On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
>
> I have a GIMPLE pass and would like to make use of the data type
> information that the Go frontend produces. Is there a way to access
> this information from the middle end without having to query the
> frontend?
What kind of data type info
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matt Davis wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a GIMPLE pass and would like to make use of the data type
>>> informa
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Schwarz wrote:
>
> I have run some tests to determine the gcc 4.5.3 integer promotion policies.
This message is not appropriate for the mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
which is for the development of GCC itself. It would be appropriate
on the mailing list g
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Richard Günther
wrote:
Oy vey, he's changed his name again.
Ian
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>The main issue is that the test in configure is brain-dead and demands an
> explicit version.
Any reason not to fix that?
Ian
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Dmitry Mikushin wrote:
>
> We have a version of GCC coming as additional toolchain for several
> supported Linux distros. Moreover, package we are shipping also contains
> modified glibc and some other libraries. In this situation, applications
> built with this com
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Prasad Joshi wrote:
>
> I recently joined this mailing list and I was particularly interested
> in knowing how the atomic built-ins
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html) are
> implemented in gcc.
>
> I skimmed through the source code
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>
> Next, I compiled a 5000-line C++ source file at both -O0 and -O2.
I have to assume that David is working with C code, as stabs debugging
for C++ is nearly unusable.
Ian
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> Let me explain again for you. Every 'if' statement in C is translated into a
> 'fucom' or similar instruction, which sets a number of conditions flags in
> the co-processor. Some instructions need you to load these into the eflags
> register
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>
> I read code in lower-subreg.c and found GCC only split some of
> multi-word mode instructions, like load from memory into pseudo reg,
> etc. The related code is in find_decomposable_subregs.
>
> So for below example from PR56102:
>
> double g
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Matt Davis wrote:
> This question is similar to my last; however, I think it provides a
> bit more clarity as to how I am obtaining offsets from the frame
> pointer. I have an RTL pass that is processed after expand passes. I
> keep track of a list of stack alloc
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Igor Kovacevic
wrote:
>
> I'm a master student and I'm writing my thesis on bug triaging in open
> source project and I wondering if I can access to a big part of the
> bug repository,
> if I can, how to do it ?
> Writing a crawler/parser for bugzilla or something
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Frédéric Buclin wrote:
> (Igor jumped into the Bugzilla developers IRC channel, so that's why I
> heard about this thread.)
>
> Ian said:
>
> "I'm willing to provide you with a dump of gcc's bugzilla database if
> you can give me the exact command to run."
>
>
> S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Chassin wrote:
> is there any function allows loading Gimple output from file and create the
> internal Gimple structure ?
Not to my knowledge, but see http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GimpleFrontEnd .
Ian
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
>
> First ,As per the gcc Gimple to RTL conversion ,the RTL insns set
> should be same for the both target ...am i rite here ???...or do i
> miss something here ???
Although you didn't say that the targets are, you said that you had
two differ
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matt Davis wrote:
>
> decl = create_tmp_var(type, "testarray");
> DECL_INITIAL(decl) = build_constructor(type, entries);
>
> return decl;
Do you ever create a DECL_EXPR statement for this local variable?
Ian
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> What does C/C++ and GCC offer to ensure writes are complete before
> reads are performed on a value in a multi-threaded program?
The write must be done using
__atomic_store(pointer, value, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
The read must be done using
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:47 AM, David Brown wrote:
>
> Anyway, the simplest memory barrier in gcc is :
>
> asm volatile("" ::: "memory");
That is a compilation level memory barrier, but it clearly does
nothing at the machine level.
To get a machine level (and compilation level) memory b
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Frediano Ziglio
wrote:
>
> I imported some headers from Linux kernel which mainly came from
> gcov-io.h and the structures used internally by GCC.
>
> Our problem is currently about the license. In gcov-io.h is stated that
> license is mainly GPL2 which the exceptio
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 04.02.13 at 17:46, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Frediano Ziglio
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I imported some headers from Linux kernel which mainly came from
>>>
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Would it make sense to release the header file under a permissive
> license or even public domain?
>
> The information there is just ABI, it's dubious that it is copyrightable
> at all. If two colleagues of Frediano's did a clean-room reve
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> Consider this code in va_gc::reserve:
>
>
> template
> void
> va_gc::reserve (vec *&v, unsigned reserve, bool exact
> MEM_STAT_DECL)
> {
> unsigned alloc
> = vec_prefix::calculate_allocation (v ? &v->vecpfx_ : 0, reserve,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Alec Teal wrote:
>> On 13/02/13 12:39, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Alec Teal wrote:
>>> It's just a filename ... we compile it with a C++ compiler.
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>
>> I
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>
> We recently got a bug report for the GCC D compiler frontend which shows that
> we
> currently don't inline any templated functions. The reason seems to be that
> decl_replaceable_p always returns true for D template functions.
Why is tha
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor google.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Why is that? decl_replaceable_p is supposed to be true for a function
>> that may be replaced by an entirely different function at runtime.
>> This is mainly t
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> I've been using John Regehr's Integer Overflow Checker (IOC) on a few
> libraries. It is a Clang plug-in and can be found at
> http://embed.cs.utah.edu/ioc/.
>
> The checker has flagged two libraries I use for performing undefined
> right
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
> I'm looking at a machine with limited stack, and no push instructions or
> displaced-addressing mode. The call instruction stores the return address in
> the link register.
>
> For non-recursive functions we save the return address in a st
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>
> the gdc D compiler currently doesn't implement "non-POD" types. As in C++
> those
> types can have copy constructors or destructors and should be kept in memory.
> Right now I just set TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the RECORD_TYPE tree and it's most
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Joseph F Shobe wrote:
> I've been doing some research and using your SVN repository. I have limited
> myself to just performing 'svn log' and 'svn ls' requests.
>
> However, as of late, I am no longer able to to perform this function from a
> server located at W
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:49 AM, YU Chenkan wrote:
>
> I'm a newbie and I'm trying to modify the front end to extend C.
>
> I know the following code can be accepted,
>
> void f (struct S { int a; } s, int a[][s.a]) { } .
>
> I'm wondering whether it is possible to build a structure which h
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:46 AM, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
> On Mar 6 2013, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>
>>
>> Except GCC implements C's unions as allowing to do type punning as an
>> extension and as far as GCC is concerned that is not going to change
>> any time soon.
>> This is a documented exception to
"amnon stanislavsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you please direct me on how to change gcc so that it will translate
> c/c++ files to an assembly language to a new instruction set that I am
> building?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/
Notably the chapters "Machine Descriptions" and
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In rtlanal.c we have these lines:
>
> nregs_ymode = hard_regno_nregs[xregno][ymode];
> ...
> && (GET_MODE_SIZE (ymode) % nregs_ymode) == 0)
>
> The m32c cc1 crashes here because xregno is 1 and ymode is QI, and
> register 1 cannot hold a QI valu
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course there is a third option:
>
> * Make pedwarns warnings by default unless -Werror or
> --pedantic-errors are given (just like the C front-end).
This makes sense to me. I have never understood why it is a good idea
for the C++ and C fro
Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As such, I'd like to get a general indication from the greater GCC
> community as to this plan. Does this document seem like a good idea?
> (Previously, we've left this kind of document to the user community.
> Often the passage of time has not been pa
tian xiaonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, All. I don't know How to regenerate a new
> configure file while added new target on config.sub,
> and gcc/config.gcc. I am a newcomer in using GCC.
Changing config.sub and/or gcc/config.gcc does not require
regenerating the configure script.
If yo
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would first ask why subreg_get_info is being called with ymode ==
> > QImode for a hard register which can not hold QImode. That implies
> > that there is a QImode value in the register, which you say is
> > invalid.
>
> Are there any ports besides m3
Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to allocate a scratch register: write immediate constant
> into scratch register r, write register r into memory
>
> ;; write imm into memory
> (define_insn_and_split "mov_imm_by_store"
>[(set (match_operand:I8I16 0 "memory_operand"
Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A warning that flagged code like
>
> if (c1 || c2 && c3)
>...
>
> would swamp users in warnings, since this kind of code is extremely
> common, and this isn't the kind of thing that anyone who's not a total C
> beginner has trouble with.
That is what -
Haizhou LING <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Suppose we dump the GIMPLE tree into a file by using gcc option. Is it
> possible to import the GIMPLE file into the gcc and generate the target
> code?
No.
The LTO project is working toward making something like that possible.
Ian
"Doug Gregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To make this discussion a bit more concrete, the attached patch
> removes this particular warning from -Wparentheses and puts it into a
> new warning, -Wprecedence, that is not enabled by -Wall. This is
> slightly more fine-grained than what -Wparenthese
"Kaveh R. GHAZI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For what is to save developer time, which is way more valuable than cpu
> time.
If you are the only person running the compiler, then developer time
is far more valuable than CPU time. But tens of thousands of people
run the compiler, and they run i
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 17, 2008 2:12 PM, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Richard Guenther wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >> template
> > >> struct Foo
> > >> {
> > >> template
> > >> friend void func(const Foo &);
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> void ch
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Jan 17, 2008 2:12 PM, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > >> template
> > > > >> struct Foo
> > > > >> {
> > > > >> template
> > > > >> friend void func(const Foo &);
Andrew Hutchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The alternative, perhaps, would be to set each length attribute
> dynamically in each pattern - if that was possible. But that looks
> like way more work.
That is certainly the best way. Search for "length" in mips.md for
one example of how it can
Andrew Hutchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I say above, the logic already exists as c function. If we could
> call these directly to determine the attribute value, it would be much
> easier!
You can. Use symbol_ref. Again, examples in mips.md. Note how the
default value for the "length
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The m32c port has this:
>
> #define DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE 4
>
> However, dwarf2asm.c has this:
>
> int
> size_of_encoded_value (int encoding)
> {
> . . .
> case DW_EH_PE_absptr:
> return POINTER_SIZE / BITS_PER_UNIT;
>
> The net result is th
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The EH code does seem to use POINTER_SIZE pretty consistently.
> > DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE is for the debug info, not the exception frame
> > info. I haven't looked into the history of why this is so.
>
> Hmmm... I suppose the EH info is used by the runtime as
"Andreas Krebbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should we do something about this for GCC 4.3 or just XFAIL the
> testcases for s390 and s390x?
I haven't tried to figure out what is really going on, but I know the
answer to this question: an off-by-one error in the line number for a
warning is a
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I saw that regclass() function determines which class of register
> the registers in the current units should be assigned to. The question I
> have is: Will this decision change in any other parts of the compiler?
> or is this this the final place
"Thomas A.M. Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I generate a GIMPLE form extended with new nodes coming from language
> extensions. I would like to generate assembly code directly from those
> nodes. I was thinking of using the GCC builtins system. But I cannot
> find the entry point (hook and
"Thomas A.M. Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you mean scheduling of the instruction, does it mean that the
> register allocation for ASM is not that advanced than it is for a
> builtin ? For instance the use of register classes, for the
> instruction.
Register allocation for an asm us
"Rodrigo Dominguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am PhD student in Computer Engineering. I would like to contribute to GCC
> and at the same time learn more about cross-compilers. I have taken a couple
> of compiler classes and I can program in C. However, I am not familiar with
> the GCC inter
Joern Rennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:51:25PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:18:14PM +, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> > > However, AFAIK having multiple source files is at odds with a simple test.
> >
> > If noinline attribute doesn't he
Pjotr Kourzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> int main() { const int size=10; struct foo {
> int array[size]; int* p; };// f = { .p=0 };
> struct foo f = { .p = 0 }; }
With gcc mainline, compiled with checking, I get an ICE:
/home/iant/foo1.c: In function
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To invoke this instruction from the source level, a compiler builtin
> > is provided.
> > Since C syntax doesn't provide functions with two results, this builtin
> > refers
> > to them via pointers:__super_ld32( int* x, int *y, int *a)
>
> I did some
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In the response of Paolo I also don't understand how the DI pseudo could be
> > mapped on two consecutive SI regs. I think gcc always will map a multiword
> > pseudo on consecutive word-size regs. Am I wrong here ?
>
> Oops, I forgot a part. In th
Jonathan Adamczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NightStrike wrote:
> > What is gcc's irc server?
> >
>
>
> #gcc on irc.oftc.net
Which is mentioned on http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki , by the way.
Ian
Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to understand an assertion failure in reload1.c:8135.
>
> In delete_output_reload(), I'm getting an assertion failure
> in this code:
>
>for (i1 = reg_equiv_alt_mem_list [REGNO (reg)]; i1; i1 = XEXP (i1, 1))
> {
>gcc_assert
Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Apparently tricks are needed as the -rpath is used both at
> run-time and at link-time, ld complains about "No such file or
> directory" if the path doesn't exist on the host side.
-rpath-link is your friend here.
In the past I've just manually co
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I was slightly mistaken. The manual says "Searching -rpath in
> this way is only supported by native linkers and cross linkers which
> have been configured with the --with-sysroot option."
>
> I don't remember why that exception is there.
Bec
Michael Eager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I patched the code to only count the occurrence if the
> locations are different. Any idea if that has adverse
> consequences?
I would expect that to work. But before bringing it back to mainline
I'd like to find out why the locations are the same.
>
Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why are constructors included twice in object code?
This is required by the C++ ABI.
It is, in my opinion, a real bug that gcc does not simply merge
identical constructors. There are ABI issues with changing, in that
it can change the behaviour of ex
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Why are constructors included twice in object code?
> > This is required by the C++ ABI.
> > It is, in my opinion, a real
I just spent a couple of hours looking into what turned out to be an
issue with decl_constant_value_for_broken_optimization, and I wanted
to record the notes.
The function was introduced here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-10/msg00649.html
At the time Joseph added this comment:
/*
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In the current compiler, it seems very likely that every call to
> > decl_constant_value_for_broken_optimization can simply be removed.
> > The constant propagation passes should implement the optimization.
>
> What about format checking for constant
Andrew Hutchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Register contains parameter that is passed to function. This register
> is not part of call used set.
It's very odd to pass parameters in a register which the callee may
not modify. What target is this?
Ian
"Steven Bosscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the quick response. As it turns out, the libcall issue will
> > > soon be gone, as bonzini will be deleting them. We have finally
> > > overcome that
"Steven Bosscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28 Feb 2008 12:41:30 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > libcalls are still used for no-conflict blocks. This may be what you
> > mean by the scheduling thing. No-conflict blocks are e
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe at last years summit Ian told me that someone at google was
> working on this -- Ian is this still true?
Unfortunately that person moved on to other projects.
Ian
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a patch that give us caret diagnostics in C/C++. There a lot
> of things that can be improved but because I wanted to get some
> feedback with my current approach.
>
> Basically, I store a pointer linebuf in the line_map structure to a
>
"Doug Gregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see that it is time to submit applications to be a mentor
> organization for the Google Summer of Code. I've updated the GSoC wiki
> page at:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode
>
> with a class of projects I'm interested in; others should do
"H.J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the patch for both gcc 4.3 and 4.4. OK for 4.3/4.4? Tested on
> Linux/ia32
> and Linux/ia64 with gcc 4.3/4.4.
> gcc/
>
> 2008-03-03 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> PR target/35453
> * config/i386/smmintrin.h (SIDD_XXX): Renamed to .
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is OK for mainline. I will defer to an RM for 4.3, though my
> recommendation is that it should go into 4.3 if possible.
Sorry, the thread broke, and I didn't see that this had already been
approved.
Ian
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to do some development on the C Compiler in Cygwin and I
> am doing the following to build it:
gcc@gcc.gnu.org is the wrong mailing list. Please send any further
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
> $ ../gcc-4.0.2/gcc/configure
R
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you Ian. I did the modification you mentioned...now I am running
> into more problems.
Again: gcc@gcc.gnu.org is the wrong mailing list. Please do not send
any more e-mail about this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please take any
followups to [EMAIL PR
"Philipp Marek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Shouldn't this be done in the linker instead?
> Well, can the linker change the instruction sequences? Ie. put a JMP
> instead of other code?
Sure. The linker can do whatever it likes. The usual problem is that
by the time the linker sees the cod
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian suggested that we delete this information after the FE is
> finished. This makes sense, I think, from a memory-saving
> perspective. But, that means we will get different kinds of error
> output depending on when a diagnostic is emitted, which I think
Andy H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have problem with data flow and combine that is causing ICE with
> experimental build. Despite all efforts to blame my own target
> changes,
> I have reached the conclusion that this is a gcc COMBINE bug, but seek
> your advice before filing a bug report.
Yo
"Fran Baena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/3/10, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Fran Baena wrote:
>> > RTL represents a low-level language, machine-independent. But I didn't
>> > find any especification of such language represented. This is, I found
>> > no document where the language
"Fran Baena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> By the way, RTL is not really machine-independent. The data
>> structures are machine independent. But the contents are not. You
>> can not, even in principle, take the RTL generated for one processor
>> and compile it on another processor.
>
> I
FX Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Fortran 2003 standard requires that Fortran compilers be able to
> know, at compile-time, what size the various int_fastN_t types have
> on the target (for N = 8, 16, 32 and 64). I've discussed that issue
> before on this list, and was told it's a known
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 08/03/2008, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Another approach would be to only use the carets for parse errors,
>> which is where they are the most helpful. For a middle-end er
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Another approach would be to only use the carets for parse errors,
>> >> which is where they are the most helpful. For a middle-end error like
>> >> "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying
>> >> multiplication" a ca
Liu Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are 2 bugs existing in __udiv_qrnnd_c:
>
> 1. remainder could not be counted correctly
> __r1 and __r0 are not adding enough, so I use do..while to replace former if
>
> 2. the case of overflow of __m are not considered
> so I add a couple of lines to han
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not certain that this is the tradeoff I prefer, but I haven't
> exactly done a survey of what diagnostics are emitted where. My
> general worry is that these more distant (from the FE) diagnostics
> will also be the ones where having good location info
Chris Lattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> As you know the optimizers can pull together information
>> from all over the place. The actual warning can be issued for code
>> which looks very different from anyth
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I think we moved slightly off topic here. Getting the
> locations right is in general a much complex task than simply
> providing caret diagnostics that show whatever location we happen to
> have at hand.
But let's start with what we hav
"Gabriel Dos Reis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> > Do we still want to keep this branch alive?
>>
>> Looking at the changes that were made in the last three months still,
>
"Peter Dolding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since test is in a different object file it gets completely skiped
> from optimising even that it should be optimised out.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LTO_Driver
Ian
GCC has been approved as a supported project for Google's Summer of
Code 2008. Summer of Code is a program in which Google pays students
to work on open source projects.
Now we need people to sign up as mentors. As in past years, I think
mentors should be restricted to people listed in the MAINT
NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/17/08, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you are interested, please sign up at
>>http://code.google.com/soc/mentor_step1.html
>> You will need to have a gmail.com account.
>
> How does someo
David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> GCC has been approved as a supported project for Google's Summer of
>> Code 2008. Summer of Code is a program in which Google pays students
>> to work on open source projects.
>>
>
Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following code generators use FOR_EACH_BB[_REVERSE] in the
> target machine dependent reorg pass:
> - bfin
> - frv
> - ia64
> - mt
> - s390
> Are these invalid code generators then? Or are we talking about
> different
Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> The following code generators use FOR_EACH_BB[_REVERSE] in the
>>> target machine dependent reorg pass:
>>> - bfin
&g
"Alexey Salmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to join the gcc development process and I decided that
> Lexer/cpplib will be a good place to start. It's quite interesting for
> me, I have some experience in this theme in few projects, fortunately
> there is a http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cp
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know it's a bit late, but I just thought that it'd be really nice if GCC
> had a C# frontend. I don't have time to do this myself right now (although
> I'm willing to work on it in the future if noone beats me to it), but maybe
> someone would pick it
"Alexey Salmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, here's my application. Please, leave your comments as I still
> have two days to fix it if something is wrong :)
Thanks for sending this.
> Project
> I want to make some improvements in the Lexer/cpplib area:
> 1) Change the way of file handli
"Chad Attermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all. Late last year I posted a couple of questions about
> multi-threaded application hangs in Solaris 10 for x86 platforms, and
> about thread-safety of std::basic_string in general. This was an
> attempt to solve persistent problems I have b
"Chad Attermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can not confirm that it was the i386 code included in the gcc build
> but it appears that way from the signature. Is this perhaps a problem
> with the way that gcc 3.4.3 shipping with Solaris 10 x86 was built?
> Should it have opted for the i486 ve
2601 - 2700 of 3176 matches
Mail list logo
