This is the beta release of binutils 2.17.50.0.10 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2007 0122 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
Starting from the 2.17.50.0.4 release, the default output section LMA
(load memory address) has changed for allocatable sections
Hi all,
Which optimization levels affect gimple?
I've tried for a program to check what kind of gimple code you get
with -fdump-tree-gimple and -O0 and -O3 have different results,
however, -O3 and -O9 have exactly the same output. Will -Ox for x > 3,
generate the same gimple trees? (i.e., are don
We would like to invite everyone to read over the Call for Papers for
the 2007 GCC Developers' Summit located at
http://www.gccsummit.org/2007/cfp.php and to consider submitting a
proposal for this year.
This year we're going to be from July 18th to 20th for a change and hope
that you're all
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:18:34AM +0100, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> [sorry for breaking the thread; stupid gmail doesn't want to add
> custom References headers]
>
> >It may be that not too many people pick up 4.2.0. But, if 4.3 isn't
> >looking very stable, there will be a point when peop
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:57:45AM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> >Gcc 4.2 has a serious FP performace issue:
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-01/msg00408.html
> >
> >on both ia32 and x86-64. If there will be a 4.2.0 release, I hope it
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:22:46PM -0800, George R Goffe wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I got an email from Joe Buck who suggested that I fix a clock skew problem
> between 2
> of my systems. I did this but this did not change the "other" problem with
> this
> build effort. A diff of the 2 sets of error me
This is the beta release of binutils 2.17.50.0.11 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2007 0125 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
Starting from the 2.17.50.0.4 release, the default output section LMA
(load memory address) has changed for allocatable sections
On 1/24/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/24/07 12:44:
> check what kind of gimple code you get with -fdump-tree-gimple and
> -O0 and -O3 have different results,
>
-fdump-tree-gimple is the first dump *before* any optimizations occur.
To se
This is the beta release of binutils 2.17.50.0.12 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2007 0128 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
Starting from the 2.17.50.0.4 release, the default output section LMA
(load memory address) has changed for allocatable sections
On 24 Jan 2007 09:56:55 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Paulo J. Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which optimization levels affect gimple?
> I've tried for a program to check what kind of gimple code you get
> with -fdump-tree-g
On 1/24/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/24/07 12:44:
> check what kind of gimple code you get with -fdump-tree-gimple and
> -O0 and -O3 have different results,
>
-fdump-tree-gimple is the first dump *before* any optimizations occur.
To se
On 1/26/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/26/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/26/07 06:52:
>
> > Is the output of -fdump-tree-optimized a subset of GIMPLE?
> >
> Yes. The output is an incomplete tex
On 1/28/07, Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/24/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/24/07 12:44:
>
> > check what kind of gimple code you get with -fdump-tree-gimple and
> > -O0 and -O3 have different results,
&
On 1/26/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote on 01/26/07 07:28:
> It's after doing TER, so the statements are no longer valid GIMPLE statements.
>
Silly me. Richard's right. You want the output of -fdump-tree-uncprop.
That's the last GIMPLE dump (if my memory d
On 1/29/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-fdump-tree-all gives you all the dumps by the high-level optimizers.
-fdump-all-all gives you all the dumps by both GIMPLE and RTL optimizers.
Is this -fdump-all-all version specific? Doesn't work on 4.1.1:
$ g++ -fdump-all-all allocation.c
Hi all,
I've been looking into the gcc sources and I'm somewhat confused.
Are gcc/g++ comepletely independent programs or do they share a backend?
This question comes from the fact that I was trying to find a point in
the source where I could get the GIMPLE tree and do with it what ever
I wished
On 1/29/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-fdump-tree-all-all will work
as will -fdump-rtl-all-all
I never added support for -fdump-all-all-all :)
Thank you!
--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampto
On 29 Jan 2007 11:38:15 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Paulo J. Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been looking into the gcc sources and I'm somewhat confused.
> Are gcc/g++ comepletely independent programs or do they share a ba
On 29 Jan 2007 11:38:15 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see why you would have to modify any code in the frontend.
You would modify the middle-end code. Rebuilding the compiler would
rebuild cc1, cc1plus, etc.
Well, I spent the morning looking at the code and since
On 1/31/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/30/07 10:11:
> Well, I spent the morning looking at the code and since what I need is
> only the flow of gcc up until I have the GIMPLE tree, I could add a
> pass after the pass which generates the
I forgot to send to the mailing list that the --disable-multilib from
Andrew worked. Thank you all.
:)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 31, 2007 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling GCC
To: Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/3
On 1/31/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/31/07 11:26:
> So, ideally, I would like just the gcc part until the first part of
> the middleend where you have a 'no optimizations', language
> independent AST of the source file.
>
On 2/1/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 02/01/07 04:37:
> What can I do then to stop gcc to further process things? After
> informing the user there's no more reason on my site to continue.
>
Stop gracefully or just stop? The latter
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:03:36AM +0100, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> (I don't know if the good mailing list for this is gcc@ or gcc-patches@)
>
> Apparently trunk rev 121458 don't bootstrap on linux debian sid amd64 ie
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>
> I'm getting
>
> make[4]
Hi all,
I've changed gcc by adding a new pass, however, when I compile gcc,
during compilation it calls itself, so I disabled bootstrap but that
is still happening even during bootstrap. Is there any way to compile
gcc without the final gcc compiling something?
Moreover, how can I add a flag to
On 2/2/07, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
> I've changed gcc by adding a new pass, however, when I compile gcc,
> during compilation it calls itself, so I disabled bootstrap but that
> is still happening even during bootstrap. Is there any way to compile
> gcc without the final
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:19:57AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> I've been seeing:
>
> /Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-darwin/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/
> Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-darwin/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-
> darwin/i686-apple-darwin9/libstdc++-v3/src -L/Volumes/mrs5/net/gcc-
>
On 1/31/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/31/07 11:26:
> So, ideally, I would like just the gcc part until the first part of
> the middleend where you have a 'no optimizations', language
> independent AST of the source file.
>
On 2/6/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 02/06/07 14:19:
> Why before pass_build_ssa? (version 4.1.1)
>
It depends on the properties your pass requires. If you ask for
PROP_cfg and PROP_gimple_any then you should schedule it after the CFG
has bee
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:32:28PM +0300, Vladimir Sysoev wrote:
> Hi!
> I create test to reproduce issue with cpu2006/454.calculix
> See attached. File e_c3d.f contains cutted subroutine from calculix.
> tr535.f main entry point of the test. you can use go-script as a
> reference how i get these r
"make bootstrap" used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was
bootstrapped. "make bootstrap" would abort if comparison was failed.
Now, compare stage2 and stage3 is not longer done for
"make bootstrap". Is that intentional? I think it is a very bad
idea.
H.J.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:00:41PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> "make bootstrap" used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was
> bootstrapped. "make bootstrap" would abort if comparison was failed.
> Now, compare stage2 and stage3 is not longer done for
> "mak
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 05:11:15PM +0100, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
> On 07 Feb 2007 15:36:14 -0800
> Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can anybody else out there recreate this on their x86_64 system?
>
> Not that I could not recreate the segfault but I found a way to hide the
> s
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:09:40PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 05:11:15PM +0100, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
> > On 07 Feb 2007 15:36:14 -0800
> > Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Can anybody else out there recreate this
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:53:00AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:04:05PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:00:41PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > "make bootstrap" used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was
> > >
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:34:24PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> François-Xavier Coudert napisał(a):
>
> >$ gcc -march=pentium4 -O3 a.c && time ./a.out
> >064069fbc13963b920219c3e939225e38e38e38e3956d81c71c71c71c0ba0f00
> >./a.out 1.81s user 0.00s system 99% cpu 1.818 total
> >$ gcc-4.3 -march=pen
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:35:28PM +0300, Vladimir Sysoev wrote:
> Hello, Daniel
>
> It looks like your changeset listed bellow makes performance
> regression ~40% on SPEC2006/leslie3d. I will try to create minimal
> test for this issue this week and update you in any case.
>
That is a known iss
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:16:12PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> >> > > > It looks like your changeset listed bellow makes performance
> >> > > > regression ~40% on SPEC2006/leslie3d. I will try to create minimal
> >> > > > test for this issue this week and update you in a
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:53:55PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >> This is 4.7% drop of SPECfp_base2006 ratio (geomean of individual FP
> >> ratios).
>
> Clearly, 4.7% is significant. Grigory, thanks for the measurements!
>
> >> Here is the full set of changes in cp
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:30:16PM +0800, Zuxy Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -march=native choose pentium4 instead of pentium-m for Pentium M processors
> (see config/i386/driver-i386.c)? Is this intentional or a typo?
>
It is because Pentium M implements Pentium instructions. You should
get:
bash-3.0
Hello,
I have stumbled upon a very problematic issue. I have been, through a
pass, creating a structure of the gimple tree which fits my interests.
However, my final need is _after_ all gimple functions are processed,
to process that structure to give interesting reports to the user.
Now, I stumb
On 2/28/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 02/28/07 11:07:
> Is there a way to install a finalizing function? (to be called after
> all functions in the pass have been processed)
> Or to know if the current function being processed is the last o
On 3/1/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 03/01/07 10:41:
> My IPA pass seems to be run only for -On, n>=1, is there a way to make
> it ran even for -O0?
No, we only run IPA passes if flag_unit_at_a_time is set. That only is
set when optimizi
Hi all,
In an IPA pass, for each CFG node, I have a tree decl member from
which I can access the return type, name of the function, argument
names and its types, but I can't seem to find a way to get the
function code. I would guess it would be a basic block list but I
don't know where I can get
On 3/2/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 03/02/07 10:12:
> In an IPA pass, for each CFG node, I have a tree decl member from
> which I can access the return type, name of the function, argument
> names and its types, but I can't seem to f
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Grigory Zagorodnev wrote on 03/03/07 02:27:
>
> > There are three checkins, candidates for the root of regression:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=122487
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=12248
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:00:30PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 3/3/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [1] 176.gcc and 253.perlbmk usually miscompare for me. Not sure why.
>
> >176.gcc=default=default=default:
> >CPORTABILITY = -Dalloca=_al
Hi all,
I've just added a new gcc subdir : head/gcc/myproj with structures and
utilities for my ipa pass which lives in head/gcc. Now I have to tell
gcc to compile the files inside myproj. Is there a standard way to do
this? I've looked into head/gcc/Makefile.in but it seem quite
cluttered and I
On 3/6/07, W. Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I use multiple inheritance in my project. In the child class i have
functions GetParam() and SetParam().
In the cpp-file I call GetParam() function, but I fell to SetParam()
function.
Can You help me?
Don't take me wrong but it is most likely
On 3/6/07, Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I've just added a new gcc subdir : head/gcc/myproj with structures and
utilities for my ipa pass which lives in head/gcc. Now I have to tell
gcc to compile the files inside myproj. Is there a standard way to do
this? I
On 3/6/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06 March 2007 16:07, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> Well, added a couple of lines to gcc/Makefile.in referring to files in
> myproj. Still, although it is partly working one thing is annoying me.
> It's using these flags by
On 3/6/07, Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I've just added a new gcc subdir : head/gcc/myproj with structures and
utilities for my ipa pass which lives in head/gcc. Now I have to tell
gcc to compile the files inside myproj. Is there a standard way to do
this? I
On 3/6/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06 March 2007 18:22, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar: symbol-tables.o: No such file or directory
>
> And in fact there is no symbol-tables.o but I saw it being compiled so
> I wonder where it has gone to.
>
On 3/6/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, I advise that when adding a pass, regardless of whether the code can fit
in a single file or is large enough to need to use several separate files,
it's consistent to put all the files that implement the pass in the main 'gcc'
source directory
On 3/7/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 07 March 2007 14:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it time to offer "second-strap" level of compilation? Ie allow C99 to
> bootstrap the creation of a basic GCC compiler, then allow a second compile
> using the basic GCC compiler to get the full
On 3/7/07, Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07 March 2007 14:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is it time to offer "second-strap" level of compilation? Ie allow C99 to
> > bootstrap the creati
On 3/2/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 03/02/07 10:12:
> In an IPA pass, for each CFG node, I have a tree decl member from
> which I can access the return type, name of the function, argument
> names and its types, but I can't seem to f
On 3/7/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 14:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it time to offer "second-strap" level of compilation? Ie allow C99 to
> bootstrap the creation of a basic GCC compiler, then allow a second compile
> using the basic GCC compiler to ge
On 3/7/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 03/07/07 10:36:
> Is this normal? It seems there are no basic blocks set for the
> functions. Probably my pass is being run before the bbs are created?
Looks like it. Set a breakpoint in build_tree_
On 3/7/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paulo J. Matos wrote on 03/07/07 11:43:
> What am I missing?
You are debugging the wrong binary. I'd suggest you browse through
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebuggingGCC
You need to debug one of cc1/cc1plus/jc1
Thank you. It
On 3/7/07, Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paulo J. Matos wrote on 03/07/07 11:43:
>
> > What am I missing?
>
> You are debugging the wrong binary. I'd suggest you browse through
> http://gcc.
On 3/7/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As explained: because it makes it impossible for users running old systems
with pre-C99 compilers to build gcc and thereby excludes them from the world
of free software, which is the opposite of what we're trying to achieve.
Well, I surely und
Hello all,
when using functions from libiberty, I'm for example using xstrdup and
xmalloc but free is not defined as free or xfree afail nor strlen so
how should I include things? Before system.h and then standard libs or
the other way around?
I am almost sure it should be the other way around b
Thank you all for the excellent suggestions, I'll be looking into all
of your references this afternoon. Regarding my initial question, I
understand I don't need free.
My real problem was if I needed to include standard libraries after
including system.h or if system.h would provide me free from s
Hello,
Why is it that a left hand side of a modify_expr usually had void_type
while other times it has integer, real or something else _type? One
pattern I'm detecting is that when the lhs is a user variable it has
void type, but when the lhs if a gcc generated variable, the modify
expr has the t
Hello,
in tree.def, in DEFTREECODE for call_expr, it says operand 2 is the
static chain argument, or NULL. Can someone tell me or reference me to
what static chain argument is?
Cheers,
--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of
On 3/8/07, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in tree.def, in DEFTREECODE for call_expr, it says operand 2 is the
> static chain argument, or NULL. Can someone tell me or reference me to
> what static chain argument is?
It's for nested functions, eg
int parent (int n)
{
int child (int
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 05:27:21PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Most of the problems are fixed, dealII remains with:
>
> /gcc/spec/sb-balakirew-head-64-2006/x86_64/install-hack/bin/g++ -c -o
> quadrature.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -Iinclude -DBOOST_DISABLE_THREADS
> -Ddeal_II_dimension=3 -O2 -D
Hello all,
INTEGER_CST seems to have TREE_INT_CST_LOW and TREE_INT_CST_HIGH
fields (tree.def). Each has 32 bits.
1 - Should I use ints for these fields?
2 - If the INTEGER_CST is negative, is the negative part only in one
of the high or low fields, i.e. low is always unsigned and high is
always s
Hello,
When programming, due to my journeys through C++ recently, I've been
using 0 instead of NULL. Strangely gcc compilation doesn't warn me
about it. Is it ok to do this? (So far, I had no problems). Is there
anything I should be aware when using 0 instead of NULL in gcc code?
Cheers,
--
Pau
On 3/13/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 March 2007 13:52, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When programming, due to my journeys through C++ recently, I've been
> using 0 instead of NULL. Strangely gcc compilation doesn't warn me
> about it. Is i
On 13 Mar 2007 07:58:41 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Paulo J. Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> INTEGER_CST seems to have TREE_INT_CST_LOW and TREE_INT_CST_HIGH
> fields (tree.def). Each has 32 bits.
No, each has type HOST_WIDE_INT. On a
Hi all,
In #gcc, it was suggested to use referenced vars to get all the
referenced vars for a function. I added to my IPA pass props,
PROP_referenced_vars , used push_cfun and then
FOR_EACH_REFERENCED_VAR, however, it just segfaults in
tree-flow-inline.h:34 :
hti->slot = table->entries;
It was s
On 3/13/07, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> int x;
> {
> int y;
> {
> int z;
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
>
> just happens to have three statements, all VAR_DECL,x, y, z, without
> any reference to the starting and ending blocks. As a side
On 3/13/07, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> int x;
> {
> int y;
> {
> int z;
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
>
> just happens to have three statements, all VAR_DECL,x, y, z, without
> any reference to the starting and ending blocks. As a side
On 3/13/07, Jeffrey Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 18:09 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > int x;
> > {
> > int y;
> > {
> > int z;
> > ...
> > }
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > just happens to have three statements, all VAR_DECL,x,
On 3/13/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uh, since when did 4.1 support IPA GIMPLE?
What do you mean by that?
--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampton, UK
On 3/13/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/13/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/13/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Uh, since when did 4.1 su
This is the beta release of binutils 2.17.50.0.13 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2007 0315 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree.
You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:19:44PM +0100, fafa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that G++ 4.1.2 (on a Pentium 4) generates different instructions
> for
> lea0x0(%esi),%esi
> or
> lea0x0(%edi),%edi
> with the same meaning but different encoding depending on the switch
> "-momit-leaf-fram
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:29:05AM -0400, Doug Gregor wrote:
> On 3/23/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >When I brought up the 16-bit option earlier, Jakub replied that x86 would
> >get hosed worse because it's 16-bit accesses are not as efficient as it's
> >8 or 32 bit ones.
> >
> >
This is the beta release of binutils 2.17.50.0.14 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2007 0322 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree.
You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been
ACX_BUGURL has
[case "$withval" in
yes) AC_MSG_ERROR([bug URL not specified]) ;;
no) REPORT_BUGS_TO="";
REPORT_BUGS_TEXI=""
;;
*) REPORT_BUGS_TO="<$withval>"
REPORT_BUGS_TEXI="@uref{`echo $withval | sed 's/@/@@/g'`}"
;;
esac]
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 04:57:03PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> > It assumes there is no @ in $1. Shouldn't be
> >
> > REPORT_BUGS_TEXI="@uref{`echo $1 | sed 's/@/@@/g'`}"
>
> Feel free
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:55:38PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > REPORT_BUGS_TO="<$1>"
> > - REPORT_BUGS_TEXI="@uref{$1}"
> > + REPORT_BUGS_TEXI="@uref{`echo $1 |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:20:10PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 23 March 2007 18:11, H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:55:38PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> "H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> RE
> So I think that the easiest way to integrate this with the rest of the
> compiler is to have a target hook that emits trees to compute SHIFT, INV1
> and INV2.
(define_tree_expand "name"
"condition"
{
preparation statements;
}
)
:-)
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:13:30AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Please do this instead:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "$BUGURL" | sed 's/@/@@/g'`}
>
Will it work with spaces in $BUGURL?
H.J.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:57:52PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 07:01:40PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > The following change broke --disable-multilib:
> >
> > 2007-03-23 Michael Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > .
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:28:18PM +0200, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> >My nightly bootstrap of mainline on i386-linux failed tonight, on
> >revision 123192.
>
> This issue is still not fixed as of now. A diff was posted to PR31344
> with the mention "This isn't a real patch." Is a real patch
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 02:41:51PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 3/27/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:28:18PM +0200, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> >> >My nightly bootstrap of mainline on i386-linux failed tonigh
Many x86 SSE source codes use __declspec. I'd like to make
__declspec available for Linux/x86. We can do one of the
following:
1. Define TARGET_DECLSPEC for Linux/x86.
2. Define TARGET_DECLSPEC for x86.
3. Add -mdeclspec.
Any comments?
H.J.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 02:06:15PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/2/07, H. J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Many x86 SSE source codes use __declspec. I'd like to make
> >__declspec available for Linux/x86. We can do one of the
> >following:
>
> Do t
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:11:06PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 4/2/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If the Windows version of GCC has to recognize __declspec to function
> >as a hosted compiler on Windows, then the work already needs to be done
> >to implement it. So what's the harm
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:17:59AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 4/4/07, FX Coudert wrote:
> >Bootstrap has been broken since 2007-03-25 on i[345]86-linux. This is
> >a decimal float issue reported as PR31344, and is due to a decimal
> >float patch, probably the following:
> >
> >2007-03-23
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 01:27:09PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> I was wondering, if:
>
> /* X86_TUNE_USE_INCDEC */
> ~(m_PENT4 | m_NOCONA | m_CORE2 | m_GENERIC),
>
> is correct. Should it be:
>
> /* X86_TUNE_USE_INCDEC */
> ~(m_PENT4 | m_NOCONA | m_GENERIC),
>
> ?
inc/dec has the same p
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:29:46AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> >> I was wondering, if:
> >>
> >> /* X86_TUNE_USE_INCDEC */
> >> ~(m_PENT4 | m_NOCONA | m_CORE2 | m_GENERIC),
> >>
> >> is correct. Should it be:
> >>
> >> /* X86_TUNE_USE_INCDEC */
> >> ~(m_PENT4 | m_NOCONA | m_
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> >>>inc/dec has the same performance as add/sub on Core 2 Duo. But
> >>>inc/dec is shorter.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>What about partial flag register
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:51:22AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
> >Intel's optimization reference manual says that:
>
> I wasn't going off the documentation... I'd be more interested in
> either benchmarks or in recommendations by Intel people that kno
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:13:17AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:51:22AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Zuxy Meng wrote:
> > >Intel's optimization reference manual says that:
> >
> > I wasn't going off the doc
101 - 200 of 820 matches
Mail list logo
