Mohamed Shafi writes:
> After analyzing the issue i find that this might be a bug. I just want
> to confirm if that is the case or not.
> In order to reproduce i think the target should have the following properties
> a. Only 2 32bit registers available as argument registers.
> b. Second 64bit va
Jason Merrill writes:
> The SVN book
> (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html)
> suggests deleting feature branches that have been merged into the
> trunk; I think this would help to reduce the clutter in the branches
> directory and avoid confusion with people
"Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
>> - libiberty
>> I need help with this one. When the linker plugin is
>> enabled (if GCC is configured to use gold), LTO can
>> detect LTO objects inside archives via the callbacks it
>> gets from the li
daniel tian writes:
> when I build the libgcc2.c, an unrecognizable RTL exist. Its about subreg.
> Here is the info:
>
> ../../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__mulvsi3':
> ../../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:169: error: unrecognizable
> insn:
> (insn 24 26 25
Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
>> when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
>> the appended.
>
> What about just always adding --enable-shared to the host libiberty?
That will just cause everybody to always
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 09/29/2009 06:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
>>>> So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
>>>> when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
>
"Paul Edwards" writes:
> 2. If the normal way to do things is to parse the make -n output
> with perl etc, that's fine, I'll do it that way. I was just wondering
> if the proper way was to incorporate the logic into a Makefile
> rule and get that rule repeatedly executed rather than just
> havin
"Paul Edwards" writes:
>> the gcc build system working. Trying to bootstrap gcc there seems
>> like a lot
>> of pain for no real benefit.
>
> The effort is mostly in the Canadian Cross. The changes to get it to
> bootstrap from that point are relatively small.
I think you are underestimating th
"Paul Edwards" writes:
> 1. First I need to use my current build machine, Linux,
> to first of all convert the i370.md into insn*.c files, then
> generate an xgcc. The xgcc would be capable of producing
> i370 code so long as I use the "-S" option. It doesn't really
> matter how this xgcc was c
Hi Tom, in the fix for PR 22168 you deprecated #ident, in the sense
that gcc now warns about it. Is that really a good idea? #ident is a
reasonably widely used extension: codesearch.google.com finds "about"
110,000 uses. It's supported by other compilers--it was introduced on
System V, I believe
"Paul Edwards" writes:
>> * Configure gcc as a cross-compiler.
>
> So this would not be considered a Canadian Cross after all,
> and with configure I only change the target, not the host?
The end result is a Canadian Cross, but the first step in a typical
build of a Canadian Cross is a cross-com
"Paul Edwards" writes:
* Copy header files and libraries from the host (MVS).
>>>
>>> That's fine. And use the --with-root option of configure to get
>>> them used?
>>
>> --with-sysroot, yes.
>
> I have been trying combinations of --prefix and --with-sysroot, and
> --with-build-sysroot, but
Zoltán Kócsi writes:
> Is there a documentation of the various magic letters that you can
> apply to an operand in inline assembly?
Unfortunately, no.
> The
> only place I found some information was going through the
> gcc/config//.c file and trying to find the meaning of such
> letters in the
Denis Onischenko writes:
> I am getting the following error when compiling "x86_64 to powerpc64"
> cross gcc, as soon as the libgcc_s.so.1 has appeared in obj/gcc
> directory.
This question would be more appropriate for the mailing list
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. Please take any followups there. Th
"Jon Beniston" writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>>> Index: gcc/config/lm32/sfp-machine.h
>>> Index: gcc/config/lm32/crti.S
>>> Index: gcc/config/lm32/lib1funcs.S
>>> Index: gcc/config/lm32/crtn.S
>>> Index: gcc/config/lm32/arithmetic.c
>>> Index: gcc/config/lm32/t-fprules-softfp
>>> Index: gcc/config/lm32
Diego Novillo writes:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 09:55, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
> wrote:
>
>> Are LTO plugins fondamentally different from others, non LTO plugins?
>
> Yes, it should be probably be named 'linker' plugins. It's a plugin
> for gold to allow extraction of individual .o files out of sta
Diego Novillo writes:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:34, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:29:29PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>>> I suppose LTO plugins means plugin dlopen-ed in lto-plugin/lto-symtab.c
>>
>> It sounds to me like this confusion comes from "LTO plugins".
Edd Barrett writes:
> I would be really interested to know how GCC:
> * Decides whether or not to embed tables in the data segment of the binary.
> * Selects the comparisons in the above tree.
The relevant code is expand_case and friends in gcc/stmt.c. Where a
jump table should go is decided
sandeep soni writes:
> I have been studying the gcc code lately as part of my project.I have
> got info from this mailing list about CFG and DFG information.I want
> to know how gcc uses this information to perform loop optimization?
> Does it Follow any particular algorithm or in particular what
jeffiedward writes:
> when i try to compile glibc, the following configuration error occurs:
>
> ../configure CFLAGS=" -march=i686 -O2" --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> --target=powerpc-linux-gnu --prefix=/home/tellabs/GNU/PPC
> --with-headers=/home/tellabs/GNU/include
> --with-binutils=/home/tellabs/G
Loren James Rittle writes:
> Since around Wednesday of last week, I have been unable to access
> svn+ssh://ljrit...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc through
> http://sshproxy.sourceware.org:443/
>
> I have not changed any local configuration in some time but definitely
> not since it worked the day before tha
Thomas Heller writes:
> I ran into a little issue when trying to force inlining with
> __attribute__(( always_inline )). The reason why i am trying to force
> the compiler to inline my code is simple: I want to implement handwritten
> optimizations using SSE intrinsics. However it seems that gcc
sandeep soni writes:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> I'm not really sure what you are asking. gcc supports OpenMP for
>> parallelizing loops. That is mostly done in the frontends.
>
> I have been told that openMP does parallelizin
francesco biscani writes:
> I'm experiencing a strange behaviour with GCC 4.4.1. Basically I have
> some C++ mathematical code which gets a ~x2 performance drop if I
> *remove* the following debug line from the code:
This message is not appropriate for the mailing list g...@gcc.gnu.org.
It is a
Joern Rennecke writes:
> Quoting Ian Lance Taylor :
>
>> francesco biscani writes:
>>
>>> I'm experiencing a strange behaviour with GCC 4.4.1. Basically I have
>>> some C++ mathematical code which gets a ~x2 performance drop if I
>>&g
彭建章 writes:
> I'm porting gcc , and use its autovectorization.
> How can I know wether a standard name support a vector mode ?
The standard names all have modes built into them. If you are porting
gcc, then you need to write a define_expand or define_insn in your MD
file with a standard name w
John Holdsworth writes:
> I've encountered a bus error using Apple's gcc in Xcode 3.1, 3.2
> compiling the following code or any containing for( x in y ) is used
> inside a template in Objective-C++.
>
> template
> class OODictionary {
> void boom() {
> NSArray *keys = nil;
Joel Sherrill writes:
> In checking my local changes, I noticed a minor
> difference in how the Ada source files have their
> Copyright notice. Some have a comma between the
> years and party, others do not.
>
> 9drpc.adb:-- Copyright (C) 1992-2009, Free Software
> Foundation, Inc.
Andrew Hutchinson writes:
> I can use "=" modifier to make operands use same register and early
> clobber "&" to avoid overlaps.
>
> Is it possible to have or construct a contraint that permits partial
> overlap operands. (which neither = or & would allow)
> The case would be wide types taking m
tbp writes:
> Merrily trying to make a test-case showing how unmanageable it is to
> try to override *math* flags per function, i soon had to stop
> because...
Please file a bug report.
__attribute__((optimize())) is definitely only half-baked.
Ian
Andrew Haley writes:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> --enable-plugin is used by classpath (part of libjava) and now by GCC
>> itself. disabling the build of the gcjwebplugin now disables plugin
>> support in GCC as well. Please could the option for enabling GCC plugin
>> support be renamed to somethin
Bernd Roesch writes:
> I compile an old code which use this and i think its compile with Gcc 2.95
> and the
> PPC GCC 1998 or 1999
> it fail to compile with newer compiler.
>
> #define DRAW_MAX4
> char drawstrings[DRAW_MAX][] = {
> "Number of points drawn using 3D hardware:",
Shankar Iyer writes:
> I have compiled and generated a C++ shared library with the "-fPIC" option.
> But this shared library requires text relocation during runtime and is not
> usable on seLinux which disables writeable text segments. The text relocation
> is due to use of exceptions inside
Ireneusz Szpilewski writes:
> I have 2 ideas about C++ language, maybe they could be implemented as
> GCC C++ extensions (Microsoft has many his own and no one
> complains). :-)
We generally do not want to implement language extensions. It takes a
strong argument to convince us. Also, as a pra
daniel tian writes:
> I just wanna get the argment passed to ld, when I could debug the
> ld with gdb.
> I run the command the
> rice-elf-gcc helloworld.c -v
> But I couldn't get the parameter passed to ld.
> and I don't know what the relationship between "collect2" and
>
swati raina writes:
> The compiler stores the information about dependencies among various
> instruction in control flow graphs and data flow graph. What kind of
> graphs are these? and can this dependency information be extracted
> from gcc?
See cfg*.[ch] and df*.[ch]. Note that df*.[ch] only
Mohamed Shafi writes:
> The internal doc says :
>
> — Target Hook: bool TARGET_CAN_INLINE_P (tree caller, tree callee)
>
> This target hook returns false if the caller function cannot
> inline callee, based on target specific information. By default,
> inlining is not allowed if the callee fu
"Paul Edwards" writes:
> The next thing I hit was that genmodes didn't compile because
> there were conflicts between the strsignal function in the
> Linux include files and the system.h. Looking at the system.h,
> it was including things in because it thought that the prototypes
> didn't exist.
I noticed that the -use-linker-plugin option seems to be passed to the
linker. This is because LINK_COMMAND_SPEC includes %{u*}. And that
is because -uSYMBOL is a documented linker option.
The effect is that the linker creates an undefined reference to the
symbol "se-linker-plugin". Any user un
Rafael Espindola writes:
> 2009-10-23 Rafael Avila de Espindola
>
> * gcc.c (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Remove -use-linker-plugin from the command
> line.
This is OK if it passes bootstrap and if nobody objects in 24 hours.
Thanks.
Ian
Steven Bosscher writes:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Rafael Espindola writes:
>>
>>> 2009-10-23 Rafael Avila de Espindola
>>>
>>> * gcc.c (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Remove -use-linker-plugin from the
>>> co
"Zhang Lin" writes:
> class ACE_Message_Queue_NT;
> template
> ACE_Message_Queue_NT *ACE_Message_Queue_Factory::create_NT_message_queue
> (int max_threads)
> {
> ACE_Message_Queue_NT *tmp = 0;
>
> tmp = new ACE_Message_Queue_NT (max_threads);
>
> return tmp;
> }
>
> class ACE_Message_Queue_
Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
> Are you suggesting me to upload to bugzilla the nearly 3000
> preprocessed forms of the files? I could do that, but the *.i files
> totalize more than one gigabyte. A bzip2 compressed tar archive of
> them is almost 80Mbytes.
That is a difficulty, but without a sel
Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
> May I respectfully suggest to the person maintaining the bugzilla a
> notice in the login page saying something like:
>
> GCC maintainers having write after approval (or better) access to the
> GCC trunk should preferably login with their xx...@gcc.gnu.org email
Go
palpar writes:
> 1. How can I tell from the RTL declaration of a function if it is
> declared INLINE of not?
You have to look at the tree decl, at DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P.
> 2. Where is the code responsible for allocating those variables on the
> stack which don't fit in registers (needed to fix
Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
>>
>> Adding hooks just because you think they might be useful
>> isn't the way to go.
>
> Then what is the correct way to enhance the current plugin API. There
> are a lot of stuff mis
Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> We should add hooks as we find plugins that need them. Simply adding
>> a laundry list of hooks that we think might be needed will most likely
>> cause us to overdesign. We know that we can write interesting plugi
Andreas Schwab writes:
> Rafael Espindola writes:
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
>> index b57234a..9e4cf12 100644
>> --- a/gcc/common.opt
>> +++ b/gcc/common.opt
>> @@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ funwind-tables
>> Common Report Var(flag_unwind_tables) Optimization
>> Just generate u
Rafael Espindola writes:
> Which can also be fixed by explicitly ignoring
> OPT_fuse_linker_plugin. The attached patch does that. Any preferences?
This version is OK with a ChangeLog entry if it bootstraps. Since
there have been several comments, please give people 24 hours to
suggest changes.
Bluddy writes:
> Notice that ld is chaining LO16 relocations after HI16's. However, it's
> doing something completely illegal since the LO16 for 08aecb54 is not
> preceded by a valid HI16 entry! ld got confused by the two address ranges.
While the calculation of a HI16 reloc requires the LO16 r
Uma shankar writes:
> Cross-MIPS gcc version (for Linux target) used is 4.3.2
>
> Today I saw that .so files of MIPS contain some undef symbols with
> non-zero value
>
> The few I saw are defined in libC
>
> Wont this confuse dynamic linker of 4.3.2 ? ( i know that in 4.3.3.
> , there is the
Uma shankar writes:
> a) The compiler activates the warning mechanism only if optimisation
> is enabled at compilation time with -O option. For all the bugs that
> I went through at bugzilla, the failure is not -O level dependent.
> The warning-failure occurs for all levels of optimisation
Mohamed Shafi writes:
>>From ice4.c.168r.asmcons
>
> (insn 5 2 6 2 ice4.c:4 (set (reg:SI 61 [ s ])
> (mem/c/i:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("s") [flags 0x2] 0xb7bfd000 s>) [0 s+0 S4 A32])) 2 {*movsi_internal} (nil))
>
> (insn 6 5 7 2 ice4.c:4 (set (reg:QI 62)
> (plus:QI (subreg:QI (reg:SI 6
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> with the new plugin infrastructure, it makes sense to replace the
> one-catches-all md reorg pass with target-specific passes plugged into
> the pass manager.
Yes, please.
> - there's also M68HC11 and SH... well, I doubt there will be volunteers.
But note that, e.g., bt
ddmetro writes:
> 1. We are expecting that pass_sched and pass_sched2, each will enter
> schedule_insns() function once per pass. However, we found that it is
> entering schedule_insns() function per function(in the program) per pass.
> (If there are two functions in the input program, pass_sched
Jean Christophe Beyler writes:
> I've been working on handling the Debugging information for the use of
> GDB on my port. Though I definitely know that, when compiling in -O3,
> some information is lost and the debugger can't always have all the
> information, I'd like to at least keep the values
Jean Christophe Beyler writes:
>> You can force your writes to the stack to not be removed by making
>> them use UNSPEC_VOLATILE. You would write special define_insns for
>> this.
>
> Is there an architecture port that has done this already ?
No, because, when given the choice, gcc prefers fast
"Grigori Fursin" writes:
> Also, I am trying to figure out if GCC 4.5 branch is still open or not?..
gcc 4.5 is in stage 3, which normally means that no new features are
permitted. That said, plugins are a new feature in gcc 4.5, so the
release managers are likely to grant some leeway for chang
Byoungyoung Lee writes:
> If the optimization options provided in a different way,
> the same source codes would be compiled into different executables.
>
> In the different executables,
> the register allocation or instruction orders might be easily changed,
> but I think that's not that big cha
Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh writes:
> I have a thread & 2 func.flush_2_db() is in thread & add_element() is
> outside of thread.
> add_element's job is adding data to link list.& flush_2_db()'s job is
> reading list & drop from list.But my problem is override data & lost
> data, because flush_2_db is in
Mohamed Shafi writes:
>Ok the constrain for address register is 'a'. Thats typo in the
> pattern that i given here. The proper pattern is
>
> (define_insn "*saddl"
>[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=a,d")
>(plus:SI (mult:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "a,d
Jean Christophe Beyler writes:
> How can I force the prologue to keep this instruction. It is useless
> only in the case that there is no function call or no alloca. But I
> have a case where there is a function call and it is still removed.
Make the hard frame pointer register a fixed register,
"Paul Edwards" writes:
> Now all code needs to be exposed to this. ie libiberty and
> gcc. To fit in with the new style of building, I basically want
> to update ansidecl.h to do a:
>
> #ifdef PUREISO
> #include "mshort.h"
> #endif
>
> Does that seem reasonable?
The ISO C99 standard requires t
"Bingfeng Mei" writes:
> I need to pass a tree node (section name from processing pragmas)
> from C frontend to main GCC body (used in TARGET_INSERT_ATTRIBUTES).
> I store the node in a global pointer array delcared in target.c.
> But the tree node is garbage collected in the end of c-parser
> p
"Justin P. Mattock" writes:
> wanting to know if there's a pure64 patch for 4.5.0
> right now I've plugged in a pure64 patch for 4.4.1
> on 4.5.0.
> will this be good or is there more to that needs to be added.
> http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/gcc-4.4.1-pure64-1.patch
You might do better to as
"Paul Edwards" writes:
> Another "where" question. The i370 port can't cope with 64-bit
> integers.
I think I would stop right there. Why can't the i370 port support
64-bit integers? Plenty of 32-bit hosts support them.
That said, these days gcc always defines __SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__. It
would
"Paul Edwards" writes:
> and c-parse.c:
That file no longer exists so I don't know how to interpret this.
>> I think I would stop right there. Why can't the i370 port support
>> 64-bit integers? Plenty of 32-bit hosts support them.
>
> It got an internal error. I don't have the skills to ge
For the last year and a half I've been working on a gcc frontend for
Go, a new experimental systems programming language designed by a
small group at Google. We've just open sourced it. You can read more
about it at http://golang.org/ .
The gcc frontend is called gccgo. I've just committed it t
I committed the gccgo frontend using a BSD-style license with this
boilerplate:
// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
The frontend is currently tightly tied to gcc. However, m
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> [...] Go, a new experimental systems programming language designed
>> by a small group at Google. [...] The frontend is written in, yes,
>> C++. [...]
>
> Neat. Are there any plans to h
Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
> BTW, I understood perhaps wrongly that Ian Taylor seems to believe
> that gccgo has not much future, and that most of the software written
> in Go (the Google niche language) could be compiled by something which
> is not GCC based.
I certainly hope that gccgo has a
Sebastian Pop writes:
> I haven't looked at the gccgo branch yet, but have quickly browsed
> over the material at golang.org, and I found no document describing,
> at a high level, the design of the compiler(s) and the runtime of go.
As far as I know there is no such document.
First let me say
"Adrian Wadey" writes:
> I'm new to GCC and was wondering if anyone has done work on a back end for
> small micros such as microchip PICs? It is something I'd like to work on
> but would like to know if there are any reasons why GCC only appears to have
> back ends for larger format CPUs.
Peopl
Paolo Carlini writes:
> I'm trying to resolve one way or another this PR, which I have assigned
> to myself a long time ago... The issue essentially is very simple. This
> kind of code:
>
> struct S { int s[3]; };
> struct S s1 = { 1, 1, 1 };
>
> triggers a warning with -Wall about missin
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> 2009/11/17 Ian Lance Taylor:
>>
>> I don't really understand how this interacts with std::tr1:array,
>> though.
>
> For it to be a more convenient drop-in replacement for builtin arrays
> you want to initialise tr1::array like so
Paolo Carlini writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> OK, to me that seems like an excellent reason to implement a special
>> case for the warning here. For example, perhaps if a struct has only
>> one field, and that field is an aggregate, then we don't warn if there
&g
"M. Mohan Kumar" writes:
> Are VTA patches part of mainline gcc now?
Yes.
Ian
Andrew Hutchinson writes:
> I am tracking test failure with avr target where function sqrtf is
> undefined reference at link time.
>
> Here is command line:
>
> /media/verbatim/gcchead/obj-dir/gcc/xgcc
> -B/media/verbatim/gcchead/obj-dir/gcc/
> /media/verbatim/gcchead/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/p
yunfeng zhang writes:
> Sorry! I've made a mistake! But using LD_PRELOAD to force to reposition a
> variable/function from a module is violating software engineer. And the more
> important is, as the result, all user *all* pay the bill for this even they
> make sure they don't need the feature, s
daniel tian writes:
> Addition information, I just found. It was deleted in function: void
> set_insn_deleted (rtx insn), in emit-rtl.c.
You need to figure out how register 42 in the call insn got changed to
register 0 if reg_renumber[42] was not set to 0.
Ian
daniel tian writes:
> I have a problem about RTL sequence.
> If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to schedule
> them.
> Like the following(all the variable is rtx):
>
> emit_insn(reg0, operands[0]);
> emit_insn(reg1, reg0);
> emit_insn(operands[0],
daniel tian writes:
> 2009/12/11 Ian Lance Taylor :
>> daniel tian writes:
>>
>>> I have a problem about RTL sequence.
>>> If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to schedule
>>> them.
>>> Like the follow
daniel tian writes:
> By the way, I don't underand the start_sequence and end_sequence.
> What does those function mean.
> I checked the source code in emit-rtl.c.
> I still can't figure out what they do.
> There is a structure sequence_stack, I don't what it does.
start_sequence and end_
Joern Rennecke writes:
> If you need more rigid scheduling, you can use CC0.
No, please don't. I accept that CC0 is necessary today for a few
processors, but I really don't think we should encourage any new uses
of it.
Ian
Ivan Shcherbakov writes:
> I have noticed that the latest ports of GCC (e.g. i386) use a
> pseudo-register (argp in i386) defined as fixed in FIXED_REGISTERS.
> When I implement it similarly in msp430 port (instead of hardware
> register r5, add a pseudo-register marked as fi
Ivan Shcherbakov writes:
> ELIMINATE_REGS and TARGET_CAN_ELIMINATE are set correctly. As far as I
> understand from further investigation, at some point during
> compilation, the argument pointer register is used, then the
> expand_prologue() produces INSNs including "push
Ivan Shcherbakov writes:
> It seems that in x86 the argp register gets
> eliminated before the reload phase.
That seems unlikely to me. What pass do you think is eliminating the
argument register?
Ian
Ivan Shcherbakov writes:
> For i386-gcc, this seems to happen during global register allocation
> pass. This corresponds to IRA pass of gcc 4.4.x. I have attached the
> corresponding RTL dump files.
That means that reload is where the register is eliminated, as
expected. Reload is really pa
"g...@cyberfiber.org" writes:
> can someone please comment?
1) This is definitely the wrong mailing list. Try sysad...@gnu.org.
2) Nobody can help you without much more information, like exactly
what you tried to do and exactly what happened.
3) You probably want gdb-patc...@sourceware.org.
Matt writes:
> I'm trying to fix some errors/warnings to make sure that gcc-as-cxx
> doesn't bitrot too much. I ran into this issue, and an unsure how to
> fix it without really ugly casting:
>
> enum df_changeable_flags
> df_set_flags (enum df_changeable_flags changeable_flags)
> {
> enum df_c
NightStrike writes:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> The gcc-in-cxx branch is no longer active. All the work was merged to
>> trunk, where it is available via --enable-build-with-cxx.
>
> Is that option regularly tested?
Probably not.
>
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> --with is wrong for this. It's not about the ambient system built against.
>> It's a feature selection for how you build binutils, which means --enable.
>>
>
> Here is the updated patch.
I'm still not entirely convinc
Matt writes:
> Yes, was I pasted was a local change. I was trying to eliminate the
> implicit cast to int from the enum type, which was causing my
> --enable-werror build to fail. At this point, I think the better
> option would be to break up the enum values into indivdual #defines
> and do a ty
Roland McGrath writes:
>> I'm still not entirely convinced that this is the way to go. It seems
>> to me that ideally one wants to be able to select the linker at
>> runtime. I don't see how this patch supports that. What am I
>> missing?
>
> It covers the first step by letting you run "ld.bfd
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Roland McGrath writes:
>>
>>>> I'm still not entirely convinced that this is the way to go. It seems
>>>> to me that ideally one wants to be able to select t
Matt writes:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Matt writes:
>>
>>> Yes, was I pasted was a local change. I was trying to eliminate the
>>> implicit cast to int from the enum type, which was causing my
>>> --enable-werror bui
Roland McGrath writes:
>> Mainly because an alternative is to install them in subdirectories
>> with the name ld. Then gcc can run them directly using a -B option.
>> I don't know which approach is best.
>
> I think it keeps things simplest for humans to understand if the actual
> binaries are a
Gary Funck writes:
> Above 'as' is a script, and at line 83 it is trying to
> invoke the assembler, which indirectly will try to invoke
> ORIGINAL_AS_FOR_TARGET, but that variable is empty:
> ORIGINAL_AS_FOR_TARGET=""
>
> I notice that the build script, 'reghunt/bin/gcc-build-simple does
> some e
"Paulo J. Matos" writes:
> I just noticed that the pro_and_epilogue pass in gcc3.4.3 for certain
> functions is ran multiple times with sibcalls enabled. Why is that?
>
> What I did was to put a printf on the epilogue and sibcall_epilogue
> pattern so that during compilation it prints the name of
Alex writes:
> I am a beginner on gcc backend. I was performing some experiments
> on .md file using a completly new backend set of files written by
> me. I end up on something I really could not understand. Regarding
> addition, I put the following code on my .md file:
>
> (define_expand "ad
1101 - 1200 of 3176 matches
Mail list logo
