
CLASSPATH=test.jar gij test1
Still d
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
