Hello! > In preparation for the final merge into mainline. I need to test > the branch on various platforms. Richi is currently testing on > i586, ppc, ppc64, ia64, s390, s390x. > > If anyone has free cycles I would appreciate results from other > ELF-capable targets. > > $ svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/lto > $ mkdir bld && cd bld > $ ../lto/configure --enable-lto && make > > You will need to have libelf 0.8.12 installed > (http://www.mr511.de/software/libelf-0.8.12.tar.gz)
alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu is in a very good shape, but the patch from [2] was needed. Extra failures: FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-3 cp_lto_20080908-3_0.o-cp_lto_20080908-3_0.o execute -O0 -fwhopr FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20080908-3 cp_lto_20080908-3_0.o-cp_lto_20080908-3_0.o execute -O0 -flto FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20090106 cp_lto_20090106_0.o-cp_lto_20090106_0.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20090106 cp_lto_20090106_0.o-cp_lto_20090106_0.o execute -O0 -fwhopr FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20090106 cp_lto_20090106_0.o-cp_lto_20090106_0.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20090106 cp_lto_20090106_0.o-cp_lto_20090106_0.o execute -O0 -flto FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20090311 cp_lto_20090311_0.o-cp_lto_20090311_1.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20090311 cp_lto_20090311_0.o-cp_lto_20090311_1.o execute -O2 -fwhopr FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20090311 cp_lto_20090311_0.o-cp_lto_20090311_1.o link, (internal compiler error) UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20090311 cp_lto_20090311_0.o-cp_lto_20090311_1.o execute -O2 -flto FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-warn-unused-result.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-7.c (test for warnings, line 8) FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-7.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090116 c_lto_20090116_0.o-c_lto_20090116_0.o link, (internal compiler error) UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20090116 c_lto_20090116_0.o-c_lto_20090116_0.o execute -O1 -fwhopr -fPIC FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr40725 f_lto_pr40725_0.o-f_lto_pr40725_1.o execute -O2 -fwhopr FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr40725 f_lto_pr40725_0.o-f_lto_pr40725_1.o execute -O2 -flto [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg02655.html [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40392#c2 Uros.
