On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
I have bootstrapped and tested i586, x86_64, ppc, ppc64, ia64,
s390 (o
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
>> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
>> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
>
> I h
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
>>> the branch on various platforms. Richi is cu
Hello!
> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
>
> If anyone has free cycles I would appreciate results from other
> ELF-capable targets.
>
> $ svn co svn://gcc.gnu.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:46:29PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > gets from the linker. Since the linker plugin is a shared
> > object, and it uses libiberty functions, it needs to use a
> > shared libiberty.
>
> Why can't they just link a static libiberty?
This comment from opcodes
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The summary is as follows, extra errors compared to a run
> without the merge patch applied:
>
> i586:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> The summary is as follows, extra errors compared to a run
>> without the merge patch applied:
>>
>> i586:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (internal compiler error)
>> FAIL: gcc.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 22:00, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> You say "tested on x86_64". More detail is needed. Have you tested both
Sorry, I completely spaced out and forgot to mention this. Various
folks are testing the branch. I sent a request for testing the branch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test
> the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on
> i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x.
I have successfully bootstrapped on
{i586,x86_64,ppc,ppc64,ia64,s390,s
Hello all,
I am doing a port for a 32bit target in GCC 4.4.0.
I have defined memory_constraints in predicates.c like this
(define_memory_constraint "Sr0"
"Memory refrence through base registers"
(match_test "target_mem_constraint (\"r0\", op)"))
In the function target_mem_constraint i have
"Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
>> - libiberty
>> I need help with this one. When the linker plugin is
>> enabled (if GCC is configured to use gold), LTO can
>> detect LTO objects inside archives via the callbacks it
>> gets from the li
daniel tian writes:
> when I build the libgcc2.c, an unrecognizable RTL exist. Its about subreg.
> Here is the info:
>
> ../../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__mulvsi3':
> ../../../rice-gcc-4.3.0/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:169: error: unrecognizable
> insn:
> (insn 24 26 25
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:47, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
> when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
> the appended.
Thanks. Testing.
Diego.
Профессиональное решение компьютерных проблем, установка Windows XP(SP3,SP2),
Vista (SP1,SP2), Office (2003/2007), И другой софт. Облуживание организаций,
заключение договоров, все документы. Выезд на место работы. /информация, цены,
контакты на w w w .i p t ele com .h 18 .r u (удалите пробелы м
My question is my definition of strict correct?
or should it be reload_in_progress || reload_completed?
This is not my area of expertise, but "reload_completed" is definitely
too weak.
I actually think strict should always be true when testing for
satisfaction of constraints.
Paolo
So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
the appended.
What about just always adding --enable-shared to the host libiberty?
Paolo
Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
>> when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
>> the appended.
>
> What about just always adding --enable-shared to the host libiberty?
That will just cause everybody to always
On 09/29/2009 06:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
the appended.
What about just always adding --enable-shared to the host libiberty?
Hi.
On Darwin we've got some difficulties with the guality testsuite
components.
first there are a couple of changes needed to get the basic
check_gualityXXX.exe to run
(a) we have to detect Darwin in the same category as unix for the
redirect.
(b) we need "-save-temps" to find the debug
Hi,
I have a zero-extension elimination patch that has been reviewed and needs
one minor fix before it is ready for submission. I can get this in by Thursday,
October 1st. Would it be alright to submit this patch then ?
Thanks,
-Sriraman.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Richard Guenther
tschere...@micron.com writes:
> I posted the following question about GCC and Solaris locale support to
> both gcc-help and libstdc++:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2009-09/msg00212.html
>
> It was recommended I try darwin, or ieee_1003.1-2001 for
> --enable-clocale when building GCC. None
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Can't we use graphite to re-roll loops? That is, compress the
> polyhedron by introducing a new parameter? But maybe I am
> not good at guessing what your initial bloat issue looks like.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that there is enough
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 09/29/2009 06:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
So all Diego needs to do is pass --enable-shared down to libiberty
when --enable-lto/--enable-gold. The way to do that is something like
the appended.
>>>
>>> What about just alway
On 09/29/2009 07:32 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
My question is my definition of strict correct?
or should it be reload_in_progress || reload_completed?
I'm tempted to say it should be the later, but I'm not sure it really
makes any difference since reload does not query the operand predicates;
i
I'm very interested in your results. Also, which version would you be
trying to patch? Version 4.4.1, or the current development branch?
Thanks...
Todd
Speech recognition in use. It makes mistakes. I correct the ones I
notice...
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@tec
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 14:21 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/23/2009 02:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > The class types for std::decimal::decimal32 and friends do have the
> > proper modes. I suppose I could special-case aggregates of those modes
> > but the plan was to pass these particula
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 18:39 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:27 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 10:29 +0200, Richard Guenther w
On 09/29/2009 01:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
I've been trying to find a place in the C++ front end where I can
replace all references to the class type to the scalar types, but
haven't yet found it. Any suggestions?
cp_genericize?
Though I'm not sure what to do about global variables...
r~
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 13:37 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 01:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > I've been trying to find a place in the C++ front end where I can
> > replace all references to the class type to the scalar types, but
> > haven't yet found it. Any suggestions?
>
> cp_
On 09/29/2009 01:49 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 13:37 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/29/2009 01:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
I've been trying to find a place in the C++ front end where I can
replace all references to the class type to the scalar types, but
haven't yet f
Richard Guenther wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> The trunk is in Stage 1. Stage 1 will end on Sep 30th.
Richard, I've got a patch for adding what I think (but may be wrong) counts
as a new feature - shared library libstdc++ as DLLs on windows platforms - and
it's been stuck in review limbo for tw
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> We have ~48 hours left for stage 1 and I can't be confident of getting
> it reviewed in the remaining time, so I'd like to make a special
> request: can you, as RM, please say that this is OK in principle and
> that if I can get v3 approval (it already has
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20090929 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20090929/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Thanks Bingfeng.
We are now facing the following problem:
We are trying to get the .dfa output file, showing details about the
automaton constructed. However we are unable to do so.
We tried
(a.)uncommenting - (automata_option "v") - in ia64.md file
(b.)adding v_flag = 1 in gen_automata_option(
Hi,
Sometime between revision 151933 and 152300, libjava is broken on
i386-darwin8.11.
libgij.so fails to build with the following error:
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/ld: Undefined symbols:
_libiconv
_libiconv_close
_libiconv_open
_environ
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Here wa
And this was caused by Dave Korn's change on the 2009-09-22.
He added -no-undefined to libgij_la_LDFLAGS which causes libtool to
remove -Wl,-undefined -Wl,dynamic_lookup from the link line.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> And this was caused by Dave Korn's change on the 2009-09-22.
> He added -no-undefined to libgij_la_LDFLAGS which causes libtool to
> remove -Wl,-undefined -Wl,dynamic_lookup from the link line.
Ow, sorry about that, I didn't know it would change things for Darwin. I'll
wh
On 09/29/2009 04:23 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
The PowerPC 32-bit ELF ABI says that a struct is passed as a pointer
to an object or a copy of the object. Classes are treated the same
as classes. Does the C++ ABI have rules about classes like
std::complex that would cause them to be treated differ
2009/9/30 Richard Henderson :
> On 09/29/2009 07:32 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
>>
>> My question is my definition of strict correct?
>> or should it be reload_in_progress || reload_completed?
>
> I'm tempted to say it should be the later, but I'm not sure it really makes
> any difference since reload
39 matches
Mail list logo
