ot;C++" { } around them
(not a well known feature, but ok.)
- Jay
--host=i686-apple-darwin9 --target=i686-apple-darwin9
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5493)
I could try with my own gcc.
But maybe it is a matter of flags to gcc/ar/ld.
- Jay
y ways of using a simplified cost model where the cost of each
> instruction is specified manually in the instruction pattern alongside
> the length? (Or even just *using* the length as the cost...)
Hi David!
Does -Os achieve this?
Jay.
P.S. Sorry if you got two copies of this.
/src/gcc-4.7.0/configure -disable-bootstrap -enable-languages=go
book2:gccgo-4.7 jay$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-apple-darwin9
Configured with: /var/tmp/gcc/gcc-5493~1/src/configure --disable-checking
-enable-werror --prefix=/usr --mandir=/share/man
--enable-languages=c,objc,c
he dependencies of
tree-nomudflap.o.
and 4.7.0 is the same.
(on the other hand -- it seems kind of hacky and maybe the right fix is the
other way around?)
- Jay
front end work.
(Yes, go is certainly an interesting hybrid -- native code + static compilation
+ static typing + C-like syntax + garbage collection + fast compilation
via a good module system instead of the C preprocessor toiling over the same
million lines repeatedly... -- you don't see
nce unordered is
"new".
Thank you, sorry, I'm in a rush right now,
- Jay
> From: i...@google.com
> To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
> CC: g...@integrable-solutions.net; jwakely@gmail.com; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: -fno-rtti in configure.ac breaks buildi
p file for Make's benefit.
rm -f cs-$output
echo timestamp > cs-$output
Shouldn't the timestamp > cs-$output only be a) mainly if the other file
updated, by the mv and b) corner case, if it doesn't exist?
Maybe rm -rf by the mv, and echo if not exist?
- Jay
lt; 8) | 0x0fff0
or such.
#2 is more portable, i.e. to compilers with "__int64" and "0xFFi64" instead of
"long long" and "LL".
#3) something involving a double-precision integer using two longs, as I
believe gcc does elsewhere.
#2 Depending on HOST_WIDE_INT being portable suffices imho.
- Jay
error.
Maybe it should be autoconf'ed away?
Or just removed entirely if building with -disable-bootstrap? (kind of like
how -O2 is removed)
- Jay
g. HP-UX/HPPA K&R-only, Irix, etc.);
I gotta go,
- Jay
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:27:16 +
> From: jos...@codesourcery.com
> To: lopeziba...@gmail.com
> CC: jay.kr...@cornell.edu; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Re: pretty-print.h war
ields, but
it doesn't look for bitfield_refs. It should?
also, in fold-const:
/* A bit-field-ref that referenced the full argument can be stripped. */
should probably check that the other type is integral
and that the signedness matches.
- Jay
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:57:44PM +0000, Jay K wrote:
> >
> > Our front end is wierd.
> > The input is unusually low level, and so are the trees it produces.
> > I do have a hankering to fix that (or maybe just to output more portable
C...)
> >
They clause client code taking the address
=> cause
structs adn classes
=> and
nt non-optimizing host
compilers.
Thanks,
- Jay
char *) ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN;
#define abort() fancy_abort (__FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__)
#if (GCC_VERSION < 2007)
# define __attribute__(x)
#endif
#ifndef ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN
#define ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN __attribute__ ((__noreturn__))
#endif /* ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN */
- Jay
--
the 4.6 repo in response to Bug 48291.
Thank you for your time!
Jay Jay Billings
Hi,
Thanks for your replies, scalar evolution is what I was looking for!
--
Jay L.T. Cornwall, http://www.esuna.co.uk/~jay/
PhD Student
Imperial College London
hese things are in the "yeah, changing that would be interesting,
we are just don't have many people working on the feature", I'd be happy to
throw some patches towards it. I hesitate to just start sending patches over
the wall, however, without first doing some kind of verification that I have
any clue what I'm doing; I certainly am not certain how things would be
prioritized, or even really who is working on it. ;P
Sincerely,
Jay Freeman (saurik)
sau...@saurik.com
> > "Jay Freeman (saurik)"
> "Ian Lance Taylor"
> Thanks for the bug report and the analysis. I think it does simply
> require an '&'. That makes it analogous to the way
> __morestack_release_segments is used in generic-morestack-thread
> > "Jay Freeman (saurik)" writes:
> "Ian Lance Taylor" wrote:
> > After getting more sleep, I realize that this problem is actually much
> > more endemic than I had even previously thought. Most any vaguely
> > object-oriented library is going t
there's a good reason not do this,
is there a better approach?
Thanks,
--
Jay L.T. Cornwall, http://www.esuna.co.uk/~jay/
PhD Student
Imperial College London
recv, etc.
and I don't know if "path leading to" is possible to model here, haven't
looked, sorry.
- Jay
rr3D)[][];
And to delay stride binding until the constructor is analysed. Intel
C/C++ goes some way towards this (GCC 4.1 fails on this statement
instantly) by allowing this program to compile. However, an error is
still flagged if any attempts to access the array are made.
--
Jay L. T
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
