On 9 July 2013 11:02, David Given <d...@cowlark.com> wrote: > Right now all the cost macros are left as the default, which is probably > the root of the problem; but I'm having a lot of trouble getting my head > around them. In the interest of actually getting something to work, are > there any ways of using a simplified cost model where the cost of each > instruction is specified manually in the instruction pattern alongside > the length? (Or even just *using* the length as the cost...)
Hi David! Does -Os achieve this? Jay. P.S. Sorry if you got two copies of this.
