2009/12/8 Benjamin Redelings I: > Hi, Hi, I've CC'd the libstdc++ list, please reply there instead of the gcc list.
> It seems that many current uses of list<T>::merge( ) fail to compile with > -std=c++0x, but I don't see a bug in bugzilla for this. Itseems to result > from: > > list<_Tp, _Alloc>:: > #ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ > merge(list&& __x) > #else > merge(list& __x) > #endif > > For c++0x, don't we need BOTH versions, since lvalues no longer bind to > rvalue references, or am I missing something? The WP only has: void merge(list<T,Allocator>&& x); template <class Compare> void merge(list<T,Allocator>&& x, Compare comp); See http://home.roadrunner.com/~hinnant/issue_review/lwg-active.html#1133 which covers a similar issue with splice. Jonathan
