------- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 22:08 ------- What version of gcj are you using? This seems to work fine for both 4.0 and 4.1.
-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Summary|gcj creates incorrect |gcj creates incorrect |(byte-)code |(byte-)code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25379