On Jun 4, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Yes but that is not all the problem because a lot of the time
the maintainer is also the submitter. There is no way to discourage
the behavior of the maintainer on going on to other stuff while there
are known regressions to fix.
A wiki page of
On Jun 5, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
I found out recently that with just the gcc-core and
gcc-g++ files, bootstrapping with --enable-languages=c,c++
fails since "gcc/objcp" was being processed without
Objective C front-end and runtime files being there in
the source tree.
I think th
On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:28 PM, xiaoyi wang wrote:
In order to make sure that our proprietary code is not exposed to
GPL restrictions by using gcc,
Thanks for the audit. I'm getting the feeling that we should
introduce features into the files and give hard compilation errors
when the rules a
On Jun 9, 2006, at 2:49 PM, xiaoyi wang wrote:
Since we are on a very tight schedule to migrate to
gcc4.1.0, we cannot wait until gcc4.2 to be released.
But before we can roll out this compiler, we need to
have some written statement from FSF that says it's
legally safe to link with these librari
On Jun 9, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
Currently I have implemented in g++ the "Static Assertions" and the
"Right Angle Brackets" C++0x features in g++. Those are the simplest
ones that got into the working draft
Any feedback is welcome!
Well, I hope that you are able to do up the
On Jun 10, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Monika Sapra wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I have tried this but when I check out GCC
source
using SVN, It is 1.38 GB. I have space problem on my system so it is
difficult to check out all supported tool sources and make combined
tree.
Ha, that's nothing, you sh
On Jun 12, 2006, at 5:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my point above was that -strict-aliasing is included in -O2 and
my code works fine at -O2. Only -O3 causes problems, so I didn't
expect
-fno-strict-aliasing to make any difference.
Code in violation of the aliasing rules can appear
On Jun 13, 2006, at 2:02 AM, Roberto COSTA wrote:
In the meantime, I hope this doesn't prevent requesting a
development branch.
I too think the SC should decide this issue. They are there for
guidance, and on this issue, I think that is what we need.
I don't think this prevents anyone fro
On Jun 13, 2006, at 1:21 AM, Bill Northcott wrote:
I am trying to build a universal APPLE gcc on a MacOS PPC system,
because I want to tweak it to add a couple extra features.
The assumption is incorrect because, MacOS PPC systems do not have
i386 code in their system libraries, only ppc and
Any suggestions? Does the -isysroot compiler flag fix this sort of
issue? It does not seem to be used in the gcc build.
I'd expect it might. Run with -v and see if isysroot is given to
ld. If not, add -Wl,-isysroot=... to pass it down to ld. In later
compilers, we do this automagically
On Jun 13, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Past the above, I have no better ideas for getting patches reviewed
other than appointing more maintainers.
I'd welcome the issue be addressed by the SC. I'd favor more timely
reviews. Maybe auto approval for a patch that sits for more than
On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Joe Buck wrote:
There have been a number of proposals that basically amount to
threatening
the patch reviewers with negative consequences, but I'm not for that.
I too think that would be the wrong direction to go.
I'm not sure I *want* GCC to start changing much
On Jun 15, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Is there a standard process we use to eliminate -f options? or is it
more on a per options basis.
I think we should take into consideration the option. For corner
case options that aren't used very often, removing them outright be
well be
On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Maintainers said that they are overwhelmed by the amount of work
required to review. Post-approval testing seems just a waste of time
to me.
It is, well, unless you want mainline to build and pass a regression
suite. No amount of pre-te
On Jun 15, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
The front-end in question has stopped working because the traditional
setjmp/longjmp translation of try/catch constructs is no longer
working correctly with versions of GCC higher than 4.0.
How is it no longer working? I don't understand how i
Here are just a few more issues I was wondering about for VLAs:
static int i;
static int new_i() { i++; return i; }
static int bar(int a[new_i()][new_i()]);
void foo(int n) {
/* Presently an error, but, should it be (due to bar having a VM
type and bar having other than no linkage)? */
ex
Ok, good, you gave the same answers I was hoping for. :-)
On Jun 16, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
But the definition in terms of contained declarators hardly makes
things clear. I would say, however, that while VM-ness shouldn't
propagate out from function argument types to the
On Jun 16, 2006, at 6:57 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
static int bar(int a[new_i()][new_i()]);
If that isn't a sequence point violation, it probably ought to be,
shouldn't
it?
No, the text has no meaning (in this case (non (const int))), read it
as `'*' and you'll have a better mental model for
On Jun 16, 2006, at 5:54 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
For the bootstrapping problem I mentioned earlier, they added volatile
to variables in the scope but it did not change anything.
For the problem I am thinking of, volatile should go a long way in
working around the compiler bug, assuming no
On Jun 16, 2006, at 12:47 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I think that every variable you do "weird" things with in C, must
be declared volatile.
The C++/Objective-C/Objective-C++ language standards ensures that you
don't have to mark all variables volatile in the presence of EH.
These builtins
On Jun 16, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Dustin Laurence wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is stepping into deep quicksand
No, just hard work. It is only quicksand, if you start, but never
finish.
The mechanism I might favor would be to handle all the fun inside the
language front end. Objective-C does t
On Jun 16, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
I'd like to catch automatically over/underflows on floating point
Wrong list. You want gcc-help...
Does it mean that if I use this, exceptions are thrown when I have an
over/underflow?
No, it it meant that, the documentation would say that
Is someone else interested in the daily output of contrib/compare_tests
in case the return code of this script is 1?
Is there a mailing list for this kind of output?
On Jun 18, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
Is someone else interested in the daily output
Or while (1) do, if you have the bandwidth... :-)
But, please, just email the results to yourself and try that for a
week. :-)
This will help shake out the trivial things. You'll also ne
On Jun 22, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
So I guess that there is no baseline as such, and the only meaningful
way to use the results is to compare testsuite outputs with and
without your changes?
Depends upon what you're doing... For the normal regression test
while developing
On Jun 23, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
First number is GCC with Boehm's GC and the number in parentheses is
GCC with page collector.
combine.c: top mem usage: 52180k (13915k). GC execution time 0.66
(0.61) 4% (4%). User running time: 0m16 (0m14).
Are these with checking on or of
On Jun 28, 2006, at 1:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a PhD student working on optimal instruction scheduling
problems. I want to
integrate my scheduler into the GCC. Can you tell me where to
start? and
important links which can be helpful for the integration work?
I'd start by downlo
On Jun 29, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Rajkishore Barik wrote:
I am trying to complie GCC 4.1 on an AIX 5.3 machine having 2 power5
processors.
Then this is the wrong list... You'd want gcc-help.
On Jul 1, 2006, at 12:54 AM, kernel coder wrote:
I'm having trouble in understanding the term sequnce in an insn
chain.get_insns() actually returns the current instruction.
I'd recommend reading the code:
/* Emission of insns (adding them to the doubly-linked list). */
/* Return the first in
On Jul 1, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Gary Funck wrote:
To further complicate matters, if the program is rewritten into a
single
file as follows:
int __thread x;
int main() {
extern int x;
x = 5;
}
it will fail at compile-time with gcc 4.1:
This sounds like a bug that should be fixed. You shou
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:58 AM, J.J.Garcia wrote:
Im involved in testing some old stuff about gcc 2.95.3 for an
specific arch and
i realize after looking at gcc.gnu.org that there are not the
corresponding test
cases for dejaGNU
Please, does anybody knows where i can get them? Actually im usin
On Jul 5, 2006, at 2:26 AM, J.J.Garcia wrote:
Can i assume that what im using (2.95.2.1) is the last used
previously to
release 2.95.3 20010315 (release)?
Not really. If you were going to stake your life on it, you'd not
want to do that. I doubt the stakes are that high however. Anyway,
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The codec is at http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/openavs/.
Currently, it requires a 3Ghz or better CPU to get a resonable
framerate. I would like the codec to be useful even on 586
( 1Ghz or
so ). Any ideas?
Recode slower parts in as
On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
And I posted a patch to do the same in Objective-C mode as C mode :).
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg01013.html
Is the reason that Objective-C was excluded been fixed? If so, while
I don't like the semantics in place now, I'd rat
On Jul 6, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
Please see the form in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg02298.html
One of these days I will have to put this into the wiki.
Added:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Copyright%20assignment
Link to it added to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HomePage
see
On Jul 6, 2006, at 1:48 PM, FX Coudert wrote:
I'd like to be able to check that this code indeed issue the error
message on stderr and indicate to dejagnu that non-zero exit codes
does not mean that the test FAILed). How can I do that?
There are two strategies, first would be to write a driv
On Jul 7, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I'm afraid I have to ask you to remove this again.
Done.
On Jul 7, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I believe I recall we were not supposed to have either, but you raise
a good point. I will double check this with RMS, and if he agrees, I
will make sure to add the questionnaire (and buy Mike a drink next
time
I meet him).
I'd welcome
On Jul 7, 2006, at 7:14 AM, jacob navia wrote:
Where is the library I should link with?
nm libgcc_eh.a | grep register_frame
00e4 T ___register_frame_info
It is automatically linked with. I think you probably have the wrong
number of _ at the front, try removing one. After that, try nm
On Jul 10, 2006, at 6:57 AM, jacob navia wrote:
What is the procedure for registering the frame info?
If you don't get an answer, you may have to debug it. Just follow
what something like eh6.C from the C++ testsuite does, and what it
calls, when, and with what data, then mirror the eh6.C
On Jul 9, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov wrote:
I would like to offer one expansion for C/C++.
Did you just reinvent downcasting in C++? If so, C++ already has
that feature!? As for C, C, I'd claim C already has that feature[1],
you merely have to put in a #define into your lib
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
Do such changes require ChangeLog entries?
For my own beyond trivial fixes that I catch quickly (say, less than
24 hours), normally I just fix them with a `fix typo' type svn log
entry. When in doubt, or if you're fixing someone else's
Gosh, so close...
I found that the below patch gets me one step closer to it building.
I'm sure it is wrong... but it should be enough of a hint for the
right person to know how to fix it.
Doing diffs in libstdc++-v3:
--- libstdc++-v3/include/ext/codecvt_specializations.h.~1~
2005-1
On Jul 10, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
The next problem after that one is that:
ext/pb_ds/detail/binary_heap_/binary_heap_.hpp:235: internal
compiler error: Bus error
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html>
On Jul 11, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
I don't know how many yet, as testsuite takes more than 24 hours
here on Cygwin, 1.8GHz Turion. I can run it much faster inside in
VMWare on Linux on the same machine.
Is there any way to speed it up on Cygwin?
Sure, install Linux. :-)
On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
I don't know what to do about the ICE: it looks like Mike has a patch.
My patch to fix this isn't at all obvious that it is correct to me.
There are no signs that it will be reviewed anytime soon, so, I'd say
please r
On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:
"the client code needs to know about the existence of this type so
it can get pointers and references to instances and pass them back
in later and maybe be able to call virtual member functions and
access non-static members" by putting i
On Jul 13, 2006, at 8:48 AM, jacob navia wrote:
1) I generate exactly the same code now as gcc:
You don't want to generate exactly the same code as gcc, unless it is
exactly the same case; you want to generate the correct code.
Divide and concur.
Do simple things work? For example, do:
r
On Jul 14, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
That would mirror how C++ handles classes in unnamed namspaces. In
other words, the visibility would have to be part of the mangled name.
Can't do that and preserve the abi, also, there is no concept in gcc
currently to so name it, and wha
On Jul 14, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I seem to remember a PR posted by Adobe people kind of related to
this, but maybe I'm remembering wrong. I have to dig up bugzilla.
If it is a bug that describes how matching doesn't work across dylibs
on older darwin systems (pre-tiger),
On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
What that concretely means is that it alienates, for example, codes
based on Factory desigbn pattern using typeinfo objects.
I'd love some input from the MS VC++ programming crowd on this
issue. I don't see how they get past this issue. I
On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to use the register ebp in the input/output register
list
Wrong list. Also, for trivial questions like this, ask the compiler,
it will tell you.
cpu=ev6 or better to CFLAGS works just peachy
-mike
pgpkHs0qKbu4H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
=ev4), but poor old
ev5's would still be broken :)
-mike
pgp2sFREkjCor.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
Also, sometimes it happens that a file will start as trivial/non-
trivial, and then later modifications will change it to non-trivial/
trivial, but the patcher doesn't bother to add/remove the copyright
notice. Just like sometimes people forget t
On Jul 19, 2006, at 3:08 AM, jacob navia wrote:
This is just to tell you that now it is working.
Yeah. Glad to hear it, and thanks for the update.
On Jul 20, 2006, at 2:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a C program that I need to compile
This is the wrong list for such question.
On Jul 21, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Using gcc-4.1.1. Info says variable-length array is supported in c+
+ mode,
but doesn't seem to work
Nope, sure doesn't. I don't recall any good reason why we can't
support it. I'd file a bug report for it.
Being able to compile c99 style
On Jul 22, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Roar Thronæs wrote:
I have started working on moving the frontend from 3.4.3 to 4.1.1.
If you want to contribute it here, I'd skip 4.1.1 and just do 4.2.
By the time you'd be done, 4.2 would be out. Plus, if you need any
fixes in the compiler, you stand a high
On Jul 24, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Gichuru Riria wrote:
hi all, i help installing gcc 4.0.3
Please try the gcc-help list instead. Also, be sure to check out the
documentation at our web site that explains this in detail. Also,
4.0.3 is old, I'd recommend a newer version as well. Good Luck.
On Jul 25, 2006, at 5:00 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
In the particular case of two static functions or two static global
pointers, it is possible for the compiler to compute it. Isn't it? I
think that the linker will reorder the sections, but not the functions
inside a section.
:-) Your assump
On Jul 26, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
Hi, I have been porting mozilla firefox to the SH4 platform.
However, I have
run into some horrible floating point problems.
This list isn't for what you think it is for. This list is for
contributors to gcc to talk about the developmen
On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Rahul Phalak wrote:
I want to add command line options in GCC for analyzing application
code
for a set of rules.
I agree with Ian for the most part. For research and development,
you will want to give your users lots of control. They will then
give you feed
On Aug 3, 2006, at 2:04 AM, Niu, Bao Qiang (Henry) wrote:
I have a problem when I try to do the 'make' operation
Please don't send to gcc, this list is for something else...
If you don't hear back from gcc-help, you might want to try the
manual, I think how to do this is documented in there.
If one asks Geoff's regression tester what it thinks of the day to
day quality of gcc, one gets:
256 build native
65 regress-8 native
64 regress-6 native
55 regress-5 native
48 regress-9 native
42 regress-4 native
41 regress-7 native
39 regress-3 native
33 regress-11 native
30
On Aug 4, 2006, at 6:31 PM, supradip dey wrote:
What are the header files & functions used by gcc?
There are many, please see the source.
Is it same as borland turbo header files ?
No.
On Aug 7, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Kapil Dhawan wrote:
I am very much confused about Increment Operator implementation.
Can somebody send me a link about the gcc implementation.
If you don't get any response, please see the source code and the svn
history and the mailing list archievs for additiona
On Aug 11, 2006, at 4:21 AM, kees de jong wrote:
When I changed the program to use openmp and compiled it
with the new -fopenmp switch, everything went fine.
But what amazed me, on running this program it only used
6 seconds to complete the multiplication!
Glad to hear it and thanks for the fee
On Aug 14, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
How true :) Nevertheless the goals for the FSF GCC should IMHO be
purely based on rather technical arguments and considerations, not
the drive by paying customers.
:-) I'd of course argue that a compiler with no customers (I'd use
the term
On Aug 14, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
Gentle People?
Wow, someone's been spreading false accusations about us. :-)
I am currently running gcc 3.1 on both my Ultra 5
Solaris 8 Sparc machine and on Solaris 8 Intel machine.
The Application C source code that compiles and executes
pe
On Aug 14, 2006, at 7:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have porting our S+core 32b CPU gcc backend for gcc-4.1.1, and have
finished applying process in FSF,
but how can i add our backend code into gcc package?
Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html in general.
You'd need to file an as
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:11 PM, Mahafuzur Rahaman wrote:
1) Any advise on selecting Linux distro?
This is akin to asking ones religion. :-) We generally don't push
religion around here... gnu.misc.discuss would be the usual place to
discuss religious questions. Just select one and follow i
On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
We have accumulated five XPASS instances in the libstdc++
testsuite on MacOS X...
XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc
execution test
XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/wchar_t/21674.cc
execution test
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Joe Buck wrote:
Can the test framework distinguish based on the OS release?
Yes. It's a fundamental feature:
set host_triplet powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0d1
set build_triplet powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0d1
set target_triplet powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0d1
set target_alias
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Well, I note sure how to handle some of these testcases. For
instance,
1_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc has...
// { dg-require-debug-mode "" }
// { dg-options "-O0 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG" }
// { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } }
Wel
On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Juerg Lehni writes:
I compiled the lastest GCJ from SVN head today, and when linking to
my application that uses JNI invocation and worked well before, I
recieved a "undefined symbols" error about _JNI_CreateJavaVM and
_JNI_GetDefaultJavaVMInitArgs
On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I assume the linker is choking on the line...
.stabs "i:G(0,3)",32,0,4,0
...right?
Yes. The linker is complaining that there is no _i in the program.
If you add one, it would have worked. I'm asking our linker and
debugger peopl
On Aug 17, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I assume the linker is choking on the line...
.stabs "i:G(0,3)",32,0,4,0
...right?
Yes. The linker is complaining that there is no _i in the program.
If you add one, it
On Aug 19, 2006, at 7:50 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I don't believe that this warning with "-O3 -m64 -g" is
due to the fortran compiler optimizing away the storage.
DId you read my previous emails on this topic? If not, please see
it, if you have, please read it again. I think there is a
On Aug 19, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
...so even if "i" were being optimized away only ld64 seems to care.
Yes.
The ld 32-bit linker remains silent on the issue.
Yes.
On Aug 21, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Christian Joensson wrote:
I just noticed a slight change in behaviour... on my system, I have
edited dejagnu's remote.exp such that it defaults its timeout to
1800 instead of 300. However, on gcc trunk, I see that, for example,
in the libstdc++ testsuite log, the
On Aug 21, 2006, at 6:34 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I just wanted to be clear that you believe only the line...
+ .stabs "i:G(0,3)",32,0,4,0
in that .s file is incorrect
I never said that, let me refer you to my previous email for what I
said. I did say that it was causing the problem.
On Aug 21, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Trunk fails to build for me with:
Maybe related (from http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/HEAD/):
2006-08-16T23:25:59Z 2006-08-17T14:40:57Z pass native 116195
2006-08-17T14:43:02Z 2006-08-17T15:38:47Z build native 116224
2006-08-17T17:16:01Z 2006-08-1
I hate to even bring this up, but... should things like:
int m[1 << 27] = {0};
be put in .bss? I'm tempted to say no, if you want that, you have to
remove {0}.
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
The only difference I can see between the builds with gcc trunk and
Apple's gcc is that I have to remove the -Wno-long-double -no-cpp-
precomp flags the build with gcc trunk (because they don't exist).
My only comment would be to remove -Wno-lo
On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
...which is quite nice since it is the same number of failures as
with -m32 with three additional unexpected passes.
Excellent. Nice to hear.
What I found was that I could set a breakpoint at assign.f90:1 but
when I tried to run the program
On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
--- gcc-4.2-20060822/gcc/testsuite/lib/prune.exp.org2006-08-23
18:33:56.0 -0400
+++ gcc-4.2-20060822/gcc/testsuite/lib/prune.exp2006-08-23
18:41:28.0 -0400
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
regsub -all "(^|\n)\[^\n\]*file path
On Aug 25, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
`indirect_jump'
An instruction to jump to an address which is operand zero. This
pattern name is mandatory on all machines.
I don't see how it can be supported. But most programs don't need it.
Well, the usu
On Aug 25, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
Yes, it's a necessary part of the x86_64 work - the question is
whether or not x86_64-darwin might go in for 4.2 at all.
Mark has recently stated his position (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
patches/2006-08/msg00924.html) on patches that are va
On Aug 27, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Can one of you remind me who we need to lobby at Apple
In the gcc project, contributions are generally speaking, made by an
individual. Geoff operates a regression tester, probably the one
you're thinking of. In the past, he has considered
On Aug 28, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Might that not increase the rate of testing on regress?
Sorry, nope.
On Aug 28, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Well then alternatively, might not 'make -j 2' increase the rate at
which gcc is built on regress?
Yes, we know about -j2. When I said, sorry, nope, I meant to convey
the idea that in fact that adding a -j2 won't speed it up.
Or doesn't Da
On Aug 28, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> If we can't speed up the testing
? -j2 makes testing go faster as well.
Sigh, I misstated that one. My comment in that case was about the
general case. I meant to say that -j2 is as applicable to testing as
it is to buil
On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Okay. How about this. Have regress set to at least do a -m64 make
check once a week.
I think it is a G4, so testing G5 code-gen might have to wait until
the G5 emulator is done. :-)
Can you contribute G5 results once a week?
At least that
On Aug 31, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
What happened to regress to allow it to suddenly do make checks
at every svn revision?
Does it seem noticeably different to you? I don't see much
difference, only that it is slower now...
2005-11-19T20:41:33Z 2005-11-20T03:40:58Z regress-5 n
tically link in crt0 to your shared library ...
something like that. Otherwise you have to do a lot of work (invoking
syscalls directly and such).
thanks -mike
On Sep 17, 2006, at 6:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I am seeing a problem with gcc trunk in the 'make install' when
java
support is built on Darwin PPC. The failure is...
make[7]: *** No rule to make target `org/w3c/dom/html2/
HTMLCollection.java/org/w3c/dom/html2/HTMLCollection.class', need
On Sep 6, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Václav Haisman wrote:
what is that status of this [1] extension being accepted into GCC?
I think the thread died out with the suggestion that it be proposed
it to the ISO/ANSI C++ people... seems like a reasonable way to go.
On Sep 6, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Serge Bögeholz wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:28 +1000 (EST)
From: Serge Bögeholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: g++ question
This list isn't for how to program in C++. This list is for how to
write a compiler.
I was writing some code t
On Sep 15, 2006, at 2:32 PM, Ross Ridge wrote:
Also, I don't think it's safe if you merge only functions in COMDAT
sections.
Sure it is, one just needs to merge them as:
variant1: nop
variant2: nop
variant3: nop
[ ... ]
this way important inequalities still work. This requires multi
801 - 900 of 1036 matches
Mail list logo
