On 11/07/12 21:20, Alexandra Sawyer wrote:
>
> I've reported a broken link on your site
> gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/1999-q3n/msg00261.html that links to
> http://www.cs.unb.ca/~alopez-o/math-faq/math-faq.html and haven't
> heard back, so I just wanted to verify whether you're the right
> person to co
On 10 November 2012 20:51, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> So 32-bit gcc works just fine. However I need a pile of libs all over the
> place ( gmp, mpfr, mpc, etc etc ) for this to work
No you don't. If you put gmp, mpfr and mpc in the GCC source tree, or
install them with --disable-shared, then you d
On 10 November 2012 22:08, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> You know, somehow I'd missed that gcc would build the numerical libs for you
> if they were in tree... I'd only heard about the host tools (binutils,
> etc.). Does it do the same for all deps (e.g. readline) as well?
No.
The contrib/download_prereq
On 11 November 2012 21:57, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Here is what I did with gmp :
>
> $ ls $SRC/gmp*
> /usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
>
> $ /opt/schily/bin/star -x -bz -xdir -xdot -U -fs=16m
> file=/usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
> star: 1262 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 12922880 bytes = 12620.00k)
On 18 November 2012 18:03, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Regarding PCH [pre-compiled header], I think that it is related to PPH
> [pre-processed headers]
>
> I don't understand yet if PPH is abandoned, or just post-poned. I was
> believing it was a very mature experimental branch.
See http://gcc.g
On 18 November 2012 18:25, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 08:06:08AM -1000, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
>> wrote:
>> > I really think that GCC need some form of garbage collector.
> [...]
>>
>> What's wrong with std::shared_ptr
On 19 November 2012 19:35, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 06:37:29PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 18 November 2012 18:25, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 08:06:08AM -1000, NightStrike wrote:
>> >> On Sun, N
On 23/11/2012, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:29:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 11/18/2012 07:06 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>>
>> >What's wrong with std::shared_ptr?
>>
>> The pointer needs two words, and the per-object overhead for the
>> reference counts etc. is fo
On 24 November 2012 00:40, Nathan Ridge wrote:
>
> I am regular reader of several mailing lists, some of which (such as this
> one) require plain text, and some (like cdt-dev) which allow rich text.
>
> My experience has been that the formatting of messages on plain-text
> lists is consistent acros
On 24 November 2012 17:47, Robert Dewar wrote:
>
>> 2) The fact that Android refuses to provide a non-HTML e-mail capability
>> is ridiculous but does not seem to me to be a reason for us to change
>> our policy.
>
>
> Surely there are altenrative email client for Android that have plain
> text cap
On 28 November 2012 07:36, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> What you described is the 'transitional model' right? but I don't see
> any of those in the C++ standard working paper:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3347.pdf
It's far too early for anything to have been voted into
This message is inappropirate on this list, which is for discussing
development of GCC. For help using or building GCC please use the
gcc-help list instead. Please take any follow up to that list, thanks.
On 28 November 2012 15:19, Martin Laabs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I currenty build an arm-elf cross
On 28 November 2012 09:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28 November 2012 07:36, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> What you described is the 'transitional model' right? but I don't see
>> any of those in the C++ standard working paper:
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/
On 28 November 2012 20:16, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 02:53 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> Is it permissable to ask a meta-question here ?
>
> What's so horrible about the definition of header files that something like
> this is necessary ?
>
> In Fortran we have modules. Certainly, the effic
On 14 December 2012 21:51, Joe Buck wrote:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>> On
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/abi.html
>> we have a stale link to
>> http://www.codesourcery.com/public/cxx-abi/abi.html
>
>>What's the new canonical location for this document?
>
> Looks like CodeSou
On 14 December 2012 21:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Gerald did ask me to update the libstdc++ docs but I didn't (and I'm
> still not sure what the consensus was regarding which link to use.)
Actually the right fix for the libstdc++ docs seems pretty obvious,
I'll do it tomorrow.
On 18 December 2012 03:06, ETANI NORIKO wrote:
>
> Of course, we can use GCC on a host core, and we can use MPFR and GMP.
> However, as long as we use LD to link object files and create a binary file
> for a computing device core, we cannot use MPFR and GMP.
>
> Here, we would like to ask you as
On 2 January 2013 14:32, NAVEEN CHANDRAKAR wrote:
>
> My question is what is the definition/grammer of empty structure. As i
> couldn't find it covered in C/Cxx standard document.
The page you linked to defines a GCC extension to the C language, so
if course it's not in the C standard. As the pag
On 16 January 2013 08:59, Mischa Baars wrote:
> On 01/16/2013 08:57 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, I have an Intel manual here that states that any operation on a
>>> QNaN should return a QNaN, which means that also the compare should
>>> return a QNaN when one or both of the arguments is a
On 17 January 2013 15:48, Michael Witten :
> The documentation here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/download.html
>
> says:
>
> It is possible to download a full distribution or
> specific components... If you choose to download
> specific components, you must download the core
> GCC dist
On 17 January 2013 17:29, Mischa Baars wrote:
> On 01/17/2013 06:23 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 17 January 2013 15:48, Michael Witten :
>>>
>>> The documentation here:
>>>
>>>http://gcc.gnu.org/install/download.html
>>
On 17 January 2013 17:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 17:29, Mischa Baars wrote:
>>
>> Does that mean that you are satisfied with the 'if / else' as is, and that
>> you also do not need an improvement of the arctangent in glibc?
>
> You
On 17 January 2013 17:48, Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> Indeed I am, I thought you were trying to say that gcc-x.y.z.tar.gz has
> missing components. I had some trouble compiler: unable to compute suffix
> for object files, but now it seems to work?!
Did you read http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure_su
N.B. This mail is not appropriate on this mailing list, which is for
discussion of development of GCC. For help with GCC use the gcc-help
list or to report bugs use bugzilla, thanks.
On 19 January 2013 18:58, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> /*
> *
> * The output of this with gcc 4.7.2 is:
> *
> *
On 22 January 2013 14:29, Alec Teal wrote:
>
> On 22/01/13 14:20, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> On 01/22/2013 12:55 PM, Alec Teal wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22/01/13 09:00, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/22/2013 06:01 AM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
>
> Hello, may I know the estimated timeframe by which
On 22 January 2013 17:12, Alec Teal wrote:
> On 22/01/13 17:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>
>> Crap reply, it's just wishful thinking. Who says GCC has to or will
>> "finish" when Clang does? Are you going to do the missing work? Or
>> get som
On 22 January 2013 17:30, Alec Teal wrote:
> You totally missed the point there. Stop being Mr Defensive btw.
Stop swearing and criticising people for responses you don't like.
> Bitching about the year the versions of GCC and Clang were made to try and
> diffuse just one person's (potentially wr
On 22 January 2013 16:52, NightStrike wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Robert Dewar wrote:
>> Anyway, it still comes down to figuring out how to find the resources.
>> Not clear that there is commercial interest in rapid implementation
>> of c++11, we certainly have not heard of any such i
On 22 January 2013 18:02, Alec Teal wrote:
> On 22/01/13 17:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 22 January 2013 16:52, NightStrike wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Robert Dewar wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, it still comes down
On 22 January 2013 17:51, Alec Teal wrote:
> On 22/01/13 17:40, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 22 January 2013 17:30, Alec Teal wrote:
>>>
>>> You totally missed the point there. Stop being Mr Defensive btw.
>>
>> Stop swearing and criticising people
On 22 January 2013 19:13, Alec Teal wrote:
>
> I meant "out there" not with GCC, I do think macros have a use, a report of
> the form "expanded from: " would be helpful, and some sort of callstack-like
> output?
GCC 4.8 does something like that. It isn't perfect yet, but it's pretty good.
On 23 January 2013 06:53, Alec Teal wrote:
> Why not:
>
> make an "optional keyword", "hard", have a meaning if before "typedef", I
> suggest tokenising "hard" as a normal token (however it is processed now why
> change it? I am not sure on GCCs exact grammar for c languages) but if AND
> ONLY if i
On 23 January 2013 07:11, Uday Khedker wrote:
>
> This is because no matter what one has done, unless one has contributed
> code, one is not considered a contributor to GCC.
There are people credited in
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Contributors.html for documentation
or bug triage work.
Please use the gcc-help mailing list for discussing using and building
GCC, rather than this list. Please take any follow up there, thanks.
On 23 January 2013 08:25, Alec Teal wrote:
> On 23/01/13 08:19, Alec Teal wrote:
>>
>> On 23/01/13 08:16, Alec Teal wrote:
>>>
>>> configure went well but I
On 23 January 2013 09:15, Alec Teal wrote:
> I was fearful of using the word attribute for fear of getting it wrong? What
> is "this part" of the compiler called
I think attributes are handled in the front end and transformed into
something in the compiler's "tree" data structures.
FWIW I've usua
On 24 January 2013 16:21, Alec Teal wrote:
> That's because this has nothing to do with objects, in the paper that was
> linked (called "strong typing") it implemented new types rather like
> objects, "using score = public int { //definitions }; for example,
> "extending an int" effectively, this i
On 28 January 2013 06:18, Alec Teal wrote:
> the very
> nature of just putting the word "hard" before a typedef is something I find
> appealing
I've already explained why that's not likely to be acceptable, because
identifiers are allowed before 'typedef' and it would be ambiguous.
You need a diff
On 1 February 2013 21:27, Alec Teal wrote:
> Nevermind, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ this is amazing and linked to from
> the gcc-melt link.
And linked to from the GCC home page ... I kinda assumed when asking
for something to read you'd looked at the GCC web pages already.
If you say what you'
On 9 February 2013 23:49, Jay K wrote:
> problems compiling 4.7, with Solaris cc and/or Solaris CC (C++)
>
>
> 1) ENUM_BITFIELD is not portable. I've reported this before.
Have you reported it to bugzilla?
> It is likely that in 4.8 this is moot, as the C++ case will be the only one
> remaining
On 13 February 2013 15:33, Alec Teal wrote:
>
> A few questions, what is this stage 1? (link to documentation please, or a
> descriptive answer).
See http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
> for the choice of file extension, this is really a tiny thing, but I do have
> a reason for .cpp
> http://stacko
On 13 February 2013 15:33, Alec Teal wrote:
> I'm also thinking of re-writing the C++ parser there are some interesting
> todos (using lookahead rather than "try the next option") it's a topic I
> enjoy and something I could (probably) do, especially given a working
> version already. thoughts and
On 13 February 2013 16:32, Alec Teal wrote:
> On 13/02/13 16:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 13 February 2013 15:33, Alec Teal wrote:
>>>
>>> A few questions, what is this stage 1? (link to documentation please, or
>>> a
>>> descriptive
On 13 February 2013 17:01, Alec Teal wrote:
>
> On 13/02/13 17:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>
>> I read it. That's not debate, just ill-informed speculation ("cpp is
>> the recommended extension for C++ as far as I know"). We already have
>>
On 18 February 2013 13:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> The reason I went looking for the flag is someone asked about a crash
> on the OpenSSL mailing list. I knew it was due to an uninitialized
> field (but they did not realize the value was not initialized). I
> wanted to suggest a quick way to find w
On 4 March 2013 19:59, Thierry Moreau wrote:
>
> The observation is *if* the gcc source code has some C++ depency(ies) which
> similarly needs say version>=4.7 and a machine has only gcc 4.4 installed,
> then migrating to e.g. gcc 5.3 requires installing v.X, (4.7 <= X <
> first-version-that-can't-
On 6 March 2013 12:38, David McQuillan wrote:
> Have there been any implementations of gcc for a 32 bit pointer system where
> the registers are 64 bits long?
Yes, the new x32 ABI for x86_64, see
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ and
http://lwn.net/Articles/456731/
"If the old GNU extern inline behavior is desired, one can use extern
inline __attribute__((__gnu_inline__)). The use of this attribute can
be guarded by #ifdef __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ which is a macro which is
defined when inline has the ISO C99 behavior, or compiled with
-fgnu89-inline option."
I t
On 11/01/2008, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> Exactly so. I think that we have two kinds of pedwarns: those that are
> pedantic in the sense we use for C (like, that there cannot be a naked
> semicolon at the top-level of a file, or that "long long" is not in
> C++98) and those that refer to semanticall
On 12/01/2008, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is an initial patch implementing some of your proposals. I used
> pederror as the name of the function. That is, it is an error unless
> fpermissive is given.
Ah, very fast! :-)
I was just starting somethign similar, I provisio
On 13/01/2008, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/01/2008, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is an initial patch implementing some of your pr
On 13/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I think all others should change to permerrors.
I only meant all others in cp/decl.c of course - here are the remaining files.
Again I've only listed the ones that should remain as pedwarns and
other special cases - most change to permerr
On 17/01/2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> Well, a language lawyer can probably clear things up. From a look
> at the std it looks like w/o a previous declaration the above should
> be invalid. And at a different point it suggests the decl becomes
> available.
Yes, at the point of instantiation
On 18/01/2008, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, at the point of instantiation of Foo the friend is declared,
> and can then be found by ADL because Foo is an associated type.
> The reference parameter 'x' doesn't cause an instantiation, only &#
On 18/01/2008, Dragan Milenkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for clarification and info. I believe issue #34 addresses exactly
> what we're talking about.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#34
Aha, yes ... but strangely that seems to have been closed as
Not-A
On 19/01/2008, Russell Shaw wrote:
> How do i disable that? My code explicitly compares string pointers.
Your question is off-topic on this list, which is for development of
GCC, please use the gcc-help list for help using the compiler:
http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html
-Wno-address will suppress the
On 21/01/2008, Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian Joensson wrote:
> > Now, is there some funny stuff going on here that I simply miss or is
> > this what to expect currently?
> >
> I would suggest compiling the testcase outside the testsuite and having
> a look to the pre-processe
On 22/01/2008, Christian Joensson wrote:
> 2008/1/21, Jonathan Wakely
> > My first guess would be that you've somehow got the C++0x and TR1
> > versions of boost_sp_shared_count.h mixed up and you're including the
> > wrong one.
>
> well, the testsuite
On 02/02/2008, Rodrigo Dominguez wrote:
>
> How do you reply to a thread in the mailing lists? The only way I can
> think of is sending an email with the same subject and copy/paste the
> thread into the email body. Will this work?
No. Just use the "reply" function of your mail program. If you se
On 02/02/2008, Rodrigo Dominguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, NightStrike wrote:
>
> > On 2/2/08, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 02/02/2008, Rodrigo Dominguez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How do yo
On 02/02/2008, NightStrike wrote:
>
> I thought this, too, but I just checked (having recently subscribed, I
> still had the welcome email). The email doesn't contain any of the
> instructions I thought it did. Instead, you have to send a message to
I subscribed to this list six months ago and g
On 04/02/2008, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the logs, I don't have any way to test on that platform
> > > unfortunately, but it seems that the symlinks for the new shared_ptr
> > > headers are missing. I think that would happen if you hadn't done a
> > > cle
Hi Volker, thanks for picking these issues up. I told Manuel I'd
review the rest of the remaining pedwarns, but haven't had time to do
it either.
2008/6/11 Volker Reichelt:
> * Scopes in for-loops:
>
> void foo()
> {
>for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) {}
>i = 0;
> }
>
> warn.cc: In function 'vo
2008/6/13 Mark Mitchell:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> Hi Volker, thanks for picking these issues up. I told Manuel I'd
>> review the rest of the remaining pedwarns, but haven't had time to do
>> it either.
>
> Just to chime in here: Volker, I a
2008/6/12 Jonathan Wakely:
> 2008/6/11 Volker Reichelt:
>> * Scopes in for-loops:
>>
>> void foo()
>> {
>>for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) {}
>>i = 0;
>> }
>>
>> warn.cc: In function 'void foo()':
>> warn.cc:4:
2008/6/18 Mark Mitchell:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> Could a C++ maintainer please review this patch to turn most pedwarns
>> into permerrors.
>
> This patch is OK, with minor nits below. Thanks for working on this!
Thanks Mark, I'll submit a revised patch this evening.
Jonathan
2008/6/18 Mark Mitchell:
>> * I don't think the pedwarn in joust() in cp/call.c should be a
>> permerror, is this a GNU extension?
>> if (warn)
>>{
>> pedwarn ("\
>> ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even \
>> though the worst conversion for the first is bette
Thanks for the review, here's another patch ...
2008/6/18 Mark Mitchell:
>
>> * Should it really be a hard error for a class to declare itself as a
>> friend? I don't think it's expressly forbidden
>> e.g. class A { friend class A; };
>> I changed this to a permerror, restoring the old behaviour.
2008/6/20 Mark Mitchell:
>
>> Shall I commit this?
>
> Yes, please.
Thanks, Mark, I've committed it.
Volker, all the problems you noticed should be fixed, if you find any
other cases that seem wrong please let me know.
Cheers,
Jonathan
2008/6/23 NightStrike:
> On 6/23/08, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>> > I think it could also be addressed with the gcc compile farm. I
>> > thought that there was some place where we could put patches, and they
>> > would be automatically picked up and tested by some sort of automatic
>> > scripts a
Is there any particular reason why
gcc-{ada,java,objc}-4.3.2.tar.bz2{,.sig} and
gcc-core-4.3.1-4.3.2.diff.gz{,.sig} are not on the GNU FTP site,
although they're present on sourceware.org?
ftp://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/releases/gcc-4.3.2/
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.2/
Jonathan
2008/9/24 Simon Hill:
> Brain Dessent wrote:
>> You're essentially trusting that all
>> exception specifiers for every function in the program and *all* library
>> code are always present and always correct which is a huge leap of faith
>> that I don't think is supported by reality.
>
> I agree tha
The link on gcc.gnu.org for the GCC 4.1 status refers to an email about GCC 4.2
Regards,
Jon
John L. Kulp wrote:
> Shouldn't the last (optional) argument be (1) const and (2) a reference
> (rather than a potentially very expensive copying call-by-value)? Among
> other things, if you have a type declared with alignment attributes, it
> will fail on this. I notice the MSVC implementation h
On 06/09/2007, Peter A. Felvegi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i don't know if it's a bug, please clarify:
> int y = reinterpret_cast(x);
> rc.cpp:4: error: invalid cast from type 'int' to type 'int'
5.2.10 in the C++ standard lists the conversions allowed by
reinterpret_cast. This is not on
On 08/09/2007, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It still seems odd, and this restriction could make the coding of
> templates more complex.
Agreed, but I'm not sure making reinterpret_cast convenient to use is
a noble aim :-)
It should be used a last resort, in the knowledge that the resul
On 21/09/2007, Michiel de Bondt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using strings to show my point was not a good idea. You can add a field
> "int number" to the struct and perform similar operations (with =
> instead of strcpy).
I believe Andrew's right and the strcpy case is valid, but you do have
a po
On 24/09/2007, Jonathan Adamczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What about something like the following?
>
> struct proxy {
> T& t;
> proxy(T& t_) : t(t_) {}
> proxy& operator=(const T& r) { foo(t, r); return *this; }
> };
>
> struct B { proxy get() { return proxy(bar); } };
>
> int
On 25/10/2007, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > Well technically these headers have been deprecated since at least 3.2
> > (maybe even back in 3.0) with them producing a warning. So I don't
> > know if we should move them or not but we have
On 26/10/2007, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 22:56 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > The plan is to also move auto_ptr and the old bind1st/bind2nd function
> > binders to backward, if/when they are deprecated in C++0x, which would
> > g
On 26 Oct 2007 15:20:01 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It appears that the draft C++0x memory model prohibits speculative
> stores.
>
> Therefore I now think we should aim toward prohibiting them
> unconditionally. That memory model is just a draft. But I think we
> should
On 27/10/2007, L.Yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to build the source of gcc and make '-msoft-float' available. But
> I don't know how to build the source code. I just do it as the following
> steps:
Hi Peter,
this list is for discussing the development of gcc. To get help
building and u
On 07/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a part of the code :
> --
> extern struct dummy temp[];
> error: array type has incomplete element type
> -
On 13/11/2007, ganesh subramonian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me why the cast2 fails but cast1
> works? What effect does the cstyle cast have?
It makes the program incorrect.
This mailing list is for discussion of GCC development, for help using
GCC use the gcc-help list. For
On 09/11/2007, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Builds today fail during stage2 when compiling 'reg-stack.c'
> >
> > $ make bootstrap-lean ...
> > { ... lots of stuff snipped ... }
> > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > /export/home/arth/gnu/gcc.git/gcc/reg-stack.c: In funct
On 17/11/2007, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm still seeing the same failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, is this
> > going to get fixed?
>
> You're not supposed to configure the compiler with --disable-checking as this
> disables the internal assertions, use --enable-checking=rele
On 28/11/2007, Stephane Hockenhull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2007 14:01, 'Daniel Jacobowitz' wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:56:58PM -0500, Stephane Hockenhull wrote:
> > > hence my question: where is it?
> >
> > In libstdc++. You have to link with libstdc++ to us
On 12/12/2007, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * The googlish user says
> "i'm using the massive googlecc compiler that uses a lot of tons
> of libraries
> distributed in all the world!"
>
> * google shutdown => googlecc compiler doesn't work, ended history, byebye.
Yet agai
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 21:56, Paul Smith wrote:
> The tricky bit is that although both the host and target are always
> x86_64/i686 GNU/Linux systems, I need the generated compiler to run on
> much older systems than the one I build it on.
>
> I have a sysroot I've created (downloading RPMs from old
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 16:46, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 14:17 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 21:56, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > The tricky bit is that although both the host and target are always
> > > x86_64/i686 GNU/Linux
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 14:13, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 3/16/20 2:54 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > Are you trying to copy from the raw message representation?
>
> Exactly.
That's never been reliable.
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 21:15, David Korczynski wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> My name is David Korczynski and I have been doing some work on
> integrating fuzzing by way of OSS-Fuzz into the gcc project. This came
> out of fuzzing libiberty within the binutils project where we found
> several bugs within libib
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 21:54, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> I'm one of the old timers that likes our current work flow, but even I
> think that we are risking our future by staying with antiquated tools.
> One of the first things I need to teach new people is now to use email
> "properly". It is a barrier
N.B. the CC list has got too big and is causing posts to this thread
to be held for moderator approval.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 22:45, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>
> > > Some git based projects are using gerrit.
> >
> > Which I looked into previously and decided I didn't like it. If I
> > recall correctly, gerri
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 07:16, jf wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a printf-like function lover. I always found that better than doing
> something like out << "blabla : " << var1 << ", blabla" << etc.
>
> Now, I use a lot of different platforms and to be portable, I'm supposed
> to use PRIxxx constants fo
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 15:24, PRIYANSHU ARYA via Gcc wrote:
>
> Dear Sir/ma'am:
>
> I'm a new learner wanted to contribute in your open source project so i
> want to know how to start contributing in your open source projects and
> want to know all the requirements for contributing in your organiz
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I do not want to start a flame war.
>
> I just am curious what was the reason why
> the old system cannot be used any more?
The software it ran on hasn't been maintained for years.
> Would there be a possibility to get the old look-a
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 05:51, Fangrui Song wrote:
> It is really difficult for a non-subscriber to comment now.
> There are no To: or Cc: fields on Pipermail.
Yes, that's a pain. You can click on the sender's address at the top
of the archived mail (or use
https://gitlab.com/miscripts/miscripts/-/
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 20:29, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> >> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these
> >> days is
> >> lore.kernel.org, powered by publi
Please don't cross-post to both the gcc and gcc-help mailing lists.
Either your question is about GCC development, or it's about help
using GCC, not both. Pick one list.
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 08:44, MAHDI LOTFI via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello
> I am a researcher from Jam Petrochemical company I want to
1401 - 1500 of 2300 matches
Mail list logo
