Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following code generators use FOR_EACH_BB[_REVERSE] in the > target machine dependent reorg pass: > - bfin > - frv > - ia64 > - mt > - s390 > Are these invalid code generators then? Or are we talking about > different things?
Yes, they are probably broken. You can mostly get away with it if you don't use define_delay. > If this basic block infrastructure is not valid anymore is the pure > insn-list the only data structure I can use? Yes. Yes, this is very lame, but rewriting reorg.c is painful. Ian
