------- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-12 22:08 -------
What version of gcj are you using?
This seems to work fine for both 4.0 and 4.1.


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
            Summary|gcj  creates incorrect      |gcj  creates incorrect
                   |(byte-)code                 |(byte-)code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25379

Reply via email to