On 6 November 2011 16:10, David Brown wrote:
> Perhaps I have been getting too worked up about small things here, and
> missing out on the major points, such as the efforts made to keep things
> consistent through the use of header files. I still find it odd that
> features are added in different
On 7 November 2011 03:02, James Dennett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:55 PM, niXman wrote:
>> When I try to build gcc-trunk on OpenBSD-5.0(gcc-4.2.1), I get the
>> following error:
>>> gcc-4.6.2/i686-pc-openbsd5.0/libstdc++-v3/include/mutex:818:64: error:
>>> invalid conversion from 'void (*)
This should probably be on the gcc-help list.
On 7 November 2011 01:08, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> Well, dear GCC users I am now seeing behavior that falls in the arean of
> the bizarre. No sense in talking much about it but here is the error
> message :
>
> /opt/bw/src/GCC/gcc_4.6.2/gcc-4.6.2/intl/
On 7 November 2011 07:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 7 November 2011 03:02, James Dennett wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:55 PM, niXman wrote:
>>> When I try to build gcc-trunk on OpenBSD-5.0(gcc-4.2.1), I get the
>>> following error:
>>>> gcc-4.6.2/
Fixed on trunk by revision 181072.
Please use bugzilla or the libstdc++ mailing list next time.
On 8 November 2011 19:29, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 07:18:52AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since recently, I am facing several of the warnings above when
>> building GCC-trunk cross for RTEMS targets.
>>
>> So far, not much clues about what is going on, except
On 8 November 2011 22:01, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> And this breaks x86 builds with semi-older binutils. Binutils without
> AVX support gives the following error message while build libtm:
> /usr/bin/as: unrecognized option `-msse2avx'
Is that related to this bootstrap failure I'm seeing on netbsd
On 10 November 2011 10:58, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> With the type inference abilities given by
> the auto keyword, it is sometimes hard for a beginner to understand what type
> is some
> particular expression in his code (or what exactly function is called in an
> overloaded
> context).
If
On 10 November 2011 16:08, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:54:52 +
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> Doesn't DWARF debug info already contain all that info anyway?
>
> It is not a textual file, and it is not easily parsable. Nobody would write a
On 10 November 2011 16:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 10 November 2011 16:08, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>> It is not a textual file, and it is not easily parsable. Nobody would write
>> a DWARF
>> parser in a few hundreds lines of Emacs Lisp.
>
> But it contains a
On 10 November 2011 16:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 10 November 2011 16:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 10 November 2011 16:08, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>>> It is not a textual file, and it is not easily parsable. Nobody would write
>>> a DWARF
>>> par
On 10 November 2011 17:36, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:54:52 +
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> > That type annotation produced by g++ would be usable by external editors,
>> > etc.
>>
>> That's a pretty big assumption, and th
On 12 November 2011 08:56, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the reason I'm delighted with auto is that there are cases
>> where I do not want to know the type (or I want to write generic
>> code that will work with different kinds of containers). For
>>
>> std::multimap amap;
>>
>> when I wr
On 15 November 2011 08:38, Mingjie Xing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, I run into a very odd things when change my gcc toolchain
> from 3.3.* to 3.4.*. The compiled application such as a simple hello
> printing, is unable to redirect into a file.
>
> $ ./hello
> hello
> $ ./hello > log
> $ cat log
> $
I wanted to download my patch in comment 15 of http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2972#c15
So I clicked on the attachment link, and I get the patch viewer,
showing me a coloured, side-by-side diff. Very pretty, but no use if
I want to download it to apply it to the GCC source.
So I clicked on the "Raw Unified
2011/11/15 Frédéric Buclin :
> Le 15. 11. 11 10:50, Jonathan Wakely a écrit :
>> So I clicked on the attachment link, and I get the patch viewer,
>> showing me a coloured, side-by-side diff. Very pretty, but no use if
>> I want to download it to apply it to the GCC source.
On 18 November 2011 09:57, esmaeil mirzaee wrote:
> Hi
> apologize for interrupt and weak English.
This email is not appropriate for this mailing list, for help using or
installing gcc please use the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org mailing list.
Please follow up on that list instead, thanks.
> I need to ins
On 21 November 2011 00:50, Jeff Evarts wrote:
> Seriously, I meant no offense, and didn't want to cause a stir.
I didn't interpret the replies as offended or stirred, I think they
were just saying "it's not clear from your question whether you are
already familiar with the most rudimentary* tools
Generally questions about building or using gcc should go to the
gcc-help mailing list, not here.
On 22 November 2011 19:01, Aran Clauson wrote:
> I tried removing this line, but the file is regenerated by the make system.
> Since others have built and are building trunk, I assume that I have a
>
On 23 November 2011 03:06, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
>
> Oh, one last thing, the environment had to be set correctly. I had
> mpc, mpfr, and gmp in /usr/local, and the following environment
> variables needed to be set for the compile to work:
> ABI=64
> CONFIG_SHELL=sh (NOT! bash)
> ARCH=x86-64
> CF
2011/12/5 Marco Antonio Gómez Martín:
> Hello,
>
> Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
>
> The table entries:
>
> Defining move special member functions N3053 GCC 4.6
> Allowing move constructors to throw [no
2011/12/5 Jonathan Wakely:
> 2011/12/5 Marco Antonio Gómez Martín:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Just to let you know that I have found some broken links at
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
>>
>> The table entries:
>>
>>
On 6 December 2011 15:11, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on gcc-4.6.2/x64/linux:
>
> template inline string format(const string& fmt,
> TA&&... args) {
>
> string_formatter f;
> f.format(fmt, std::forward(args)...);
> return f.get_result();
> }
>
> results in:
>
> er
On 6 December 2011 15:18, David Brown wrote:
>
> But clearly the uninitialised warnings are useful, and users would like to
> see them improved - if it is possible to do so without adversely affecting
> code generation, of course.
Yes, we all like good things, and we all want more good things, as
On 6 December 2011 16:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'm guessing you've called format with an explicit template
> argument list, and it's not compatible with the actual types you
> called the function with. Due to
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50828 t
On Wednesday, 7 December 2011, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 19:14, Christian Joensson wrote:
>> I am trying to build gcc trunk on cygwin (with the snapshot of
>> 20111207) and get this:
>
>> /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/ada/adaint.c -o ada/adaint.o
>> In file included from /usr/local/src/trun
On 8 December 2011 01:09, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>>> Should the Cygwin header use
>>> extern "C++" on those declarations even though they're inside #ifdef
>>> __cplusplus, or should adaint.c not #include things ins
On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
>
> Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a warning, as clang already
> does.
> So that you get a warning for the following code:
>
> struct A { int i; };
> struct B : A
> {
> A::i; // <- warning here
> };
>
> warning: access declarations ar
On 12 December 2011 09:18, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>> On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
>>>
>>> Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a warning, as clang already
>>> does.
>>> So that you get a warnin
On 12 December 2011 10:08, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>> On 12 December 2011 09:18, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>>>
>>>> On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
On 12 December 2011 21:13, Quentin Neill wrote:
>
> I think an improvement could be made in automated downloading of GCC
> and dependencies (I looked in the wiki and the document and didn't see
> this, but it is worth mentioning).
>
> Any script (and new users as well) must understand which depende
On 12 December 2011 21:54, Quentin Neill wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>> On 12 December 2011 21:13, Quentin Neill wrote:
>>>
>>> I think an improvement could be made in automated downloading of GCC
>>> and dependencies
On 20 December 2011 12:49, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> The point of the example is that you cannot write
>
> if (__builtin_expect (ptr, 1))
> error ();
>
> so the "!= NULL" is important here. But you are right that
> "error ()" is a bit unexpected; care to send a patch that c
On 20 December 2011 13:31, Peter A. Felvegi wrote:
>
> I suspect there is a regression from g++ 4.4 in later versions. If the name
> of the class is ambiguous in a catch(), this fact is not reported.
Bugs should be reported to bugzilla:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#report
Please also provide a reduce
ror ();
+ ptr->foo ();
@end smallexample
@noindent
I've CC'd the gcc-patches list, which is where patches should be sent
for review, and included a ChangeLog entry:
2011-12-21 Jonathan Wakely
Jim Avera
* doc/extend.texi (__builtin_expect): Improve
On 21 December 2011 18:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21 December 2011 02:00, Jim Avera wrote:
>> Ok, here is a patch which improves the example:
>>
>> --- gcc/doc/extend.texi.ORIG 2011-12-20 17:35:32.236578828 -0800
>> +++ gcc/doc/extend.texi 2011-12-
On 23 December 2011 09:06, Miles Bader wrote:
> Is the following code valid?
>
> #include
>
> struct X
> {
> std::tuple tt{1, 2}; // works
> };
>
> struct Y
> {
> std::tuple tt = std::tuple{1, 2}; // *error*
> };
>
> 'cause it results in an error with gcc 20111210:
>
>
On 24 December 2011 10:50, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 12/24/2011 03:04 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
>>
>> What do people think... is this a better non-virtual-dtor warning?
>
> In general this type of diagnostic issue isn't very difficult to work on.
> First, I would recommend checking if we have a Bugzil
On 28 December 2011 20:57, R A wrote:
>
> templates, i have no problem with, i wish there could be a C dialect that can
> integrate it, so i wouldn't have to be forced to use C++ and all the bloat
> that usually come from a lot of it's implementation (by that i mean a
> performance close to C i
On 28 December 2011 21:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28 December 2011 20:57, R A wrote:
>>
>> templates, i have no problem with, i wish there could be a C dialect that
>> can integrate it, so i wouldn't have to be forced to use C++ and all the
>> bloat that
On 30 December 2011 15:25, Jakub Staszak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've found that:
>
> class Prv {
> private:
> union
> {
> union
> {
> unsigned int Bits;
> };
> };
> };
>
> unsigned int getBits(Prv *P) {
> return P->Bits;
> }
>
> doesn't generate any error. Is it a bug?
Yes, I think
On 5 January 2012 16:33, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
>> If the final C++11 still requires gets in , despite it being
>> removed in C11, that's probably also a bug in C++11. (At least the most
>> recent draft I have to hand still has gets in .)
>
>
> It still h
On 5 January 2012 18:24, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 05/01/12 18:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 5 January 2012 16:33, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>>
>>>> If the final C++11 still requires gets in , despite it being
>
This mailing list is for development of gcc, not help using it.
Please direct questions about using or building gcc to the gcc-help
list, thanks.
On 10 January 2012 00:54, John Harper wrote:
> My little test program then compiled but wouldn't run even though the
> library said to be missing does
On 11 January 2012 09:08, Mingjie Xing wrote:
> 2012/1/10 Ian Lance Taylor :
>> Stamp files in make work like this:
>>
>> FILE: STAMP-FILE; @true
>> STAMP-FILE: DEPENDENCIES
>> commands to create FILE.tmp
>> move-if-change FILE.tmp FILE
>> touch $@
>>
>> What this says is: if a
On 11 January 2012 14:49, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>> I'm not sure why "@true" is needed, as I think GNU make allows simply
>> ";" for an empty recipe, maybe Ian can explain that part.
>
> The rules I described work
On 12 January 2012 19:16, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> I think a compelling case could be made to ship 4.7 with a
> configure-time flag that sets the default C++ dialect to C++11.
>
> So, I would propose
>
> --with-std = dialect
>
> or
>
> --with-std-version=c dialect default, c++ dialect default
>
>
On 12 January 2012 21:03, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 03:17 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> And if we are going to do that, shouldn't it be ASAP? Otherwise we'll
>> not be able to change anything significant in .so.7 once it's
>> available in 4.7
On 13 January 2012 11:51, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> Dennis Clarke writes:
>>
>>> for (argno = 0; argno < argc; argno++) {
>>> if (argno < 6)
>>> *tsp++ = reg[REG_O0 + argno] = va_arg(ap, long);
>>> else
>>> *tsp++ = va_arg(ap
On 13 January 2012 17:45, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Note that one of the objectives of this email is to try and get
> maintainers from thinking there is going to be "a perfect time" to
> switch. Development history tells us there will always be more changes.
> We've been sitting on ABI-breaking ch
On 16 January 2012 13:55, Hans Aberg wrote:
> [I am not on this list, so please cc me.]
>
> On OS X 10.7.2, gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120115 from SVN compiles using the
> /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 that is installed by Xcode 4.2.1.
>
> But if one first compiles GCC 4.6.2 using the same LLVM-GCC, then th
On 16 January 2012 14:49, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2012, at 15:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>>> The config.log of this directory just indicates a program doing the check
>>> that will fail (now overwritten by new ./configure && make).
>>
>> Do not
On 16 January 2012 17:31, Hans Aberg wrote:
> Bison puts up snapshots at ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/bison/, an alternative to
> those that do not need the latest bleeding-edge version.
So does GCC, the front page says "Our sources are readily and freely
available via SVN and weekly snapshots" and li
On 17 January 2012 09:12, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2012, at 08:30, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> > When looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/, there are some large links to the
>> > versions, but none for 4.7.
>>
>> GCC 4.7 has not been released yet.
>
> There is a development version. You might comp
On 19 January 2012 10:21, tintu david joy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a system with Suse 10.3 and gcc version 4.2.1. Will there be
> inbuilt fortran compiler or do I have to install it separately. Thanks
This question is unsuitable for this mailing list, please use the
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org list fo
2012/1/20 Ludovic Courtès:
>
> Yeah, but it’s a shame that those compilers define __GNUC__ without
> supporting 100% of the GNU C extensions. With this approach, you would
> also need to add !defined for Clang, PGI, and probably others.
May I politely suggest that this is the wrong place to compl
On 21 January 2012 00:32, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 23:28:07 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> May I politely suggest that this is the wrong place to complain about
>> other compilers pretending to be GCC :)
>
> I think that's the fault of GCC, which should
On 21 January 2012 13:42, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-01-21 01:24:19 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> And what about the fact other compilers haven't defined such a macro
>> for each extension they implement, whether it comes from GCC or not,
>> is that GC
On 21 January 2012 13:55, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 21 January 2012 00:32, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> On 2012-01-20 23:28:07 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>> May I politely suggest that this is the wrong p
On 22 January 2012 11:34, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-01-21 13:58:53 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 21 January 2012 13:42, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> > On 2012-01-21 01:24:19 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> >> And what about the fact other compilers haven&#x
On 3 February 2012 21:28, Peter A. Felvegi wrote:
> on all tested gcc versions (4.4, 4.5, 4.6,4.7). There is definitely a type
> called 'Type' in struct 'Derived'. I'm not sure, the above code might be
> ill-formed, but then I'd like to see a specific error message.
I think the problem is that Der
2012/2/5 David Brown :
>
> Enum types in C++ can be any integer type big enough to cover the required
> range. I think most C++ compilers use the smallest integer type that covers
> the range.
With the three C++ compilers I tried enums are int-sized for
compatiblity reasons, so that enums declare
This mailing list is for discussing development *of* gcc, not help
using it. Your question would be appropriate on the
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org list, please take any follow-up there, thanks.
On 7 February 2012 13:57, Alexandre Almeida wrote:
>
> It seems to be impossible to define an inline member fun
2009/7/28 Basile STARYNKEVITCH:
>
> It could perhaps be not a branch, but a plugin, but I know not much about
> C++ concepts, and absolutely nothing about the existing C++ concepts
> branch[es].
I don't think that would work - the standard library changes that go
along with the language feature co
2009/8/7 Mr. Vivek Varghese Jacob:
>
> i would like to know the latest stable version of gcc...
> i have went through the website..
Did you miss the front page? And the releases page?
If you still can't find the information* please send your question to
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org instead.
Jonathan
*
2009/8/7 Maxim Dementiev:
>
> It means that swap for user types could be defined either in std namespace
> or in the user type namespace (argument-dependent name lookup).
Yes, this is intentional. swap() is a point of customisation point,
see http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184401876 and the definition in
2009/8/18 Larry Evans:
> I don't have any program called Mail on my system:
It might be called /usr/bin/mailx or just /usr/bin/mail (small 'm') on
some systems.
Jonathan
2009/10/14 Ben Bridgwater:
> Can anyone tell me why this template constructor only works at global scope?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ or the gcc-help mailing list.
This mailing list is for discussing development of GCC, not help using it.
> I realize I could use a std::initializer_list constructor
2009/11/16 Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh:
> Dear all,
> I wrote a program & when i monitor it with "top" command, i see an
> incremental load average.When i see with a profiler program same oprof,i
> saw function of my thread has 66% activity.
> I read many body of that function,but i have got 1 result: i
2009/11/17 abdelali ghoulam:
>
> I downloaded "gcc-4.4.2.tar.gz" and it's first time I use GCC, I do not know
> how to install it on windows vista.
> I want to use C and C + +
This mailing list is for discussing development of gcc, not how to
install or use it, you should ask on the gcc-h...@gcc.
2009/11/17 Ian Lance Taylor:
>
> I don't really understand how this interacts with std::tr1:array,
> though.
For it to be a more convenient drop-in replacement for builtin arrays
you want to initialise tr1::array like so:
std::tr1::array a = { 0, 1, 2 };
rather than
std::tr1::array a = { { 0, 1
2009/11/18 Mark Mitchell:
> Joe Buck wrote:
>
>> I think that the cleanest way is to suppress the warning for structs
>> with one member
>
> And recursively?
>
> So that:
>
> struct A { int i; };
> struct B { struct A a };
> struct C { struct B b };
> struct C c = { 1 };
>
> does not trigger th
2009/11/25 Piotr Wyderski:
> After upgrade to trunk-20091124:
>
> class C {
>
> protected:
>
> C(const C&) = default;
> };
>
> main.cpp:1506:23: error: 'C::C(const C&)' declared with non-public access
> cannot
> be defaulted in the class body
>
> But I can't find anything about it
2009/11/26 Piotr Wyderski:
>
> Clean, simple and GCC used to happily accept that.
Only with the experimental C++0x mode, which is a moving target and
you shouldn't really complain if it changes.
> But now it is illegal because of 3 draft violations:
>
> Base() shall be public, but is not
> ~Base(
2009/11/26 Jonathan Wakely:
>
> This still lets you use defaulted functions, but the base is not
> trivially copyable.
Oops, I meant the base is not a trivial class ... but then it can't be
anyway as you have a virtual function.
2009/12/8 Benjamin Redelings I:
> Hi,
Hi,
I've CC'd the libstdc++ list, please reply there instead of the gcc list.
> It seems that many current uses of list::merge( ) fail to compile with
> -std=c++0x, but I don't see a bug in bugzilla for this. Itseems to result
> from:
>
> list<_Tp, _Alloc>::
2009/12/8 Tim Murdoch:
>
> I'll begin by stating my knowledge of Unix is almost non-existent.
> Using the basic skills that I learned many years ago, I'm currently
> trying to rescue a near dead hard drive with DDRescue. First, I need
> to install a C++ compiler, which I have downloaded (v4.3.3) a
2009/12/10 sergio borghese:
>
> Now my question is: is it correct that the compiler enforces the
> constantness of the variable, even tought it states in the warning
> that the const qualifier has been discarded?
the calls to printf can be optimised to printf("i: %dn", 0) so it
doesn't use the val
2009/12/28 Pardis Beikzadeh:
> Hi,
This question should be asked on the gcc-help mailing list, not this one.
> I'm having a problem while installing gcc3.2. I'm trying to install
> gcc3.2 for my installation of cygwin because anything higher than that
> won't work if I try to compile mex files fo
2010/1/10 swati raina:
>
> I am tried to debug gcc using the following commands
>
> 1)[sw...@localhost ~]$ gdb --args /usr/bin/gcc
See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebuggingGCC
2010/1/11 Piotr Wyderski:
> Hello,
>
> Is the a way to get access to the currently thrown
> C++ exception object? cxxabi.h gives me only access
> to its std::type_info via __cxa_current_exception_type().
> On the other hand, the ABI documentation describes
> the struct __cxa_exception, but it is no
2010/1/14 Christoph Rupp:
>
> To reproduce, these steps are necessary:
>
> wget http://crupp.de/dl/hamsterdb-1.1.1.tar.gz
> tar -zxvf hamsterdb-1.1.1.tar.gz
> cd hamsterdb-1.1.1
> ./configure --enable-internal
> make
There are lots of these warnings, which you ignore at your peril:
freelist.c:332
2010/1/19 Simon Hill:
> Axel Quote:
> "Anyways there is an already filed GCC bug about this defect report
> against the standard,
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 ."
>
> That bug report is suspended. Is this due to the C++ standards issue
> you referred to?:
> http://www.open-std
On 25 January 2010 15:51, Piotr Wyderski:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
union { float f; uint32 i; } u = {.f = v};
return u.i;
>>>
>>> Nope, that is not allowed either.
>>
>> Of course it is allowed. It's a legitimate gcc extension, and it's
>> supported by many other compilers too.
>
> It
On 29 January 2010 11:09, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
>> Thus, what's the point of submitter fiddling with those Bugzilla
>> fields? Putting some sort of psychological pressure on people actually
>> working on fixing the bugs?
>
> Well, that's true when it comes to high prioritie
On 2 February 2010 08:26, Christian Fröbel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a hard time figuring out how exactly pthread_cancel() works
> in a C++ program. It seems that a thread cancellation is somewhat
> similar to throwing an exception. But I couldn't find any proof or
> details about it. I'm not
On 26 March 2010 07:54, Vaibhav Shrimali wrote:
> Hello,
> I made some changes in the compiler gcc-4.3.2 and am currently trying
> to build the compiler.
> There are no compilation error in the source code. I followed the
> steps specified at : http://gcc.gnu.org/install/index.html
> while configu
On 2 April 2010 14:12, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> Paolo,
> I don't believe this occurs with the x86_64-apple-darwin10
> target but only with i686-apple-darwin10 so it may well be
> a bug in the 32-bit linker on darwin. I'll try benchmarking the
> actual linkage command at both 32-bit and 64-bit to s
On 6 April 2010 21:10, Jerome Quinn wrote:
>
> What is the minimum gmp for cloog-ppl? Is it the same as for gcc? My
> system gmp is too old for gcc so I've got gmp 4.3.2 placed in the gcc
> source tree per the instructions. It would be nice to have cloog use
> the gmp that will be built as part
On 6 April 2010 22:02, Jerome Quinn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> source tree per the instructions. It would be nice to have cloog use
>>> the gmp that will be built as part of the gcc bootstrap.
>>>
>>> Is
On 9 April 2010 17:00, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> I have no idea how to fix this. Ideas?
Maybe a dumb question, I don't know the context of this problem...
Is the only C++ header that causes a problem?
is exactly equivalent to because it only declares
macros, which are not in namespace std
On 11 April 2010 17:17, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> I would also add that some of this seems like deja vu from the
> egcs days. Granted it is extremely unlikely, but who is to say that
> at some future date, if the license conflicts subside, that FSF gcc
> might decide that llvm wasn't so bad for the
On 15 April 2010 10:04, Singh, Neeraj K wrote:
>
> But, I don't have the value for http-proxy-host and http-proxy-port-any clue
> what this should be?
The web proxy at your site. If you don't have a web proxy, don't use
them. If you do have a web proxy, you can probably find the details in
your b
On 19 April 2010 18:34, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>
> Note [*]: are we sure that other announced features, like Link Time
> Optimization, are *easily* usable by *ordinary* GCC users? I don't know, and
> I am not sure... Perhaps most ordinary users only know about -O1 or -O3...
Well, yes, because
On 19 April 2010 08:20, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> On 04/18/2010 11:57 PM, Jie Zhang wrote:
>>
>> On 04/19/2010 02:43 PM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>>>
>>> I couldn't resist..(had to play),
>>> anyways I looked through the reports
>>> but didn't see anything that was
>>> familiar. so I went and crea
On 3 April 2010 00:16, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> Jonathan,
> The test program when compiled as i386 randomly hangs under both the
> 32-bit and 64-bit
> kernels on Darwin 10.3.0. I've emailed Mike Stump an Instruments trace file
> sampling the
> hung binary. Unfortunately, I don't know how to con
On 21 April 2010 21:54, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 3 April 2010 00:16, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> >
>> > Jonathan,
>> > The test program when compiled as i386 randomly hangs under both the
&g
On 23 April 2010 22:49, Michael Witten wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, this is off-topic, and stop trying to incite people to fight,
>> in this and other threads, please. It is not the first time you do it.
>> If you just hate gcc so much, just leave. Thanks,
>
> I don't know what you're talking about.
Prob
2008/10/19 Edward Peschko:
>
> That worked (thanks) but exactly why did it work? Shouldn't gcc be
> smart enough to realize that it is working either with a c++ file or
> linking to a c++ library?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/Invoking-G_002b_002b.html
"g++ ... automatically specifi
2008/10/21 `VL:
> 3) Any good alternatives for cscope/ctags? It seemed to me that
> eclipse has some good framework, but it looks to be too much integrated with
> it...
You could look at these, which all provide more than ctags:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGrok
http://synopsis.fresco.org/
ht
901 - 1000 of 2232 matches
Mail list logo
